User: starksm
Date: 02/02/08 00:00:19
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb CacheKey.java
Log:
Until CacheKey is dropped, have it use the bean key equals and
hashCode methods if they are implemented by the bean key class.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +56 -48jboss/src/
Now you started to think into that direction, so don´t complain about the
follow-ups ;-)
I just woke up, my instinct still rules over my rationality, so don´t take
this literally ...
I´m voting for an additional series of (military-style or american flag
design, should be big in 2002) bikinis an
User: starksm
Date: 02/02/07 23:49:40
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb Tag: Branch_2_4 CacheKey.java
Log:
Fix problem with cast in equals
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.12.2.2 +157 -138 jboss/src/main/
Hi,
JBoss : Just Because Other Servers Suck...
Regards
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Bugs item #514240, was opened at 2002-02-07 05:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=514240&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Guenter Gartner (gartnerg)
Assig
Bugs item #510397, was opened at 2002-01-29 14:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=510397&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William A. Kaufman (wkaufman)
>
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 491
Successful tests: 466
Errors:10
Failures: 15
[time of test: 8 February 2002 5:10 GMT]
[java.version: 1
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 491
Successful tests: 477
Errors:8
Failures: 6
[time of test: 8 February 2002 4:20 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
Yes, it does improve significantly the build time. When I put together
the patch back in November, the speedup was close to 10% if I remember
correctly.
Cool. I will rerun the script this week-end and commit it.
Cheers,
-- Guillaume
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Heath [mailto:[
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/02/07 19:51:09
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCStartCommand.java JDBCStopCommand.java
Log:
closed connections before end of transaction. Problem showed up using an xa connector
Revision ChangesPath
1.19
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 491
Successful tests: 466
Errors:10
Failures: 15
[time of test: 8 February 2002 3:23 GMT]
[java.version: 1
The current tomcat integration is not usable with 3.0. I'm going
to update it next week.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Rinehart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thur
Well, since none of your example changes jump out and scream
I am a much clearer packaging model, I would say this is a
matter of style and as such, not really that important.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Me
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 491
Successful tests: 476
Errors:8
Failures: 7
[time of test: 8 February 2002 2:54 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
Suggetions for leaflet tagging the skirt !
-- ( translation from Oleg´s sourze ... )
The bloom of the furture holds freedom,
SUNRISE nurture the influx of our taste,
Hey, president follow the vangard,
Autonomous BEA ...
--
+ the runner up´s ++
Humor is expelled !.
The Source is you.
LUDICROU
Yes but...
While I agree with you that organization by function often makes more sense
that by type, and in particular in regards to the metadata mess, I think
there is one good reason to package by type, that applies to both the
deployers and the proxies:
Put interfaces to the outside world in
For what it's worth, I think this is great! Go Jules! May the Source be with
you.
- Original Message -
From: "Jules Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'marc fleury'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Jboss-Development@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:2
I have been putting off writing this email for a while... mostly because I
am lazy.
Any ways, I am concerned about the current trend for packaging which is
being employed in JBoss. By packaging I mean the way in which we organize
our classes into packages. I believe the current "package by t
User: user57
Date: 02/02/07 17:06:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceController.java
Log:
o logging changes (mostly info -> debug), some fixes for showing
exception traces
o minor formatting changes (so that really long lines fit into 79
cols)
Revision
More Matrix references:
You have to let it all go. Fear, doubt, and disbelief. Free your mind.
If you are not one of us, you are one of them.
I don't even see the code anymore. All I see is blonde, brunette, red-head.
Dodge this
Since someone posted a Star Wars reference, I feel inclined to p
User: user57
Date: 02/02/07 17:06:19
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment DeploymentException.java
MainDeployer.java SARDeployer.java
Log:
o logging changes (mostly info -> debug), some fixes for showing
exception traces
o minor formatting change
On Friday 08 February 2002 02:20, you wrote:
> OK - I know it's corny, but we haven't had any Star Wars references:
>
> JBoss - May the Source be with you
:)
This one should be the winner IMHO!
But keep "Star Wars" somewhere around to let us, non-native speakers to catch
the humor!
User: user57
Date: 02/02/07 17:06:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvoker.java
Log:
o logging changes (mostly info -> debug), some fixes for showing
exception traces
o minor formatting changes (so that really long lines fit into 79
cols)
User: user57
Date: 02/02/07 17:06:19
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/oil OILClientIL.java
Log:
o logging changes (mostly info -> debug), some fixes for showing
exception traces
o minor formatting changes (so that really long lines fit into 79
cols)
Revision C
On Friday 08 February 2002 02:10, you wrote:
> JBoss - it's better than sex !
Sure, no kidding!!!
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
OK - I know it's corny, but we haven't had any Star Wars references:
JBoss - May the Source be with you
Someone must be able to come up with a quote about coming over to the
resistance, vanquishing the dark side, etc.
Jules
_
Do
User: schaefera
Date: 02/02/07 16:02:59
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtotimer.2.xml
Log:
Updated the wrong examples for old style Schedulers.
Revision ChangesPath
3.4 +3 -3 manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtotimer.2.xml
Index: howtotimer.2.xml
=
It's late, I'm drunk - these probably won't seem so funny in the morning
but, Hell
Get a Life ! - JBoss
Some Blues Brothers:
We're on a mission from God - JBoss
Yes !! Yes!! Jesus H. Tap-Dancing Christ...I have seen the Light ! - JBoss
.I have seen the Light ! - JBoss
I don't know
User: user57
Date: 02/02/07 16:07:19
Added: src/main/org/jboss/util ThrowableTranslator.java
Log:
o Damn JMX exceptions piss me off!
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util/ThrowableTranslator.java
Index: ThrowableTranslator.java
Hey, native speakers, just translate this into English :)))
JBoss:
Sprouts of the future grows up free...
Feel the flavor of the dawn...
Hey, boss, take JBoss!
Wanna free BEA?
P.S. Dr.Jung's idea is The Best
___
Jboss-development ma
Someone your side should definitely have write perms - I away
fri-sat-sun-mon, so won't be able to do anything.
Jules
Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I have made a change to Jetty (tag JBOSS_200202072130) that has a
> setClassLoader method on HttpContext ( and thus WebApplicationContext).
>
> This
on 08-02-2 00.46, Adam Heath at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not
>> qualify ...
>
> What do you mean by the above comment?
>
> I sent my mail with humor, or attempted humor. I
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not
> qualify ...
What do you mean by the above comment?
I sent my mail with humor, or attempted humor. I don't read humor in your
response above.
_
shit, no - I didn't...
with the -server option.
Equal: 281
Switch: 20
this is win2k, sun 1.3 vm.
cheers
dim
- Original Message -
From: "Torsten Schlumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: RE: [JBoss-dev] something is bro
I will second the switch ...
on 08-02-2 00.15, James Ward at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Simply Irresistible
>
> YOUR APP SERVER SUCKS!
>
> First they ignore us...
> Second they laugh at us...
> Then they fight us..
> And then we win!
>
> We're the shit!
>
> For a good time type www.jboss
Simply Irresistible
YOUR APP SERVER SUCKS!
First they ignore us...
Second they laugh at us...
Then they fight us..
And then we win!
We're the shit!
For a good time type www.jboss.org
If At First You Don't Succeed... Switch to JBoss
Hi All,
Just wrapping up the final couple of chapters on EJB For Dummies, and I'd like to get
a solution in for deploying the EJB 2.0 app I'm working on and accessing it through
Tomcat4.0 web pages. Two Things:
1) Integration of Tomcat 4.0 and JBoss 3.0 - Is an integrated package forthcoming?
This technique was also proposed in the JDC tech tip of this month, and has
the caveat that a serialized/deserialized String would not work with ==,
even if it was assigned from a static value.
OTOH, the final code translated for a switch depend on the number of 'case'
values. If they're many the
When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not
qualify ...
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
To the BEA series:
JBoss: never BEA loser
Christopher
--
.Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Dmitri,
I'm just nosey - did you try this little test with
the '-server' VM option (which jboss uses by default) ?
Because when I tried a very similar thing a while ago
the numbers were very different then.
Not that important - just a question
Cheers,
Torsten
__
on 07-02-2 23.36, Colin Daly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> in the immortal words of Ali
>
> JBoss:
> we're young
> we're fast
> we're handsome and
> we can't possibly be beaten.
We would collect excessive belly lint .. though ...
___
Jboss-developme
JBoss: 2 BEA(this crossed out) or not 2 BEA(this circled)
Sorry, it just seems funny.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
My proposals. JBoss: The dependable open source server or JBoss: We're here to serve.
Daniel
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=7991
___
Jboss-development mail
in the immortal words of Ali
JBoss:
we're young
we're fast
we're handsome and
we can't possibly be beaten.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-develop
JBoss Tshirts
I JBoss, you will soon
Born free... free to use
It springs from the source
Serve yourself with JBoss, FREE
(who said there is no free lunch?)
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=7991
JBoss:
- Boss the system
- THE BOSS
- xx downloads monthly... wonder why ?
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=7991
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAI
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
> If it makes the build faster then do it. Removing imports won't change any
> logic.
Ooh. I never even considered it'd make the build faster.
This probably also speeds up javadoc as well.
___
Jboss-develop
The source for String in 1.3.1 l shows a lazy init for the hashCode return
value.
--jason
At 09:30 AM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Since String is final, the hashcode is probably precomputed when the String
>is created, thereby not causing any processing but the retrieval of the
>
If it makes the build faster then do it. Removing imports won't change any
logic.
--jason
At 11:38 AM 2/7/2002 -0500, Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
>Hi Jason,
>
>Sounds good to me, it's one of those things, it never feels like it's
>a good time to do because it touches so much code.
>
>So let me
Hi,
JBoss : Just a Bunch Of Sympathic Superheroes ...
Regards
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Oh no, then my boss will start to understand why it takes so long for me to
get anything done...
nah he isn't that smart.
--jason
At 11:30 AM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>JBoss:
>YOUR developers have probably already contributed.
>
>Michael
>
>
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> Quick feature request for 3.0.
>
> Currently, (the spec and current jboss code) says web modules should be in the
> ear. Jboss allows for this to be unpacked. And this is great. However,
> there are downsides to even this.
>
> We have a 650 meg website(l
the java.lang.char issue is a JVM bug: if you have 'char' parameter the
serialization stuff pukes.
danch
Colin Thorburn wrote:
> I'm using (JBoass 2.4.1 + Tomcat) reflection to have ejbCreate call an
>initialisation class. This class calls ejb public members having single arguments -
>byte,
to extend that:
"fuck bea, got jboss?"
(a la fuck milk, got beer?)
- Original Message -
From: "Filip Hanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'marc fleury'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge.
Net'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:34 AM
Subject
got jboss?
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Craig Johannsen wrote:
> Submitting a story to Slashdot is just as good as writing a script to waste
> Oracle's add money. People complain that when their site is mentioned on
> Slashdot, they get overwhelmed by huge numbers of "hits" on their site.
> "Hit" being webspeak for
I'm using (JBoass 2.4.1 + Tomcat) reflection to have ejbCreate call an initialisation
class. This class calls ejb public members having single arguments - byte, Byte, int,
Integer, Character, char etc.
ejbCreate complete OK, but if I have used a char argumnet to any of these funtions
Method.inv
Front: One j2ee server to rule them all, One j2ee server to find them,
One j2ee server to bring them all
Back : and in the darkness bind them.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
__
User: schaefera
Date: 02/02/07 11:33:15
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Fixed a missing tag, which made the build to fail.
Revision ChangesPath
3.3 +1 -0 manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Index: howtonetbeansdebug.xml
=
JBoss: All Your J2EE Are Belong To Us
> From: Colin Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:13:26 +1100
> To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jboss-Development@Lists.
> Sourceforge. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
>
> to plagiari
Jboss: bwahahahahaha, we're comming
[with image of "boys with briefcases" fleeing the field]
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
> Jboss B
Most of the strings we are talking about are dynamic (or at least run-time
configurable), so we would have to do string.intern() to be able to use ==
and I don't think that you'd want that internal list of strings growing like
that. Besides, when you have a new string and do an intern(), it looks
I will take a look at this too. I like the flat predeploy, actually I was
aiming for it in my recursive unpack...
david jencks
On 2002.02.07 15:24:13 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
> Nachrichtjung
>
> 1- Ok i agree that we should make the list of deployable checks dynamic.
> Each deployer register w
You've got my vote - if it counts!
--- Scott Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Front: I took the red pill.
>
> Back: JBoss
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
_
Steal this application server.
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=7991
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, marc fleury wrote:
> when we do
>
> if (string.equals("this"))
>
> else if (string.equals("that"))
>
> how much slower is it than
>
> switch (stringAsInt)
> case THIS:
>
> case THAT:
If strings are final, then you can use ==, instead of the much slower
.equals().
A switch st
Front: I took the red pill.
Back: JBoss
> -Original Message-
> From: Bordet, Simone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
>
>
> JBoss:
> There is no spoon.
>
> J
Hi Geeks
JBoss
The damn best application server, period.
JBoss
Can you dig it ?
JBoss
You have better ways to spend you money, don't you ?
Andy
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
Jboss Beats Overpriced ServerS
c
--- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |1. Envision the future
> |2. My WebOS.
> |3. WebOS is here.
> |4. WebOS is JBOSS.
> |5. JBoss is the BOSS.
>
> Ok on the topic of money:
>
> we will be selling the tshirts, so while you don't pay
> for the conferenc
Title: Nachricht
jung
1- Ok
i agree that we should make the list of deployable checks dynamic. Each deployer
register with the MainDeployer and the registration sends a callback that gets
the "extension" you support. Note that the "find deployer" is a bit more
advanced than the extension
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 09:05:18
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/web AbstractWebContainer.java
Log:
Dr Jung's patch
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/AbstractWebContainer.java
Index: AbstractWebContainer.java
Title: Nachricht
Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: marc fleury
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Februar
2002 20:55An: Jung , Dr. Christoph;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev]
Web-Inf Deployment and MainDeployer
I don't understand this pat
Title: Web-Inf Deployment and MainDeployer
RCS file:
/cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/AbstractWebContainer.java,v
retrieving revision 1.20 diff -r1.20 AbstractWebContainer.java 248c248 <
catch (Exception ignored) {throw new
DeploymentException(ignored.getMessage());} ---
Looks as though those Oracle's still like jboss.
Database - Is your database safe? Make it safe.
www.oracle.com Oracle9i Database. Unbreakable. Can't break it. Can't
break in.
--B
___
eMuse Technologies
Unit 24, Trinity Enterprise Centre,
Pea
|JBoss has already weathered a Slashdotting or two with no problems
yes being slashdotted was a non-event 30% CPU utilization at peak (Jetty as
webserver)
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
Hi Jason,
Sounds good to me, it's one of those things, it never feels like it's
a good time to do because it touches so much code.
So let me do this: I'll run my script, test that it works well and
does not break things and commit the changes to CVS HEAD this week-end
unless someone complain
Bugs item #511343, was opened at 2002-01-31 10:40
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511343&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt (mpetteys)
Assigned to: No
JBoss has already weathered a Slashdotting or two with no problems
(according to Marc, not close to pegging CPU).
Craig Johannsen wrote:
> Submitting a story to Slashdot is just as good as writing a script to waste Oracle's
>add money. People complain that when their site is mentioned on Sla
JBoss:
YOUR developers have probably already contributed.
Michael
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Patches item #514347, was opened at 2002-02-07 08:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=514347&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mnewc
|1. Envision the future
|2. My WebOS.
|3. WebOS is here.
|4. WebOS is JBOSS.
|5. JBoss is the BOSS.
Ok on the topic of money:
we will be selling the tshirts, so while you don't pay for the conferences
you can really make a donation to JBoss in exchange for the tshirts.
That means we will print
If you are truly ripping off Mikey D's then it should be
Over Billion Served
marc fleury wrote:
> I like it we would do
>
> One Billion Served
>
> marcf
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> |Fagerlund
> |Sent: Thursday,
I like it we would do
One Billion Served
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
|Fagerlund
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:33 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is really clever
we could do
front
back
reserved for the contributors :)
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung
|, Dr. Christoph
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:38 AM
|To: 'Jboss-Development ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'
|Subject:
|Yes, I remember three years ago when JavaOne was a cool
|conference, but those days are long gone now. So before I use up
|all my frequent flier miles, let me be sure I understand:
|
|1) You guys are giving a free two-day tech seminar near the
|JavaOne conference?
Yes this A FREE seminar, DEEP t
>JBoss:
>
>
JBOSS
Downgrade your costs
Not your server
Salesy enough?
Regards,
Adrian
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
___
Jboss-de
Hello all,
I seem to be having an issue allowing the container to store entity beans. I
am not too sure if it is me or the container. I enclose the errors.
15:32:10,126 INFO [Default] UserBean()->ejbCreate(TestUser)
15:32:10,133 INFO [Default] UserBean()->ejbPostCreate(TestUser)
15:32:10,18
Ok, I am tired of all of your crap.
1. Envision the future
2. My WebOS.
3. WebOS is here.
4. WebOS is JBOSS.
5. JBoss is the BOSS.
Cheers,
Chris.
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=7991
I'm slightly of topic, anyway
IMHO, Strings are dead slow when comparing to ints.
This is not because of string math (i.e. comparison, etc.)
but because of _new_ and _new_ Strings which takes
part in many methods with Strings involved
(and almost _every_ String finishes in GC)
So I look at jdk1
>
>
>JBoss:
>
>
JBoss: the one to follow.
JBoss: leads the pack.
JBoss: not the pointy hair kind.
or
JBoss: .04ms and falling :-)
--Victor
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-d
I tested exactly this a short while ago with some
'kindergarten test program' (simply timing loops)
Yes - I can hear them in the background shouting at
me what about VM optimization, which OS,
what machine, what else is running, bla bla ...
But I don't want to publish this in a scientific journal.
Ah, I forgot:
"Parse Error: Unexpected closing tag "
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2002 15:38
An: 'Jboss-Development ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'
Betreff: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
Foreside
Yes, I remember three years ago when JavaOne was a cool conference, but those days are
long gone now. So before I use up all my frequent flier miles, let me be sure I
understand:
1) You guys are giving a free two-day tech seminar near the JavaOne conference?
2) I do not need to purchase JavaOn
Foreside:
Aliens on Speed
Backside:
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Delurking...
Then shouldn't it be something like:
One AppServer to rule them all
and in their price choke them.
JBoss
Best regards
Mikael Helbo Kjaer
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af Juha
> Lindfors
> Sendt: 7. februar 2002
JBoss: Save $$$
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Since String is final, the hashcode is probably precomputed when the String
is created, thereby not causing any processing but the retrieval of the
value. Not sure if this is true, but, it makes sense to me...
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
One Server To Rule Them All
(ok, so I like LOTR :p )
>
>
>
> JBoss One for All
>
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-dev
> lopment
_
Bugs item #511343, was opened at 2002-01-31 10:40
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511343&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt (mpetteys)
Assigned to: N
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo