User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 03:50:27
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/monitor Tag: BranchMX_1_0
MonitorSUITE.java
Added: src/main/test/compliance/monitor Tag: BranchMX_1_0
MonitorTestCase.java
Removed:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 03:50:27
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query Tag: BranchMX_1_0
QueryTestCase.java
Log:
Made queries threadsafe, better but still incomplete monitor tests
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 03:50:27
Modified:src/main/javax/management/monitor Tag: BranchMX_1_0
CounterMonitor.java Monitor.java
Log:
Made queries threadsafe, better but still incomplete monitor tests
Revision ChangesPath
No
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 03:50:27
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/monitor/support Tag: BranchMX_1_0
CounterSupport.java CounterSupportMBean.java
StringSupport.java StringSupportMBean.java
Added:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 03:50:26
Modified:src/main/javax/management Tag: BranchMX_1_0 AndQueryExp.java
AnySubStringQueryExp.java AttributeValueExp.java
BetweenQueryExp.java BinaryComparisonQueryExp.java
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 05:12:13
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/monitor MonitorSUITE.java
Added: src/main/test/compliance/monitor MonitorTestCase.java
Removed: src/main/test/compliance/monitor BasicTEST.java
MonitorUnitTestSUITE.java
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 05:12:12
Modified:src/main/javax/management AndQueryExp.java
AnySubStringQueryExp.java AttributeValueExp.java
BetweenQueryExp.java BinaryComparisonQueryExp.java
BinaryOpValueExp.java
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 05:12:12
Modified:src/main/javax/management/monitor CounterMonitor.java
Monitor.java
Log:
merge RelMX_1_0_0_12 to RelMX_1_0_0_13 to dev branch
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +390 -376
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 05:12:13
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/monitor/support CounterSupport.java
CounterSupportMBean.java StringSupport.java
StringSupportMBean.java
Added: src/main/test/compliance/monitor/support
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 05:12:13
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query QueryTestCase.java
Log:
merge RelMX_1_0_0_12 to RelMX_1_0_0_13 to dev branch
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +64 -0 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/query/QueryTestCase.java
Index:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Adrian Brock wrote:
If we really wanted to provide a minimal kernel,
Standard and ModelMBeans are really services
on top of the DynamicMBean core. But that's probably
not relevent to most users of JMX
The Model MBean implementation should at least eventually move out of
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
Have I broken the hourly compile?
I noticed last night's test runs didn't clobber
the testsuite first. The cluster tests still failed.
I requested a full checkout, and since then it has
been reporting a missing build.sh
Regards,
Adrian
_
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 06:43:19
Modified:.modules
Log:
Added JBossMX to standalone JBossMQ
Revision ChangesPath
1.105 +1 -0 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
===
RCS file:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 07:16:47
Modified:.modules
Log:
Add JBossMX thirdparty support to JBossMQ standalone
Revision ChangesPath
1.106 +8 -6 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
===
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
I tried a full checkout on my machine after seeing this and did not have
any problems. I don't know what is going on with this.
david jencks
On 2002.03.24 09:21:44 -0500 Adrian Brock wrote:
Have I broken the hourly compile?
I noticed last night's test runs didn't clobber
the testsuite
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 07:27:33
Modified:.modules
Log:
Standalone JBossMQ missing the common and system modules
Revision ChangesPath
1.107 +2 -0 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
Hi Hiram,
I'm not sure I'm doing this correctly.
JBossMQ standalone includes JBossServer.
The standalone version hasn't been update with
the system, common, management module changes.
It also has a missing version.mf that I've added.
I'm going to keep going, but it is getting closer
to
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 07:47:57
Modified:.modules
Log:
Add JBossManagement to JBossMQ standalone
Revision ChangesPath
1.108 +1 -0 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
===
RCS
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
build.sh: build.sh: No such file or
As a jakarta committer, I have to say thanks for stating this as
succintly as you did.
I also read the article and thought that it was a little harsh, but was
not too worried about it.
I admire what Jboss is and what the Jboss group is attempting. You guys
are the next Linux/Apache. Keep up
Hi,
--- Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have I broken the hourly compile?
I noticed last night's test runs didn't clobber
the testsuite first. The cluster tests still failed.
I requested a full checkout, and since then it has
been reporting a missing build.sh
It went AWOL for
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 09:12:21
Modified:.modules
Log:
Standalone jbossmq needs pool and connector as well
Revision ChangesPath
1.109 +2 -0 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
===
Ahh, yep it's out of date. It's been a while since I did a standalone
build. If you want, I'll look into bringing the build upto date.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX and JBossMQ
Hi,
--- Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have I broken the hourly compile?
I noticed last night's test runs didn't clobber
the testsuite first. The cluster tests still
failed.
I requested a full checkout, and since then it has
been reporting a missing build.sh
It
Hi Hiram,
I've got a bootable system now. It is a bit
bloated for standalone JBossMQ.
I've converted it to Jason's latest build system.
I'll commit soon and leave you to cut out the fat :-)
Regards,
Adrian
Ahh, yep it's out of date. It's been a while since I
did a standalone
build. If
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 09:38:31
Added: jbossmq/etc version.mf
Log:
Integrate JBossMX into JBossMQ standalone, bring the build up-to-date
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 build/jbossmq/etc/version.mf
Index: version.mf
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/24 09:38:31
Modified:jbossmq build.xml
Log:
Integrate JBossMX into JBossMQ standalone, bring the build up-to-date
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +382 -158 build/jbossmq/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Scott,
I really can't see anything to gain by becoming a Jakarta project, other
then more bureaucracy.
BTW, we do have the whole stack. We just support a pluggable web tier.
-dain
Scott Sanders wrote:
As a jakarta committer, I have to say thanks for stating this as
succintly as you did.
Bugs item #534398, was opened at 2002-03-24 20:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=534398group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigned to:
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:32
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +57 -5 jbosscx/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:48:06
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EntityPersistenceManager.java
Log:
removed statistics provider from EntityPersistenceManager interface. It doesn't seem
to be used, and bloated the interface for my purposes.
Revision ChangesPath
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:31
Added: src/main/org/jboss/resource/security
ConfiguredIdentityLoginModule.java
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm TxCapsule.java
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +71 -28jboss/src/main/org/jboss/tm/TxCapsule.java
Index: TxCapsule.java
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb GlobalTxEntityMap.java
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +11 -1 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/GlobalTxEntityMap.java
Index: GlobalTxEntityMap.java
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:33
Modified:src/etc/conf/default auth.conf jboss-service.xml
standardjaws.xml standardjboss.xml
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:44:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm/usertx/client
ServerVMClientUserTransaction.java
Log:
New ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +56 -21
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:53:27
Added: src/etc/deploy new-hsqldb-default-service.xml
Log:
Temporary example Datasource configuration for new connection manager
implementation. Configuration will improve...
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:54:33
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:49:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins BMPPersistenceManager.java
Log:
added a little more info to error logging
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +5 -3 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/BMPPersistenceManager.java
Index:
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:50:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
JDBCEntityBridge.java
Log:
added a little more info to exception
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +2 -2
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:54:59
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/bank - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:54:59
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/test - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:54:59
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/adapter - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:54:59
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:43
Added: src/resources log4j.xml
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant jca-jdbc wrappers, but work ok with e.g. the firebird
connector. Also, nojars combined targets
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:44
Modified:src/resources/bmp/META-INF ejb-jar.xml
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant jca-jdbc wrappers, but work ok with e.g. the firebird
connector. Also, nojars
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:44
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant jca-jdbc wrappers, but work ok with e.g. the firebird
connector. Also, nojars combined targets
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:44
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/adapter TestConnection.java
TestConnectionFactory.java
TestConnectionRequestInfo.java
TestManagedConnection.java
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:45
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/ejb
CachedConnectionSessionBean.java
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant jca-jdbc wrappers, but work ok
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:45
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/bank/ejb AccountBean.java
CustomerBean.java TellerBean.java
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:45
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/test
BaseConnectionManagerUnitTestCase.java
CachedConnectionBankStressTestCase.java
CachedConnectionSessionUnitTestCase.java
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 13:55:30
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jca/bank/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:03:15
Modified:src/etc/deploy jms-service.xml
Log:
included a configuration version for the new ConnectionManager implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +40 -0 jboss/src/etc/deploy/jms-service.xml
Index: jms-service.xml
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:05:30
Removed: src/resources log4j.properties
Log:
test logging converted to xml config
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 14:00:44
Modified:src/resources/bank/META-INF jaws.xml
Log:
Tests for new ConnectionManager implementation. Many of these fail with the current
less-than-spec-compliant jca-jdbc wrappers, but work ok with e.g. the firebird
connector. Also, nojars
This appears to be fixed. If you ever find a lock for anoncvs_jboss (or
really anoncvs anything) or a maximal lock, please submit a request to
drop those locks here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=1atid=21
Just explain that there is lock for the 'jboss' project and
I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
extended period of time let us know...
--jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
This appears to be fixed. If you ever find a lock for anoncvs_jboss
(or really anoncvs anything) or a maximal lock, please submit a
request to drop
on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
extended period of time let us know...
We did - di We not ?
Should We have to do that ?
___
Jboss-development mailing
Bugs item #519741, was opened at 2002-02-19 18:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=519741group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/24 16:36:17
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
fix so there is only one hsql config copied. This copies the new one, obvious
change to go back to the old one
Revision ChangesPath
1.112 +3 -1 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 549
Successful tests: 371
Errors:150
Failures: 28
[time of test: 25 March 2002 1:40 GMT]
[java.version:
This was caused by both versions of defaultds configuration
(hsqldb-default-service.xml and newhsqldb-default-service.xml) being copied
to deploy. I've fixed it in cvs... we'll see how the next run goes.
david jencks
On 2002.03.24 19:39:39 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test
Change Notes item #534493, was opened at 2002-03-25 01:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=534493group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to: David
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 380
Errors:149
Failures: 27
[time of test: 25 March 2002 2:23 GMT]
[java.version:
on 25-03-2 01.07, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 378
Errors:149
Failures: 29
[time of test: 25 March 2002 5:10 GMT]
[java.version:
Bugs item #534542, was opened at 2002-03-24 21:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=534542group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Moses Wang (mwang)
Assigned to: Jason
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 378
Errors:149
Failures: 29
[time of test: 25 March 2002 6:11 GMT]
[java.version:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
compile-classes:
[mkdir] Created dir:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 528
Successful tests: 194
Errors:326
Failures: 8
[time of test: 25 March 2002 7:16 GMT]
[java.version:
Hello,
My ejb jar files worked perfectly in jboss3.0 alpha version, but when i deployed it to
jboss 3.0 beta version, i failed!
there is no any error reporting. i just found the deploymenet enter the endless loop!!
such as:
03:54:04,963 INFO [MainDeployer] Deploying:
79 matches
Mail list logo
