This is fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jboss-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] no server/*/log dirs in Branch_3_0 build...
Am I imagining this ?
Is it intentional ? If not, could we have one - It
No, I don't have anything specific in mind for generalizing the scoped
loaders so that seems fine. DeploymentInfo seems like the place for the
lookup and if not found, creation of the loader repository.
I won't branch for 3.1 until the week of July 7-13.
Scott Stark
Patches item #572983, was opened at 2002-06-24 06:41
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=572983group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ben Alex (benalex)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #572988, was opened at 2002-06-24 12:02
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572988group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: sanjeevi (sanjeeviathreya)
Assigned
Hello Mike,
If I understand your question correctly, yes (well, no to the 'dreaming'
question :-) ). The 'default' list of ports would either be in the config
file (like example below), or in each of the services' respective config
files.
I think this is what you mean (?). At config-time,
Bugs item #562660, was opened at 2002-05-30 16:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562660group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Deleted
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell
Number of tests run: 640
Successful tests: 636
Errors:1
Failures: 3
[time of test: 24 June 2002 0:30 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #571721, was opened at 2002-06-20 10:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=571721group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Goke (jeffgoke)
Assigned to:
Jason,
I want to wrap up the Jetty load balancer as a JBoss service. However
the load balancer is written using the nio libraries from jdk1.4 (because
why load balance if your bottle neck is a user space java.io threads on
your load balancer).
Can we get optional jdk1.4 support into the build
Number of tests run: 763
Successful tests: 228
Errors:523
Failures: 12
[time of test: 24 June 2002 8:33 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
Number of tests run: 763
Successful tests: 228
Errors:523
Failures: 12
[time of test: 24 June 2002 10:38 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
Bugs item #572988, was opened at 2002-06-24 10:02
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572988group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2.2 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: sanjeevi (sanjeeviathreya)
sorry guys, but brazil will take it (easily I hope): )
Richard Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Christian Riege wrote:
hi,
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 22:14, marc fleury wrote:
| As long as the USA don't win but they shall defeat Germany
| and send them home.
|
|lol.
split them out of the ear, number and stop wasting time, you are done
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:20 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; marc fleury
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] How to
Hi all, I've been posting about this subject a while ago, and we are
using multi instances of jboss/eclipse and tomcat in the same machine
for use by developers remotely. We use the approache of a multi-homed
host, with more then one ip address.
At first we some of services out, changed the
I have an application that used to work until rc2, after trying to use
with rc3 or 3.0.0 it start to give me jdbc error.
Here is the ejb-ql and sql generated for it:
ejb-ql : select object (o) from Praca where p.municipio.uf.oid= ?1
sql :
SELECT t0_p.oid FROM PRACA t0_p, MUNICIPIO
I've had this before on a (non-sourceforge) CVS repository, the lock file in
the repository needs to deleted, I guess you have to be a sourceforge
administrator to do this?
Here's a bit about it in the CVS manual...
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs_10.html#SEC88
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 18:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573192group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to:
Post a bug report to the sourceforge project using this link:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=1atid=21
and state that a stale lock needs to be removed and give the full
cvs path that has the lock.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group,
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 11:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573192group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #573199, was opened at 2002-06-24 12:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573199group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
Assigned
Emerson,
The JMX-HTML Adaptor MBean (from Sun jmxtools.jar) does not allow the
specification of a bind address - only a port, and max # of clients. There
is no attribute for it, and in fact, the server socket open call uses the
no-address constructor (port,backlog). That said, I thought someone
There is a replacement servlet in the varia package under
src/main/org/jboss/jmx. Being just a regular war it has all the
capbilities of a web application/web container including configuration
of the ports, bind address, transport encryption, and role based
security.
File a bug report a sourceforge. Make sure to include the ejb-jar.xml
file, or the revelent sections if it is huge.
-dain
Emerson Cargnin - MSA wrote:
I have an CMP application that used to work until rc2, after trying to
use with rc3 or 3.0.0 it start to give me jdbc error.
Here is the
This is definitely a hack (not a pattern), but if it works for you, use
it. Support for auto number keys is on the todo list.
-dain
Justin Casp wrote:
hey List
I posted this problem/workaround to the jboss-user list but never got a
response. Maybe it got lost in the shuffle or maybe it's
Bugs item #573199, was opened at 2002-06-24 11:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573199group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
Bugs item #573215, was opened at 2002-06-24 12:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573215group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Assigned to:
So you can undeploy jmx-html-adaptor.sar, and instead deploy this servlet to
your Jetty/Tomcat. Neat. The bigger benefit here is that you can put your
own security constraints on it so Joe Fatfinger can't point a browser at
8082 and stop or remove running services. I like. Wish I had known sooner
Yes. This will be the default html adaptor in the 3.0.1 default
and all configs. The minimal config will keep the ri adaptor
since that config has no servlet container.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message
Bugs item #573199, was opened at 2002-06-24 11:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573199group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
On 2002.06.23 18:46:09 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
I thought these type of failures were going to be logged as errors
Ok, they should be now in 3.0.1, port soon to 3.1
david
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-
Bugs item #573199, was opened at 2002-06-24 16:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573199group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
Bugs item #573244, was opened at 2002-06-24 13:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573244group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Assigned to:
Submit a request to SF and tell them which project and where the lock(s)
are. They should clear them in a day or two.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:07 AM
To: jboss-dev;
Dude... you don't get it. Other folks will be using EAR and will
probably have to have them ordered. It is unreasonable to tell all of
them to unpack and number.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent:
I am planning on integrating the changes I make to Branch_3_0 into head
once I have everything working with 3.0.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 10:42 PM
To: jboss-dev;
Do you know when this spec will finalize... or if it has already?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] SwiftMQ JMS RA
Bugs item #572116, was opened at 2002-06-21 09:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572116group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Bugs item #572281, was opened at 2002-06-21 15:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572281group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Colin Li (colinl)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #573215, was opened at 2002-06-24 12:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573215group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Bugs item #573244, was opened at 2002-06-24 13:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573244group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Assigned
Bugs item #571995, was opened at 2002-06-21 02:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=571995group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #572373, was opened at 2002-06-21 20:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robson Miranda (rpdmiranda)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Holger Engels
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
Holger, in JBoss 3.0 we have client
Not finalized yet. Public review of the first public draft ended June 16,
I hope they take the time to read my comments and incorporate them...
unlike te jdo guys. There are a bunch of cool things. The tx inflow
contract should make adding the d to our tm pretty easy.
david
On 2002.06.24
Is using depends tags in jboss.xml working?
david
On 2002.06.24 15:23:39 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
Dude... you don't get it. Other folks will be using EAR and will
probably have to have them ordered. It is unreasonable to tell all of
them to unpack and number.
--jason
Haven't gotten that far... I am kinda lazy today.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] How to specify depens for EJB
Is
The behaviour you describe in both situations is obviously not desired but
it is all that is implemented in JBossMQ at this time ( I know this because
I wrote it ). In other words the problems you are seeing are not brought
about by your lack of understanding or a bug as such, it simply
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:24 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] How to specify depens for EJB
|
|
|Dude... you don't get it. Other folks will be using EAR and will
marc fleury wrote:
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:24 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] How to specify depens for EJB
|
|
|Dude... you don't get it. Other
ok, but have you seen some kind of wrong sql generation bug appeareing
in 3.0.0??
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
File a bug report a sourceforge. Make sure to include the ejb-jar.xml
file, or the revelent sections if it is huge.
-dain
Emerson Cargnin - MSA wrote:
I have an CMP application
I motivated and it looks like there is depends support in both places,
at least there is code to generate a depends list. It does not look
like it is being used though... or perhaps I am confused on what it
should be doing.
I am not seeing what I had expected, which was to see the dependency
Do you know where this depends list is used?
I found this... should have looked before I asked, it was very obvious
=]
--jason
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
Bugs item #572373, was opened at 2002-06-21 20:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572373group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robson Miranda (rpdmiranda)
There is already 1.4 support in both 3.0 and HEAD. The jboss/connector
module has some conditionals which build some javax stubs for 1.3 but
not for 1.4.
IMO it would be better to integrate Jetty as binary, so that we don't
have to keep the build systems in syncs in addition to the sources.
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 11:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573192group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned
Bugs item #550606, was opened at 2002-04-30 08:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=550606group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Moos (moosi_1978)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #562004, was opened at 2002-05-29 13:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562004group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Justin Casp (jcasp)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #555070, was opened at 2002-05-12 05:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=555070group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dylan van Iersel (dviersel)
Assigned to:
I think this does work, it is just the logs which are confusing.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] How to specify depens
Number of tests run: 767
Successful tests: 740
Errors:20
Failures: 7
[time of test: 25 June 2002 1:24 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Number of tests run: 783
Successful tests: 770
Errors:9
Failures: 4
[time of test: 25 June 2002 3:14 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Number of tests run: 793
Successful tests: 780
Errors:8
Failures: 5
[time of test: 25 June 2002 4:40 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0_01]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Bugs item #558672, was opened at 2002-05-21 06:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=558672group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned
Bugs item #567349, was opened at 2002-06-11 03:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=567349group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruno Lamouret (qjafcunuas)
Bugs item #565721, was opened at 2002-06-07 02:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565721group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: raitmayer ronny (raitmayerr)
Bugs item #555383, was opened at 2002-05-13 03:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=555383group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ernst de Haan (znerd)
Assigned
Number of tests run: 764
Successful tests: 745
Errors:15
Failures: 4
[time of test: 25 June 2002 5:57 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Bugs item #563936, was opened at 2002-06-03 09:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=563936group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alejandro Otero Freire
Bugs item #566624, was opened at 2002-06-09 17:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=566624group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ron van Pol (corpsusvitale)
Assigned
70 matches
Mail list logo
