=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
David,
thanks for the detailed analysis of this.I had seen this once before but
had never been able to reproduce it.
I think I know what is going on It is not strickly a race rather
the thread is being returned to the pool with interrupted status true -
this is effecting it being used
Change Notes item #594528, was opened at 2002-08-13 11:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=594528group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #594563, was opened at 2002-08-13 12:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594563group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
Hey
I just found out a way to optimize the use of MarshalledObject, if it's
used to send stuff over the network (JBoss has it's own version, but it
has the same basic code).
The MO serializes the data into a ByteArrayOutputStream, which then is
toByteArray'ed in order to get the data. This
Bugs item #594580, was opened at 2002-08-13 08:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594580group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Callies (pcallies)
Assigned
Bugs item #594596, was opened at 2002-08-13 15:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594596group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nir Oren (jhudsy)
Assigned to:
thanks
marcf
PS: want to get your RW back? do you still have it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Rickard Öberg
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing MarshalledObject, or
Sorry if this has been addressed, out email has been out for
a while.
I've been investigating the Interrupted while requesting
permit exception
that now occurs in recent jboss 3 versions under heavy load
and wonder if
it is due to a race condition in the jetty thread pool. In
any case
Do you have a simple test case for 3.0.1? If so then I would
like to volunteer to look at it, I should have some time
later today
That's the spirit, it seems this bug is well cornered between David,
Jules and Greg but thanks for proposing
regards
marcf
Do you have a simple test case for 3.0.1? If so then I would
like to volunteer to look at it, I should have some time
later today
That's the spirit, it seems this bug is well cornered between David,
Jules and Greg but thanks for proposing
Sorry, I must have missed that. Our email
After looking at EJBModule, there doesn't seem to be a way to pass
configuration information to Interceptors. I'm going to put this in if
nobody objects.
Bill
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for
Hi guys,
I'm writing an article about JBoss 3.0 to a magazine here in Brazil, the
JavaMagazine.
I'm trying to make a matrix with the J2EE 1.3 especifications and
current JBoss relative implementations.
Below is the result that I found, but will be great if someone check
this list.
API
Do it, this is something we have been missing for a while.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:44
Hello,
Why do you write partial support for ejb 2.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Handerson Ferreira Gomes
Envoye : mardi, 13 aout 2002 18:17
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-dev]
I've seen something very similar with Jetty 3.1.7. Calling
RequestDispatcher.include() should flush the output stream, but it appears
not to. If you add an explicit
response.getWriter().flush();
(or response.getOutputStream().flush() I guess, though I haven't tried it)
just before the
marc fleury wrote:
thanks
marcf
PS: want to get your RW back? do you still have it?
No, I'm cool without it. I just happened to do this optimization in some
code I wrote for my new AOP framework, and remembered that MO's were
being used quite heavily for calls in JBoss. That's all.
To minimize changes, you'll have to extract config information from XML
attributes, ok? Otherwise we fuck up everybody's container configurations.
i.e
container-interceptors
interceptor config1=hello
config2=worldorg.jboss.some.fucking.interceptor/interceptor
/container-interceptors
Bugs item #594596, was opened at 2002-08-13 16:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594596group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nir Oren (jhudsy)
Assigned to:
Seems to be a Jasper thing, exactly the same happens with Tomcat 4.0.4. If
you programatically dispatch a request from within a JSP, either with
something like this:
%RequestDispatcher rd = application.getRequestDispatcher(/Included.jsp);
rd.include(request, response);%
or with the equivalent
I had played around with making allowing interceptors to implement
XmlLoadable, but discarded it as I had made to many changes to other
bits to test it properly.
The only major change I had to make was to use attributes for class
names:
interceptor class=some.package.Interceptor
param
I think it would be better to fix the config and migrate than to create
confusing configuration. I don't believe that legacy support should
prevent change.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Tuesday,
Bill,
You are absolutely correct. The interceptor configuration is set. We
discussed with Juha and Adrian in Palma and there is an elegant way to
provide interceptor configuration. If you have a simple fix for EJB and
you need it right now, go ahead, but we have a simple way at the JMX
layer
I think your being too lazy now, and config via attributes is
in general insufficient. Just check if an element has a child
element that maps to a setXXX(Element) accessor where
the XXX corresponds to the child element name. This does
not break existing configs as no interceptors have
Isn't someone (Adrian??) working on making the interceptors into mbeans
with lists of them being another mbean, this list replacing the container
configuration??
david jencks
On 2002.08.13 12:43:14 -0400 Bill Burke wrote:
To minimize changes, you'll have to extract config information from XML
Hi,
I´m from Brazil and I need
your help. I´m trying to integrate the Jboss with MQSeries. Could you send me
an explication how can I configure the Jboss?
Thank´s,
Marcos Oda
Developers Team
www.globalcode.com.br
www.globaleducation.com.br
+55 11 9917-5833
I don't need the interceptor configuration for anything important right now,
but I will commit something soon anyways.
Let me know if development stalls on the new MBean interceptor stuff and
I'll help out.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Ok, I won't be lazy :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] you can't configure interceptors...
I think your being too lazy now,
If that is the case and you need it right away, use a nested element
instead of the paramn bits. This way you retain the current config
style but are not required to come up with some confusing scheme to add
configuration.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTW, this is for 4.0)
is HEAD the way to 4.0 in cvs ?
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
Seems to get everything, the text of the node as well as all child elements.
Seems like it should ignore everything but TEXT_NODE and CDATA stuff.
public static String getElementContent(Element element, String
defaultStr)
throws DeploymentException
{
if (element == null)
Hi
It looks good (just came back from Europe) so I am
a little bit jet-lagged.
Could you do me a favour and check out the new
ScheduleManager and its ScheduleProvider and see
if you could adapt this CronSchedulable to the new
Scheduler.
I am going to deprecate the old Scheduler in favour of
the
Hi Geeks
Just wrote a simple (very simple) Email to
JMS converter (MBean) which currently
only supports plain text emails but now you
can use it to check email addresses after
registration etc.
I will finish it tomorrow and upload it then
to CVS.
Have fun
x
Andreas Schaefer
Bugs item #594875, was opened at 2002-08-13 20:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594875group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Buikhuizen (nznl)
Assigned
Bugs item #594875, was opened at 2002-08-14 13:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594875group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Buikhuizen (nznl)
Assigned
Bugs item #594875, was opened at 2002-08-13 20:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594875group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Buikhuizen (nznl)
Hello,
I have switched my application from jboss-2.4 to jboss-3.0 because of
its clustering feature.But while converting
I am getting below mentioned error in most of the beans..
java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread;
nested exception is:
37 matches
Mail list logo
