can expand deadlock detection
to other locks that are beyond the scope of Entity beans.
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple
Yes, thank you Laurent! We need to get more visibility for your work. I
can't wait to eventually try this out.
Thanks again,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Laurent
> Etiemble
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 7:26 PM
> To: Jboss-
Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
Cast your vote for JBoss as JDJ Best App Server
http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/vote.cfm
> -Original
Brock wrote:
Ideally there should be no hashmap for normal usage.
Using the principle: you don't pay for what you don't use.
Regards,
Adrian
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 20:02, Bill Burke wrote:
In our quest to improve performance, I'm doing a redesign of our
Invocation object to minimize
Ok, I wouldn't be able to improve raw, over-the-wire, remote performance
without breaking compatibility with older JBoss versions.
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
Only problem here is that what I've done so far is not backward
compatible with a previous version of JBoss. I guess this is
I'd rather not maintain something like that. What do you think?
IMHO, we should guarantee over-the-wire compatibility only for a
specific branch. over-the-wire compatibility should be breakable
between major releases.
Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 23:00, Bill Burke wrote:
The stability of 3.2 and its performance are priorities #1, 3.x will
live for MANY years
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:22 PM
To: Private list for internal JBoss Group discussion; Jbos
contention. OptimizeIt has this at 32.9% in my
little test on a dual CPU machine with 10 threads in contention.
Thanks,
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by
is getting them lined up in the proper order"
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-developme
this too.
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Developme
xx
___
jboss-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.
t(insertQuery, insert);
psCache.put(findQuery, find);
psCache.put(deleteQuery, delete);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 3000; ++i)
{
testCachedPS(con, i);
}
end = System.currentTimeM
Connections should be single threaded, shouldn't they? We're doing some
cloning/synchronization in a few places to protect against concurreny
when the connection shouldn't have to worry about that. Especially in
WrappedConnection.close()
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief
WrappedConnection is not put into the pool, correct? So if I want to
implement a PreparedStatement cache, I need to store it in
BaseWrapperManagedConnection?
Thanks,
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC
soring their leaders.
Finally the availability of professional services is a boost to
corporate adoption of succesful open source projects such as Hibernate.
We strongly believe this is the way of the future at JBoss.
Best regards,
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Archi
oss.
All and all, I hope you all look favorably on this new relationship. I
know I do.
Thanks all!
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Wel
Screwed up my own announcement *blush*
Forgot to mention that Gavin King, the creator, leader of Hibernate, is
now an employee of JBoss Group! You probably assumed that from reading
the post though I hope.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
All,
I would sincerely like to welcome Gavin and
Ok, I implemented prepared statement caching for our JCA connector. I
see the same 30% improvement I spoke about below. The is with Oracle
9.2 mind you. I did the same test with HSQL and it really ahd no affect.
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
Hey,
Seems statement caching does make a difference
test...
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss
Adrian,
Are we removing the CachedConnectionInterceptor? We have code in place
to replace it?
Bill
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
ject: cvs sucks these days .. ?!?
Hi,
a fresh checkout Jboss-3.2 with Branch_3_2 always terminates
with a error code 1 and e.g thirdparty/ is missing.
Can anybody give me a hint?
Thanks
Heiko
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief
istinfo/jboss-development
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
====
o! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
ng an LDAP server.
Best,
Brian
At 04:48 PM 9/29/2003 +0200, you wrote:
There is a project on sourceforge "javaLDAP". Maybe that can be used as
a head start.
--Marcus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, Sep
No. Not until we are ready to retire 1.4.x which won't be for at least
a year after 1.5 is out. It is just too much to maintain both.
Bill
Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
Does the port to the futur 1.5 Java compiler could be
useful ? (like generics, enhanced for loop, static
import ...)
--- Bill
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.c
this is a big deal as most of
the time spent right now is in waiting for DB locks to free up anyways.
Could you please help me with configuring this the right way? It seems
that almost no other applicationserver supports this kond of
partitioning and I think this could be a major advantige.
Bill
-
.
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better
Anybody know how to set the Bindaddress on the SNMP agent? Doesn't seem
to have this feature.
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giv
x27;t work with older versions, but any RMI invocations
should be ok with new class types.
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Pr
Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 22:55, Bill Burke wrote:
I can optimize marshaling of EJB invocations over wire if I create new
classes that extend older versions correct?
As long as the old versions still work.
A better approach would be to write a new proxy factory,
leaving the
extendible as everything is either package protected or private.
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Li
__
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: E
nt in the
suspected hotspot.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bill Burke wrote:
I've been optimizing marshalling by extending ObjectInputStream and
OutputStream, and overriding readClassDescriptor and
writeClassDescri
_
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net
208)
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us
I'm on RH 8.0.
I'm getting java.net.SocketException: Too many open files
To get over this problem do I just expand via /proc/sys/fs/file-max? Or
is there a different way?
Thanks,
Bill
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss
be null.
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know wha
n OTHER waiting sessions.
===
P
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what
###
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net
October 26th. 12:36 AM.
Proud dad and mom doing fine.
http://www.jboss.org/bill/burke/baby.jpg
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help
nt mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
1.3 although we have a lot of the websmurfices done.
Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
Hi,
I am starting a developpment for JBoss.
Which version of J2EE should I use to be fully
compliant with JBoss ? May I try the 1.4b2 ?
=
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC
lp us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Grou
Posting to jbosxs-dev. Let's keep it there please!
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We should
not be maintaining past versions of deployment descriptors in 4.0, 3.2,
or 3.0. Anybody
.core mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/the.core
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net
the latter there's
no additional work on the admin but package would not be updated with
new document type, something you'd want people to do eventually.
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
--
an/listinfo/jboss-group
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code
EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Bill Burke'
Betreff: Re: AW: Jboss: XML binding for jboss.net
Because this becomes an
element and type in the jaxb binding I have two interfaces
and two impl classes that really are not needed. Expand this
across all the j2ee descriptors and there are hundred
a real set of objects whose names may
change.
___
jboss-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group
--
Bill Burke
Chi
ch an effect on performance. Do we have any numbers here?
Bill
- when session must be replicated (always, time based, etc.)
supported in TreeCache: sync, async (optionally interval-based)
- synchronous or asynchronous
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
triggered, it sends a notification. This notification would be turned
into an email message or sent to some other data feed. Sound like a
good idea?
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This
FYI, this may not work with all browser as there may be a JDK mismatch.
You may have to upgrade your browser's JDK as this uses an applet that
requires JDK 1.2.2
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
Hi all,
I added graphing to the web console in Branch_3_2. I will eventually
merge it to HEAD.
No
sorry, just thought I'd add the browsers I've tested with:
Netscape 7.1
I.E. 6.0
Bill Burke wrote:
FYI, this may not work with all browser as there may be a JDK mismatch.
You may have to upgrade your browser's JDK as this uses an applet that
requires JDK 1.2.2
Bill
Bill B
OU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
====
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss
eptable in terms for performance.
I need to reread your question on oneway, but I thought it would be
implemented outside of JBoss Remoting and within AOP interceptors.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:24 AM
To:
It should be configuration. Either client is as optimimal as possible,
meaning as soon as method is called, it spawns a thread or enters a work
queue, or we go to the server before the client returns.
Bill
Tom Elrod wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
I need to reread your question on oneway, but I
http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
wrote, I would write the query this way:
SELECT UserId, LocationId, MAX(LastLoginDate) FROM Blah GROUP BY LocationId
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Nov 25, 2003, at 10:33 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Unfortunately EJB QL only allows 1 item in the select statement so no
GROUP BY. Use Hibernate.
Even then
Anybody know of a good benchmarking suite for JMS?
If so, are you willing at all to help port it to JBoss?
Thanks,
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by
! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, but in EJB QL/JBOSS QL you can only select one item, so group by
is useless.
I forgot to add a unique primary key to the example below. Which is what
you typically select on.
Anyway, if you think GROUP BY is
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/19 11:41:32
Modified:src/docs/common jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
Log:
formatting.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +12 -4 newsite/src/docs/common/jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
Index: jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
===
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/19 11:52:36
Modified:src/docs/common jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
Log:
fixed my screwed up formatting.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 newsite/src/docs/common/jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
Index: jboss-jbossClustering.jsp
===
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/20 07:51:28
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/testbeancluster/bean
StatelessSessionBean.java
Log:
added some code for eye-ball clustering colocation testing
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
jbosstest/src/ma
In other words, one EJB can be accessible through IIOP, RMI, SOAP, XML-RPC
all at the same time. This is the future. Multiple MBean invokers, 1 MBean
as per Marc's vision.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> Sen
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/20 07:50:34
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/testbeancluster/bean - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/20 07:51:45
Modified:src/resources/testbeancluster/META-INF ejb-jar.xml
Log:
added some code for eye-ball clustering colocation testing
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jbosstest/src/resources/testbeancluster/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: Bill Burke; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations
>
>
> oh good point, but that doesn't require "top level"
> configuration, just drop
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Reverbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:38 AM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations
>
>
> You
Are we going to get JDK 1.4 working with JBoss 3.0 before we go final? I
think this may be a good path to take. I remember a big obsticle being the
jmxri implementation. Have we ditched jmxri and replaced it with Juha's
great stuff?
___
Jboss-develo
> 2 - Marc's code allows multiple invokers per container. The JRMP stuff
> is all there, but there is still some work to be done to enable
> multiple homes. There is also some work to be done on the IIOP stuff
> (IIOP invocations are not going through JMX today).
>
To clarify. Th
Just compiled and ran stuff with JDK 1.4. I had to uncomment out the JDBC
3.0 stuff in the connector code though. It would be nice if we could
conditionally compile this stuff in.
Jason, build meisters...In ant, can you determine the version of the
compiler you're compiling with and do a condit
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Francisco Reverbel
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:11 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multip
This is already the case, Jason. Invokers are configured as an MBean.
standardjboss.xml binds the ProxyFactory to the container. Implicitly, a
default invoker is bound to the container. You can bind your own invoker to
the container by specifying or with an MBean
name in jboss.xml.
In the fu
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:04 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Francisco Reverbel; marc fleury;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations
>
>
> >
Hey,
Jason made a good point. If you want to use a different invoker for your
container you currently have to provide a new container configuration and
also specify the new invoker in jboss.xml. This is too much configuration.
A better design might be as follows.
1. The ProxyFactory becomes an
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Reverbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:44 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations
>
>
> On Wed, 20
file.
Thanks,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:17 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] expanding buildmagic for JDK 1.4
>
>
>
; -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:12 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] expanding buildmagic for JDK 1.4
>
>
> Looks like the easiest thing todo short
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
> To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
>
>
> This is the last piece of the puzzle,
>
>
N
ursday, March 21, 2002 8:49 PM
> To: Francisco Reverbel; Bill Burke
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
>
>
> |whatever.) This is crucial: proxy factories and invokers must
> |know each other!!! The container, however, should n
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Francisco Reverbel
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:37 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: marc fleury; Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs re
Ok, I'll reread your "bla bla". Sorry I misinterpreted.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Bill Burke; Francisco Reverbel
> Cc: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-de
How do I get at it?
Thanks,
Bill
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Maybe the invokers should run on a hard-coded port. With a hard-coded port,
I think references can live beyond the life of the server. Or maybe I don't
know what I'm talking about :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
>
Only home interfaces are registered into JNDI.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:22 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: marc fleury; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Todo:
Nope, no leak. A synchronization object is registered with the transaction.
It will release the instance.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Henri Chen
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:34 PM
> To: Bill Burke
i
>
> P.S. It did cause trouble in my code. I saw two instances were
> consecutiously activated and I read the source code of jboss
> release 2.4.4.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:10 PM
> To: H
After a brief lookover of the jboss.net code, I couldn't figure it out. If
a method is returning a reference to an EJB, how does this get translated
into SOAP? If you call a home.findAll for instance, how does a collection
of references get translated into a SOAP response?
Thanks in advance for
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung
> , Dr. Christoph
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:01 AM
> To: 'Bill Burke'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] how do ejb proxies g
This is because we trash the instance.
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug in EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?
>
>
> Dear Bill,
>
>
> From: Henri Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Bill Burke
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in
> EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?
>
>
> Is this implies that there is no Option B
; Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: Bill Burke
> Cc: Henri Chen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in
> EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?
>
>
> I agree. Commit option B assumes that you can "synchronize the
> instance¡¦s
soon I hope?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Good points Tom.Do you do your optimistic lock check on
both ejbLoad and ejbStore?I suggest using the following container
configuration with your optimistic locking scheme. If you try it out, let
me know how it works out.
Thanks,
Bill
Standard CMP
EntityBean
false
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/04/09 19:21:07
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/lock
SimplePessimisticEJBLock.java
Log:
not supporting this anymore.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://
Tom,
Ok, I know what you need. Give me a few.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
> yeh
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in
> EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizati
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- BeanLock.java 19 Dec 2001 03:39:14 - 1.13
+++ BeanLock.java 10 Apr 2002 05:32:58 - 1.14
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
* @author Bill Burke
* @author Marc Fleury
*
- * @version $Revision
801 - 900 of 2180 matches
Mail list logo
