[JBoss-dev] Old thread again: INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN1

2001-04-05 Thread Lennart Petersson
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

SV: [JBoss-dev] TODO: JBossCMP 1.1 FAST!

2001-05-07 Thread Lennart Petersson
Marc, as i said before i've not plenty of time besides catching up our deadlines... BUT to have FAST cmp is cruisal for us since we are ONLY using cmp (and the system is actually running - believe or not :-). So i'm willing to do what i can on this subject! /L

SV: [JBoss-dev] 113th Try: Scoped J2EE Applications ... Please verify these few pending diffs to org.jboss.deployment !

2001-05-18 Thread Lennart Petersson
Go go go i think :-) It seems like we are facing exact the same problems as those you where talking about. We are also developing a kind of ERP system, targeted for the Retail market and as you know thera are a lot of components involved in such a system (sales, stock, customer, items,

SV: [JBoss-dev] remote jboss configuration

2001-06-19 Thread Lennart Petersson
Hi Marc! I'm also interesting in any work you are doing regarding maintaining a wide farm of JBoss servers. We are soon reaching production phase at our largest customer (Postal offices in Norway - 350 local offices will have 1-2 jboss running... i will soon make up a project description :-).

SV: [JBoss-dev] Deployable service archives new configuration system

2001-06-20 Thread Lennart Petersson
This is interesting... and i'am doing things in this direction :-) Ok, i've not been thinking as far as you have done, how this would handle JBoss modules, but more on how our own application could be extended with new services in an easy way. I'm having this running today but on another EJB

SV: [JBoss-dev] Deployable service archives new configuration system

2001-06-20 Thread Lennart Petersson
- Original Message - From: Schaefer, Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:55 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Deployable service archives new configuration system Do you want to contain the configuration file (service.xml) be part of the

[JBoss-dev] CVS mysterious, at least for me...

2001-06-25 Thread Lennart Petersson
CVS the 2.4 branch. /Lennart === Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?

2001-07-05 Thread Lennart Petersson
then really productive :-( Please, any ideas are welcome! I will complement with more detailes as my own tests progress. This might be what make us Go! or Die! /Lennart === Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english [EMAIL PROTECTED

SV: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?

2001-07-06 Thread Lennart Petersson
Hi! Problem 1 solved by you Vincent - that was the missing toString() method in the PK class (Should that really matter, why are JBoss using it in the cache?). Problem 2 was no problem, it was the old EJBDoclet passivate bug. The erroneous component was not regenerated with a corrected

SV: [JBoss-dev] NO PROBLEM IN CACHE i tell you READ YOUR CODE (to myself)

2001-07-06 Thread Lennart Petersson
Cache size very high. And your overager periods very high as well. 2. Solution 2. Set your cache size to 1/1 (min/max) Let us know please. Vincent. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Lennart Petersson Envoyé : jeudi 5

SV: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?

2001-07-06 Thread Lennart Petersson
Having exact same arguments as you :-( But of couse you are having 2 processors - lucky you ;-) /Lennart - Original Message - From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:28 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?

[JBoss-dev] CPU killer...

2001-08-20 Thread Lennart Petersson
(); ... ... } *** End Well ok, I do understand what is happening, i'm more interested in why it is done and if there is a way to do it more efficient because in my testcase this printStackTrace() is taking 65 % of the CPU time !!! /Lennart === Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english

SV: [JBoss-dev] CPU killer...

2001-08-20 Thread Lennart Petersson
Wholy shit what a lousy reader i am... I've completly missed the if(m_debug) line !!! And that one was set to true in the version i have. So i was in a debug mode... Sorry to disturb you all /Lepe - Original Message - From: Lennart Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jBoss

[JBoss-dev] Can not chekout tag JBoss_2_4_0

2001-08-23 Thread Lennart Petersson
=== Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] What happend with this thread: MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge network traffic

2001-08-24 Thread Lennart Petersson
Did it ever come to a conclusion? Where do we stand today? Does the network traffic still get bloated by a somethimes rather large URL list? /L === Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Jboss-development

SV: [JBoss-dev] What happend with this thread: MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge network traffic

2001-08-30 Thread Lennart Petersson
for the web service. - Original Message - From: Lennart Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jBoss Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:40 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] What happend with this thread: MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge network traffic Did it ever

[JBoss-dev] Why did Fast Updates Based on Rowid disappeared?

2001-09-01 Thread Lennart Petersson
Browsing the list i couldn't find any clear answers? /Lennart === Lennart Petersson www.benefit.se/english [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

[JBoss-dev] VB: [JBoss-user] Help preparing an intro to JBoss

2001-09-19 Thread Lennart Petersson
Hi! The same goes for me - the training is a real success :-) To refer to Edwards mail i think that it would be good to have some presentation material from JBoss downloadable, because it is quite often that you have to hold a short presentation of JBoss and its features and why it is a good

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.java

2001-11-14 Thread Lennart Petersson
];Lennart Petersson/a + * @version $Revision: 1.14.2.6 $ */ public class JDBCDefinedFinderCommand extends JDBCFinderCommand { @@ -207,7 +208,8 @@ Set setOfPkTokens = new HashSet(pkTokens.countTokens()); while(pkTokens.hasMoreTokens

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.java

2001-11-14 Thread Lennart Petersson
PROTECTED];danch (Dan Christopherson)/a * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Bill Burke/a - * @version $Revision: 1.19 $ + * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Lennart Petersson/a + * @version $Revision: 1.20 $ * * pbRevisions:/b * @@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ Set

SV: [JBoss-dev] Classloader puzzle

2001-11-26 Thread Lennart Petersson
This is interesting. I sent a mail back in the end of august titled 'What happend with this thread: MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge network traffic'. We where looking at our network traffic and saw enormous traffic going on. Traced this down to the codebase that was hanging around all

Re: [JBoss-dev] About JBoss3.0

2001-11-29 Thread Lennart Petersson
Ok, since you are on the dev list you can at least specify WHAT you have to change to get it running. /Lennart - Original Message - From: Arman Melkumyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:09 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] About JBoss3.0 Hello dear

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore

2002-11-21 Thread Lennart Petersson
There sure is a problem with the homepage if you want to reach non-developers - you know... those people earning more but doing less :) I get that response a lot of time from our marketing/salesman/bla bla bla people that they don't get what it really is from reading the homepage... Sure a lot

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss on j2me?

2002-12-11 Thread Lennart Petersson
Hope it will... cause i will use it like that in a project :) /L onsdagen den 11 december 2002 kl 12.03 skrev Stefan Groschupf: Hi, some crazy guy had tried to run the jboss micro kernel on a j2me device? Should that be possible?   Thanks Stefan

Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss on j2me?

2002-12-11 Thread Lennart Petersson
You bet I am !!! shhh... don't tell my boss :) /Lennart - Original Message - From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss on j2me? Are any of you guys interested in working on a

Re: [JBoss-dev] CMP transaction problem

2003-01-28 Thread Lennart Petersson
tisdagen den 28 januari 2003 kl 02.38 skrev Fan Yang: Hi, all,   I have a CMP transaction problem and can not find correct answer from the forum. I appreciate very much if anyone can give me a clue.   I have a stateless session bean and 2 CMP entity beans. (trans-attributeall set to

[JBoss-dev] The recent OSX 1.4.1/XDoclet problem

2003-03-17 Thread Lennart Petersson
Was Mr. Jenk's fix only for head? Because I get problems when building 3.0/3.2 also. Here is output from 3.0: compile-mbean-sources: [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/lepe/projects/JbossSources/jboss-3.0/common/output/gen-src sourcepath is deprecated. the preferred way to design sources is via

Re: [JBoss-dev] The recent OSX 1.4.1/XDoclet problem

2003-03-18 Thread Lennart Petersson
, you can still build with 1.3.1 by setting: JAVA_HOME= /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home Steve Coy On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Lennart Petersson wrote: Was Mr. Jenk's fix only for head? Because I get problems when building 3.0/3.2 also. Here

Re: [JBoss-dev] The recent OSX 1.4.1/XDoclet problem

2003-03-18 Thread Lennart Petersson
hm... 3.2 seems to work as you said, but 3.0 still bangs out on xdoclet... /L tisdagen den 18 mars 2003 kl 12.43 skrev Stephen Coy: I just got Branch_3_2 to build using this trick and with JAVA_HOME set to /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home rather than the

Re: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL]: clean conf/jboss-service.xml deploy

2003-03-19 Thread Lennart Petersson
Hi Sacha! I think this sounds very good, because it is as you said a bit confusing with all these files in deploy and conf. To group them together in JMS/JMX/... subdiroctories i think would be a good solution and also having them apart from users application deployments - like deploy/system

Re: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_0 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2

2003-03-22 Thread Lennart Petersson
Thanks Stephen!!! /L - Original Message - From: Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 4:15 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_0 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2 As a consequence, we needed ant 1.5, so that has been incorporated as well.

Re: [JBoss-dev] Looking to do 3.2.0 final next this weekend

2003-03-25 Thread Lennart Petersson
If you have -server as default - would it be possible to catch some errorcode from the java command and in that case give it a try without -server? Most probably the JVM will support the -server option when called from a .bat-file :) /L onsdagen den 26 mars 2003 kl 06.02 skrev Ian Duggan: On

[JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Lennart Petersson
Please would it possible to have JBoss site stabilised? As it is now you never know what it will be like next time surfing there and forum messages that i sent yesterday is now suddenly gone and other threads reports to be updated but they arent And are there really 620 guests

Re: [JBoss-dev] NUKES on JBoss

2003-03-27 Thread Lennart Petersson
Oh, in that case... forget my last post - Looking forward to a fast and stable and not-always-changing site :) by the way... at the moment it is not answering ;) /L torsdagen den 27 mars 2003 kl 16.30 skrev marc fleury: is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running. it is stable and

Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-28 Thread Lennart Petersson
Ok, what can be done to solve that problem? In the end it is slow no matter who's the problem... /L fredagen den 28 mars 2003 kl 12.34 skrev julien viet: application is not slow, the bandwidth is small. the box is all the time in iddle and the average time for computing a page is 17 ms.

Re: [JBoss-dev] I can't believe france is out of the world cup

2002-06-19 Thread Lennart Petersson
No way... Not Senegal... Not since the kicked out Sweden :( Go England Go !!! There migth still be one gold medal to Sweden :) /Lennart man what a cup! Italy out... simone, yeah you can cry on my shoulder I know the feeling, Only Spain is exciting these days, But I really want Senegal to win

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interrupted while requesting permit!

2002-08-30 Thread Lennart Petersson
Please have a look at patch 60070. Else the 3.2 release want boot up in a minimal configuration. /Lennart torsdagen den 29 augusti 2002 kl 18.14 skrev Scott M Stark: The 3.2 beta release will be this Sat. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-10-07 Thread Lennart Petersson
It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :) /Lennart måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey: It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc fleury

Re: [JBoss-dev] new forums for development

2002-11-12 Thread Lennart Petersson
Looks good. Any news about nntp gateway? /Love mail and news - hate browsers :) tisdagen den 12 november 2002 kl 18.27 skrev marc fleury: Guys, I just created a bunch of forums in the development forums. --- This sf.net email is

Re: [JBoss-dev] new PooledInvoker: speeds up invocations

2002-11-15 Thread Lennart Petersson
torsdagen den 14 november 2002 kl 19.43 skrev marc fleury: Plus the name sucks. Let's stir clear of 'cute names', PooledInvoker clearly describes what it is. amrc f Isn't 'amrc' a cute name :) /L --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS documentation availability.

2001-12-04 Thread Lennart Petersson
http://www.flashline.com/components/productsbyvendor.jsp?vendorid=1376sid=1007457247953-3563667752-51 /Lennart - Original Message - From: Nick Pellow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:59 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS documentation availability.

Re: [JBoss-dev] Off Topic: a Success-Story of a special kind

2001-12-05 Thread Lennart Petersson
: You will love it most of the time at least :) /Lennart - Original Message - From: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:06 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Off Topic: a Success-Story of a special kind Finally after 6 years

Re: [JBoss-dev] current mbean structure confusing

2001-12-07 Thread Lennart Petersson
I definitely prefer the SAR kind of way to deploy services, even that i understand the maintenance problem. Would it be possible to have a 'global' service.xml file to be updated with new properties when a SAR is deployed with initial properties fetched from SAR xml. Then this 'global'

Re: [JBoss-dev] Autogenerated primary keys etc

2002-01-11 Thread Lennart Petersson
Is this a feature supported by other J2EE servers? If so, we should have it also. If not, should we be first? I'm now in a situation that i actually myself would like to have that feature, but can't cover all the pros and cons with it. Any comments from others already been this way, i mean there

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Autogenerated primary keys etc

2002-01-14 Thread Lennart Petersson
Ok, what i was looking for to hear about was the ability to support different databases auto-generated columns. I see the problem with it, just wanted to check if anyone had give it a try for some of the most popular databases... Guess i will wait for JDBC 3.0 :) /Lennart Den 2002-01-11

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Autogenerated primary keys etc

2002-01-14 Thread Lennart Petersson
Sound like a fucking stupid dummy question, but what the hell... What is having the best performance? 1) To let the DB generate next key using some kind of IDENTITY/SEQUENCE function? 2) To do like we do today and many others i guess, something like the HIGH/LOW key generator in Castor. We have

Re: [JBoss-dev] jbossmq message transport times

2002-01-16 Thread Lennart Petersson
Den 2002-01-16 02:37:12 skrev Loren Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm testing on MacOS X, which for our purposes is just another Unix flavor with an oddball GUI. Hi hi hi I'm waiting for my PB TI to arrive... really longing for Unix with an oddball GUI :) /Lennart

Re: [JBoss-dev] Apologies on Head is dead

2002-01-28 Thread Lennart Petersson
What about all of us that has already done the training and really loves to meet you again will there be any more kind of trainings, workshops, conferences bla bla bla in case my boss has some $$$ over to spend on me (now looking at my thin and slick powerbook... oh man i'm

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST

2002-02-07 Thread Lennart Petersson
JBoss: Save $$$ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 is official

2002-02-21 Thread Lennart Petersson
onsdagen den 20 februari 2002 kl 23.46 skrev Jeff Tulley: Marc, If JBoss moves to 1.4, it still would need to be backward compatible for at least a transition period. Consider those who want to run on an IBM JDK, or platforms that do not yet have 1.4 support. I would suggest not

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossOne T-Shirts...

2002-02-21 Thread Lennart Petersson
Put JBoss on your server... and your money on beer And Marc - please think of us european people that don't have a budget big enough to go transatlantic for free beer...make the t-shirts availble on-line (or i send you money and you send mee a t-shirt :) /Lennart

[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Tshirts at JavaOne FREE TRAINING

2002-02-25 Thread Lennart Petersson
On 02-02-26 0:17, marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK we have a winner, well actually we have two. JBoss: All your J2EE are belong to us JBoss: May the source be with you Thanks for all the great proposals. We chose based on we won and went with classic stuff. So we put an

Re: [JBoss-dev] NetBoot Demo: Full J2EE Container

2002-03-08 Thread Lennart Petersson
This is a really cool feature :) Will you in future handle local caches so not everything is downloaded each time or when you are off-line? /Lennart _ View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=10434