probably consider this even if
you decide to cache the result.
In my local (older) copy of this manual
The typical cost of walking this hierarchy is in the range 5 to 15
microseconds on a Pentium II @ 233 Mhz'
Although this has disappeared from the online version.
regards
Neale Swinnerton
it longer works with
JBoss. Regards, Simon
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net
with using ant's replace for the moment - it works fine for
this
Thanks for the help,
Jules
Neale Swinnerton wrote:
Try
!DOCTYPE project [
!ENTITY jsp_mappings SYSTEM jsp_mappings.xml
%jsp_mappings;
]
and then
jsp_mappings;
where you need
to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
Works for me, no problem.
$ lynx --version
Lynx Version 2.8.4rel.1 (17 Jul 2001)
libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.6b
Built on linux-gnu Mar 15 2002 02:09:19
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:39:42PM +0200, Tobias Frech wrote:
Hi!
If I use lynx to surf www.jboss.org then I get a 500 internal
-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
invalidate this code?
The assumption is that the volatile reference will be copied into a local
Exactly my point... :-)
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com
.
If you want to carry on flogging this horse, carry onI'm happy as is.
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
this horse, carry onI'm
happy as is.
:-)
:-)
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 16:38, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Thanks Scott.
I think the proxy code needs a good rewrite. It seems to use a lot
complicated code and array tricks because the writer decided not to use
the collections APIs.
If we can simplify this code, I think we should change our
.
-David
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
?
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
can't generate a subclass of an abstract
class, and this is where BCEL could take over.
If you want to look into writing a replacement with BCEL that would be
very cool (they do have a sample dynamic proxy generator).
-dain
danch wrote:
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
doesn't behave as documented) wrt
primitive types. There is a bug on bug parade (#4369208) which raises the
inconsistency javadoc - implementation.
The 'problem' is that e.g. Class.getName(Character.TYPE) returns char rather
than C
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote
/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
ifIsGetterMethod, ifIsSetterMethod - TODO: There is a big
overlap
* here with stuff in ejb - have a look.
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
?
Thanks in advance,
Neale Swinnerton
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:13:03AM -0600, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
I'm apply the createMETHOD patches from sourceforge.
As the patch says the verifier code is incomplete.
The 2.0 verifier does not exist, the patch allows
createMETHOD for 1.1
I
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Neale Swinnerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Guidance required EJB1.1/2.0
Hi,
I wrote that patch
Now Marc gave me r
to the verifier and the
container so the correct behaviour is observed
for EJB1.1
I tried to commit it, but I think the hotel where I'm
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
the work to the verifier and
the
container so the correct behaviour is observed
for EJB1.1
I tried to commit it, but I think the hotel where
I'm
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:47:16
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/beans - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:47:17
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/test - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:46:46
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:51:42
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/beans/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:54
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.86 +52 -3 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:53
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.76 +9 -1 jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:54
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler Util.java
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:55
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/test
ProxyCompilerUnitTestCase.java
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:52
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.100 +8 -1 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
;
/**
* ReadOnlyBean.java
*
*
* Created: Tue Jan 22 17:13:36 2002
*
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Neale Swinnerton/a
* @version
*
*
* @ejb:bean name=ProxyCompilerTest
* jndi-name=ProxyCompilerTest
* local-jndi-name=LocalProxyCompilerTest
:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Neale Swinnerton/a
* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
*/
public class ProxyImplementationFactory {
// Constants -
// Class Names
private final static String RUNTIME_CN
Yeah I can have a look at that...
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:36:31PM -0300, Francisco Reverbel wrote:
Hi Neale,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Neale Swinnerton wrote:
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:53
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy/compiler Proxies.java
FYIif you didn't see the CVS Updates..
I have just checked in the BCEL proxy compiler replacement. I ran the testsuite
before I applied my patch and the again after applying the tests and all was
OK(i.e. same as Chris's automated message).
So I committed, Since this was my first commit I
Look in the forums http://www.jboss.org/jive.jsp
Charles Goodwin said:
1) I'm looking for the Nukes development mailing list, is this the right
place?
2) If it is the right place, have you considered having a separate mailing
list for Nukes given the high traffic nature of this list and the
37 matches
Mail list logo