.
|
|
|Scott Stark
|Chief Technology Officer
|JBoss Group, LLC
|
|- Original Message -
|From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Cc: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
|<[EMAIL P
don't even think about it
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:36 PM
|To: Trevor Squires
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Multipule MBeanServers
|
|
|Do you know if ther
already submitted, but the spirit is definitely that we already won
"All you J2EE are belong to us" is a classic in that respect
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Ignacio Coloma
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:05 PM
|Cc: [EMAI
|JBoss
|We have already won.
yes, that is the spirit
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Daniel OConnor
| * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
| -* @version $Revision: 1.42 $
| +* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark
| +* @version $Revision: 1.43 $
| *
| * Revisions
| * 20010704
| @@ -45,8 +46,
I think we need to rewrite the service, it is in need of a big factorization
at this point.
Again I will try to do that with the new JBoss3.0 service/proxy
architectures. Stay tuned.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Cool. So JBoss is doing its own implementation of JMXRI? Excellent
|Great guys!
hey, where have you been living for the past 3 months? You took a job?
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
|No, there is no requirement that objects be stored in serialized form.
great, I will try to do that at the client proxy level then. It will be a
great example of detached invokers and externalized client interceptors.
Fuck, I need client interceptors in a BIG way. I will move that up my list
We are screwed until Juha & co put out a jmx-lite implementation out,
I don't think we need the full enchillada, juha, in fact I find the full
enchillada difficult to digest. I don't want all the services. Can we get
a "bare-bones" JBossMX or MBoss. So we can get JBoss on MBoss?
In clear, can
Again we can take care of this at the proxy (the one to JNP) level. I will
look into it, always wanted to
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:03 AM
|To: David Jencks; jboss-dev
|Subj
|JBossMX will be finished long before Sun do their
|maintenance release of jmxri (jmx 1.5) :-)
Get us the MBoss, the microkernel base for JBoss
I don't need or want the full services,
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
That is a problem with JNP.
JNP serializes everything by default. You must use the not serialized
object to bypass the serialization.
One thing I would like to look into is to reimplement the JNP service with
the new service architecture and custom client proxies of JBoss3.0 so we can
leverage
We should really get JBoss on 1.4 due to the speed up on reflection
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
|Sipe
|Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:08 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 is official
|
|
|I
|Its not a question of the expense of log.debug vs log.trace here.
|Both are used under a guard in this code and will only incur the
|cost of generating the log message string if logging is requested.
Ok so we don't create the Strings.
|The issue is that a lot of useful information is issued usi
I'll look into this,
the only 'real' optimization we need to be doing is the caching of the
ObjectName. The rest (switch and stuff) is code candy.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 200
will look today
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Jan Bartel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:40 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: Jules Gosnell; Greg Wilkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: ClassLoader problems with war contents
|
|
|Marc,
|
|The Jetty/JBoss
|Actually the RARDeployer registers RARDeployments with ServiceController so
|they participate in dependency management also.
right, good
|I changed Application and Container so EJB mbeans do this also: do you mind
|if I put it in before 3.0 beta? Do you want to wait until we are using
|jsr-77
don't do new objectname(string) it is a pig
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg
|Nitz
|Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 4:54 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
|jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/
@@
| * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
| * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark.
| * @author Bill Burke
| -* @version $Revision: 1.71 $
| +* @version $Revision: 1.72 $
| *
| * Revisions:
| *
| @@ -543,50 +543,41 @@
| * Handle a oper
|So it then delays startup but once the EJB is deployed it does not start
|the mbean. I'm I getting closer?
not really, you will hold up the deployment but since the dependency logic
is only present in the SARDeployer at the moment, you miss the deployment of
the ejb.
to do what you want you sho
yes clearly scott,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 4:03 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Package organization
|
|
|I'm not saying style is not important, but t
david
the classpath should not be used unless you go http installations try to
remove these dependencies.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 8:38 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|S
yes but do fix that if you can adrian,
thanks
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Adrian Brock
|Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:37 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] New Deployment Architecture Doesn't Ignore
|do
ation
| -* is pre-calculated.
| -*
| -* @see org.jboss.ejb.plugins.NoPassivationInstanceCache.java
| -* @see org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceCache
| -* @see org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityProxy
| -* @author Marc Fleury
| -* @author Bill Burke
| -* @author Scott Stark
| -* @ve
yes, this is the way it would work right now, and no it would not be the
intended behavior.
methinks you can submit a patch to the maindeployer that uses the
'findDeployer' call in the scans so we can weed out bullshit entries like
this one.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTE
it is classic but it is good,
man, it is all really good, it is going to be tough,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules Gosnell
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:21 PM
|Cc: 'marc fleury'; 'Jboss-De
you are right i will give greg read write
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules Gosnell
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:55 PM
|To: Greg Wilkins
|Cc: marc fleury; Dave Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oleg
That is really funny
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Hunter Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:22 AM
|To: marc fleury; JBoss Dev
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
|
|
|JBoss: All Your J2EE Are Belong To Us
|
|> From: Co
day, February 07, 2002 9:06
AMTo: 'Jboss-Development
([EMAIL PROTECTED])'Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev]
Web-Inf Deployment and MainDeployer
Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: marc fleury
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Februar
2002 20:55An
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 09:05:18
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/web AbstractWebContainer.java
Log:
Dr Jung's patch
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/AbstractWebContainer.java
Index: AbstractWebContainer.java
Title: Web-Inf Deployment and MainDeployer
RCS file:
/cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/AbstractWebContainer.java,v
retrieving revision 1.20 diff -r1.20 AbstractWebContainer.java 248c248 <
catch (Exception ignored) {throw new
DeploymentException(ignored.getMessage());} ---
|JBoss has already weathered a Slashdotting or two with no problems
yes being slashdotted was a non-event 30% CPU utilization at peak (Jetty as
webserver)
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
|1. Envision the future
|2. My WebOS.
|3. WebOS is here.
|4. WebOS is JBOSS.
|5. JBoss is the BOSS.
Ok on the topic of money:
we will be selling the tshirts, so while you don't pay for the conferences
you can really make a donation to JBoss in exchange for the tshirts.
That means we will print
I like it we would do
One Billion Served
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
|Fagerlund
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:33 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is really clever
we could do
front
back
reserved for the contributors :)
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung
|, Dr. Christoph
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:38 AM
|To: 'Jboss-Development ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'
|Subject:
|Yes, I remember three years ago when JavaOne was a cool
|conference, but those days are long gone now. So before I use up
|all my frequent flier miles, let me be sure I understand:
|
|1) You guys are giving a free two-day tech seminar near the
|JavaOne conference?
Yes this A FREE seminar, DEEP t
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 00:56:35
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvokerHA.java
Log:
Modifications to the war deployment of webinf/classes
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -1
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/JRMPInvoke
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 00:56:35
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/web AbstractWebContainer.java
Log:
Modifications to the war deployment of webinf/classes
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +6 -6 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/AbstractWebContainer.java
Index: Abstra
Feb 2002 07:48:49 - 1.10
+++ JRMPInvoker.java 7 Feb 2002 08:56:35 - 1.11
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.10 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.11 $
*
* Revisions:
* 2002/01/13: Sacha Labou
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 00:46:53
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvokerHA.java
Log:
Remove works now but we still have NPEs in the HA testsuite (?)
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -2
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/
|On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, marc fleury wrote:
|
|Make something out of "I robot. You boss." .. perhaps:
|
| Others robot. JBoss.
|
|native speakers: form up!
Yes we should not forget the peter fagerlunds of the world..
marcf
___
Jboss-d
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/07 00:08:39
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvokerHA.java
Log:
Let's see if you like this
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +5 -4
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/JRMPInvokerHA.java
Index: JRMPIn
FIXED
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:06 AM
|To: marc fleury; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: RE: RE: [JBoss-dev] something is broken...
|
|
|Ok webinf done, my eyes are tired
|
|I will
that being said, bill
I see the problem on the cluster relying on name and I can fix this easily.
I will try to do that
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:29 AM
|To: Jboss
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 23:51:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvokerHA.java
Log:
passing '' in the invoke() action Name
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/JRMPInvokerHA.java
I
- 1.3
+++ LocalInvoker.java 7 Feb 2002 07:48:49 - 1.4
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.4 $
*
*/
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
ObjectN
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 23:48:48
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EntityContainer.java
Log:
Fix of Entity invoke() method by delegating to super
Revision ChangesPath
1.64 +57 -201 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/EntityContainer.java
Index: EntityContainer.j
Feb 2002 20:59:27 - 1.9
+++ JRMPInvoker.java 7 Feb 2002 07:48:49 - 1.10
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.10 $
*
* Revisions:
* 2002/01/13: Sacha Labou
fyi
we are going to see a slew of newbie errors, like we used to but at least we
will settle. It makes the multiple invocations path a bit more complex.
Hey I have the right to change my mind oka?
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
in my office please.
so you bitch at me all day long and then I realize that the reason there is
the extra invocation code in the entity container is because you duplicate
the code to add 2 features "getCacheSize" and "flushCache".
dude, you're gonna get a spanking.
1- the feature is weak. We
---Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Dmitri Colebatch
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:35 PM
|To: marc fleury; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: RE: RE: [JBoss-dev] something is broken...
|
|
|I have no idea if my test is ok, but I
Ok,
thanks, it seems that the time we spend there is minimal either way,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Dmitri Colebatch
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:35 PM
|To: marc fleury; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: RE: RE
Ok webinf done, my eyes are tired
I will look briefly at the EC fix for switch instead of Sring
manipulation...
anyone knows the time it takes for either one?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Wednesday
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 22:01:28
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/web AbstractWebContainer.java
Log:
Support for the webinf classes at UCL level is coded in the WAR Deployer (the
abstract web container)
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +84 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss
ok so the webinf/classes of war have been added at the UCL level so that
whole of jboss sees it and that should take care of the spec.
Again we actually recommend that if you start pushing classes around you use
the jar and either put it under /webinf/lib or any level really.
marcf
___
06:00:15 1.9
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
* Takes a series of URL to watch, detects changes and calls the appropriate
Deployers
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.8 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
*
*
*/
@@ -310,
version $Revision: 1.5 $
*
* 20011211 marc fleury:
*
@@ -140,10 +140,6 @@
// The key url the deployment comes from
this.url = url;
- // Does it even exist?
- try { url.openStream().close(); }
- catch (Exception e) {throw
when we do
if (string.equals("this"))
else if (string.equals("that"))
how much slower is it than
switch (stringAsInt)
case THIS:
case THAT:
I assume a lot as String manipulation is just dead slow, but I could be
wrong, I really don't know.
marcf
___
LOL LOL LOL
-Original Message-
From: Pete Lavetsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:39 PM
To: marc fleury
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS @ JAVAONE TSHIRT CONTEST
JBoss:
We kick ass.
Pete
___
Jboss
following our little conversation with Jason, I understand the problem and
it is indeed me, i forgot to adapt the new entitycontainer to the new "int"
based switch as opposed to string manipulation.
will fix in the coming hours, fuck I need to fly tomorrow
Also I am almost done with the webi
yeah that's me alright :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:00 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] something is broken...
|
|
|I don't know about that... but p
but hurry up cause tomorrow I am leaving for Sydney (tomorrow night) so
hurry up
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:51 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev
If it is not you, blame it on me, it is very popular these days :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:46 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] something is broken...
|
|
thanks
man
marcf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian SondergaardSent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:36
PMTo: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. NetSubject:
[JBoss-dev] Fw: Advertising on Google
I thought you al
; Actually, I'll look at changing Jetty so that it can use JBoss's
|classloader
|> directly and then we don't need to bother with any delegation.
|>
|> But as I said, this is my quick response as I once again rush
|out the door...
|> I'll read everything again la
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:49:51
Removed: src/docs/pictures Thumbs.db
Log:
Sorry bout this, not sure where it came from but gone now.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:42:44
Added: src/docs/pictures ObjectFrontier-logo.gif
Log:
Oops, forgot the logo
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pictures/ObjectFrontier-logo.gif
<>
_
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:39:15
Modified:src/docs/pictures Thumbs.db
Log:
Update: included optimization for the picabanner included, changed
pop up for Oleg Nitz to say Ukraine and not Russia, made the link
to the forums page from Developer's site work, added a partner
my father just instructed me (he is in Spain) that the Oracle ad on google
is gone, I did check and indeed the "sponsored" ad is not there any longer.
I am not naive to believe Google would turn down good for open source
but did one of you guys flood google with request to exhaust the Oracle
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:39:14
Modified:src/docs/developers navigation.jsp
Log:
Update: included optimization for the picabanner included, changed
pop up for Oleg Nitz to say Ukraine and not Russia, made the link
to the forums page from Developer's site work, added a par
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:39:14
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
Update: included optimization for the picabanner included, changed
pop up for Oleg Nitz to say Ukraine and not Russia, made the link
to the forums page from Developer's site work, added a partn
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 15:39:13
Modified:src/docs/common picabanner.jsp picateam.jsp
Log:
Update: included optimization for the picabanner included, changed
pop up for Oleg Nitz to say Ukraine and not Russia, made the link
to the forums page from Developer's site work, ad
No it doesn't, the hashcode is based on the ObjectName,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:17 PM
|To: Jboss-Dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] doesn't JRMP optimizations break hot redeploymen
following trevor squires indication that the JBoss ObjectName hashcode
implementation will be really fast and the fact that new ObjectName is a
pig, I have cached the objectName in an int that gets passed around
(hashcode). All the layers are adapted to it.
This cuts the invocation time in half.
|Marc,
||Can you take out the optimizations you did for the JRMP?
|1. You've broken JRMPInvokerHA. Can you please run the testsuite
|before you
|check anything in?
I just commited the changes for the cluster stuff. Take it easy and with
another tone.
|2. Clustering depends on the full string n
for a fast switch (SPEEED) I removed the string based branching in the
container with type encoding as int as opposed to String.
Fast avoids any String no-nense
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 14:25:04
Modified:src/docs/common picabanner.jsp
Log:
Update: Link the Rackspace banner to the rackspace/jboss page:
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +22 -1 newsite/src/docs/common/picabanner.jsp
Index: picabanner.jsp
==
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 14:10:54
Modified:src/docs/pictures geraldbrose.jpg
Log:
Update: Resizing Gerald's picture
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +17 -115 newsite/src/docs/pictures/geraldbrose.jpg
<>
_
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 13:16:00
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb ProxyFactoryHA.java
Log:
Bill, stop bitching already. Here is the rest of it :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +55 -55jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/ProxyFactoryHA.java
Index: Pr
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.2 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*
* 2001/11/19: marcf
*
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@
protected transient long currentViewId = 0;
public static final HashSet colocation = new
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 13:15:59
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server JRMPInvokerHA.java
Log:
Bill, stop bitching already. Here is the rest of it :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +29 -28
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/JRMPInvo
--- JRMPInvoker.java 2002/02/06 19:30:57 1.8
+++ JRMPInvoker.java 2002/02/06 20:59:27 1.9
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.8 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
*
* Revisions:
* 2002/01/13: Sacha Labou
at gnu.org.
+*/
package org.jboss.ejb;
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark.
* @author Bill Burke
-* @version $Revision: 1.70 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.71 $
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 12:59:27
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle StatefulHandleImpl.java
Log:
The invocation branching is now based on int and a case switch (SPD)
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -2
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/han
1.3
+++ Invocation.java 2002/02/06 20:59:27 1.4
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
*
* @see
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.4 $
* Revisions:
*
* Revisions:
@@ -76,6 +76,16 @@
ARGUMEN
--- LocalInvoker.java 2002/02/06 18:27:51 1.2
+++ LocalInvoker.java 2002/02/06 20:59:27 1.3
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.2 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*
*/
@@ -111,7 +11
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- EntityProxy.java 2002/02/06 18:27:51 1.3
+++ EntityProxy.java 2002/02/06 20:59:27 1.4
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
/**
* An EJB entity bean proxy class.
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Mar
fixed
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:24 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Marc broke JRMPInvoker.java?
|
|
|I'm getting a ClassCastException: java.lang.Int
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 11:32:05
Modified:src/etc/conf/default log4j.properties
Log:
SPEED BABY SPEED
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/log4j.properties
Index: log4j.properties
==
+++ JRMPInvoker.java 2002/02/06 19:30:57 1.8
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.7 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.8 $
*
* Revisions:
* 2002/01/13: Sacha Labourey
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@
// Extract the ObjectN
it runs on my machine,
let me double check
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:24 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Marc broke JRMPInvoker.java?
|
|
|I'm gettin
User: mnf999
Date: 02/02/06 10:27:51
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle StatefulHandleImpl.java
Log:
Fix for caching the Object Name, SPD!
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +5 -3
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle/StatefulHandleImpl.java
In
+++ LocalInvoker.java 2002/02/06 18:27:51 1.2
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.2 $
*
*/
@@ -107,9 +107,10 @@
try
{
- // Extr
class.
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.2 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*
* 2001/11/19: marcf
*
@@ -67,9 +67,9 @@
*
* @throws NullPointerException Id may not be null.
*/
- public EntityProxy(String
1.70
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark.
* @author Bill Burke
-* @version $Revision: 1.69 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.70 $
*
* Revisions:
*
@@ -546,7 +546,6 @@
throw
:59 1.6
+++ JRMPInvoker.java 2002/02/06 18:27:50 1.7
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Marc Fleury
*
-* @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.7 $
*
* Revisions:
* 2002/01/13: Sacha Labourey
@@ -314,7 +31
PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.4 $
*
* 2001/11/19: marcf
*
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
//Local invoker reference, useful for optimization
public static Invoker getLocal() { return localInvoker;}
public static void setLocal
google
|
|
|> A shitty move.
|>
|> Fight fire with fire? There's no advert at the top when you
|> type in 'oracle'.
|>
|> c
|>
|> --- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> > do a search on JBoss on google and you will see that
|> > Oracle is i
e: [JBoss-dev] Oracle has bought JBoss on google
|
|
|> A shitty move.
|>
|> Fight fire with fire? There's no advert at the top when you
|> type in 'oracle'.
|>
|> c
|>
|> --- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> > do a search on JBoss on google a
do a search on JBoss on google and you will see that Oracle is investing
some marketing dollars in trying to get you to pay for their crap. The
sponsored link at the top is from Oracle. Can't believe these guys.
Man this is brutal industry and come to think of it there is more to come.
Finally
801 - 900 of 2487 matches
Mail list logo
