Ok, what can be done to solve that problem? In the end it is slow no
matter who's the problem...
/L
fredagen den 28 mars 2003 kl 12.34 skrev julien viet:
application is not slow, the bandwidth is small.
the box is all the time in iddle and the average time for
computing a page is 17 ms.
julien
Oh, in that case... forget my last post - Looking forward to a fast and
stable and not-always-changing site :)
by the way... at the moment it is not answering ;)
/L
torsdagen den 27 mars 2003 kl 16.30 skrev marc fleury:
is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running.
it is stable and fast
Please would it possible to have JBoss site stabilised? As it is
now you never know what it will be like next time surfing there and
forum messages that i sent yesterday is now suddenly gone and other
threads reports to be updated but they arent And are there really
620 guests on-li
If you have -server as default - would it be possible to catch some
errorcode from the java command and in that case give it a try without
-server? Most probably the JVM will support the -server option when
called from a .bat-file :)
/L
onsdagen den 26 mars 2003 kl 06.02 skrev Ian Duggan:
On
Thanks Stephen!!!
/L
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Coy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 4:15 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_0 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2
> As a consequence, we needed ant 1.5, so that has been incorporated as
> wel
Hi Sacha!
I think this sounds very good, because it is as you said a bit
confusing with all these files in deploy and conf. To group them
together in JMS/JMX/... subdiroctories i think would be a good solution
and also having them apart from users application deployments - like
deploy/system a
hm... 3.2 seems to work as you said, but 3.0 still bangs out on
xdoclet...
/L
tisdagen den 18 mars 2003 kl 12.43 skrev Stephen Coy:
I just got Branch_3_2 to build using this trick and with JAVA_HOME set
to /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home
rather than the /Library
that.
As has been previously mentioned, you can still build with 1.3.1 by
setting:
JAVA_HOME=
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home
Steve Coy
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Lennart Petersson wrote:
Was Mr. Jenk's fix only for head? Because I get p
he he he doesn´t sounds like it will be done :)
ok, will try to work around it anyway...
/L
måndagen den 17 mars 2003 kl 16.57 skrev David Jencks:
On 2003.03.17 09:36 Lennart Petersson wrote:
Was Mr. Jencks's fix only for head?
yes, the xdoclet versions used with 3.0 and 3.2 are truly ant
Was Mr. Jenk's fix only for head? Because I get problems when building
3.0/3.2 also. Here is output from 3.0:
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/Users/lepe/projects/JbossSources/jboss-3.0/common/output/gen-src
sourcepath is deprecated. the preferred way to design sources is via
tisdagen den 28 januari 2003 kl 02.38 skrev Fan Yang:
Hi, all,
I have a CMP transaction problem and can not find correct answer from
the forum.
I appreciate very much if anyone can give me a clue.
I have a stateless session bean and 2 CMP entity beans.
(trans-attributeall set to Required.)
Interesting...
Is this in standard JBoss or only when doing clustering? Any specific
JBoss version?
/L
fredagen den 20 december 2002 kl 07.24 skrev Bill Burke:
If you provide no provider url, the jnid client will do a multicast
broadcast to find jndi server.
Bill
--
You bet I am !!!
shhh... don't tell my boss :)
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss on j2me?
>
> Are any of you guys interested in working on
Hope it will... cause i will use it like that in a project :)
/L
onsdagen den 11 december 2002 kl 12.03 skrev Stefan Groschupf:
Hi,
some crazy guy had tried to run the jboss micro kernel on a j2me
device?
Should that be possible?
Thanks
Stefan
--
There sure is a problem with the homepage if you want to reach
non-developers - you know... those people earning more but doing less :)
I get that response a lot of time from our marketing/salesman/bla bla
bla people that they don't get what it really is from reading the
homepage... Sure a lot
torsdagen den 14 november 2002 kl 19.43 skrev marc fleury:
Plus the name sucks. Let's stir clear of 'cute names', PooledInvoker
clearly describes what it is.
amrc f
Isn't 'amrc' a cute name :)
/L
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: T
Looks good. Any news about nntp gateway?
/Love mail and news - hate browsers :)
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 kl 18.27 skrev marc fleury:
Guys,
I just created a bunch of forums in the development forums.
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
It's the ultimate solution of the build mess - simplify you know :)
/Lennart
måndagen den 7 oktober 2002 kl 14.55 skrev Sacha Labourey:
> It is a new undocummented feature. Cool, huh?
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
>> marc
Please have a look at patch 60070. Else the 3.2 release want boot up in
a minimal configuration.
/Lennart
torsdagen den 29 augusti 2002 kl 18.14 skrev Scott M Stark:
> The 3.2 beta release will be this Sat.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LL
No way... Not Senegal... Not since the kicked out Sweden :(
Go England Go !!! There migth still be one gold medal to Sweden :)
/Lennart
>man what a cup!
>
>Italy out... simone, yeah you can cry on my shoulder I know the feeling,
>
>Only Spain is exciting these days,
>
>But I really want Senegal
This is a really cool feature :)
Will you in future handle local caches so not everything is downloaded each time or
when you are off-line?
/Lennart
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=10434
On 02-02-26 0:17, "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK
>
> we have a winner, well actually we have two.
>
> JBoss:
> All your J2EE are belong to us
>
> JBoss:
> May the source be with you
>
> Thanks for all the great proposals. We chose based on "we won" and went with
> classic stuff
Put JBoss on your server...
and your money on beer
And Marc - please think of us european people that don't have a budget big enough to
go transatlantic for free beer...make the t-shirts availble on-line (or i send you
money and you send mee a t-shirt :)
/Lennart
___
onsdagen den 20 februari 2002 kl 23.46 skrev Jeff Tulley:
> Marc,
>If JBoss moves to 1.4, it still would need to be backward compatible
> for at least a transition period. Consider those who want to run on an
> IBM JDK, or platforms that do not yet have 1.4 support.
>
> I would suggest not
JBoss: Save $$$
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
What about all of us that has already done the training and really loves to meet
you again will there be any more kind of trainings, workshops, conferences bla
bla bla in case my boss has
some $$$ over to spend on me (now looking at my thin and slick powerbook... oh man i'm
bec
Den 2002-01-16 02:37:12 skrev Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I'm
>testing on MacOS X, which for our purposes is just another Unix flavor
>with an oddball GUI.
Hi hi hi I'm waiting for my PB TI to arrive... really longing for Unix with an
oddball GUI :)
/Lennart
__
Sound like a fucking stupid dummy question, but what the hell...
What is having the best performance?
1) To let the DB generate next key using some kind of IDENTITY/SEQUENCE function?
2) To do like we do today and many others i guess, something like the HIGH/LOW key
generator in Castor. We have
Ok, what i was looking for to hear about was the ability to support different databases
auto-generated columns. I see the problem with it, just wanted to check if anyone had
give it a try for some of the most popular databases...
Guess i will wait for JDBC 3.0 :)
/Lennart
Den 2002-01-11 19:23:44
Is this a feature supported by other J2EE servers? If so, we should have it also.
If not, should we be first? I'm now in a situation that i actually myself would like to
have that feature, but can't cover all the pros and cons with it. Any comments from
others already been this way, i mean there h
I definitely prefer the SAR kind of way to deploy services, even that i understand the
maintenance problem. Would it be possible to have a 'global' service.xml file to be
updated with new properties when a SAR is deployed with initial properties fetched
from SAR xml. Then this 'global' service.
: You will love it most of the time at least :)
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:06 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Off Topic: a Success-Story of a special kind
> Finally after 6
http://www.flashline.com/components/productsbyvendor.jsp?&vendorid=1376&sid=1007457247953-3563667752-51
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Pellow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:59 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS documentation availab
Ok, since you are on the dev list you can at least specify WHAT you have to change to
get it running.
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: "Arman Melkumyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] About JBoss3.0
Hello
This is interesting. I sent a mail back in the end of august titled 'What happend with
this thread: MarshalledObject + URLClassLoader = huge network traffic'. We where
looking at our network traffic and saw enormous traffic going on. Traced this down to
the codebase that was hanging around all
";>danch (Dan Christopherson)
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Bill Burke
- * @version $Revision: 1.19 $
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Lennart Petersson
+ * @version $Revision: 1.20 $
*
* Revisions:
*
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Michel de Groot
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Vinay Menon
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>danch (Dan Christopherson
- * @version $Revision: 1.14.2.5 $
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi!
The same goes for me - the training is a real success :-)
To refer to Edwards mail i think that it would be good to have some presentation
material from JBoss downloadable, because it is quite often that you have to hold a
short presentation of JBoss and its features and why it is a good be
Browsing the list i couldn't find any clear answers?
/Lennart
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/english
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
server classpath. It is
> always
> fixed to a single url for the web service.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lennart Petersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:40 AM
> S
ew Long(hash));
}
/Lennart
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/english
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Did it ever come to a conclusion? Where do we stand today? Does the network traffic
still get bloated by a somethimes rather large URL list?
/L
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/english
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/english
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Wholy shit what a lousy reader i am... I've completly missed the if(m_debug) line !!!
And that one was set to true in the version i have. So i was in a debug mode...
Sorry to disturb you all
/Lepe
- Original Message -
From: Lennart Petersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
();
...
...
}
*** End
Well ok, I do understand what is happening, i'm more interested in why it is done and
if there is a way to do it more efficient because in my testcase this
printStackTrace() is taking 65 % of the CPU time !!!
/Lennart
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/en
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark.
- * @version $Revision: 1.5.4.2 $
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Lennart Petersson.
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5.4.3 $
*
* Revisions:
*
Having exact same arguments as you :-(
But of couse you are having 2 processors - lucky you ;-)
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?
this:
> > 1. Solution 1
> > Add a toString to your PK (hack entitypk.j).
> > Also put your Cache size very high.
> > And your overager periods very high as well.
> > 2. Solution 2.
> > Set your cache size to 1/1 (min/max)
> >
> > Let us know please.
> &g
Hi! Problem 1 solved by you Vincent - that was the missing toString() method in the PK
class (Should that really matter, why are JBoss using it in the cache?).
Problem 2 was no problem, it was the old EJBDoclet passivate bug. The erroneous
component was not regenerated with a corrected EJBDocle
et. As it is now debugging is more of a wait then really productive :-(
Please, any ideas are welcome! I will complement with more detailes as my own tests
progress. This might be what make us Go! or Die!
/Lennart
===
Lennart Peters
from CVS the 2.4 branch.
/Lennart
===
Lennart Petersson
www.benefit.se/english
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- Original Message -
From: Schaefer, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:55 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Deployable service archives & new configuration system
>
> Do you want to contain the configuration file (service.xml)
> be part of
This is interesting... and i'am doing things in this direction :-) Ok, i've not been
thinking as far as you have done, how this would handle JBoss modules, but more on how
our own application could be extended with new services in an easy way.
I'm having this running today but on another EJB se
Hi Marc! I'm also interesting in any work you are doing regarding maintaining a wide
farm of JBoss servers. We are soon reaching production phase at our largest customer
(Postal offices in Norway - 350 local offices will have 1-2 jboss running... i will
soon make up a project description :-).
Go go go i think :-)
It seems like we are facing exact the same problems as those you where talking about.
We are also developing a kind of ERP system, targeted for the Retail market and as you
know thera are a lot of components involved in such a system (sales, stock, customer,
items, pr
Marc, as i said before i've not plenty of time besides catching up our deadlines...
BUT to have FAST cmp is cruisal for us since we are ONLY using cmp (and the system is
actually running - believe or not :-).
So i'm willing to do what i can on this subject!
/L
___
Are you kidding... i'm really interested in a comparision between them. Having a
customer that refuses to have JBoss on central server (will use weblogic) but do
accept jboss on all local offices (about 350 offices - JBoss is really rocking :-)
JavaOne - i'm having a discussion with my bosses t
- Original Message -
From: Chris Kimpton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: jboss daily test results
> Hi,
>
> Below is the format of the test results that I plan to publish to the
> jboss-dev list each day. B
true
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> A Simple Session Bean
> |> SimpleSessionBean
> |> site.SimpleSessionHome
> |> site.SimpleSession
> |> site.SimpleSessionBean
> |> Stateless
> |> Container
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> SimpleSessionBean
> |> *
> |>
> |> Required
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |>--
> |>--
> |>To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>
> |
> |
> |
>
>
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Lennart Petersson
> www.benefit.se/english
>
>
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
I'm also looking for a solution on this :-(
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: Jung , Dr. Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:46 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Sourceforge: WinCVS & SSH over Firewall ..
60 matches
Mail list logo