Look in the forums http://www.jboss.org/jive.jsp
Charles Goodwin said:
1) I'm looking for the Nukes development mailing list, is this the right
place?
2) If it is the right place, have you considered having a separate mailing
list for Nukes given the high traffic nature of this list and the
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 16:38, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Thanks Scott.
I think the proxy code needs a good rewrite. It seems to use a lot
complicated code and array tricks because the writer decided not to use
the collections APIs.
If we can simplify this code, I think we should change our
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
invalidate this code?
The assumption is that the volatile reference will be copied into a local
Exactly my point... :-)
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com
.
If you want to carry on flogging this horse, carry onI'm happy as is.
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
this horse, carry onI'm
happy as is.
:-)
:-)
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development
-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Works for me, no problem.
$ lynx --version
Lynx Version 2.8.4rel.1 (17 Jul 2001)
libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.6b
Built on linux-gnu Mar 15 2002 02:09:19
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:39:42PM +0200, Tobias Frech wrote:
Hi!
If I use lynx to surf www.jboss.org then I get a 500 internal
heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
This sf.net
with using ant's replace for the moment - it works fine for
this
Thanks for the help,
Jules
Neale Swinnerton wrote:
Try
!DOCTYPE project [
!ENTITY jsp_mappings SYSTEM jsp_mappings.xml
%jsp_mappings;
]
and then
jsp_mappings;
where you need
to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:47:16
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/beans - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:47:17
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/test - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:46:46
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 08:51:42
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/beans/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:54
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.86 +52 -3 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:53
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.76 +9 -1 jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:54
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler Util.java
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:55
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/proxycompiler/test
ProxyCompilerUnitTestCase.java
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:52
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
o Replace org.jboss.proxy.compiler with a BCEL implementation
o Add a test for this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.100 +8 -1 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
;
/**
* ReadOnlyBean.java
*
*
* Created: Tue Jan 22 17:13:36 2002
*
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Neale Swinnerton/a
* @version
*
*
* @ejb:bean name=ProxyCompilerTest
* jndi-name=ProxyCompilerTest
* local-jndi-name=LocalProxyCompilerTest
:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Neale Swinnerton/a
* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
*/
public class ProxyImplementationFactory {
// Constants -
// Class Names
private final static String RUNTIME_CN
Yeah I can have a look at that...
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:36:31PM -0300, Francisco Reverbel wrote:
Hi Neale,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Neale Swinnerton wrote:
User: neales
Date: 02/03/07 09:03:53
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy/compiler Proxies.java
FYIif you didn't see the CVS Updates..
I have just checked in the BCEL proxy compiler replacement. I ran the testsuite
before I applied my patch and the again after applying the tests and all was
OK(i.e. same as Chris's automated message).
So I committed, Since this was my first commit I
to the verifier and the
container so the correct behaviour is observed
for EJB1.1
I tried to commit it, but I think the hotel where I'm
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
the work to the verifier and
the
container so the correct behaviour is observed
for EJB1.1
I tried to commit it, but I think the hotel where
I'm
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
?
Thanks in advance,
Neale Swinnerton
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:13:03AM -0600, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
I'm apply the createMETHOD patches from sourceforge.
As the patch says the verifier code is incomplete.
The 2.0 verifier does not exist, the patch allows
createMETHOD for 1.1
I
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Neale Swinnerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Guidance required EJB1.1/2.0
Hi,
I wrote that patch
Now Marc gave me r
ifIsGetterMethod, ifIsSetterMethod - TODO: There is a big
overlap
* here with stuff in ejb - have a look.
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
doesn't behave as documented) wrt
primitive types. There is a bug on bug parade (#4369208) which raises the
inconsistency javadoc - implementation.
The 'problem' is that e.g. Class.getName(Character.TYPE) returns char rather
than C
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote
can't generate a subclass of an abstract
class, and this is where BCEL could take over.
If you want to look into writing a replacement with BCEL that would be
very cool (they do have a sample dynamic proxy generator).
-dain
danch wrote:
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
?
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
.
-David
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
it longer works with
JBoss. Regards, Simon
--
regards
Neale Swinnerton
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
probably consider this even if
you decide to cache the result.
In my local (older) copy of this manual
The typical cost of walking this hierarchy is in the range 5 to 15
microseconds on a Pentium II @ 233 Mhz'
Although this has disappeared from the online version.
regards
Neale Swinnerton
37 matches
Mail list logo
