Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
configurations in the distribution I thought Marc nixed this idea -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-27 Thread Scott M Stark
] To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:37 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution I have this working... running testsuite now. This was a little bit trickier than I had first thought. The tricky bit is how

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Scott M Stark wrote: If run.bat and run.sh work as before for the default file based build/output and the testsuite runs then check it in. This is correct. I had to make one change to the testsuite, it was uing jboss.system.home, and should have used ServerConfig.getServerHomeDir(). Here it

RE: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-26 Thread Bill Burke
. Or is this too confusing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution No, he thought David's idea

[JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Scott M Stark
Rather than making less use of the configuration file sets, we need to make more. We should be shipping with at least 3 configs: 1. A minimal config that is just the JMX spine, logging, and JNDI. No ejbs, JAAS security mgr, servlets, etc. 2. A basic J2EE config maybe a little leaner than our

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Jason Dillon
Agreed. Did we ever decide on how to reorg things? I think that short term that if we go with Hirams idea of server(s) directory and leave lib, client and bin out on top then we can implement this soon. I like the idea of having a per server config lib dir to keep core libs seperated from

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Scott M Stark
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution Agreed. Did we ever decide on how to reorg things? I think that short term that if we go with Hirams idea of server(s) directory and leave lib, client and bin out on top then we can implement this soon. I like the idea

RE: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Bill Burke
I thought Marc nixed this idea -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution That is fine

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Scott M Stark
Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:28 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution I thought Marc nixed this idea -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark

Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution

2002-02-25 Thread Jason Dillon
in the distribution I thought Marc nixed this idea -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution That is fine