configurations in the distribution
I thought Marc nixed this idea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
I have this working... running testsuite now. This was a little bit
trickier than I had first thought. The tricky bit is how
Scott M Stark wrote:
If run.bat and run.sh work as before for the default file
based build/output and the testsuite runs then check it in.
This is correct. I had to make one change to the testsuite, it was uing
jboss.system.home, and should have used ServerConfig.getServerHomeDir().
Here it
. Or is this too confusing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
No, he thought David's idea
Rather than making less use of the configuration file sets, we need
to make more. We should be shipping with at least 3 configs:
1. A minimal config that is just the JMX spine, logging, and JNDI.
No ejbs, JAAS security mgr, servlets, etc.
2. A basic J2EE config maybe a little leaner than our
Agreed. Did we ever decide on how to reorg things? I think that short
term that if we go with Hirams idea of server(s) directory and leave
lib, client and bin out on top then we can implement this soon.
I like the idea of having a per server config lib dir to keep core libs
seperated from
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
Agreed. Did we ever decide on how to reorg things? I think that short
term that if we go with Hirams idea of server(s) directory and leave
lib, client and bin out on top then we can implement this soon.
I like the idea
I thought Marc nixed this idea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
That is fine
Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
I thought Marc nixed this idea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
in the distribution
I thought Marc nixed this idea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
That is fine
10 matches
Mail list logo