[JBoss-dev] JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today

2006-06-27 Thread Ryan Campbell
Title: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today We are upgrading the JIRA instance to a faster box, and the latest version of JIRA. The main purpose of this upgrade is reduced downtime and improved performance. JIRA will go down at 8 PM EDT. It will remain offline until the migration is

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-compatibility-matrix Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-compatibility-matrix?log=log20060627085157 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:249: The following error occurred while executing this line:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 integrated

2006-06-27 Thread Bill Burke
We could use declare-error AOP pointcuts to make sure that projects that require JDK 1.4 backward compatibility don't use JDK 5 libraries. Ruel Loehr wrote: We won't change it for the whole build. Some modules are required to be built to a 1.4 specification so that we can backport changes

[JBoss-dev] JSF 1.2 integrated

2006-06-27 Thread Stan Silvert
There are some outstanding Tomcat bugs that affect a few JSF 1.2 features, but most JSF 1.2 apps should work with JBoss 5 now. See http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossWithJSFCDDL for details. Stan Silvert JBoss, adivision of RedHat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Tomcat

[JBoss-dev] jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5 Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5?log=log20060627105829 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-cache-testsuite-140 Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-cache-testsuite-140?log=log20060627155748 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-JBossCache.xml:86: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4 Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4?log=log20060627173726 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml in the 4.0 branch? Scott Stark VP Architecture Technology JBoss, a division of Red Hat Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done

[JBoss-dev] What is this repository.jboss.com/jboss/artifacts content?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
What is this subset of jbossas content for? [EMAIL PROTECTED] jboss]$ ls artifacts/4.0.4.GA/lib/ CVS/ jboss-saaj.jar jboss-aspect-library.jar jboss-system.jar jboss-common-client.jarjboss-transaction.jar jboss-common-jdbc-wrapper.jar jboss.jar

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Stan Silvert
It was needed for the MyFaces upgrade. Stan Silvert JBoss, a division of RedHat [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 7:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev]

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix Build Failed

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060627192851 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:212: The following error occurred while executing this line:

Re: [JBoss-dev] What is this repository.jboss.com/jboss/artifactscontent?

2006-06-27 Thread Ryan Campbell
These are jars required by portal. Where should they go instead? I also see repository.jboss.com/jbossas/core-libs which is probably the convention which should have been used here, no? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060627185741 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:249: The following error occurred while executing this line:

Re: [JBoss-dev] What is thisrepository.jboss.com/jboss/artifactscontent?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
Right. There jbossas/core-libs is where this should be. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Campbell Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:39 PM To: JBoss.org development list; Rali Genova Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
Then this should be coming in as a dependency from the myfaces component, not a jbossas build-thirdparty.xml dependency. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Silvert Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:23 PM To: JBoss.org development list;

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-compatibility-matrix Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-compatibility-matrix?log=log20060627195350 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:249: The following error occurred while executing this line:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Stan Silvert
OK, I guess I'm confused. When we started using the repository someone broke out all the jars that MyFaces needs and put them in build-thirdparty.xml. (All except jstl.jar?) So that's the pattern I followed. However, it doesn't appear that anything except MyFaces relies on jars such as

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
Only the top component that needs to be integrated should be in build-thirdparty.xml. Anything else added was due to the same confusion you have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Silvert Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:39 PM

[JBoss-dev] jbossweb build.103 Build Successful

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb?log=log20060627215953Lbuild.103 BUILD COMPLETE-build.103Date of build:06/27/2006 21:59:53Time to build:35 minutes 51 seconds Unit Tests: (0) Total Errors and

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Stan Silvert
Got itI think. So right now in the repository we have: apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/myfaces-api.jar apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/myfaces-impl.jar apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/jstl.jar What happens when a new component wants to use jstl.jar? How would anyone easily know that jstl already exists in the

[JBoss-dev] JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today)

2006-06-27 Thread Ryan Campbell
Title: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today) This is complete; the JIRA server is online. Please report any issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . _ From: Ryan Campbell Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:15 AM To: The Core;

[JBoss-dev] jbossweb-windows build.37 Build Successful

2006-06-27 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb-windows?log=log20060627223553Lbuild.37 BUILD COMPLETE-build.37Date of build:06/27/2006 22:35:53Time to build:46 minutes 48 seconds Unit Tests: (0) Total Errors

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-27 Thread Scott M Stark
If jstl is not part of the myfaces dist it should not be bundled with it. If it is part of the myfaces dist but could be used elsewhere then it could be separated if there is such a usecase. If it is part of the myfaces dist I would not unbundled jstl until there is an independent need for jstl.