I was experiencing a similar issue with 2.4. If I didn't specify a default
datasource in standardjaws.xml, I was getting a null pointer exception. I
*did* specify a valid datasource in my jaws.xml.
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.4 release(s) & jaws.xml problem
>
>
> Yes, I think something is broken there. Do you know if the same
> will happen
> (no default ds & null pointer) in the main cvs branch?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Jul
All of this entity contention is an optional thing we will have to
explicitly "turn on", correct?
I prefer to have the container create multiple instances of identical
entities (same home, same pk) and handle the concurrency in the database.
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Let's finish and stabilize the 2.* series. This will need to go
> in the new
> 3.* series where we can rethink locking and clustering. A
> locking that will
> support distribution and
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> IMHO, for 99.999% of uses an XML over a zipped HTTP stream will be
> reasonable.
I agree. We have seen 50% improvements in speed of large result sets that is
gzipped before transmis
Windows 2000, P3-900
[Default] JBoss pre-3.0 [RABBIT-HOLE] Started in 0m:18s
(includes the 5 sec hypersonic db delay)
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:08 PM
> To: JBoss Dev
>
Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql out
of the box. Should be cool though, not only cause you will be able to
download, hot install, *run* not just an app server (which is impressive
enough), but an entire DBMS and working applications. Mui cool, push
this idea from
WinZip 8.1 allows you to click on a file to edit it. When you are done,
it prompts you whether you want to update the file in the archive. The
only braindead thing is it only works with files in the root directory
of the archive.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto
Options A, B, C or D don't have anything to do with this deadlock scenario that you
refer to. I am assuming you are talking about an app server deadlock since you don't
mention a specific database deadlock condition.
Most "advanced" servers (WebLogic, WebSphere, etc.) allow the same Bean instan
I am deployed on jBoss 2.4.6, and I changed to MethodOnlyEJBLock to prevent some
spurious ApplicationDeadlockExceptions that occur. Is it a requirement on the 2.4
version of the server to use commit option B as well?
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL
Use IDEA, and let it find usages for you!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Whats with method attributes
> read-only and
Borland uses a program called smartagent to act as a broadcast point on a
subnet. This agent asks as a discovery mechanism for both the client *and*
servers. When an agent needs to "hop" subnets, it is required that the agent
have a list of at least one other agent on the other subnet. They also
i
Bill,
Since there is little documentation regarding locking, can you clear up a
question?
Don't take this as a slam. All of the major commercial vendors have
discovered that it is problematic to perform serialization of client access
to EJB's in the container. [We can expound upon this, if you f
Sybase does not support "select for update".
Standard SQL dictates (and Sybase supports) a "select at serializable"
mechanism which will change the isolation level on the transaction to
serializable.
Of course, Oracle does not support serializable isolation.
-jim
> -Original Message-
sible.
http://manuals.sybase.com/onlinebooks/group-as/asg1250e/sqlug
-jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:57 PM
> To: 'James Cook'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason,
Is it documented anywhere, exactly how to check out and build:
1. Current Head (3.0)
2. Latest build of 2.4?
thanks,
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Jason Dillon
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:34 PM
> To: Sco
We use an appender to track any ERROR level messages from the jBoss server and/or our
application. This is done so our system administrators can be alerted to any
ERROR-level logging concerns. There are plenty of times when an Application Exception
thrown by the EJB tier doesn't warrant adminis
I usually end up creating a "disabled" directory under the deploy
directory. In here I put the clustering xml along with the JBossMQ
stuff, and the HSQL DB items. Perhaps this kind of packaging would make
it clearer that these services exist, but are simply not activated.
At some point someone wi
Similar issue with applications like Velocity. These apps depend
(somewhat misguidedly) on an unpacked deployment of web apps. This is
because they need to read "web pages" in order to parse them for tag
substitution. AFAIK, they do not delegate a class to do the reading for
them.
jim
> -Ori
Searching in the jBoss forums returns no results for me (PPC; Mac;
Yellodog Linux; Mozilla 1.2). Anyone else having this problem?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No
What will JDK 1.4's non-blocking i/o do for the scalability of a single
machine when the appserver takes full advantage?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
The following comment is found in TxCapsule.registerSynchronization() and I believe it
is causing a problem in our application.
// OSH: EntitySynchronizationInterceptor bug is fixed long ago,
// and since nobody seems to get the warning anymore it should
// be safe to be JTA-conformant.
// In ca
In JBoss RH, I am experiencing a potential bug when specifying a library in my EJB
jar's manifest file. In Installer.java, the resolveLibraries method correctly parses
the classpath defined in the manifest.
In Installer.resolveLibraries, my baseURL is set to
file:/E:/jboss-3.0.0alpha/deploy/bi
JDBC 3.0 is supposed to expose an api for the auto-generated fields in a
table. For JAWS integration, it will prob. be better to wait for this.
- jim
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j
I doubt that there is a technique for guaranteeing enterprise unique UIDs in
Java.
jim
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Neville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Object Unique Id Generator
> There are a series of
Is there a need for including additional classes on the system classpath if the
ClassPathExtension MLet is used?
jim
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-416920 ] Don't use
According to the following documentation, jBoss includes the ability to deploy
library archives in an ear file.
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch10s71.html#N37d7
"On deployment one - common - classloader is created. This classloader will get
all archives in its classpath that are refere
TECTED]>cc: Subject: RE:
[JBoss-dev] Bug: Ear deployment - Support ClassesHi,> -Original Message->
From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> > According to the
following documentation, jBoss includes the > ability to deploy>
library archives in an ear file.> > ht
So the manifest in the EJB's (which I saw is sorta doc'd in the EJB spec) can
indicate a classpath. When jBoss (and hopefully, any J2EE-compliant container)
encounters these classes, they get added to the current classpath. Great! This
allows a developer to include a set of shared classes only onc
There are entire languages built up around the processing of rules. Progress is
one. Most of us write the code to validate objects in our system by using
methods. Rules-based engines aford the opportunity to externalize these rules.
BTW, rules engines have become "in vogue" the past year and will
I think it shouldn't matter which server originated the handle. It should
always work as long as a container is running the bean somewhere. This is
what the robust containers do, so should jBoss.
Sachay and Stacy have proposed/implemented some ideas for how to achieve
high-availablity. This (or a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> I see two problems with how web containers are integrated into
> JBoss due to the lack
> of a web container integration interface/mbean. The first problem
> is that there is no JBoss
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The point I'm trying to make is that with CMPs current state, we should not
> be encouraging people to have tuned-updates turned off because they will
> most certainly run into deadlock problems if they have more than one
> con
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> It's very easy to get deadlock.
>
> Table Apple:
> apple_prim_key Number
> apple_data1 varchar(256)
> apple_data2 Number
>
> Table Pear:
> pear_prim_key Number
> pear_apple_id Number (in
Let's just say your not quite as nauseous as I am reading this crap.
Why not check the CVS log and flog the committer privately. Although I hope
he/she has thicker skin than I would.
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleur
The spec doesn't say anything...it's up to container implementation.
I kind of like the optimization where you can limit the number of beans
prefetched since it seems like it would be trivial to setup and implement.
Hadn't seen any other servers offer this configuration option either...
I wouldn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> do me favor, stop answering wrongly questions on jboss-user (I was reading
> one of your posts the other day) and certainly don't tell me what
> you think
> or don't think on jboss-dev.
he ejb
> and servlet containers (I'm thinking JAAS).
>
> This would certainly decrease the amount of work I
> have to do and mean that the majority of this code was
> reused with all servlet containers leading to it being
> better maintained and making it easier to integrate
I am also interested in the topic of template engines, esp. those driven by
XML models. Can you provide links to any of these "opensource" offerings?
thanks,
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
> Walters
-snip
> At this point I
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> really the problem with the CPE is that it *lists* the directory and adds
> all the file. The list doesn't work with the http server directory and
> afaik there is no way for us to list a remote directory. The only
> workar
I assume that tests are run from the HEAD branch? If so, I would also assume
that the current 2.2.2 (stable?) release also suffered quite a few
errors/failures?
jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturda
WebLogic was the only container (besides jBoss) to serialize access to entity
beans in the container. They decided to remove this for a couple reasons:
1. Throughput sufferred.
2. The developer began to rely on this serialization in their coding practices.
I would hope that entity serialization
> Really cool stuff! This can be easily implemented in CMP/JAWS since JAWS
> keeps the old state alive.
>
Bill,
Before digging into source, can you answer these questions? We have a need
to identify which fields have changed in our state objects for an audit
trail. I am gathering information rega
43 matches
Mail list logo
