Is there a need for including additional classes on the system classpath if the
ClassPathExtension MLet is used?
jim
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-416920 ] Don't use
According to the following documentation, jBoss includes the ability to deploy
library archives in an ear file.
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch10s71.html#N37d7
"On deployment one - common - classloader is created. This classloader will get
all archives in its classpath that are
E:
[JBoss-dev] Bug: Ear deployment - Support ClassesHi, -Original Message-----
From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] According to the
following documentation, jBoss includes the ability to deploy
library archives in an ear file. http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch10s71.
There are entire languages built up around the processing of rules. Progress is
one. Most of us write the code to validate objects in our system by using
methods. Rules-based engines aford the opportunity to externalize these rules.
BTW, rules engines have become "in vogue" the past year and
I think it shouldn't matter which server originated the handle. It should
always work as long as a container is running the bean somewhere. This is
what the robust containers do, so should jBoss.
Sachay and Stacy have proposed/implemented some ideas for how to achieve
high-availablity. This (or
- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The point I'm trying to make is that with CMPs current state, we should not
be encouraging people to have tuned-updates turned off because they will
most certainly run into deadlock problems if they have more than one
concurrent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
It's very easy to get deadlock.
Table Apple:
apple_prim_key Number
apple_data1 varchar(256)
apple_data2 Number
Table Pear:
pear_prim_key Number
pear_apple_id Number
The spec doesn't say anything...it's up to container implementation.
I kind of like the optimization where you can limit the number of beans
prefetched since it seems like it would be trivial to setup and implement.
Hadn't seen any other servers offer this configuration option either...
I
that the majority of this code was
reused with all servlet containers leading to it being
better maintained and making it easier to integrate
new servlet containers
Are we on the same wavelength ?
Jules
--- James Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From
I am also interested in the topic of template engines, esp. those driven by
XML models. Can you provide links to any of these opensource offerings?
thanks,
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
Walters
-snip
At this point I would
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
really the problem with the CPE is that it *lists* the directory and adds
all the file. The list doesn't work with the http server directory and
afaik there is no way for us to list a remote directory. The only
workaround
I assume that tests are run from the HEAD branch? If so, I would also assume
that the current 2.2.2 (stable?) release also suffered quite a few
errors/failures?
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
WebLogic was the only container (besides jBoss) to serialize access to entity
beans in the container. They decided to remove this for a couple reasons:
1. Throughput sufferred.
2. The developer began to rely on this serialization in their coding practices.
I would hope that entity serialization
I was experiencing a similar issue with 2.4. If I didn't specify a default
datasource in standardjaws.xml, I was getting a null pointer exception. I
*did* specify a valid datasource in my jaws.xml.
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.4 release(s) jaws.xml problem
Yes, I think something is broken there. Do you know if the same
will happen
(no default ds null pointer) in the main cvs branch?
--jason
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, James Cook wrote:
I was experiencing a similar issue with 2.4. If I didn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Let's finish and stabilize the 2.* series. This will need to go
in the new
3.* series where we can rethink locking and clustering. A
locking that will
support distribution and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
IMHO, for 99.999% of uses an XML over a zipped HTTP stream will be
reasonable.
I agree. We have seen 50% improvements in speed of large result sets that is
gzipped before transmission.
Windows 2000, P3-900
[Default] JBoss pre-3.0 [RABBIT-HOLE] Started in 0m:18s
(includes the 5 sec hypersonic db delay)
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:08 PM
To: JBoss Dev
Borland uses a program called smartagent to act as a broadcast point on a
subnet. This agent asks as a discovery mechanism for both the client *and*
servers. When an agent needs to hop subnets, it is required that the agent
have a list of at least one other agent on the other subnet. They also
Bill,
Since there is little documentation regarding locking, can you clear up a
question?
Don't take this as a slam. All of the major commercial vendors have
discovered that it is problematic to perform serialization of client access
to EJB's in the container. [We can expound upon this, if you
Sybase does not support select for update.
Standard SQL dictates (and Sybase supports) a select at serializable
mechanism which will change the isolation level on the transaction to
serializable.
Of course, Oracle does not support serializable isolation.
-jim
-Original Message-
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:57 PM
To: 'James Cook'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] what DBMS's support select for update?
What is the syntax in Sybase? Or did I miss the point
Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql out
of the box. Should be cool though, not only cause you will be able to
download, hot install, *run* not just an app server (which is impressive
enough), but an entire DBMS and working applications. Mui cool, push
this idea
Searching in the jBoss forums returns no results for me (PPC; Mac;
Yellodog Linux; Mozilla 1.2). Anyone else having this problem?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No
Options A, B, C or D don't have anything to do with this deadlock scenario that you
refer to. I am assuming you are talking about an app server deadlock since you don't
mention a specific database deadlock condition.
Most advanced servers (WebLogic, WebSphere, etc.) allow the same Bean
I am deployed on jBoss 2.4.6, and I changed to MethodOnlyEJBLock to prevent some
spurious ApplicationDeadlockExceptions that occur. Is it a requirement on the 2.4
version of the server to use commit option B as well?
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
shameless plug
Use IDEA, and let it find usages for you!
/shameless plug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Whats with method
JDBC 3.0 is supposed to expose an api for the auto-generated fields in a
table. For JAWS integration, it will prob. be better to wait for this.
- jim
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason,
Is it documented anywhere, exactly how to check out and build:
1. Current Head (3.0)
2. Latest build of 2.4?
thanks,
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:34 PM
To: Scott M
I usually end up creating a disabled directory under the deploy
directory. In here I put the clustering xml along with the JBossMQ
stuff, and the HSQL DB items. Perhaps this kind of packaging would make
it clearer that these services exist, but are simply not activated.
At some point someone
Similar issue with applications like Velocity. These apps depend
(somewhat misguidedly) on an unpacked deployment of web apps. This is
because they need to read web pages in order to parse them for tag
substitution. AFAIK, they do not delegate a class to do the reading for
them.
jim
What will JDK 1.4's non-blocking i/o do for the scalability of a single
machine when the appserver takes full advantage?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
The following comment is found in TxCapsule.registerSynchronization() and I believe it
is causing a problem in our application.
// OSH: EntitySynchronizationInterceptor bug is fixed long ago,
// and since nobody seems to get the warning anymore it should
// be safe to be JTA-conformant.
// In
WinZip 8.1 allows you to click on a file to edit it. When you are done,
it prompts you whether you want to update the file in the archive. The
only braindead thing is it only works with files in the root directory
of the archive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
34 matches
Mail list logo
