Bill Burke wrote:
Man you crack me up sometimes :)
We used to have a running joke about support calls for O2K. I'm sorry, but
you're just too stupid to use our product. Please cd to /usr/local and
rm -rf o2k.
Bill
I think we've _all_ wanted to say that one time or another!
-danch
. The knowledge expertise on these lists is remarkable, and I
learn new stuff daily.
-dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Juha-P Lindfors
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY
on 1-08-16 09.58, Peter Antman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my dream is a XML based routing messaging infrastructure build
around or into JBoss and JBossMQ.
I been thinking of implementing a module that is enabling the managment of a
distributed colocated execution area, in effect a routing
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote:
My opinion of it back 5 months ago was that it was not really even close to
usable yet. Have things changed radically since then?
Well, I think the emergence of UDDI/WSDL gave them a boost to speed
up, and all the core specs seem to
On 16 Aug, Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. JBoss should begin by focusing on the specs publishes by the java
community process, such as:
JAXM (XML messaging)
JAXR (XML registry)
JAXRPC (XML RPC)
Just for the record:
JSR:
67 Java APIs for XML Messaging 1.0 (public review with ea
Just a quick question. Is the preference to use ebXML for web services
instead of SOAP? In addition to SOAP? What about the efforts to wrap
IBM/Apache's SOAP stuff in MBeans?
The reason I ask is that I saw a technical demonstration of ebXML and the
XML-One conference in London about 5 months
Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan -
Blue Lotus Software
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL
programming.
-dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more
|Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more?
yes but not everybody lives in the we see technology for what it really is
sphere.
Along these lines XML for me is just ASCII externalized tree structures I
am serious... we are seriously hype resistent because of that tough
Lindfors
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote:
Just a quick question. Is the preference to use ebXML for web services
instead of SOAP?
No, ebXML uses SOAP as its
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, marc fleury wrote:
|Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more?
yes but not everybody lives in the we see technology for what it really is
sphere.
And I would like to state for the record that just because it is XML
doesn't necessarily mean its
|And I would like to state for the record that just because it is XML
|doesn't necessarily mean its human readable ;-)
sure does :)
I can read XML in the flesh, everyone can... come on now.
marcf
|
|-- Juha
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
|Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more?
yes but not everybody lives in the we see technology for what it
really is
sphere.
Along these lines XML for me is just ASCII externalized tree
structures
: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:50 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
|
|
| |Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more?
|
| yes but not everybody lives in the we see technology for what it
| really is
| sphere.
|
| Along these lines
Of marc
fleury
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
no listen at least this time we can communicate about the wheel, did you
ever try explaining CORBA to your mama? well *you* probably did,
being an ex
ORBIX2000
on 1-08-16 00.58, Juha-P Lindfors at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I would like to state for the record that just because it is XML
doesn't necessarily mean its human readable ;-)
The big Woow here as i seen it is that XML is machine read'able
This in effect means ??? !!! -heh void()
back to being the wizard of oz... I think you are the lion, rickard was the
tin-man, Scott is dorothy... I am the small bald guy hiding behind the
curtain making all that big noise...
scott is dorothy... *chuckle* =) Where is toto or the straw man?
--jason
17 matches
Mail list logo
