On 2010-02-24 17:27, Nathan Fritz wrote:
Perhaps some client driven pep is in order for showing a user facing
unique name for individual sessions.
Based on current usage of resource, most probably description field from
geoloc would be a nice replacement.
--
Maciek
xmpp:mache...@uaznia.net
On Saturday 24 of October 2009 05:30:01 cw wrote:
SEND: body rid='296594347' xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/httpbind'
sid='6b52c7a7'presence/iq type='get' to='t...@computer'
id='os1'onlinestatus xmlns='computer:contact'//iq/body
onlinestatus xmlns='computer:contact'/ is not a standard
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jun 3 21:51:37 2009, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
Is the list also available in XMPP univers?
A pubsub node?
Need an XMPP account? Just find one using our PubSub system. All you
need to get started is an XMPP account...
How about SASL Anonymous?
--
Maciek
Fabio Forno wrote:
2009/3/20 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be:
Hi, does anybody know a client supporting pep for avatars.
Psi should support it. Perhaps Gajim too?
Well, so there is something wrong since I see nothing. Let's go to bug
hunting!
I'm afraid Psi implementation didn't update
jlist wrote:
Speaking of presence messages, is there a way to tell from these
messages (or by any other means) that a buddy has gone off-line?
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-07.html#rfc.section.4.7.1
Basically, you send presence type='unavailable'/
--
Maciek
Julien Genestoux wrote:
The goal here is to be able to create users with the component
(only...), so how can clients connect to my component without being
authenticated to my server first?
Hmm this sounds a bit strange..
How does this work with HTTP registration right now?
--
Maciek
Julien Genestoux wrote:
Well, as with any service : they visit our website (they can access only
'public' spaces, including a signup page) and then they signup. Once
signed up, they can access their privatate and they get a login/password
for the jabber server!
The goal here is to do the
Julien Genestoux wrote:
So people use this website to register an account on your XMPP server?
Then you can use the same protocol (jabber:iq:register) to provide
account registration on your server.
Actually, no they don't create an account on the server it self... The
server doesn't hold
ashiraz wrote:
Remko Tronçon;4907 Wrote:
Please base yourself on http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3920.txt and
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3921.txt That's the only official and
correct way to implement an XMPP client.
I am not merely usingthe above wiki I am also using Oreilly's book on Jabber.
Arne Claassen wrote:
I'm trying to determine whether XEP-0004 can be used by a bot to send
data forms to a client.
- include a form via x/ inside a message sent from the bot to the
client. Client gets the message and shows the body in chat, but does
not show the form
Try Psi.
If I
Eric Will wrote:
I found my problem. As I figured, it was my fault. I hadn't counted on
cnonce being base64-encoded, and in my code that forms the `response`
hash I use, I split the string into key=value by splitting on the '='
sign. The cnonce had an '=' on the end of it, which was just
jlist wrote:
I figured it out - I needed to set type to chat.
It worked fine with gtalk but gizmoproject somehow
drops a message if it doesn't have chat type.
Sounds like a bug on gizmoproject side.
--
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev
Lastwebpage wrote:
on the other side,
who want really get messages from unknown contacts?
And who wants to grant subscription to a jid you see first time in your
life and you have no idea why you're being asked for it?
--
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jlist wrote:
Is it possible to send a message to an ID that's not
in once's buddy list?
Yes, you can do this.
--
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum:
jlist wrote:
Good to know. Thanks. I can't seem to do this with gtalk, though.
Is it the gtalk client or both client and server that prevent
doing so?
This is a feature of google's server: if I use their server and you
send me a message while I don't have you on my list, message will be
Jonathan Dickinson wrote:
As he noted his admin is a ogre.
I sounds like the only ports available on his intranet are the email ones.
Maybe we need BOSS (Bidirectional-streams Over Synchronous SMTP)? ;)
--
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev
Ovidiu Craciun wrote:
Hi all,
I recently subscribed to JDev@jabber.org and [EMAIL PROTECTED] through
http://www.xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml web page.
I get daily email digests and I would like to get instead individual emails
as they are sent.
How can I change this settings for my
Jonathan Dickinson wrote:
What are the options here?
feature
var='http://www.mycompany.org/xml-rpc/example.ConvertCurrency.php' /
Note that there may be things like feature
var=http://jabber.org/protocol/something/ there, too. It would be a
bit confusing if we started adding URLs
Daniel Henninger wrote:
Any reason not to go ahead and add it? I also wouldn't mind seeing:
simple
sametime
ocs
And hell:
xmpp
Since such a thing does exist. =) I'm actually also using gtalk, but I
don't really think that ought to be officially registered. *shrug* =)
Then make it
Sander Devrieze wrote:
2008/5/22 Daniel Henninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
xmpp
Since such a thing does exist. =) I'm actually also using gtalk, but I
don't really think that ought to be officially registered. *shrug* =)
Yes, why do you actually have such a transport? AFAICS this only can
JabberForum wrote:
From one machine, I login as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Resource1.
Simultaneously I login in another machine as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Resource2.
The 2 JIDs differ only by the Resource names..
What is special about the resource names that we cannot accomplish just
by having a unique
Sean Gilbertson pisze:
I believe the correct way to do this is:
presenceshow/show/presence
Isn't presence/ good enough?
--
Maciek
Remko Tronçon pisze:
1. Modify existing documentation and implementations to a more strict
behavior that would treat values not mentionned in RFC 3921 as illegal.
most implementations just ignore an unknown type and treat it as
'available', which i think is a sensible thing to do.
On the
Fabio Forno wrote:
You are right if you consider present IM
clients, which handle content only if they have hardcoded support for
that particular namespace. That is the reason for which we stated the
API mailing list, IM clients should be able to retrieve also the
presentation logic of the
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 01:08:21PM +0100, Remko Tronçon wrote:
I added another proposal to the GSoC page, entitled XSD Schema Compiler.
Sounds interesting. And probably useful, too.
--
Maciek Niedzielski
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
shashi kiran pisze:
Hi Norman it works great for Block.
i Used the Following unblock
presence to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' type='subscribe'/
presence to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' type=*'**subscribed**'*/
Is this the Proper way??
As far as I know, you cannot grant subscription (send
JackieZhang pisze:
hi,all
i download the newest version jabberd2.1.23,i find that my jabberd client
can't login the jabberd2.1.23,but my jabberd client can login to
jabberd2.1.15,i get the xmpp message:
SEND:
iq id='session' type='set'session
Tomasz Sterna pisze:
Dnia 2008-02-08, Pt o godzinie 09:51 +0200, Norman Rasmussen pisze:
Can you ask Coccinella to use a different resource? If you remove the
@ does it help? (I'm thinking that having an @ in the resource might
be confusing jabberd2)
I was worried about the capitalization
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008 7:06 am, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:23:38PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 2:52 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
(1) reply to the presence probe by sending to the user
the full XML of the last
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
On the other hand, usually just 1/3 of my roster is online. So if
server starts sending presence for all contacts,
initial presence flood from the server increases 3 times.
So do I take
sequence of
messages using single acknowledge).
There are amore advanced acking extensions, but they are still being
developed and are not really implemented.
--
Maciek Niedzielski
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
paste binary data directly into XML,
so you also cannot put it directly into XMPP.
--
Maciek Niedzielski
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:23:38PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 2:52 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
So a nice server will return the last unavailable presence information
(with a Delayed Delivery flag), thus
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
What's wrong with Gajim?
Are there other Python clients out there?
cjc, written in PyXMPP by lib's author (Jacek).
--
Maciek Niedzielski
Psi developer, XSF member
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
David Ammouial wrote:
Also, XEP-0070 is HTTP-specific.
You know, it was written as HTTP-specific, but it usually be quite
easily abused in other situations. Maybe it's worth separating 70 into
two parts, one about confirming something over XMPP and other about
HTTP-auth via XMPP.
--
Maciek
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
See here:
http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-00.html#rules
Hmm... I just noticed something.
Let's say we're pinging a client which does not support ping namespace:
Example 9. Ping Not Supported
iq from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/chamber'
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-00.html#rules
Let's say we're pinging a client which does not support ping namespace:
Example 9. Ping Not Supported
iq from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/chamber
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Alexander Gnauck wrote:
I would like prefer smth which allows multipart
messages with different content types where plain text is always
required. Content types could be plain text, xhtml, rtf etc...
Hmm, there are many issues with email to jabber translation
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Alexander Gnauck wrote:
I would like prefer smth which allows multipart
messages with different content types where plain text is always
required. Content types could be plain text, xhtml, rtf etc...
Hmm
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
Whitespace is significant in the body/ element, no?
True, so we need to remind client developers that it's significant in
the html node too, and that it's the job of the _receiving_ client to
ensure that the whitespace is preserved (not the sending client)
Just a
Hi,
I wrote a simple script that can be used for xmpp-pinging.
http://machekku.uaznia.net/jabber/xmppping/xmppping-0.1.tar.gz
(requires python and PyXMPP)
It tries to mimic ping command, so should be not so hard to use ;)
To have some practical use cases, it returns 0 if there was at least one
Andreas Putzo wrote:
So, my question is: Is there a way to ask the server directly, whether
there are messages pending without actually get them delivered to the
client and therefore deleted on the server?
Maybe you're looking for XEP-0013: Flexible Offline Message Retrieval?
--
Maciek
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
On 11/15/06, Magnus Henoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norman Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been playing with OpenID and using the XEP-0070 example as a
source for logic. It was very irritating to have a unique resource
all the time because Psi loads each
Daniel Henninger wrote:
MSN username: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber MSN translated JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So where did this use of % come from?
As far as I know, % was used in the same way in very old times, in SMTP,
in cases when it was impossible to send email directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stanczak Group wrote:
Ok. Why so little activity here? Standards wouldn't seem where stuff
would be.
You could say (for fun ;)) that this list is to discuss problems with
protocols designed by Standards-JIG people. So if they do their job
well, then there's not so much activity here ;)
--
Magnus Henoch wrote:
I got bored and tried to implement the server side of XEP-0070
(verifying HTTP requests via XMPP) in PHP.
Try it here: http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~henoch/jabberauth/index.php4
Source: http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~henoch/jabberauth/index.txt
Enter your Jabber ID as
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
@reno:
- then set up a rule to send all 'email sent to jdev@jabber.org' to a
certain folder.
Or use List-Id header.
- i think you can also set up a rule to move 'email you send to
jdev@jabber.org' to the same folder - that way, you keep your replies
with everyone
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
Instead of going to that mythical well-connected server (which really
can only be jabber.org in this context), I've got an idea for what
could be done first. It's very client-intelligence-dependent but
makes sense to me.
1. SRV query to the child domain to which the
Daniel Noll wrote:
Instead of going to that mythical well-connected server (which really
can only be jabber.org in this context), I've got an idea for what
could be done first. It's very client-intelligence-dependent but
makes sense to me.
1. SRV query to the child domain to which the client
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 8/29/06, Maciek Niedzielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the idea was:
if your full domain is: host1.some.network.example.com, then:
1. check if host1.some.network.example.com is a jabber server
2. else check if some.network.example.com is a jabber server
3. else
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
Instead of going to that mythical well-connected server (which really
can only be jabber.org in this context), I've got an idea for what
could be done first. It's very client-intelligence-dependent but
makes sense to me.
1. SRV query to the child domain to which the
Christian Hammers wrote:
Is it possible to send messages from different programs simultaneously
using only one account?
(...)
But as this program reacts on emails via /etc/aliases, it may happen that
more than one instance gets started simultaneously but only the first one
is allowed to
Florian Holzhauer wrote:
If you have any suggestions about improving such stats, I would love
to hear them.
Do virtual-hosted domains always resolve to the same IP number? Maybe
this could help to eliminate the duplicates.
--
Maciek A: It's against natural order of
Hal Rottenberg napisał(a):
On 7/22/06, Matthias Wimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jabber servers provide virtual hosting and have typically no default
domain. Therefore, I think it will be at least hard to find out the
domain name this way.
Yes but I think that's overly broad to say Jabber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming (for legacy reasons), the only injection point available in
the code for this uni-directional keepalive is a message or
presence packet, how bad is it to send a presence / to the server
(vs. say a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even with an empty presence payload like presence / ?
It means: I'm online with no status message (and not away/dnd/etc)
- --
Maciek A: It's against natural order of reading.
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mircea Bardac wrote:
On Thursday 08 June 2006 01:50, Joonas Govenius wrote:
2. Should the protocol specify how to handle a body
in a message containing whiteboard data? Should it
be allowed?
Think of the following (*):
1. messages can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
has someone a good solution how to reuse an existing community site with
md5'd passwords with a jabber server? Only plain passwords can be
accepted by the jabber server, which can be checked against the md5'd
passwords
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Cantrell wrote:
I'm hoping someone can suggest a good transport solution.
I'd like to set up transports for (...) Google.
Google transport is called s2s module and should be included in your
jabber server ;)
- --
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sander Devrieze wrote:
Op dinsdag 25 april 2006 13:12, schreef Remko Troncon:
I believe it is worth to note that this XHTML compliancy is extremely
unique to ejabberd; I can't find *any* other instant messaging server
with a web interface that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Friday 21 April 2006 06:44, George Hazan wrote:
Does anybody know about an attempt to compile the GNUPG sources as the DLL
for Win32? It takes too much time resources to call that EXE every time I
want to decode/encode a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trejkaz wrote:
Remko Troncon wrote:
- If you really want to support Google Talk, you can get away with a
regexp match on the JID, and enable all these non-standard extensions.
No other server is using these anyway. As long as GT doesn't change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
That wiki page currently describes how to add Jabber-ID header support
to Emacs, Mail.app, Mutt, and Thunderbird. How about Eudora, KMail,
Notes, Outlook, etc.?
I think you can add headers in Outlook Express using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
Thank you, Google!
http://ralphm.net/blog/2006/01/17/gtalk_s2s
It seems that I need to get subscription from gmail user to be able to
send them messages.
--
And now dear Google, after giving us something so sophisticated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pedro Melo wrote:
http://ralphm.net/blog/2006/01/17/gtalk_s2s
It seems that I need to get subscription from gmail user to be able to
send them messages.
No, I was able to send a message between my gmail and sapo account
without subscribing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 1/17/06, Maciek Niedzielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both ways?
I could send from gmail to somewhere else, but sending to gmail failed:
Don't worry, it's a Beta.
Or new anti-spim policy ;)
- --
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Perhaps we need a little JEP that specifies the recommended order of
negotiation for the stream features in the registry, and we update that
JEP whenever we define a new stream feature?
I'm sure it will be easier to refer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:57, Magnus Henoch wrote:
I'm trying to make my Jabber server require people registering an
account enter an e-mail address for password retrieval and such (in
practice, it might be too obnoxious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
i.e. a full email transport, but not doing pop3 or imap, rather
waiting for the smtp delivery.
How would you handle attachments? Just curious. :-)
SMTP transport on uaznia.net provides
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Scottorn wrote:
Thanks for all the info thus far, if you are interested, there is a
smtp transport that Peter had sent me that sounds like exactly what you
are describing,
I think uaznia.net is running a bit modified Theoretic SMTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe I should start learning erlang? ;)
- --
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFDoJr57knNPWzAbeURAkq/AKCUrWRn55XY9Q+BldamyfdjTA9HTwCgzo7f
Nuhxyeg4XpAcYwpxU7MHSY4=
=C6Ek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 11/24/05, Norman Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/24/05, Matt Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClearType refers to Microsoft's version of sub-pixel
anti-aliasing on LCD monitors.
I've found it even makes CRT fonts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trejkaz wrote:
On Windows, though, Swing draws just like any real theme, and thus looks
better than SWT, which does not.
And does any of the libraries support ClearType on Windows? I hate using
Java applications, because the fonts look so bad in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trejkaz wrote:
Trejkaz wrote:
On Windows, though, Swing draws just like any real theme, and thus looks
better than SWT, which does not.
And does any of the libraries support ClearType on Windows? I hate using
Java applications, because the fonts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
One of my Coccinella users are using Psi behind a NAT while his friend is not
behind a NAT and when doing filtransfers when the initiator is behind the NAT
have observed two peculiar things:
Are they having there own proxy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 10/19/05, Chems Amrani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to develop a client Jabber working on different OS. Could you
tell me which API is suitable for that ? Maybe an API Java. Which
one is the simplest to use ?
At the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BreezeChan wrote:
I'm working on a jabber client for palm ,that base on some JabberPalm
project's libaries. As i know,JabberPalm is publish under GPL Jabber
Open source License. It's should be legal If i publish my new
Jabberclient as shareware?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Henninger wrote:
I don't suppose there is a Uri prefix that indicates a chatroom is there?
Or any interest in such a thing? Basically I think it would be nice if
there were a link that could trigger the client to pop up an 'enter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rory wrote:
Any chance that someone
could send me an invitation code so that I can test my
client-side XMPP library against Google Talk?
Sent.
- --
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro Bottoni wrote:
Which Python library would you use for developing a small Jabber client?
pyxmpp (looks like the official python library)
http://pyxmpp.jabberstudio.org/
This is the only python library I ever tried, and I had no problems
On Śr Lipca 27 2005, 3:17, Samuel Goto napisał(a):
I am starting to write JEPs support for my library ...
and I have mainly two questions :
1) Wich one should I start with ? (I was thinking about Service
Discovery and VCards because they sounded interesting ... then muc,
chat, etc )
On Pn Lipca 25 2005, 15:27, Tant Ludovic napisał(a):
- when a message or a presence is sent from a local jid to specific
virtual jid, forward it to differents real jid. And when a presence
query is asked for a virtual jid, reply 'available' if at least one of
the different real jid is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Mario Salzer wrote:
I recently tried to advocate a similar [EMAIL PROTECTED] syntax as
shortcut for Web URLs (as replacement for less user-friendly OpenID
homepage addresses). But because of the fear for AOL users, this
83 matches
Mail list logo
