PP JID you'll use to communicate. It's just a mapping process at the
moment you add the buddy account.
Only political/strategy reasons, and possibly a little concern with
another attack vector, prevent Facebook from adding S2S.
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
@pedromelo
http://www.simplicidade.or
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
>> came across this today and I haven't seen it mentioned here:
>>
>> http://www.pentestit.com/xmpploit-tool-attack-xmpp-connections/
>>
>> I hav
Hi,
came across this today and I haven't seen it mentioned here:
http://www.pentestit.com/xmpploit-tool-attack-xmpp-connections/
I haven't tested it yet, and the article is strong on claims and light
on explanations on how it works, so take it with a grain of salt.
Bye,
--
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-06
>
> Adjustments can have epic proportions on that list ;)
True, but from some of the summaries I've read
(http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/04/04/http_post for example) 0.6 seems
to be gaining consensus.
Eith
Hi,
in case anyone needs a new XML parser:
http://tibleiz.net/asm-xml/
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f
Hi,
found this today, seems to work between my office and home networks,
both behind NAT.
http://samy.pl/pwnat/
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http
video transmission should be
done by something built for that purpose, like a video server.
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberfor
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Norman Rasmussen
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
>> I was able to login with a Psi-based client. The lack of SRV records
>> is unfortunate.
>
> It shouldn't matter chat.facebook.com has an A record f
th Peter: first they crawl, then they walk.
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.o
it. The roster is read-only: I can move contacts
to new groups and rename them, but all that is lost after a reconnect.
Bug reported :)
All in all, great news.
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
Hi,
On 2009/10/13, at 00:20, Graham Merrill - KB8SEW wrote:
I've been playing with Ryan Eatmon's Net::Jabber and Net::XMPP but I'm
stuck. According to the docs, there's a way to retrieve the vCard
info from
a Jabber server, but for the life of me I cannot figure out the
syntax.
Does anyo
Hi,
On 2009/09/04, at 07:55, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Pedro Melo wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for clients that support XEP-0115 version 1.5 to test
interoperability with my own code.
Anyone?
Gajim does. Don't hesitate to report interop problems!
Will d
Hi,
I'm looking for clients that support XEP-0115 version 1.5 to test
interoperability with my own code.
Anyone?
Thanks,
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jde
On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/12/09 11:24 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
>>
>>> The big question of all is whether it is the job of jabber.org to
>>> compete with
>>> S
d of jabber.org
> entirely. ;-)
I don't think its the role of jabber.org to compete direcly with Jabber.
But there are certain services that would make the network better
(like a network of sock5 proxys, and all the NAT-busting stuff) that
require some form of central coordination
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/11/09 10:00 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>>
>>>>> Or would @pt.jabber.org IM accounts exist also?
>>>> I'm not sure y
The usual text applies I think: "Start talking now with our web-based
chat, or download one of this applications for your PC/Mac".
> "client" is a dev. term that has no concrete meaning for regular end
> user
> IMO. Well perhaps we should experiment by
etc), but running a full IM
service, not so much.
But I also understand that other, who already have a bigger community,
might want that to.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: m...@simplicidade.org
Use XMPP!
___
ther global-but-localized services such as Fon.
Can't see that far right now.
> 10. Keep everything as local as possible.
Keep local what should be local, I think.
Relays, for example.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: m...@simplicidade.org
U
I'm hoping to bring that back soon. :)
Yeah, I remember seeing something about a "european" proxy server for
jabber.org... is that still on the roadmap?
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: m...@simplicidade.org
Use XMPP!
___
its like having kids: you have to put them from time to time outside,
so that they can shout, run, trip, hurt, run again... It makes it
easier to deal with their frustrations if they got all that of their
system.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID:
Hi, my name is Pedro Melo and its been a couple of hours since I
didn't wish that XMPP file transfer just works.
Best regards,
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listi
On Mar 9, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/9/09 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a
>> venue
>> for community discussion. I'm calling this the "Monthly XMPP
>> Meeting" or
>> MXM (you can pronounce it like "m
eceiving large bursts of messages from you and trigger rate-
limits, so the end user experience might suffer. Assume that you'll
have to provide local accounts for users who require QOS.
Apart from that, have the appropriate amount of fun.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simp
What is the best practice as far as how to deal with this.
> Do you expire resources eventually?Or probe if a resource hasn't
> been updated in some amount of time?
I would either presence probe or IQ ping the resource every X hours if
no activity is detected.
Not pretty, but thi
Hi,
On Sep 19, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Pedro Melo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this is the proper place to discuss this, but I
> assume that all the client developers subscrive to jdev.
>
> So Cisco acquired Jabber Inc, and with it I assume the Jabber
> trademark.
&
Hi,
I don't know if this is the proper place to discuss this, but I assume
that all the client developers subscrive to jdev.
So Cisco acquired Jabber Inc, and with it I assume the Jabber trademark.
What happens now to the Jabber trademark?
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog:
ont be stored in offline messages.
But actually, I think the point is moot. I expect Pubsub services not
to send me messages if I'm offline.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
___
system. :(
>>
>> btw, what about a text field in subscribe request, jabber and/or
>> gtalk
>> support this?
>> (I found nothing in the ADD dialog in PSI or in
>> http://tinyurl.com/5ll87w)
Last paragraph of
http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre
t; a link or some names that I can search for.
>
>> You can use two:
>
>> or .
>
>> the main difference is that is a request/response dialog: you
>> sen a or a and get back a type="result">> or a . The id attribute of the
>> response matche
two:
or .
the main difference is that is a request/response dialog: you
sen a or a and get back a or a . The id attribute of the
response matches the id of the request.
The is more of a send and forget about it style of
communication.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www
there with:
git-clone git://github.com/xsf/documentation.git
The mirror is updated hourly from a server I own and keep. If you
find any problems, please complain to me.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP
sent them to Peter, in case he wants to make this available
at the xmpp.org site.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-
lines be to said authors, to prevent
message loops.
Do you need a email-like Precedence header (like tagging messages as
Dave suggested) or checking to see if we are talking to
something that claims to be human is enough?
Just because you, remko, and me don't like auto-replies, doesn&
Hi,
(reposted to dev because I'm an idiot).
On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
Pedro Melo wrote something on Jaiku that made me think. (Always
dangerous).
I told you not to listen to me...
His scenario was basically:
- Two (presumably) mutually subscribed resources,
adating your GeoLocation node);
Check the list archives for more information.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Hi,
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Jonathan Dickinson wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Pedro Melo
>> Sent: 23 June 2008 03:20 PM
>> To: Jabber/XMPP software development list
>> Subject: Re
Hi,
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get an Google Account. Log into Google Talk. Look at the resource you
> get back from the server. It ends with 8 char hex string. Its the
> serve
t
> worst) before it could be sent. Does anyone have any clever ideas
> how to get around this?
Get an Google Account. Log into Google Talk. Look at the resource you
get back from the server. It ends with 8 char hex string. Its the
server that is handling this connection. So each route
nents are the way to go to implement large scale bots.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forum
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Pedro Melo
>> Sent: 17 June 2008 03:56 PM
>> To: Jabber/XMPP software development list
>> Subject: [jdev] OT: MOA alerts via PubSub
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> In case you are into MOA events (see http://
>&g
Hey,
In case you are into MOA events (see http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/
moa/microlensing_alerts.html for an explanation), you can now receive
them via XEP-0060.
See https://it019909.massey.ac.nz/moa/alert/howtosubscribe.html for
instructions.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP
r'/>
>
> but I get this back:
>
> type='error'
> xmlns='jabber:client'>
>
>
>
>
>
> So, any ideas? Pointer to component development documentation
> maybe? I haven't
> been able
they see, they will pick up
on the ideas, and if possible in the code, and integrate it with
their own code base.
Everybody wins.
IMHO, of course.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, this will be helpful for me.
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Mar 29, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
Dnia 2008-03-27, czw o godzinie 23:27 +, Pedro Melo pisze:
* S2S: for federation;
* XEP-0114 and XEP-0225 support.
This would allow anyone to write a component in any language they
want, and the make it available in the XMPP
ation in the US ;)
It really depends on where you spend it :)
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t use a bot
@jabber.org to power their commercial services (hiveminder, I'm
looking at you now...).
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Tro wrote:
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Pedro Melo wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:29 PM, David Janes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Greg Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
full server.
This is something that I think does not exist, and that many people
could use.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ample would be Nagios notifications.
Besides, if everybody starts publishing blog updates to a pubsub
node, maybe we can stop this non-sense of pooling feeds once and for
all.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--
"Courage in an untrained mind leads to cruelty, and in a trained mind
it leads to hope and compassion." ~ P.J. Saher
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ber server is no more available.
It helps the test scenario you presented us with, unplugging of
ethernet cable..
Most OSs have some sort of notification for this. I know Mac OS X
has, and I think Linux also. And Tomasz mentions windows too.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL
re than 45 seconds of
inactivity is detected.
The second point is worded like that because we don't immediately
send the XMPP ping. We wait 5 minutes or until the user needs it (so
the next time we send any stanza we also send the ping).
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL
bSub.
It would make that pubsub connection available to the webapps using a
Javascript DOM object.
Until then, I think we will bring the web app inside the XMPP cilent.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le to implement.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipped].
Wrapping the roster from the transport rather than overloading its
usual function looked attractive, but maybe there are gotchas with one
inside another (even if namespaced).
ENOCRYSTALBALL, can't see reasons for/against either one.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTE
l.dom.
Should work.
You might want to check the roster item jid to make sure it matches
the gw.remote.dom, though.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
finds the transports via disco
(my implementation hasn't). My use case is very ad-hoc and limited,
so this limitations are acceptable.
You can bypass 1) if your server sends the internal roster ASAP, and
then forwards the external gateway roster as roster pushes.
Best regards,
--
HIId
sorry. See http://www.process-one.net/en/ejabberd/
downloads/
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; gmail.com) rich recipients just fine, but messages from gmail.com
SG> can't be delivered (users get error messages).
http://www.ejabberd.im/fix-dns-srv solved my problem. Thanks to
badlop :)
the latest installers for ejabberd 1.1.4 from process-one.net already
include this fix.
Best r
ing to allow roster manipulation from a
component. I'll expand this soon... I want to see how to leverage
roster exchange XEPs.
That my initial brain dump.
I'm specially insterested in the namespace routing feature, given
that it allows us to extend the core router easily.
--- end paste ---
This was sometime in June.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that should
solve most of the problems reported.
See: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2007-June/015739.html
and follow up emails.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on from 5 or 6 different JIDs.
The roster is assumed to be for people you trust.
I think the case for service bots is the only one where I would limit
the use of XEP-0115 given that by default a lot of JIDs will
subscribe it and you'll auto-accept them all, so no trust there.
Best regards,
avoid any arguments or
misunderstandings on how to do it, id rather have a proof of
concept so people can see something working.
Have you looked at http://volity.org/?
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
going from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ch a room and saying: "all, block x.y.z.w"
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another variant:
open a tcp connection to an jabber server, and send a
stanza, making sure you use a lot of 'e's.
Unless your XML parser has DoS detection and prevention, like over-x-
bytes node names, attributes, value and data, you are vulnerable to
these.
Best regards,
--
HIId:
our setup.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case you missed it: http://jabphone.com/
I wonder what they are using to translate jingle signaling into SIP
signaling? An asterisk plugin of some sort? :)
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Jan 17, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Pedro Melo wrote:
http://ralphm.net/blog/2006/01/17/gtalk_s2s
It seems that I need to get subscription from gmail user to be
able to
send them messages.
No, I was able to send a message between my gmail and sapo account
without
sapo account
without subscribing first. It was blazing fast :)
They don't have a socks5 proxy yet, though.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d this particular SHOULD of
RFC-3921 in their client.
I guess you're the only one. :-)
--
smk
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Remko Troncon wrote:
On 19 Nov 2005, at 13:03, Pedro Melo wrote:
I think that with all the SPPS stuff going around, 0084 will
probably be updated to use it. And eventually it will be the
standart protocol. Until then, I would support both 0008 and 0153
remember that there was a discussion about using pub-sub.
Status?
I think that with all the SPPS stuff going around, 0084 will probably
be updated to use it. And eventually it will be the standart
protocol. Until then, I would support both 0008 and 0153.
Best regards,
--
HIId: Pedro Melo
SMTP
75 matches
Mail list logo
