Tobias Markmann wrote:
Okay...that would work but in general you only need one JID because the
servers are able to intercommunicate via s2s.
offer both, email notification and XMPP notification. It is also
possible that admins are responsible for multiple server. So Jid
notification makes
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't really a problem.TobiasOn 9/21/06,
Alexander Gnauck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tobias Markmann wrote: Okay...that would work but in general you only need one JID because the
On 21/09/06 at 08:57 +0200, Tobias Markmann wrote:
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)
Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't
really a problem.
Email is probably more reliable than relying on third party gateway: I
wouldn't want to lose such
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 21/09/06 at 08:57 +0200, Tobias Markmann wrote:
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)
Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't
really a problem.
Email is probably more reliable than relying on third party gateway: I
I'm having the idea of adding a feature which tests s2s features of the servers. The monitoring core would try to connect to each server via s2s to check the available features (encryption, etc.).What do you think?
On 9/21/06, Richard Dobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On
2006/9/21, Tobias Markmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having the idea of adding a feature which tests s2s features of the
servers. The monitoring core would try to connect to each server via s2s to
check the available features (encryption, etc.).
What do you think?
It sounds nice, but I don't
You're right. Monitoring the server availability (uptime, ping delay) should go together with a description of the server components and features(availability of tls, account registration, gateway, user directory, off-line storage...)CédricLe 21 sept. 06 à 21:50, Tobias Markmann a écrit :I'm
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Markmann wrote:
That sounds okay for me. Even if the problem is similar in my eyes to
i.e. Google's caching feature since I don't believe they ask all
webmaster whether they are allowed to mirror their pages or not. I'll
also extend the monitoring part to keep the accounts
Hi Tobias,
Some days ago someone pointed me to a post on the jadmin maling list
[1]. What they are talking about are the accounts that my monitoring
software have created for monitoring login times and server features on
each server. Then I noticed that stpeter responded to that[2] and said
That's right but anonymous login isn't widely supported today and I don't know what you mean by we have s2s for that. The only way to monitor s2s connections is either using accounts on the servers or including some testing protocol right in the server. The first is easier to realise and works
10 matches
Mail list logo
