- Original Message -
> On 10/15/13 8:50 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > What is the benefit to "OpenJDK 7u Authors, Committers and Reviewers" of
> > using our valuable time
> > to do this?
>
> "inclusion into a CPU release before 7u60" "fo
D branch. When u60 forks upstream, we'll
fork for 2.5 in the same manner. Hopefully, this won't be anywhere near as long
as u40 was.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 10/17/2013 7:51 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> > 2013/10/17 Dalibor Topic :
> >> On 10/17/13 4:29 PM, Andrew
The last tag I see added in http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u is nearly a
month ago:
summary: Added tag jdk7u45-b31 for changeset f4373de4b75b
and that doesn't include merges with the post u40 changes.
When will the next u60 build drop be?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Eng
- Original Message -
> Omair, Andrew,
>
> Are one of you handling this fix for 7u forest ? It's still marked as
> unresolved.
>
We're both pretty snowed under with the security updates at the moment.
I don't think it'd be a matter of just blindly b
.
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: 5c703dacb076
Author:bae
Date: 2012-03-28 17:04 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk/rev/5c703dacb076
7154047: [macosx] When we choose print one page in the print dialog,it still
prints all the pages.
Reviewed-by: anthony
! src/macosx/classes/sun/lw
; >>
> >> Sometime in February, JDK 7u4 will move to a new forest called
> >> jdk7u/jdk7u4. This is where we will stabilize the release and all
> >> subsequent builds of 7u4 will be built from this forrest. This
> >> means that jdk7u/jdk7u-dev remains open for changes. Anything
> >> integrated after we create jdk7u/jdk7u4 will be included in JDK
> >> 7u6.
> >>
> >> By the time we are through feature complete and have a better idea
> >> on the amount of bugs open against 7u4, I will update you on what
> >> the last month will look like.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Edvard
> >
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
Changeset: 40084a75a36f
Author:bae
Date: 2012-04-07 12:46 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk/rev/40084a75a36f
7154505: [macosx] NetBeans sometimes starts with no text rendered
Reviewed-by: prr, kizune
! src/macosx/native/sun/java2d/opengl/CGLGraphicsConfig.m
ermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-February/002042.html
which says there is "about a month or so left". Then a release appears
about two months later. Am I missing something?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Original Message -
> On 5/1/12 12:58 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > which says there is "about a month or so left". Then a release
> > appears
> > about two months later. Am I missing something?
>
> Hard to say. I think that the JavaOne strategy
This patch is needed so that OpenJDK7 builds on GCC 4.7 on GNU/Linux.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7150392
Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/fb3a2cafc230
Ok for OpenJDK7u6?
Thanks,
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7124400/7u6/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-May/004260.html
Reviewed by: Artem Ananiev, Anthony Petrov.
Thanks,
Andrew
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7154088/7u6/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-May/004253.html
Reviewed by: Anthony Petrov.
Thanks,
Andrew
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7146550/7u6/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-May/004262.html
Reviewed by: Artem Ananiev, Sergey Bylokhov
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: e9014eaf0e03
Author:bae
Date: 2012-05-28 13:19 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/e9014eaf0e03
7146550: [macosx] DnD test failure in createCompatibleWritableRaster()
Reviewed-by: art, serb
! src/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/CDragSourceContex
Changeset: 7f0e6be7f7ea
Author:bae
Date: 2012-05-28 13:29 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/7f0e6be7f7ea
7124400: [macosx] CGraphicsDevice.getConfigurations() returns reference to
member (does not copy configs)
Reviewed-by: art, anthony
! src/macosx/cla
Changeset: 9fa6e878fcdb
Author:bae
Date: 2012-05-28 13:36 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/9fa6e878fcdb
7154088: [macosx] Regression: Component.createImage do not inherits component
attributes
Reviewed-by: anthony
! src/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/LWCompo
rmail/jdk7u-dev/2012-April/002818.html
> [1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-May/002893.html
>
>
> --
> Release Lead, Java SE Updates
> Java Platform Group
> Oracle Corporation.
> (408)276-7564
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7120895/7u6/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-May/002551.html
Reviewed by: Igor Nekrestyanov
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: 3335ab17d926
Author:bae
Date: 2012-06-01 19:24 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/3335ab17d926
7120895: FontConfiguration should not use thread contextClassLoader
Reviewed-by: igor, prr
! src/share/classes/sun/awt/FontConfiguration.java
6886358: layout code update
Ok for backport?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7153693/7u6/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-June/002566.html
Reviewed by: Jennifer Godinez, Phil Race
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: 9b727b561f58
Author:bae
Date: 2012-06-15 18:48 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/9b727b561f58
7153693: Three 2D_ImageIO tests failed due ImageFormatException on OEL 6.*
Unbreakable Kernel x64
Reviewed-by: jgodinez, prr
! src/share/native/sun/
nd, the next build in jdk7u will be for jdk 7u8.
>
> If you have any objections or concerns, let me know before the end of
> this week.
>
> Cheers,
> Edvard
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-February/001900.html
Good to see a clear tag for
d, we'll create a corresponding icedtea7-2.3
forest.
Obviously, it would be nice to be able to use the upstream forest directly but
we're
not there yet :-D
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
ok at:
http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
t being in the
wrong format) that affect our builds.
I don't know if things would have been different if it had taken longer for
these
things to enter 7, but I do think that less obvious changes should take a
little time.
Otherwise, what's the point in having two reviews in the first pl
t; >
> > I think Phil's suggestion is that back-port requests should cc the
> > mailing list for the area. That would at least allow the original
> > author
> > and reviewers a chance to jump in if they wish. I think this
> > suggestion
> > make sen
>
> >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010910.html
> >>>>
> >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010940.html
> >>>>
> >>> I can't tell if you are planning to push one change-set or three
> >>> but
> >>> I think
> >>> it would be better to transplant all 3 three rather than
> >>> collapsing
> >>> it into
> >>> one change-set + bugID (just makes it easier to compare 7u vs. 8
> >>> and
> >>> makes
> >>> the bug archeology easier).
> >>>
> >>> -Alan.
> >>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
ES=true
check), but will
allow us to build the JDK with the same debug information as we did prior to
7071904.
Thanks,
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> Unfortunately this request comes very late in the 7u6 stabilization
> phase. Thorough testing & analysis is almost complete and we're
> preparing for release.
Hmmm... was this announced somewhere? All I see in my archives are
- Original Message -
> On 8/10/12 7:52 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -----
> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >> Unfortunately this request comes very late in the 7u6
> >> stabilization
> >> phase. Thorough testing & analys
- Original Message -
> +1 on getting a clearer communication around 7u deadlines Andrew.
> Hopefully we can make progress there. Unfortunately, it was just some
> unlucky timing around a phase 2 approval request in this case.
>
No worries; we can only improve on such thin
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6/
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
I'll post a webrev but basically it needs to be surrounded by an #ifndef
OPENJDK.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Original Message -
> I can't find the original jdk8 review thread either.
>
> Good catch Andrew. I've created a bug ID for you : (should be live in
> next 1-2 days)
> 7192804 : Build should not install jvisualvm man page for OpenJDK
>
Thanks :-)
>
is
> only being done in the context of the new build system.
>
I need to look at moving our builds to using the new system.
> David
>
>
> > regards,
> > Sean.
> >
> > On 21/08/2012 12:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> Ah good catch. I didn't
.
>
There you go:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/baf30df50ce3
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 22/08/2012 10:29, David Holmes wrote:
> > On 22/08/2012 6:30 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> On 21/08/2012 9:37 PM, Seán Coffey wrote
by: Jennifer Godinez, Phil Race
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: 8a738039cd7e
Author:bae
Date: 2012-08-29 11:52 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/8a738039cd7e
7150594: VM chash in JCK api/java_awt/Image/ConvolveOp/ tests for 64 bit jdk8
on linux.
Reviewed-by: jgodinez, prr
! src/share/native/sun/awt/medial
ent and also means that
the build benefits from any updates to libstdc++. This is how the Fedora
OpenJDK packages are built.
IMHO, it should be the default.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint
- Original Message -
> >2012/8/29 Andrew Hughes :
> > Build with STATIC_CXX=false. This removes the requirement and also
> > means that
> > the build benefits from any updates to libstdc++. This is how the
> > Fedora
> > OpenJDK packages are built.
&g
've built yourself. If there is a security issue with libstdc++,
a static build means OpenJDK needs to be rebuilt as well. If it's
linked dynamically, it doesn't.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
en Kunz
>
> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher
>
> Green Oracle <ht
- Original Message -
> I understand you both :-)
>
> Andrew, as distro packager, is rebuilding OpenJDK and package it for
> distros he maintain.
>
> So he's sure that stdlibc++ used at runtime will be same as one at
> build time and he could even mandate it
ll be forthcoming in a follow up
> email. Please continue to deliver fixes to jdk7u-dev.
>
> Regards,
> Sean.
>
> [1]
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
> [2]
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html#Critical
57:bcbc86cc5b31
user:bpatel
date:Wed Dec 01 11:02:38 2010 -0800
summary: 6851834: Javadoc doclet needs a structured approach to generate
the output HTML.
specifically the class HtmlConstants:
build-bootstrap-doclets:
[javac] Compiling 7 source files to
/home/andrew/builder
penJDK
MUST be publicly discussed on the jdk7u-dev mailing list prior to approval to
allow
for public feedback." - http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/groundrules.html
> -- Jon
>
>
> On 09/03/2012 05:53 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >>
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/6997116/7u10/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-September/002710.html
Reviewed by: Jennifer Godinez, Phil Race
Thanks,
Andrew
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/7181199/7u10/webrev.00/
Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-September/002741.html
Reviewed by: Jennifer Godinez, Phil Race
Thanks,
Andrew
Changeset: 317afcbc63ff
Author:bae
Date: 2012-09-11 16:46 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/317afcbc63ff
7181199: [macosx] Startup is much slower in headless mode for apps using Fonts
Reviewed-by: jgodinez, prr
! src/macosx/classes/sun/font/CFontManager.
Changeset: da6b89f5cd86
Author:bae
Date: 2012-09-11 16:42 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/da6b89f5cd86
6997116: The case automatically failed due to java.lang.ClassCastException.
Reviewed-by: jgodinez, prr
! src/windows/classes/sun/java2d/d3d/D3DSurfac
@link: reference not found: Objects.equals java.util.Objects#equals
../../src/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java:1717: warning - Tag @see: can't
find setInternallySetState(int) in java.util.Calendar
../../src/share/classes/java/util/Currency.java:685: warning - @throws tag has
no arg
these
fields. 7188852 removes this fix and instead implements tracking in the Java
code.
Bug report: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188852
Public review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011011.html
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/71
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> would it be possible to combine your 7110151 & 7188852 into one
> approval
> request (2 changesets) so we get an all or nothing outcome here ?
Sure, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zlib/webrev.01/ is the combined webrev.
http://
- Original Message -
>
> On 19/09/2012 18:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Sure, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zlib/webrev.01/ is the
> > combined webrev.
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/35e024c6a62c is the
> > original
> > jdk8 change
andled
correctly in the original patch. As is, the OpenJDK build doesn't seem to
have been considered, and so we end up with documentation for programs that
are only part of Oracle proprietary builds.
> Regards,
> Sean.
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/phase2/phase2-pro
- Original Message -
> On 19/09/2012 20:01, Seán Coffey wrote:
> >
> > On 19/09/2012 18:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> Sure, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zlib/webrev.01/ is the
> >> combined webrev.
> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8
anks.
>
> Regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 24/09/2012 14:24, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 19/09/2012 20:01, Seán Coffey wrote:
> >>> On 19/09/2012 18:22, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>>> Sure, http://cr.o
n.
>
> The jdk7u-dev forest will continue to take fixes for 7u12.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/releases/7u10.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/phase2/phase2-process.html
>
Any ETA on when the 7u10 forest will appear?
T
Are there any plans for OpenJDK security releases? We're obviously going to
have to
do security releases before then, and can by patching our own IcedTea trees.
If we
were using 7u directly, it's not clear what we would base those on, as we don't
want
to pull in partial developm
- Original Message -
> On 10/1/12 12:24 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > So, as I understand it,
> > * There won't be a new non-security update release until u12
> > (March-April 2013?)
>
> Yeah - the next OpenJDK 7u release is now planned for next year.
- Original Message -
> On 10/3/12 11:18 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > So, are you now saying there *may* be some fixes in the proprietary
> > u10 release
> > which are applicable to OpenJDK?
>
> No. I don't speculate about the content of future non-OpenJDK
Either u10 only has changes to the proprietary JDK code, or it contains OpenJDK
changes but for some reason
they are not be put in a separate branch. It isn't clear to me which of these
is true.
> Le 9 oct. 2012 à 16:30, Andrew Hughes a écrit
> :
>
> > - Original Messa
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7192804
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/7192804/webrev.01/
OpenJDK8 Thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2012-August/006645.html
OpenJDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/baf30df50ce3
- Original Message -
> Approved for jdk7u-dev.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 10/10/2012 16:39, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7192804
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/7192804/webrev.01/
ed in
> > one
> > changeset):
> >
> > ...
>
> Um, isn't this an awfully big change for what's supposed to be a
> low-risk
> update release?
>
Also, why does it have to be one huge changeset? That's going to make
it much harder to debug any issues.
> - Mark
+e.initCause(cause);
> >> +return e;
> >> }
> >> private static InternalError newInternalError(Throwable cause)
> >> {
> >> -return new InternalError(cause);
> >> +InternalError e = new InternalError();
> >> +e.initCause(cause);
> >> +return e;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/src/share/classes/sun/misc/Unsafe.java
> >> b/src/share/classes/sun/misc/Unsafe.java
> >> --- a/src/share/classes/sun/misc/Unsafe.java
> >> +++ b/src/share/classes/sun/misc/Unsafe.java
> >> @@ -678,6 +678,14 @@
> >> public native Object staticFieldBase(Field f);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> + * Detect if the given class may need to be initialized. This
> >> is often
> >> + * needed in conjunction with obtaining the static field base
> >> of a
> >> + * class.
> >> + * @return false only if a call to {@code
> >> ensureClassInitialized} would have no effect
> >> + */
> >> +public native boolean shouldBeInitialized(Class c);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> * Ensure the given class has been initialized. This is often
> >> * needed in conjunction with obtaining the static field base
> >> of a
> >> * class.
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7c2f5e52863c
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7055257a25c4
> >
> > The fix is identical to those two changes.
> >
> > -Rob
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
September. That will be a month ago on Friday.
What is going on?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
/pipermail/net-dev/2011-August/003383.html
> > >
> > For the record I would prefer that this change not be backported to
> > jdk7u. The reason is that is involves a specification change and
> > also
> > a
> > subtle change in behavior on both Linux and Windo
September. That will be a month ago on Friday.
What is going on?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
ication change and also
> a
> subtle change in behavior on both Linux and Windows that seems
> inappropriate to do in an update release.
>
> -Alan.
>
I concur.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
ly a compromise between that, which obviously couldn't go upstream,
and the need
to ship without cryptography restrictions on GNU/Linux distributions.
The changeset from 8 applies cleanly to 7u.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/7201205/webrev.01/
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Eng
- Original Message -
> Approved.
>
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Brad Wetmore
> wrote:
>
> > Codereview approved. It's a direct backport of the JDK8 code.
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> > On 10/30/2012 1:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrot
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-November/012217.html
> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8003322/webrev.01/
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint
jdk8:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/2d/jdk/rev/3c5bf5ed45a9
The code change for 7u12 is identical to the change in jdk8.
Thanks,
Andrew.
Changeset: 1ae6598660c1
Author:bae
Date: 2012-12-05 16:55 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/1ae6598660c1
7124347: [macosx] java.lang.InternalError: not implemented yet on call
Graphics2D.drawRenderedImage
Reviewed-by: prr, flar
! src/share/classes/sun/j
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8004344
Patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/ea20c9388d90
This bug causes the development version of LibreOffice to crash.
Andrew.
tspot/rev/a3e2f723f2a5
Thanks,
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
was surprised to see these being backported. I can follow the reasoning for
doing so, but we must be careful of introducing unwanted behaviour changes
through a fix which isn't really required in a maintenance release.
I'm not thinking so much of the <> operator but this chan
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew,
>
> cc'ing hotspot-dev
>
> On 20/12/2012 3:11 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the process for getting into HotSpot changes into 7u?
> > Can individual changesets be suggested and committed
- Original Message -
> On 12/20/12 7:33 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > I was surprised to see these being backported. I can follow the
> > reasoning for
> > doing so, but we must be careful of introducing unwanted behaviour
> > changes
> > through a fix
a.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/c707a5af0d71
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/9d98c1eb82b0
Any chance of getting:
8000780: make Zero build and run with JDK8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/a3e2f723f2a5
in too? Or is it not appropriate?
CCing the original reviewers &
n the
jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net mailing list.
Thanks,
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
mention of a license. The same file also appears in the jdk7u
repositories:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/file/tip/test/runtime/7158804/Test7158804.sh
and so will need correcting in both places.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP
- Original Message -
> On 2/11/13 8:29 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > The file:
> >
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/file/fe4a4ea5bed9/test/runtime/7158804/Test7158804.sh
> >
> > has a bad copyright header with just:
> >
>
now going to be
at least u20, with u19 being the next security update in mid-April.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
views on java7 is
> incorrect or just different from the on in java6. I have logged bug
> at
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100306. Could someone
> review
> it?
>
> Thanks
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP
x27;s never happened, (plus, even if it had, there's been no 7u release in
all that time),
leading to this bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928500
Ok for 7u? It applies and builds fine.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com
webrev/>
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
>
I asked on Twitter but haven't had a reply; why is this u21 and not u19?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
gt; > of releases should the need arise.
> >
> > Both proposals are open for discussion for one week until Thursday,
> > April 25th.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sean.
> >
> > [0]
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-
> > A
projects?
A naive person would expect 17 to be followed by 18, for example, not 21.
I was kind of expecting it, but it does mean the last feature update will be
over
a year old by the time this happens.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> hopefully the 7u release renumbering update email addresses your
> question. Placing a buffer between update release numbers will help
> avoid confusion and issues for many if the need for other releases comes
> about.
>
Not real
- Original Message -
> On 4/22/2013 2:09 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > Can you explain why we can't just number the release as the number of the
> > previous
> > release plus 1, like most other projects?
> &
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> > With IcedTea, we avoid this by using micro numbering for security
> > releases. So the
> > next feature release is always the next minor number bump and the next
> > new J
ld actually be nice to have IcedTea support *BSD, but I've never had
chance to look at it.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Original Message -
> On May 8, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 4/30/13 6:50 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> >>> The 7u source bundle [1] is quite outdated now (7u6 Aug 2012). Would it
> >>> be
> >&g
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/7u/webrev/
There's an ambiguity that applies when building OpenJDK 7 with OpenJDK 6
(and hence I haven't posted this for 8 as it can't be built with 6).
OpenJDK 6 has a class
sun.security.provider.certpath.CertificateRevokedException.
Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> Bug report just created :
> JDK-8015275 : Resolve ambiguity in OCSPChecker & CrlRevocationChecker
>
> Looks like both classes being modified for jdk8 don't exist any longer.
Ah, even better. Seems they were removed in:
cha
1 - 100 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
