Tim,
Please note attachments get stripped from the mailing lists.
All - please drop the jdk8-dev and jdk8u-dev mailing lists from this and
leave it just on hotspot-dev. I've tried to bcc those lists.
Thank you.
David
On 20/09/2017 6:44 PM, Yu, Tim (NSB - CN/Chengdu) wrote:
Hi All
Thank yo
Hi Tim,
On 19/09/2017 6:50 PM, Yu, Tim (NSB - CN/Chengdu) wrote:
Hi OpenJDK dev group
This is better discussed on hotspot-dev, so redirecting there.
We meet one issue that the VM failed to initialize. The error log is as below. We checked
both memory usage and thread number. They do not hit
ess and same error at the same place.
>>>
>>>Guy
>>>
>>>Le 04/05/17, Guy Bonneau a écrit :
>>>>I have both oracle JDK 7 and JDK 8 installed on the default Java
installation folder of my computer (Need both of them while working
with Eclipse and miscella
- you
can't necessarily do that. To build 8u you need a JDK 7 boot JDK.
David
Guy
Le 04/05/17, *Sriram Narayanan * a écrit :
It may be time saving to have the logs uploaded somewhere for a
comprehensive review and faster diagnostics.I
Ram
On Thursday, May 4, 2017, David H
gdrive/c/Projects/jdk-8/jdk/make'
make[1]: *** [BuildJdk.gmk:101: images] Error 2
Le 03/05/17 à 22:22, *David Holmes * a écrit :
On 4/05/2017 9:15 AM, Guy Bonneau wrote:
>Great!
>
>I cloned the default dev repository.
>
>I used the same configuration again. This time it wen
.
David
Thanks
Guy Bonneau
Le 03/05/17 à 08:49, *David Holmes * a écrit :
On 3/05/2017 10:31 PM, Guy Bonneau wrote:
>I took the source code from:
>
>http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/jdk8/promoted/b132/openjdk-8-src-b132-03_mar_2014.zip
>
>which seems the 8u JDK.
No that is the GA
/jdk8u-dev/
And I have both latest Oracle JDK 7 and JDK 8 installed on my computer.
Thus I guess the bootstrap JDK must be Oracle JDK 7 1.7.0_80
Yes the bootstrap JDK for building 8/8u is 7u.
David
Guy
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_80
Le 02/05/17 à 23:56, *David Holmes * a écrit :
Hi Guy,
On
Hi Guy,
On 3/05/2017 1:04 PM, Guy Bonneau wrote:
I am trying to build OpenJDK 8 under Windows 7 with Cygwin 2.8.0 and ran
into many issues that I was able to successfully fix until the last one
which leave me baffled. The configure command I use is:
Are you trying to build the latest 8u source
sadebugd.pdb mlib_image.dllsawindbg.pdb
WindowsAccessBridge-32.dll
fontmanager.pdb JavaAccessBridge.dll jconsole.pdb
jsdt.dll mlib_image.pdbschemagen.exe
WindowsAccessBridge-32.pdb
freetype.dll ...
So maybe a problem with paths? or this .pdb file missing for
freetype.dll? not
On 20/12/2016 9:34 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, David Holmes wrote:
On 20/12/2016 7:41 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
How do I add jvm args to the make test java processes? localized windows
7 home can't change the locale to en, but setting -Duser.country=US
-Duser-langua
On 20/12/2016 9:29 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, David Holmes wrote:
It probably would not hurt putting a line or two about what is where
around the FAQ, I'd say.
Which FAQ were you reading? The "JDK 8" project pertains to the
original JDK 8 release, you nee
On 20/12/2016 7:41 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
How do I add jvm args to the make test java processes? localized windows
7 home can't change the locale to en, but setting -Duser.country=US
-Duser-language=en should solve a number of i18n related test failures...
It might work to run:
make test JA
On 20/12/2016 1:09 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, dalibor topic wrote:
On 19.12.2016 14:01, Peter Koellner wrote:
Am I working on the wrong
repository version for the latest stable openjdk build? I cloned the
jdk8 tip.
What's the URL you cloned from?
I used openjdk/jdk8/jdk
Hi Peter
On 20/12/2016 9:05 AM, Peter Koellner wrote:
Well, it is even worse. I built a little test application actually
opening a JFrame and displaying a JButton opening a JFileChooser, and
the newly build jre throws exceptions on repaint:
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NoCl
Trivial patches can be accepted without the provider being an OCA
signatory. However the patch must be provided using OpenJDK technology
so it can't be taken from an external website, but if small enough
should be included inline in an email message.
Thanks,
David
On 20/11/2015 1:45 PM, Quana
Vote: yes
David
On 22/11/2013 11:47 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Stuart Marks to jdk8 Reviewer.
Stuart has Committer role in the jdk8, jdk7u and lambda projects. He has
been contributing changes to OpenJDK for almost 3 years. He is author to
more than 60 changes in the jdk8 fores
Dave,
What is in your personal ~/.hgrc file?
David
On 16/11/2013 3:19 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 20:55 +0400, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Dave,
Please post the exact and complete output of the script on the console.
Also, please post the content of your .hg/hgrc file in the r
On 7/11/2013 7:43 AM, Bhavesh Patel wrote:
Hi All,
Based on the feedback received on the new UI implementation in JDK 7
javadoc, we have made some minor changes to look and feel of the API pages
generated by javadoc in JDK 8. The JDK API documentation pages will be using
DejaVu font. A
Vote: yes
On 10/10/2013 4:51 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I hereby nominate Seán Coffey (coffeys) to JDK 8 Reviewer.
Vote: yes
David
On 2/10/2013 7:36 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I hereby nominate Magnus Ihse Bursie to JDK8 Committer.
Magnus is one of the main contributers to the build-infra project, and
since recently coming back from parental leave, has provided a steady
stream of change sets in the build are
Vote: yes
David
On 2/10/2013 3:13 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Staffan Larsen to jdk8 Reviewer.
Staffan leads the serviceability area in Oracle's JDK team and has been
contributing changes to OpenJDK since Dec 2010. He has Reviewer role on
the hsx project and is author of ~80 cha
Vote: yes
David
On 26/08/2013 9:26 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Reviewer.
Paul has been compute bound on the jdk8 project for some time. Everyone
following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul. He has been
a key contributor to the streams API and
On 24/07/2013 5:05 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
It was just brought to my attention that the output of java -version is
different on builds of jdk8 when compared to jdk7 [1]:
# java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-internal-0)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Zero
Vote: veto
The requirement for JDK Committer status is at least 8 significant
contributions (not merely 8 changesets) [1]. I feel that this CFV is
premature based on the proffered set of contributions.
Sorry.
David
--
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-committer
On 6/06/2013
Hi Amy,
This just needed to go to build-dev list - now cc'd.
This change is unnecessary:
627 $(JRE_INFO_FILE) : $(OUTPUT_ROOT)/spec.gmk $(OUTPUT_ROOT)/source_tips
A space was added before the colon but it is not needed and is out of
style with the rest of the file.
The main change of moving
On 29/05/2013 1:33 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On May 28 2013, at 18:45 , David Holmes wrote:
On 29/05/2013 11:35 AM, David Katleman wrote:
Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b91
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8015525/webrev
All are punctuation issues, no code is
On 29/05/2013 11:35 AM, David Katleman wrote:
Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b91
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8015525/webrev
All are punctuation issues, no code is involved, anyone can review.
As a veteran of many such header reviews, reviewing the patch link a
Vote: yes
David
Vote: yes
David
On 9/05/2013 2:11 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Paul Sandoz to jdk8 Committer.
Everyone following the Lambda and JSR-335 effort will recognize Paul. He
has been a key contributor to the streams API and implementation, the
spliterator API, the extensive tests and mor
Vote: Yes
David
On 25/04/2013 4:14 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
I hereby nominate Athijegannathan Sundararajan (Sundar) to JDK8 Reviewer.
Sundararajan has been with Sun/Oracle from Oct 2000. He has been
involved JDK projects from jdk 1.3.1. In jdk6, he did jsr223
(javax.script) and Rhino change
Vote: yes
David
On 25/04/2013 4:13 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
I hereby nominate Jim Laskey to JDK8 Committer.
Jim Laskey is the Lead on the OpenJDK Nashorn Project [1]. Jim joined
the FX Script compiler team in January of 2009 and has been a member of
the LangTools team since fall of 2010 wh
Looks okay to me.
David
On 20/04/2013 9:04 AM, David Katleman wrote:
Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b86:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jaxws.01
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jdk.01
Corresponding CR
htt
Vote: yes
David
On 9/04/2013 6:56 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
I hereby nominate Omair Majid for the position of OpenJDK 8 reviewer.
Omair has been working on OpenJDK since his internship at Red Hat in May 2008,
and has continued doing so after obtaining full-time employment in June 2010.
In this
I've bcc'd jdk8-dev and re-added core-libs and hotspot-runtime as that
is where the original thread was.
David
On 9/04/2013 11:49 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
Hi Martin,
I'm sorry, I lost track of this and thought it was already pushed. The
jni_md.h changes look good but I don't really unde
Hi Jiri,
Seeing this has already been discussed:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-November/002869.html
Shouldn't you be taking this up on the 2d-dev list ??
David
On 2/04/2013 9:55 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hi!
When openjdk is used on headless devices (with no fonts), then it
Vote: yes
David
On 23/03/2013 1:48 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Erik Joelsson to jdk8 Reviewer.
Erik has Committer role on the jdk8 and build-infra projects. He is the
author of more than 70 changes pushed to the jdk8 forest over the last 9
months. He has also been reviewer/co-re
Vote: yes
David
On 15/03/2013 3:03 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
I hereby nominate Eric McCorkle to JDK8 Committer.
Eric joined the Langtools team at Oracle a while back, and has already
contributed several changes to the JDK 8 repositories.
In jdk8/tl/langtools:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk
On 26/02/2013 5:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Jim,
I get a build failure now:
## Starting nashorn
/bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to @NASHORN_TOPDIR@/makefiles
make: *** [nashorn-only] Error 2
Is there some new configure arg needed to set this up?
This is caused by a missing update to the c
Jim,
I get a build failure now:
## Starting nashorn
/bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to @NASHORN_TOPDIR@/makefiles
make: *** [nashorn-only] Error 2
Is there some new configure arg needed to set this up?
Thanks,
David
On 26/02/2013 9:43 AM, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
Nashorn has been pushed to tl.
Hi Jim,
On 26/02/2013 9:43 AM, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
Nashorn has been pushed to tl. Contrary to my original announcement, you need to do a hg clone
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/nashorn/ in your forest if you don't "hg fclone."
"sh get-source.sh" will work correctly after check out
le before calling
make, or pass PROFILE="" as a make argument when building. This will be
fixed ASAP.
David Holmes
-
On 4/02/2013 8:50 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:42 PM, David Holmes
I had thought that when this was proposed the issue of not doing a
simple copy'n'modify, and the need for an improved architecture to allow
ease of porting was raised. But it seems my recoll
Hi Mark,
On 4/02/2013 6:22 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
2013/2/2 13:42 +0100, david.hol...@oracle.com:
...
I think the "risks" are a little under-stated. You have changed shared code and
that potentially impacts all platforms (unless you have only added new
functions unused on existing
th "ramping up infrastructure":
- hardware resources (like test/build infrastructure)?
- human resources within Oracle?
- human resources within IBM/SAP?
I think we have most of these allocated (except the Oracle part which I
can not speak about:)
-phil.
On 2/1/2013 5:57
On 1/02/2013 8:11 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/175
I'm forced to send this to porters-dev but I do not subscribe to that
list (so it will probably get held up).
Given the way the JEP tasks have been split it would seem much more
appropriate to me
Vote: yes
David
On 11/01/2013 12:18 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Dan Xu to jdk8 Committer.
Dan joined the JDK libraries team in Oracle about 6 months ago and has
contributed several changes to jdk8 so far:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c2be39b27e1c
http://hg.openjdk.
Vote: yes
David
On 10/01/2013 10:54 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I hereby nominate Jaroslav Bachorik to JDK8 Committer.
Jaroslav joined the serviceability team at Oracle a while back, and has already
contributed several changes to JDK 8:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/42ee6b6ad373
h
On 7/01/2013 10:06 AM, David Holmes wrote:
The mercurial servers seems to be down.
Sorry I can't recall, nor locate, the email address to which these
notifications should be sent.
Looks like mail.openjdk was down as well (took four hours for this to
show up).
Everything working
The mercurial servers seems to be down.
Sorry I can't recall, nor locate, the email address to which these
notifications should be sent.
David
Never mind. Broken clone. :(
It's taken forever to clone the forest and it's broken in numerous places.
David
On 18/12/2012 4:40 PM, David Holmes wrote:
A fresh clone of the jdk8/jdk8 forest (openjdk repos only) when build
gives a bunch of errors in jaxws:
/java/embedded/users/dh19
A fresh clone of the jdk8/jdk8 forest (openjdk repos only) when build
gives a bunch of errors in jaxws:
/java/embedded/users/dh198349/class-instance-size/jdk8-repo/jaxws/src/share/jaxws_classes/com/sun/xml/internal/ws/message/AbstractHeaderImpl.java:36:
error: package com.sun.xml.internal.ws.sp
Vote: yes
David
On 24/11/2012 12:13 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I hereby nominate Mike Duigou to jdk8 Reviewer.
Mike has Committer role on the jdk8, jdk7u, jdk7 and lambda projects.
Mike is author of over 40 changes in the jdk8 forest, has sponsored
several changes from contributors, and has been
Vote: yes
David
On 14/11/2012 4:21 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I hereby nominate Erik Joelsson to JDK8 Committer.
Erik works in the Build-Infra project, and has already contributed many change
sets to the build-infra repositories,
and most of those have been committed to the jdk8/build repositor
Hi Fredrik,
I think this will need to be split up by area.
Also in some cases it might make more sense to simply move the classes
inside the primary class and make them static nested classes - eg in
src/share/classes/javax/management/timer/Timer.java
David
On 19/10/2012 5:45 PM, Fredrik Öhr
Vote: yes
David
On 5/10/2012 7:21 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
I hereby nominate Robert Field to JDK8 Committer.
Robert works in the Langtools team at Oracle, and has already
contributed several change sets to the Lambda repository. Robert will
be contributing to the integration effort aimed
On 24/09/2012 10:15 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
No policy or recommendation ?
I'm not sure what you are asking. Projects involving significant build
support are moving to, or already using, the new build as that is the
future.
I'm discussing about official recommendation by project to select new
b
On 24/09/2012 8:50 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi Henri,
I don't know of any "official" policy here. The projects adding new features
to JDK are gradually moving to the new build system in anticipation of it
becoming the default for JDK8 "real soon now". This is true for lambda, and
I think Jigsaw (e
Hi Henri,
I don't know of any "official" policy here. The projects adding new
features to JDK are gradually moving to the new build system in
anticipation of it becoming the default for JDK8 "real soon now". This
is true for lambda, and I think Jigsaw (even though no longer targeted
to JDK8).
Vote: yes
David
On 20/09/2012 3:16 AM, John Coomes wrote:
I hereby nominate Alejandro Murillo to jdk8 Committer.
Alejandro is a performance engineer and also the HotSpot gatekeeper.
In the latter role he's responsible for delivering HotSpot sources
into jdk8 and other jdk releases; he's been w
On 24/08/2012 7:07 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Yes I fixed it :) I threw it in there because it was an issue you would have
been familiar with. (sparcv9 already special-cased it). The general problem
hasn't been fixed because the new build already handles it.
For OSX, I'm still using the old one for
On 24/08/2012 1:41 PM, Phil Race wrote:
PS
Same should be true for Linux as far as I know.
No Linux is broken. There are a few places where the compiler is
invoked without -m32 or -m64 and so defaults to building the native
format ie 64-bit on 64-bit. See 7171653 for a problem with the sizers
On 24/08/2012 11:20 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 8/23/12 6:03 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Wasn't this issue (or a similar one) previously reported and "simply"
a case where the current JDK build process does not support
cross-compiling a 32-bit JDK on a 64-bit host?
As a general sta
Hi Henri,
On 23/08/2012 10:48 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I notice a strange error report on building OSX versions of OpenJDK 8,
Lambda and Jigsaw.
It seems fdlibm is built in 64bits mode :
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc
-fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -W -Wall
On 21/08/2012 9:00 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Artem,
On 21/08/2012 8:37 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
I hereby nominate Leonid Romanov (OpenJDK user name: leonidr) to JDK8
Committer.
Leonid is a member of AWT group. He has contributed many changes to AWT
and Swing code into 7u and 8, mostly for Mac
Artem,
On 21/08/2012 8:37 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
I hereby nominate Leonid Romanov (OpenJDK user name: leonidr) to JDK8
Committer.
Leonid is a member of AWT group. He has contributed many changes to AWT
and Swing code into 7u and 8, mostly for Mac OS X platform:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jd
The ClassLoader case hadn't been addressed yet so ...
On 3/08/2012 4:52 AM, Yu Lin wrote:
Also, there are some code in OpenJDK7u that avoid the above
interleaving by adding synchronizations. For example in
jdk/src/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java from line 932 to 937
L932 synchronized
Re-directing this thread to jdk8-dev ...
On 3/08/2012 7:16 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 8/2/2012 11:52 AM, Yu Lin wrote:
My name is Yu Lin. I'm a Ph.D. student in the CS department at
UIUC. I'm currently doing research on mining Java concurrent library
misuses. I found some uses of concurrent collec
Could it be that the parallelism of the new build is simply too high for
your system - hence you get memory exhaustion?
David
On 27/04/2012 7:56 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
Hi, Magnus,
thanks for your feedback. Here is what I have already tried:
1. Disable anti-virus
2. Upgrade sh/bash/make to
Hi Brian,
The "docs" are here:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/build-infra/guide.html
with a small cheat-sheet at the end for some old v new options, but I
don't see everything eg docs/samples/demos. "configure --help" may also
show you what you need.
BTW I think debug and fastdebug are sk
On 20/04/2012 9:55 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I'd like to activate fast debug for some of OSX packages produced for
Java 8, jigsaw and lambda.
What's correct way to do it at make time ?
DEBUG_NAME=something SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=false ?
Just set
SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=false
(I don't kn
On 19/04/2012 3:36 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
autoconf is in the top repo, not the jdk repo.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/rev/e1830598f0b7
Doh! See I knew it would be something basic.
Thanks Kelly.
David
-kto
On Apr 19, 2012, at 7:03 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 12/04/2012 7:
On 12/04/2012 7:47 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The build-infra project [1] has been working for a while with creating a
new build system. The goals of the project include, but are not limited
to, improved build performance and improved ease of use.
The first part of this project has now been p
?
David
-
Mahesh Pujari
*From:* David Holmes
*To:* Mahesh Pujari
*Cc:* Magnus Ihse Bursie ;
"jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net" ;
"build-...@openjdk.java.net"
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:02 AM
*Subje
On 17/04/2012 12:49 AM, Mahesh Pujari wrote:
I used the new build system to build on windows and Linux (32 bit binary). On
Windows, I was able to sucessfully build with out any issues (release only,
haven't build with debug), and on Linux (3.3.0-4.fc16.i686) I was able to build
clientAndServer
On 24/03/2012 10:29 AM, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
Hi Krystal,
Thanks for the link. But looks like it is not mentioned whether the JEP is
accepted or not.
Does anybody know if this JEP is going to be accepted for JDK 8?
As far as I can see the JEP hasn't even been posted yet:
http://openjdk.j
t per the
rules those votes can not be counted. Not that it makes any difference
to the result.
Just something to be aware of when conducting a CFV.
David
-
thanks,
dmeetry
On 03/13/2012 01:22 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
On 3/12/2012 1:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 13/03/2012 3:48 AM,
On 13/03/2012 3:48 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
Voting for Oleg Pekhovskiy [1] is now closed.
Yes: 9
Veto: 0
Abstain: 9
I only see 6 emails with a Yes vote in the archive and no abstains.
Doesn't change the result but ...
David
-
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this
Hi Michael,
Partial review of jdk changes. Sorry but it is too large to go through
everything in detail.
General meta comment: When this stuff went into 7u my biggest complaint
was that it introduced a mass of new platform-specific stuff in places
that weren't otherwise platform specific. Th
Michael,
I only glanced at this so far.
In make/common/Release-embedded.gmk you've dragged in the fix for
7087956 which we haven't pushed into JDK8 and don't plan to. It's
probably harmless to put it in but the CR will need updating in that
case. Or just drop it.
David
On 23/02/2012 7:50 A
that people occasionally pre-set these variables in their
environment to override the default settings in the build system, or to
add to them. If you do that then you will need to update your build
environment to use the new names.
Cheers,
David Holmes
(Don't shoot me, I'm just the
current
layouts and be made available to those wanting it, then over time, and
probably for post JDK8, get updated to handle modules and the new build
system.
Just my personal opinions.
David Holmes
On 31/01/2012 8:49 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
hi all,
Last year there was a discussion [1
f any active projects to do anything more than this, this would
seem to be the most you could expect to get in Java 8.
For Java 9+ ... work with an OpenJDK Committer to write up a JEP [2].
Cheers,
David Holmes
[1]
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/lambda/Defender%20Methods%20v4.pdf
[2]
On 4/12/2011 5:37 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 12/03/2011 05:21 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Dec 3 2011, at 07:12 , Rémi Forax wrote:
On 12/03/2011 03:33 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:37, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've started to remove warnings from java.util
and I'm not able to cleanly retrofi
83 matches
Mail list logo
