Re: Propose viglesiasce as maintainer for Google Source Plugin

I believe I've gotten all the ducks in a row. Can someone flip the bit? https://github.com/jenkinsci/google-source-plugin/issues/10 On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 3:27:52 PM UTC-7, Marky Jackson wrote: > > Thanks Vic > > On Oct 10, 2019, at 3:26 PM, 'Vic Iglesias' via Jenkins Developers < >

Re: 2019 Elections: voting is delayed

Given that there's been a few people who have requested to be removed from the list, would it make sense for the election nomination process to be updated whereby a nominee has to accept their nomination? The worst case scenario is that someone doesn't spot that they've been nominated and ends up

Re: 2019 Elections: voting is delayed

Updated https://docs.google.com/document/d/15rJYkBjWLGZTL87xeJ4P2Y1LNn7C0EBb0wkDVUSfLmQ/edit# On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:36 AM Marky Jackson wrote: > Sitting here with Oleg and just found out that I am included in the board > member elections, I withdraw my nomination for the board position. > I

Re: Proposal to switch from OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK

Thanks very much for starting the discussion. I'm interested in evaluating the switch from OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK. I've been using JDK 8 and 11 hotspot builds from AdoptOpenJDK for many months with very good results. Several of the OpenJDK providers (Red Hat, Amazon, Azul) seem to be limiting

Re: 2.190.1 and 2019-09-25 security advisory

> On 18. Oct 2019, at 17:40, Jim Sinclair wrote: > > Can you please update the Security advisory to include 2.190.1 if it applies? Our security advisories don't list which releases have the fix, it only lists the first release of each release line (in the case of core, weekly and LTS) to

Proposal to switch from OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK

I posted this proposal on GitHub, https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/issues/893, but also wanted to get the feedback of the community here. As we start to look into supporting multiple architectures, we might want to pivot from using OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK. There are couple reasons

Re: 2.190.1 and 2019-09-25 security advisory

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:15 PM Jim Sinclair wrote: > Can you please update the Security advisory I was about to suggest you simply https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/edit/master/content//security/advisory/2019-09-25.adoc until I noticed that this part of the advisory is generated

2.190.1 and 2019-09-25 security advisory

The 2019-09-25 Security Advisory has: *Affected Versions * - Jenkins weekly up to and including 2.196 - Jenkins LTS up to and including 2.176.3 *Fix* - Jenkins weekly should be updated to version 2.197 - Jenkins LTS

Re: Plugin Pull Request Approval

Thank you for the information! I have been trying to work with the original maintainer and was hoping there would be a workaround! On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 10:32:34 PM UTC-7, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > > > Am 16.10.2019 um 19:58 schrieb Julio Guereca >: > > Hi All!! > > I am attempting to

Re: Plugin Pull Request Approval

Hi Oleg, Thank you for responding. I've responded to some messages on the Pull Request and hopefully that does provide some additional clarify on my changes. In such a case that the changes are deprecating the old functionality of a plugin, is it a better practice to publish a new plugin

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

Could use GitHub topics? Or just add to the readme On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 15:24, Robert Sandell wrote: > And how do I mark a plugin as up for adoption without the wiki labels? > > /B > > Den fre 18 okt. 2019 kl 14:52 skrev Jesse Glick : > >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:27 AM Daniel Beck wrote:

Re: 2019 Elections: voting is delayed

Sitting here with Oleg and just found out that I am included in the board member elections, I withdraw my nomination for the board position. I would like to continue forth on the infra officer nomination. { "regards" : { "name" : “marky”, "phone" : "+1 (408) 464

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

And how do I mark a plugin as up for adoption without the wiki labels? /B Den fre 18 okt. 2019 kl 14:52 skrev Jesse Glick : > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:27 AM Daniel Beck wrote: > > I propose that we restore write access for plugin maintainers at least > for a time, to allow them to clear out

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:27 AM Daniel Beck wrote: > I propose that we restore write access for plugin maintainers at least for a > time, to allow them to clear out wiki pages after migrating the content > elsewhere. Makes sense, but is there some plan to notify maintainers of plugins who have

Re: Request to be made maintainer of PowerShell Plugin

Hi Filippe, Thanks for stepping up! Could you please create a pull request to https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater/blob/master/permissions/plugin-powershell.yml ? Approval from Chris in this pull request will be enough to do the transfer. Best regards, Oleg On

ANN - DevOps World - Jenkins World: Hackfest on December 02

Hi all, There are many Jenkins contributors who are going to DevOps World - Jenkins World Lisbon on December 03-05. As it was previously announced, there will be Jenkins and Jenkins X contributor summits on Dec 03 (meetup page

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

> On 17. Oct 2019, at 17:05, Olblak wrote: > >> Don't we have a feature in Confluence to add a big warning in top of pages, >> for people logged in, to point them to this thread or so? > > I added that warning message It shows for everyone, but that way it prepares everyone for the

Request to be made maintainer of PowerShell Plugin

Hi, The current maintener https://github.com/damienfinck doesn't seem active. He is no longer the for the keyboard-shortcuts-plugin due to inactivity and not responding: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/jenkinsci-dev/OQRDRC8ZBH4/ug1OwT_CAgAJ There is another maintener

Re: Query on Jenkins pipeline Stash/Unstash

Please use the users mailing list for such questions. > Am 18.10.2019 um 04:23 schrieb alok kumar : > > Hello everyone, > Can someone please let me know where do the files get stored when we stash > them in Jenkins pipeline? > > Thanks > Alok > > -- > You received this message because you

Re: how to check build command result like pipeline.

Please use the users mailing list for such questions. > Am 18.10.2019 um 04:09 schrieb jonghoon,jeon : > > Hi, > > I want to check build command result like pipeline. > > Now, I don't use pipeline job. I only have Freestyle projects. > > But I saw pipeline project, and I could see the