[gitlab-oauth-plugin] Request commit access

2019-10-20 Thread Björn Kasteleiner
Hello, I would like to adopt the gitlab-oauth-pugin, to take care of the current issues of the plugin. Gitlab-User-Id: bjkastel Jenkins-User-Id: bjkastel I've already tried to contact the current maintainer at the beginning of September, unfortunately he hasn't answered yet. I've added him

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

2019-10-20 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
- > Asciidoc format can be used as well, with the .adoc extension. - I can add that pretty easily - - > Remove the macro references in the top of the document. - - Totally done > If the document includes "Table of contents", remove this section in Markdown or replace it by :toc: macros in

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

2019-10-20 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
Okay~~~ https://jenkins-wiki-exporter.g4v.dev/ is now updated to support markdown, or a zip of markdown + images Gavin On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 2:11 PM Gavin Mogan wrote: > Thanks for the PR, I've deployed the change, and started to get prepped > for straight up markdown, markdown + zip with

Re: Guideline for upgrading plugin to JDK 9+

2019-10-20 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
> Should I upgrade the plugin to JDK 9+ or it's not mandatory because from SLA perspective Jenkins should be upgraded? I believe jenkins core is still minimum requirement of java 8. According to https://jenkins.io/doc/administration/requirements/java/ 9 and 10 are explicitly not supported. So

Re: Guideline for upgrading plugin to JDK 9+

2019-10-20 Thread Damian Szczepanik
Title: Re: Guideline for upgrading plugin to JDK 9+ I think that's the second option: [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:3.0.0-M1:enforce (display-info) @ cucumber-reports --- [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.8 yet com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:jar:2.10.0.pr2:compile contains

Re: Guideline for upgrading plugin to JDK 9+

2019-10-20 Thread Ullrich Hafner
You should not change to JDK 9 if not absolutely necessary. Did your dependency really change the API to JDK 9? Or did they just compile with JDK 9 and add a module information file which requires the increased class file level? Those files can be ignored in the pom... > Am 20.10.2019 um

Guideline for upgrading plugin to JDK 9+

2019-10-20 Thread Damian Szczepanik
Hi, After upgrading some plugin dependencies I found that dependency is compiled against JDK 9 while my plugin still uses 8 - compilation has failed. Is there any recommendation, guideline, best practices that guide about: 1. Should I upgrade the plugin to JDK 9+ or it's not mandatory

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

2019-10-20 Thread 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers
Thanks for the PR, I've deployed the change, and started to get prepped for straight up markdown, markdown + zip with images, and eventually adoc I'm totally up for forking it to infra or something, I have no idea how to do that though. On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 1:50 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: >

Question about the election process

2019-10-20 Thread Daniel Beck
Hi everyone, I'm confused by the board election process as currently proposed. According to https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Board+Election+Process * We will never have an even number of board members ("Odd number of people prevents the tie problem") * KK holds a permanent position on

Re: [Jenkins-infra] wiki.jenkins.io is now effectively in read-only mode

2019-10-20 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Thanks Gavin! I submitted the pull request for truncating RAW HTML which should improve the layout. More pull requests to come soon. I would suggest hosting this service on jenkinsci or jenkins-infra. I think we can get a lot of contributions. Also, I think we should reserve opportunities to