+1 from me.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:57 PM Gavin wrote:
> No objections
>
> On Tue., Oct. 22, 2019, 2:36 p.m. Marky Jackson, <
> marky.r.jack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am a +1
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Oleg Nenashev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like to help more with
No objections
On Tue., Oct. 22, 2019, 2:36 p.m. Marky Jackson,
wrote:
> I am a +1
>
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to help more with Jenkins Project infrastructure maintenance,
> amd I would like to request admin access to the organization.
>
I am a +1
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to help more with Jenkins Project infrastructure maintenance,
> amd I would like to request admin access to the organization.
>
> Currently I am one of maintainers if the jenkinsci GitHub
Dear all,
I would like to help more with Jenkins Project infrastructure maintenance,
amd I would like to request admin access to the organization.
Currently I am one of maintainers if the jenkinsci GitHub organization and
of Jenkins DockerHub, and I manage permissions and service integrations
Most welcome :-)
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:03 PM, 'vigl...@google.com' via Jenkins Developers
> wrote:
>
> Thanks much Oleg and Marky!
>
> On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 11:47:39 PM UTC-7 Oleg Nenashev wrote:
> done, sorry for the delay
>
> On Saturday, October 19, 2019 at 5:26:38 AM UTC+2,
This seems like a very good topic for discussion in the Jenkins Platform
Special Interest Group meeting Thursday at 14:00 UTC (
https://jenkins.io/sigs/platform/#meetings) . I've added two items to the
agenda (
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bDfUdtjpwoX0HO2PRnfqns_TROBOK8tmP6SgVhubr2Y/edit#
Thanks much Oleg and Marky!
On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 11:47:39 PM UTC-7 Oleg Nenashev wrote:
done, sorry for the delay
On Saturday, October 19, 2019 at 5:26:38 AM UTC+2, Vic Iglesias wrote:
>
> I believe I've gotten all the ducks in a row. Can someone flip the bit?
>
>
Irwin,
Thanks for the links! One of those issue is one I opened up! Like I
mentioned to Mark, I spoke with the Adopt team and the additional support
of more base images are coming in the next PR. The testing framework needs
to be updated first to support the additional bases.
On
Mark,
Currently, AdoptOpenJDK does not support Alpine or Debian in the official
images. But this will be changing in the next PR slotted to get pushed to
the official Docker library. I talked with the Adopt team last week about
support. Currently, they need to expand their testing to
I mentioned this thread on the AdoptOpenJDK slack instance; it looks like
there's been talks around increased Docker base image coverage:
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-docker/issues/236 &
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-tests/issues/1109
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:47 PM Mark
Hi All,
Is someone with write permissions able to add this item to the governance
agenda for tomorrow since the wiki page is now read-only? That would be
fantastic.
Best,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:57 AM Parker Ennis wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, Tyler. Completely reasonable concerns.
>
>
> Am 22.10.2019 um 15:20 schrieb Jesse Glick :
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:44 AM Ullrich Hafner
> wrote:
>>.withContext(new ConsoleLogSplitter(…)) // implements
>> TaskListenerDecorator and writes the output to a temporary file
>>
Yes, issues with musl vs. glibc were the key reason that I had heard for
OpenJDK to not be willing to support Java 11 on Alpine.
I don't see any mention of Alpine or Debian on the official images page at
https://hub.docker.com/_/adoptopenjdk . There is mention of Alpine and
Debian on the
Mark,
For Alpine are you referring to the issue with glibc vs musl? It looks like
the AdoptOpenJDK team built Alpine images with glibc install on top of the
base image. You can look at the Dockefile here,
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-docker/tree/master/8/jdk/alpine.
I am loving
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:44 AM Ullrich Hafner wrote:
> .withContext(new ConsoleLogSplitter(…)) // implements
> TaskListenerDecorator and writes the output to a temporary file
> .withCallback(new RecordIssuesCallback(…)) // extends
>
> On 21. Oct 2019, at 23:39, Damian Szczepanik
> wrote:
>
> I had to upgrade org.jenkins-ci.plugins:plugin what also upgrades property
> jenkins.version so I expect that some older Jenkins installations won't be
> able to see new version via plugin manager?
You can choose an older
I finally managed it to implement a block scoped step. Currently I invoke the
body of the step using this API
getContext().newBodyInvoker()
.withContext(new ConsoleLogSplitter(…)) // implements
TaskListenerDecorator and writes the output to a temporary
17 matches
Mail list logo
