Hi everyone,
We now had the situation where the number of vulnerabilities far exceeded what
the security team could handle.
https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2017-04-10/
As previously discussed on this list, I've suspended distribution of plugins
that are currently vulnerable.
> On 10.04.2017, at 22:44, Slide wrote:
>
> if you are interested!
I am.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
> On 10.04.2017, at 00:05, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> I am not sure that newly introduced layouts will work correctly there
It doesn't even work currently, because the plugin info macro is supposed to be
removed from the main content :-(
--
You received this message
> On 10.04.2017, at 00:05, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> Only since 2.40 and 2.32.2, so in my example in the original email, there's
> plenty of instances without a warning, that still would get the plugin.
In fact, I expect we'll still operate update sites for r
> On 10.04.2017, at 00:01, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> I think that the minimal requirement from the community side is to have the
> Security fixes applicable on the last Jenkins LTS with security fixes in the
> core.
Strictly speaking, this is up to maintainers, but I
> On 08.04.2017, at 00:26, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
> Having said all that, if MC *wants* the fun of maintaining trilead, I'm fine
> with that.
I told him before he sent the email about the CloudBees plans, and he was fine
with that. So unless someone
> On 06.04.2017, at 11:12, Robert Sandell wrote:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
Doing this can conceivably be part of a defense-in-depth strategy that tries to
slow down potential attacker by making information gathering as difficult as
Hi everyone,
as discussed a while back[1], and implemented for the first time with Pipeline
Classpath Plugin a few weeks ago[2], we started removing plugins with unfixed
security vulnerabilities from distribution.
What we haven't discussed is what to do with plugins that receive fixes: Should
> On 04.04.2017, at 03:54, JordanGS wrote:
>
> Is there any plans on enabling the source editor in the future for the wiki,
> see here.
you should probably ask on the infra list. I'm not sure Tyler regularly reads
the dev list.
--
You received this message
> On 02.04.2017, at 11:04, amine choukir wrote:
>
> e. I tried to look for the postinstall in the git repo of jenkins but could
> not find it.
It's in https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging (also the name of the Jira
component to use)
--
You received this message
> On 30.03.2017, at 13:33, nicolas de loof wrote:
>
> not sure where to request this.
Here is fine.
Fixed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
> On 27.03.2017, at 15:47, David Brooks wrote:
>
> However, I do not see any documentation around Step and BuildStep has been
> deprecated. I just need a little nudge in the right direction, not the full
> solution.
I think
> On 27.03.2017, at 12:56, Nikolas Falco wrote:
>
> my user name for jenkins JIRA is nfalco, I will appreciate a lot your help
> for default assignee of NodeJS component becuase since now I have to look up
> every day for new issues
Done.
--
You received this message
> On 23.03.2017, at 17:12, Jakub Bocheński wrote:
>
> I still have no write access there though.
Should be resolved now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
> On 24.03.2017, at 22:18, Steve Christou wrote:
>
> Would anyone else object to me taking ownership of the cobertura plugin also?
> I am currently the core maintainer of cobertura. If no one has any
> objections, I will add myself and mbarrien to the list of
> On 13.03.2017, at 02:14, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> I'm asking because I'd like to redefine it to point to a full browsable SCM
> URL to support linking to the correct SCM URL on plugins.j.io and don't want
> to break things that still rely on the c
> On 19.03.2017, at 01:35, JordanGS wrote:
>
> no longer found
I would be surprised if it ever existed, as our artifacts are hosted on
repo.jenkins-ci.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To
> On 17.03.2017, at 20:05, JordanGS wrote:
>
> Followed the hosting instructions found here.
>
> I wanted to verify that your credential is correctly recognized by Maven so i
> ran mvn deploy
>
> Any advice would be appreciated.
A quick Google search indicates
> On 15.03.2017, at 23:40, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> Please read and comment (you can fork my gist if you just want to
> suggest edits):
>
> https://gist.github.com/jglick/9721427da892a9b2f75dc5bc09f8e6b3
I'm very happy with this proposal. It's well thought out and
> On 13.03.2017, at 04:52, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> This is about http://updates.jenkins-ci.org/release-history.json
>
> Are there any known consumers for that file except jenkins.io/release.rss
> (which also drives @jenkins_release on Twitter)
> On 17.03.2017, at 16:28, Janario Oliveira wrote:
>
> And It goes in other places.
>
> If there is a way to fix all this, I could keep the old name
Jira link will be removed soon anyway since we currently have no great way to
handle the naming inconsistencies
> On 17.03.2017, at 15:54, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> First of all, there is no mechanism in Jenkins to change the ID of a
> plugin after people have installed it. So users will not see an
> upgrade; they will just see an unrelated plugin.
This. 4.5k users will be stuck on
> On 15.03.2017, at 17:39, Kanstantsin Shautsou
> wrote:
>
> Now it messed with statuses created for somebody needs.
What are you referring to?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe
> On 15.03.2017, at 11:31, Christopher Orr wrote:
>
> I've asked the bot again just now, but it seems to be asleep. Maybe a
> GitHub admin can take a look:
> https://github.com/jenkinsci/matrix-auth-plugin
> https://github.com/mathias-nyman
Fixed. Probably one of the leftover
> On 14.03.2017, at 23:27, Christopher Orr wrote:
>
> Such a question is very unwieldy, and makes it harder for people to
> answer. Please reproduce the problem in a bare-minimum Pipeline and
> update your question on SO.
On top of all that, it's been posted to the wrong
> On 14.03.2017, at 22:08, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>
> Have you guys tried to contact GitHub support and talk about that?
http://lists.jenkins-ci.org/pipermail/jenkins-infra/2016-October/000893.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Nice, well written request.
Re Ulli's old email address no longer working, I'm adding him in CC.
> On 13.03.2017, at 21:27, Michael Barrientos wrote:
>
> I would like to get commit rights to
> http://github.com/jenkinsci/cobertura-plugin.
>
> Per instructions on both
Hi everyone,
it seems sprints in Jira are globally visible (across projects), and, when
editing an issue, provide little context as to what that sprint is.
I think some sort of prefix in names should be adopted by everyone using
sprints in Jira -- basically James D right now -- to make it easy
> On 13.03.2017, at 15:15, JordanGS wrote:
>
> published half the files for some reason, so i believe that caused the hidden
Right, you're not allowed to delete, which is what overwriting does (delete +
create).
That version number is burnt, use the next one.
--
> On 13.03.2017, at 11:10, Robert Sandell wrote:
>
> You might not be on the list of contributors allowed to upload artifacts
> https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater
He is, but may be using a different account now.
--
You received this
Hi everyone,
This is about http://updates.jenkins-ci.org/release-history.json
Are there any known consumers for that file except jenkins.io/release.rss
(which also drives @jenkins_release on Twitter)?
Thanks!
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> On 13.03.2017, at 02:14, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> It was introduced in
> https://github.com/jenkins-infra/backend-update-center2/commit/e68790e1d48848a1b3db59b84ec3c6e9815bd351
> with no explanation of its purpose, so cc'ing Andrew.
Oops, wrong link.
I
Hi everyone,
Are you aware of consumers of the 'scm' element in the update-center.json files
that currently just points to a domain?
It was introduced in
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/backend-update-center2/commit/e68790e1d48848a1b3db59b84ec3c6e9815bd351
with no explanation of its purpose,
> On 10.03.2017, at 12:00, Fritz Elfert wrote:
>
> However: The link generator apparently needs some more work.
>
> Links on the left top ("GitHub", "Open Issues", "Latest rolling changes"
> "Changes in x.x release") seem to be broken with some plugins:
>
> E.g. broken
> On 10.03.2017, at 08:53, Gavin Mogan wrote:
>
> Is the wiki going away
No.
We cut the wiki dependency to allow the wiki to be updated etc. without
worrying about breaking the update center, not to get rid of it.
> On 10.03.2017, at 00:18, Raphael Pionke wrote:
>
> BTW: Can we adjust the links from https://twitter.com/jenkins_release to use
> the new plugins.jenkins.io page?
Right, that would be nice.
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/backend-update-center2/pull/118
> On 08.03.2017, at 11:37, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>
> I don't know if there were any strong arguments to have searching
> case-sensitive by default a few years ago or it was just set to that mode.
> Therefore, I would ask what do you think about that and about a possibility
> On 08.03.2017, at 03:16, Lucas Machado wrote:
>
> Now my BuildWrapper is subject to this 5min timeout and it gets an
> InterruptedException on case it takes longer to run
> I have a special use case that it can takes a little more the this 5 minutes
> to run.
> My
> On 07.03.2017, at 23:12, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> Since we now cannot rely on the wiki pages to exist, how can be accomplish
> the goals of having some minimal information for all plugins? Well, since
> October or so, we have plugins.jenkins.io, with a
Hi everyone,
I pushed a change to the update center today.
TLDR: Wiki edits could have inadvertently removed plugins from the update site,
breaking the suggested plugin installation experience for new Jenkins users. We
fixed that by no longer relying on wiki data during update site generation.
> On 07.03.2017, at 21:03, is@ wrote:
>
> After looking at the Jenkins Browser Compatibility Matrix I have noticed that
> Safari has level 1 support for versions 6 and newer. Since Safari is an
> evergreen browser, I would like to propose to support only the latest
> On 07.03.2017, at 15:41, Lucy StandUp wrote:
>
> Currently using the latest version of Jenkins Pipelines.
>
> Having difficulty with Gradle + Jenkins Pipelines + Espresso (Android) tests.
>
> Would like to have Jenkins’ builds show failed if tests failed.
>
> Any
> On 02.03.2017, at 06:10, R. Tyler Croy wrote:
>
> This literally affects nobody
Do you know how many translations we receive via the translation assistance
plugin?
We probably should also rebrand that plugin, rather that deprecate/tombstone
it, as it allows
> On 01.03.2017, at 18:06, mohan kumar wrote:
>
> I guess it will get the infobox information in some time. Thanks again.
Add a query parameter, e.g. ?nocache, to bypass caching. See my link in the
previous email.
--
You received this message because you are
> On 01.03.2017, at 17:00, Gabe Montero wrote:
>
> So I'm listed as a developer for the openshift-sync plugin here:
> https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater/blob/master/permissions/plugin-openshift-sync.yml#L7
>
> However if you look at the
> On 01.03.2017, at 16:00, mohan kumar wrote:
>
> The plugin that I maintain is missing its infobox on the wiki page. It was
> always properly showed but is not shown anymore. Is anyone be able to show me
> the way to solve this?
>
>
> On 27.02.2017, at 23:56, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> it would be great if the Jenkins Board shares info a kind of the Jenkins
> budget stats for previous years. It is hard to estimate how much the program
> contributes compared to other sources (I'd guess it contributes
> On 28.02.2017, at 01:51, Gavin Mogan wrote:
>
> Since Jenkins removes the start of Jenkins, is there any restriction on the
> use of the name? I saw cloudbees before has had to apply for use, but I know
> thats for seperate projects.
>
> We want to rename it to "Sauce
> On 27.02.2017, at 19:19, Siva varma Datla wrote:
>
> Is there anyway to do that?
Please ask questions like this on the jenkinsci-users mailing list:
https://jenkins.io/mailing-lists/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> On 27.02.2017, at 09:14, Gavin Mogan wrote:
>
> Is it as simple as renaming the wiki page, and updating the in the
> pom.xml file? I vaguely remember something about items in the update center
> not showing up if the wiki page didn't match the plugin page but I can't
Hi everyone,
This is about the patron program:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Patron+of+Jenkins+program
While we have never 'reviewed' the program as described on the wiki page, the
project meeting has continued to approve donor messages whenever there were
changes, and patrons
> On 21.02.2017, at 18:02, 'Claudiu Guiman' via Jenkins Developers
> wrote:
>
> But I can’t list credentials. Is it because the temporary admin account
> doesn’t have the right permissions?
Please use the jenkinsci-users mailing lists for questions like this.
> On 10.02.2017, at 11:16, Enoch wrote:
>
> we noticed that post-build mails suffixes "?page=changes" to the detail URL
> recently.
> Does somebody feel responsible or knows how to change such behavior?
>
Hi,
Please use our bug tracker to report bugs. In this case,
> On 21.02.2017, at 13:12, rouke.broer...@infosupport.com wrote:
>
> Is there any documentation on the change to ci.jenkins.io? The only thing I
> can find right now is this thread:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/439-IDYNSVY about a
> trial on using ci.jenkins.io to
> On 20.02.2017, at 18:19, Graham Lyons wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get information about running builds on Jenkins agents, with
> and without pipelines.
Please ask questions like this on the jenkinsci-users mailing list.
https://jenkins.io/content/mailing-lists
Thanks!
> On 20.02.2017, at 12:31, Robert Sandell wrote:
>
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Marking+a+new+plugin+version+as+incompatible+with+older+versions
… which should be only used when there's really no way to make work.
> On 20.02.2017, at 11:37, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> I don't like to have the changelog leaving outside of the project repository.
It already was in the case of LTS (which AFAIK is the line more successful with
users since we made it more discoverable on the site), and
Hi everyone,
I moved the changelog to the site:
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/blob/master/content/_data/changelogs/weekly.yml
All that's left in jenkinsci/jenkins is a tombstone file directing people to
the file above:
> On 17.02.2017, at 21:38, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> In that case maybe just rename the `Builder` class rather than even
> wasting time on migration.
+
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Marking+a+new+plugin+version+as+incompatible+with+older+versions
--
You
> On 17.02.2017, at 21:20, Peter Zhao wrote:
>
> Hi Jenkins gurus,
Please ask questions like this on the jenkinsci-users mailing list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this
> On 15.02.2017, at 18:21, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> Anyone opposed? If not, I'll implement this.
I removed it from the event calendar, and updated the wiki page. If I see more
references, I'll clean those up as well.
--
You received this message because you
> On 16.02.2017, at 23:29, Shawn MacArthur wrote:
>
> I've updated a plugin here
>
> https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/releases/org/jenkins-ci/plugins/nouvola-divecloud/
>
> but the latest version doesn't appear in
>
> https://updates.jenkins-ci.org/update-center.json
>
> On 16.02.2017, at 20:56, Pino Alu wrote:
>
> Using Jenkins core v 1.625.3
Jenkins 2.16 and up tell you when your plugin configuration is invalid and
refuse to load plugins with unsatisfied dependencies. I recommend you upgrade
to a recent release.
Also, please ask
> On 16.02.2017, at 07:47, Robert St. John wrote:
>
> Does Jenkins offer a mechanism to support a data migration like this?
These are the resources we currently have for format changes:
- http://javadoc.jenkins-ci.org/index.html?hudson/XmlFile.html
-
Hi everyone,
Remember Office Hours?
Yeah, me neither.
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Office+Hours
Lately we've done Office Hour-style presentations much more successfully via
the Jenkins Online Meetup.
I propose we remove office hours from our calendar, update wiki pages to
> On 13.02.2017, at 13:11, 'Roman Haas' via Jenkins Developers
> wrote:
>
> In the attachment, you find a file that lists ten suggestions for unnecessary
> code in your code base. Each suggestion consists of one or more files or
> packages; if there are
> On 13.02.2017, at 13:04, Sean Flanigan wrote:
>
> I'm having the issue too. Would you please let us know the result?
Got a canned response so far, nothing else.
Will respond to
http://lists.jenkins-ci.org/pipermail/jenkins-infra/2017-February/001033.html
once I
> On 10.02.2017, at 19:05, Victor Martinez
> wrote:
>
> from the maven configuration is failing, so I don't know how to debug
> further, any ideas/hints?
Make this ID match the one in settings.xml so Maven knows this is the same repo:
Already asked JFrog for help (my message seems stuck in the moderation queue of
the infra list), no response so far.
> On 09.02.2017, at 23:32, Victor Martinez
> wrote:
>
> Can you login to https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/webapp/#/login ? I tried to
> reset my
> On 08.02.2017, at 21:58, Slide wrote:
>
> It doesn't look like it did, I only see a Linux build happening see [1]. I
> don't think I have direct commit rights on jenkinsci/jenkins.
I created a branch and added the Windows build back on it.
> On 08.02.2017, at 21:57, siva.datla...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> th process to follow please
You could start by asking this on the correct mailing list.
https://jenkins.io/content/mailing-lists
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers"
> On 06.02.2017, at 18:23, Slide wrote:
>
> Just skipping them seems too hacky to me.
IMO we should get Windows testing back ASAP -- so if skip on Windows + TODO
comment gets us there more quickly, we should do so.
While it doesn't improve the Windows coverage, it will
This is not a dev list question.
Also, don't cross-post.
> On 06.02.2017, at 07:20, Vikrant Kaushik wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> This weekend I'm planning to upgrade my Jenkins as per below Migration plan:
>
> 1.585 -> LTS 2.32.1
>
> Request all of you to please
> On 02.02.2017, at 20:35, Slide wrote:
>
> I have verified that the message does exist, so I'm kind of at a loss.
Did the localizer run? I.e. are there generated sources for Messages.java?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> On 02.02.2017, at 19:51, Don Alcombright wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on what I am doing wrong?
This is not a question for the developers list. Please ask questions like this
on the users list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> On 01.02.2017, at 20:09, ta...@appscode.com wrote:
>
> Now that I got you here
Uh…
https://github.com/jenkinsci/swarm-plugin/commits/master?author=jglick
Whatever your request is, Jesse is probably the wrong person to ask.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> On 01.02.2017, at 15:10, Ihor Bilovus wrote:
>
> Please add new instance types (i.e. m4.16xlarge / r4.16xlarge and so on) to
> ec2-plugin.
This is not where, or even how, you ask for changes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> On 01.02.2017, at 11:28, Harsh Agarwal wrote:
>
> 2. While building with parameters the project, the values of the variables
> should be pre-computed and provide a dropdown to the users to choose from.
We're at around half a dozen plugins that do something like
> On 01.02.2017, at 12:37, gaurav lele wrote:
>
> using the ArtifactDeployer plugin
Please ask questions like this on the jenkinsci-users mailing list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To
> On 30.01.2017, at 16:41, Ayellet wrote:
>
> (in other words: I need an access from my plugin (java plugin), during
> hudson.model.listeners.RunListener flow.
A Pipeline run/build can have any number of different workspaces on different
nodes in parallel, so the notion
> On 28.01.2017, at 21:16, Mark Waite wrote:
>
> Log is appended to the end of the message.
>
> I'm building from https://github.com/MarkEWaite/git-plugin using branch
> master-PR463-add-git-lfs. It includes a dependency on git-client-plugin
> 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT which
> On 28.01.2017, at 19:56, Mark Waite wrote:
>
> when I try to download them from the web UI (or from my git plugin build),
> they fail to download.
I get that the UI fails, as the reverse proxy config is broken (see the extra
'jenkinsci' as web app context on
> On 27.01.2017, at 21:57, Keith Collison wrote:
>
> not yet merged.
Done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
> On 27.01.2017, at 09:51, 'Nikolas Falco' via Jenkins Developers
> wrote:
>
> I already release two new versions but the Wiki page of Plugin continue to
> show warning message: "This plugin is up for adoption. Want to help improve
> this plugin?"
Clicking
> On 26.01.2017, at 19:52, Moshe Cohen wrote:
>
> Can you point me to an example that does what you just mentioned?
>
This PR (that I really need to finish some time…) does something similar in
Copy Artifact:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/copyartifact-plugin/pull/32
A
This is the Jenkins developers mailing list. Please ask on the Jenkins users
mailing list instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
> On 21.01.2017, at 15:07, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
>
> adding the NEW status
>
> Having a state to basically say: "this is issue is new, but has not been
> reviewed, so may be invalid/incomplete/whatever for whatever reason" makes
> sense IMO.
Shouldn't we create a new "To
This is not an appropriate question for this list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view
> On 15.01.2017, at 19:08, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> I have just removed the ID in the distributionManagement from POM
WHY? WHY remove it altogether after being told to change it to the same value
as something else?
I give up.
--
You received this message because you are
> On 15.01.2017, at 19:08, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> still same unauthorized issue
>
What's the effective POM now?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
> On 15.01.2017, at 18:34, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> Can you please quickly review and see any issue.
>
Change the IDs of distributionManagement as well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To
> On 15.01.2017, at 17:52, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> so what would be the correct ID ?
> java.net-m2-repository OR repo.jenkins-ci.org ??
>
Doesn't matter, just needs to match.
FWIW recent parent POMs used maven.jenkins-ci.org, so you may be able to just
remove that
The password is defined for the repo ID: java.net-m2-repository
The upload goes to the repo ID: repo.jenkins-ci.org
Am I missing something here? Isn't this the problem?
> On 15.01.2017, at 10:05, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/SETTINGS/1.1.0;>
>
>
> On 14.01.2017, at 18:39, Christopher Orr wrote:
>
> Since last month, no special permissions are needed to upload SNAPSHOTs:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/53CC6ED4-3BBC-4FAD-A197-10AD7F922A34%40beckweb.net
>
> The permissions look correct here, and match
> On 13.01.2017, at 13:42, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
>
> Yes and no. There are definitely some similarities, sure, but this is case is
> not an adoption IIUC?
We should update
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Pull+Request+to+Repositories --
This unfortunately named
> On 11.01.2017, at 17:34, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> not getting why "unauthorized" error is coming
Have you looked into all of the suggestions in the 12th note at
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Hosting+Plugins#HostingPlugins-Workingaroundcommonissues
?
--
> On 02.11.2016, at 13:59, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote:
>
> 3. Add metadata to the plugin site indicating vulnerable plugins to inform
> admins who already have the plugin installed.
FTR this feature made it into 2.40 and Oliver accepted it into 2.32.2. Some
scree
> On 07.01.2017, at 01:47, Moshe Cohen wrote:
>
> 1) Where is the link to the Github repo?
I filed this https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/WEBSITE-279
> 2) How can I edit the page itself when there is an update?
The documentation content is still sourced from the plugin
> On 06.01.2017, at 16:16, Michael Donohue wrote:
>
> I would love for someone to take on this plugin.
I tagged its wiki page to increase the visibility of this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers"
> On 06.01.2017, at 14:26, Irfan Sayed wrote:
>
> 2.3
>
The first response you got linked to:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Hosting+Plugins#HostingPlugins-Workingaroundcommonissues
And it says:
> … or update to the parent plugins POM 2.5 or newer
801 - 900 of 1930 matches
Mail list logo