Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

I'm not sure where this thread is now -- are you still asking for hosting of this plugin? If so, could anyone speak up wrt whether there are legitimate reasons not to do this? So far the number of existing similar implementations has been mentioned -- how similar are they? Would an

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

The Docker landscape in Jenkins is kind of a mess, but I do feel this is a good thing for an extensible open source project. The situation is exaggerated here because there is so much interest and momentum in Docker. We've discussed two Docker client libraries in this thread. There is a third,

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:56 AM, kmbulebu wrote: > 'Here's some of the issues I've encountered while working > with the plugins that rely on the docker cli: All valid points (with some workarounds), but the flip side is that when calling a CLI you can reproduce the exact

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

This is the problem about jenkins - 1000 half backed plugins. Would be better with 100 well curated :) That's where I'd be willing to pay for support. 2015-11-18 16:48 GMT+01:00 Kirill Merkushev : > Think plugins can be merged without any problem with saving of current >

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

> > On Nov 18, 2015, at 17:32, domi wrote: > > To be honest, the whole list of jenkins docker plugins feels like a zoo and > there is no way a normal user can keep up and make the right choice. Technically it’s a question to plugin manager and providing ratings & statistics.

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

> > > To be honest, the whole list of jenkins docker plugins feels like a zoo > and there is no way a normal user can keep up and make the right choice. > I think this work should be coordinated better and an uptodate comparison > should be kept at a central place. > ..my 2cents > /Domi > > I

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 18:25, Nigel Magnay wrote: > > > To be honest, the whole list of jenkins docker plugins feels like a zoo and > there is no way a normal user can keep up and make the right choice. > I think this work should be coordinated better and an uptodate

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

Think plugins can be merged without any problem with saving of current functionality for both. (With shading of both libs). One will use one type of cloud, another - own type of cloud. They can be located in separate packages and don't mix in different cases. (But please use

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 7:28:00 PM UTC+3, Jesse Glick wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:02 PM, kmbulebu > wrote: > > I believe the real horse race is between the > > underlying docker libraries. In the end, we'll likely have a clear > winner, > > and can

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

To be honest, the whole list of jenkins docker plugins feels like a zoo and there is no way a normal user can keep up and make the right choice. I think this work should be coordinated better and an uptodate comparison should be kept at a central place. ..my 2cents /Domi > On 18 Nov 2015, at

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:02 PM, kmbulebu wrote: > I believe the real horse race is between the > underlying docker libraries. In the end, we'll likely have a clear winner, > and can standardize a group of plugins around that. Perhaps docker-commons > becomes that focal

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

FWIW, I have pushed changes for both TLS and JNLP in docker-plugin, so the comparison can now be reduced to Docker Plugin - Provides additional capabilities beyond slaves, such as Docker build steps. On Tue, Nov 17,

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

(replies inline) On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, kmbulebu wrote: > I'd like to introduce a new plugin for hosting on jenkins-ci.org, the > docker ephemeral cloud plugin. > > Github Home: https://github.com/kmbulebu/docker-ephemeral-cloud > Github and Jenkins username: kmbulebu > Name:

Re: New Plugin hosting request: Docker Ephemeral Cloud

Thanks for your kind words :). I understand. At a high level, they both aim to deliver slaves using Docker. This is an old problem; do you break away and create new, or revise in place? I think we should move forward with the new one, and let it work itself out. I'm not opposed to merging,