Plugin Licenses

So on the docs sig gitter channel we started talking about surfacing more data (like number of issues) on the plugins website, and after looking at other examples, especially NPM, I started to think about plugin licenses. Our plugin docs say unless otherwise stated, plugins are MIT license.

Re: plugin parent 4.0

Oh, i think my eyes automatically glaze over the start of these things after looking at recipe sites. That or italics. My bad, I'll update to 2.164, or tell dependabot to ignore this dep. On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:02 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > There is a *"Note: Jenkins 2.164.x is the minimum

Re: plugin parent 4.0

There is a *"Note: Jenkins 2.164.x is the minimum supported version as it's the first version that includes the Jenkins bom" *warning in release notes https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/releases/tag/plugin-4.0 For older core versions we can still release the 3.x Plugin POM versions on-demand.

Re: plugin parent 4.0

Are there version limits to the parent pom now? Is there a way to disable the bom stuff for older jenkins? https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Plugins%2Fgraphql-server-plugin/detail/dependabot%2Fmaven%2Forg.jenkins-ci.plugins-plugin-4.1/1/pipeline/ Caused by:

Re: Approval to use the Jenkins logo

Hi all, We discussed this topic at the Jenkins Governance meeting. We do not think that an approval is needed as long as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License requirements are followed. Just in case an explicit

Re: Request to maintain plugin GitHub Pull Request Builder

Hi everyone, Here's my first contribution, if you want to have a look: https://github.com/jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin/pull/775 Cheers, Antoine Le mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 10:17, Antoine Duprat a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I'm interested too in having some rights on this plugin. > I'm actually working

Re: ANN: First Jenkins roadmap meeting on April 22nd

Zoom link for the meeting: https://zoom.us/j/91947412082?pwd=M0E0ZzRHa0ZjWHFkN09XN051MHM3dz09 On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:04:22 AM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Dear all, > > At the previous governance meeting > in April we agreed to > try

Re: ANN: Agent Docker images renaming on April 12-13

Yup. I saw that after I posted. Since we are relying on this particular image, we are on our own, as in "nobody did an image, yet". I'll try to see if I can migrate the "with-java-build-tools" part into our own image. On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:43 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at

Re: ANN: Agent Docker images renaming on April 12-13

Hi Jon, I don't see such an image being already published by Jenkins. Can you specify where you are getting it? Regards, Alex On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 03:13 Jon Brohauge wrote: > Hi Oleg et. al, > > Regarding the renaming to jnlp-slave -> inbound-agent, will there be a > similar

Re: ANN: Agent Docker images renaming on April 12-13

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:13 AM Jon Brohauge wrote: > Regarding the renaming to jnlp-slave -> inbound-agent, will there be a > similar jnlp-slave-with-java-build-tools -> > inbound-agent-with-java-build-tools? That is a `cloudbees` image. Not sure whether it is actively maintained. -- You

Re: plugin parent 4.0

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:41 AM Ullrich Hafner wrote: >> occasions wasted plenty of time trying to track down cryptic `LinkageError`s >> caused by mismatched dependencies. > > Was that while developing plugins or core? Plugins. > even if the enforcer finds something during compile it might be

2.222.2 LTS ETA

Hello, Do we have any ETA about today's 2.222.2 LTS? Thanks in advance! -- Ildefonso Montero Pérez Senior Software Engineer CloudBees, Inc E: imont...@cloudbees.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe

Re: ANN: Agent Docker images renaming on April 12-13

Hi Oleg et. al, Regarding the renaming to jnlp-slave -> inbound-agent, will there be a similar jnlp-slave-with-java-build-tools -> inbound-agent-with-java-build-tools? I know that it is possible to do the "with-java-build-tools" part oneself, it is IMHO easier to rely on an image that

Re: plugin parent 4.0

> Am 21.04.2020 um 19:05 schrieb Jesse Glick : > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:11 PM Ullrich Hafner > wrote: >> The enforcer never found a real bug up to now > > Interesting, before using `RequireUpperBoundDeps` I had on numerous > occasions wasted plenty of time trying to track down cryptic

Re: plugin parent 4.0

I think Tim fixed that already yesterday (https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/commit/fdfec966fcc6048cfd2703ec2baded40eddd1db8 ) > Am 22.04.2020 um 00:26 schrieb James Nord : > >>