Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.222

My preference would be 2.234, It has the most system read features in it which would be great to announce as part of the next LTS Also 2.233 has the button re-work which really should make it in imo (and 2.234 with the help icon changes) Thanks Tim On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 11:44, Oliver Gondža

Re: ANN: Agent Docker images renaming on April 12-13

+1 On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 11:47, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > We did not receive any negative feedback about "SSH Build Agents" AFAICT. > This is also my preference at the moment: > https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker-ssh-slave/pull/50 > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 12:16 Daniel Beck wrote: > >> >> >> >

Re: Proposal: Documenting the Jenkins themes support policy

Looks good to me On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 12:14, Hickel, Kelly wrote: > yes > > > > > > -Kelly > > > > *From:* jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com *On Behalf Of * Oleg Nenashev > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2020 6:07 AM > *To:* JenkinsCI Developers ; > jenkinsci...@googlegroups.com;

JENKINS-56109 Jenkins form UI rework

Hi There’s been work going on for over a year now which converts the Jenkins form layout from using a table based design to using div’s. It’s now getting very close to landing (hopefully in the next weekly release or so, pending any feedback), and I wanted to announce it as it will have impacts

Re: Proposal: Release Jenkins weekly on Tuesday

Or we could possibly move weekly changelog to GitHub release only? I think that would make it it more less effort by being automated + slight tweaks on top Thoughts? On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 20:18, Daniel Beck wrote: > Easy fix: Whoever wants to merge something on a weekend is responsible for >

Re: Proposal: Release Jenkins weekly on Tuesday

+1 to Moving to Tuesday On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 19:47, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On 18. May 2020, at 19:30, Mark Waite wrote: > > > > I propose that we move the weekly build to Tuesday so that I don't need > to prepare the weekly changelog on Sunday night. > > > FWIW I proposed my favored

Re: Hosting the Jenkins UI/UX Hackfest repository in jenkinsci

+1000 On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 14:51, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 from me. > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:38 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am working on a repository for the UI/UX online hackfest >> next week. >> This

ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

Hi all Just an update to let you know that you can now re-run failed builds via GitHub checks on ci.jenkins.io. (Only maintainers, i.e. write access can do this, authors need to push a code change or close / reopen) This is made possible with the GitHub checks plugin

Re: API to render links with RepositoryBrowser

I think it’s this: https://javadoc.jenkins.io/plugin/scm-api/jenkins/scm/api/metadata/ObjectMetadataAction.html On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 21:56, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > SCM plugins like the Git plugin show links to the changes in the hosted > repositories (e.g. to GitHub changes). > > Is there a

Re: Create plugins that require oracle jdbc diver

Hi Miguel I would recommend adding instructions to your plugin on how users can install it. The driver should be added to the $JENKINS_HOME/jdbc-drivers folder:

Re: Loading JenkinsRule from pre-defined xml files?

https://javadoc.jenkins.io/component/jenkins-test-harness/org/jvnet/hudson/test/recipes/LocalData.html It has method retention so I don't think it'll work on a field On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 15:01, Michael Carter wrote: > Any docs on how to get something like this working? > >

Re: [jenkins-infra] Re: ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

GH Checks, which I hadn't seen before. Cool. >>>> >>> >>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 11:19, Manuel Ramón León Jiménez < >>>> manuelramon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great, thank you for the heads up. >>>>> >>>

Re: Test Results (Junit) is there an entry method I can use over generating xml?

There's a very early version of pluggable storage available that you can use with a SQL backend instead of XML https://github.com/jenkinsci/junit-plugin/releases/tag/junit-1.32 https://github.com/jenkinsci/junit-plugin/issues/142 The API may change in incompatible ways, and it's not complete

Re: Move stable/jenkins kubernetes chart to jenkinci GitHub org

Issues are open now, I've raised a few, @Gavin Mogan (or anyone else) your feedback here would be greatly appreciated https://github.com/jenkinsci/helm-charts/issues On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 23:39, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > For deploying we

Re: Forked repositories in GitHub

Hi Daniel Completely agree with this, I've accidentally submitted PRs to the wrong forks many times. Both because of GitHub CLI and also just the web UI picking the wrong one. For the record I've had GitHub support break the fork relationship from all the components that I maintain as far as I

Re: Move stable/jenkins kubernetes chart to jenkinci GitHub org

Hi Torsten We were just discussing this today on IRC strangely enough and I was planning to reach out to you about this. I take your point Gavin about there being issues with it but this helm chart has a lot of adoption and it’s best to improve what we have (and I’d be happy to help) The

Re: Remoting help - CannotResolveClassException

to xml and deserialise. Still would be interested if anyone knows: 1. how to make it work in this way 2. why it works for the h2 database in the junit plugin? Thanks Tim On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:04, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently working on pluggable storage for the Junit plug

Adopt database plugin request

Hi I would like to adopt https://plugins.jenkins.io/database/ I'm working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin and would like to refresh the plugin and make some minor improvements. Thanks Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins

Re: API to render links with RepositoryBrowser

Can you use the ObjectMetadataAction? On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 19:46, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > Seems that I am getting from one problem to the next :-( > > RunWithSCM.html#getChangeSets returns a list of changes in the current > build. The links I want to create are commits that are not

Re: ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

, which I hadn't seen before. Cool. >> >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 11:19, Manuel Ramón León Jiménez < >> manuelramon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Great, thank you for the heads up. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:55 AM Arnaud Hérit

Re: Release Drafter convention for 'do not use this release' or 'known issues'

t; (with corresponding emoji) and putting it in the > release-drafter.yml config, to ensure that nothing else uses it. > > Chris > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 5:11 PM, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers > wrote: > > I believe there is also a file in update center that can be used to

Re: Release Drafter convention for 'do not use this release' or 'known issues'

Hi Chris I'm not sure if it fits into release drafter, as it only updates drafts, as soon as you publish the release it won't be updated by the tool anymore. I assume you would never publish a knowingly broken release and it would only be known retroactively. What sort of convention are you

Re: Configuration Slicing plugin adoption

;>>>>>>>>>> main/java/configurationslicing/tools/GradleSlicer.java:[52,52] >>>>>>>>>>>> cannot find symbol >>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] symbol: method getDescription() >>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] location

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues in it. 2.263 was reverting / fixing the last of the major regressions in the previous versions. Thanks Tim On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:48, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I hope the today's 2.263 stabilizes the weekly release line: >

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

tched my test environment to Jenkins 2.263. I'll >> continue running in that environment. It is looking good so far. >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:59 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: >> >>> 2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues in

Re: certificate error on lts 2.235.2 (centos/red hat)

Yes it appears to have expired curl -kv https://pkg.origin.jenkins.io/ * Server certificate: * subject: CN=pkg.jenkins.io * start date: Apr 19 13:34:08 2020 GMT * expire date: Jul 18 13:34:08 2020 GMT * issuer: C=US; O=Let's Encrypt; CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 * SSL certificate verify

Re: Jenkins Plugin vs Pipeline Shared Libraries

You probably already know the answer but no a pipeline library can’t do most of that... It can run external code in libraries, via @grab (not really recommended) or by installing the library on the agent and calling it via shell scripts Shared libraries can’t be used for freestyle jobs at all as

buildPlugin() now with Warnings NG and GitHub checks

Hi all I’m happy to announce that the `buildPlugin()` library step that is used by almost all plugins on ci.jenkins.io now uses the Warnings NG plugin for static code analysis reporting and quality control. We have set default quality gate for: -

JEP-224 and ExtendedRead - Time to graduate to GA?

Hi all Thoughts on graduating to GA: - Agent/ExtendedRead - Job/ExtendedRead - Overall/SystemRead GA would mean: - Enabled by default - Beta API restriction removed from Overall/SystemRead - Only weekly line affected for now, wouldn't be GA in LTS until the line after

Re: JEP-224 and ExtendedRead - Time to graduate to GA?

Minor correction matrix auth doesn't depend on the plugin and role strategy will no longer depend on it after https://github.com/jenkinsci/role-strategy-plugin/pull/139 is merged (Both have a minimum core of 2.222.x) On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 21:46, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hi all > >

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

Hi Cyrille Yes we can take care of that. Arnaud can you send a PR to the permissions file and then we can get your access sorted out? Thanks Tim On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:42, Cyrille Le Clerc wrote: > Thanks Arnaud and Tim. > > With great pleasure Arnaud. I don't have bandwidth anymore to

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

Adding Cyrille to cc On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:21, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi team, > > I would like to take ownership of the pipeline-maven plugin which is now > abandoned by his previous maintainers (Cyrille and Alvaro). > I am actively using this plugin and I know it very well (I worked

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

FYI I got an out of office bounce from cyrille's email till August 24th On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:52, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Adding Cyrille to cc > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:21, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> I would like to take ownership of t

Re: Ideas Discussion: Tracing fingerprints (artifacts, credentials, docker images, etc.) across Jenkins Instances!

Hi Great to see work being done on pluggable storage. Personally I’ve never used the fingerprinting feature, but I assume / hope there’s people out there who are able to chime in. Thanks Tim On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 15:21, Sumit Sarin wrote: > Hi Everyone! > > I would like to start this thread

Re: ANN: Jenkins release artifacts uploads blockage on June 09, and a temporary downloads issue

Apparently I use an artifactory API key to release, so I had to go into my artifactory settings (https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/webapp/#/home) and generate a new API key Tim On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 13:53, Mark Waite wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:44 AM Karsten Jeschkies > wrote: > >> Hi,

Re: ANN: Jenkins release artifacts uploads blockage on June 09, and a temporary downloads issue

it's just the same as a password to maven, so use the api key instead of a password. On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 14:39, wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the advice. Hm, my ~/.m2/settings.xml had my encrypted > password. The docs ( >

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

Hi Radek Jira cloud isn’t an option due to our number of users and a couple of other reasons (there’s a ticket with a summary somewhere in jira) Linux foundation have offered to host jira though which may at least get us one we don’t have to maintain. Fully agree with your other points Maybe

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Daniel Beck wrote: > Having a screen like > https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin/issues/new/choose > could help here, but that's far from universal right now. Is this something > that could be defined via .github? Having a screen similar to this

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

/a939f198752b218c3270ac043eb0813f Thanks Tim On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 21:50, Tim Jacomb wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 21:44, James Nord wrote: > >> > am I missing something in this thread >> >> security reports? >> >> currently they are all triaged by the security team so the tea

Re: Contibuting to JUnit Plugin

There’s a draft PR for converting the charts to ECharts: https://github.com/jenkinsci/junit-plugin/pull/134 On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 00:18, Jesse Glick wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:20 PM Sanjeet Malhotra > wrote: > > reloading of previous builds is quite expensive […] Can some please >

Re: Contributing documentation from other sources

Hi Mark Have you got any examples of documentation that would be good to migrate? Sounds great though Thanks Tim On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 22:39, Mark Waite wrote: > The documentation team at CloudBees has asked if the community would be > interested in reworking or adjusting documentation that

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

ic to how we maintain issues.jenkins-ci.org on the other thread. >> >> Cheers >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Radosław Antoniuk wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:30 PM Tim Jacomb wrote: >> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Daniel Beck w

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 21:44, James Nord wrote: > > am I missing something in this thread > > security reports? > > currently they are all triaged by the security team so the team can track > disclosure deadlines etc. > how would that worknif the plugin is usimg GH issues? (yes I know gh >

Re: Plugin adoption request: Tool Environment

Hi Slavo I've granted you access to toolenv-plugin, Please go to https://github.com/jenkinsci to accept the invitation to join the organisation Send a pull request to the repository permission updater to give yourself release permissions: (use jenkins account ID not GitHub)

Re: GitHub App installations on jenkinsci

The plugin author should have the administer role though? The maintainer role lets you do very little, what repos do people have access to but they only have maintainer on? Thanks Tim On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 09:49, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > It took some discussions with the Codacy team but now I

Re: GitHub App installations on jenkinsci

That can be fixed via IRC bot, just ping in #jenkins-infra or reply here or what’s the ticket? Administer comes by default and only historical teams / people manually added to the repo won’t have it On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:26, Jesse Glick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Tim Jac

Re: Notification when new image pushed to docker hub

Hi Ewelina I highly recommend using dependabot for this https://dependabot.com/docker/ Thanks Tim On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 10:11, Ewelina Wilkosz wrote: > I hoped to get answer from people involved in jenkins release process and > dev made sense for me > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 11:09, 'Gavin

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

Wouldn't you either transfer it or ask them to re-file with the correct component? Same as with Jira? I doubt issues filed with the wrong component in Jira are ever seen by the right people either. Thanks Tim On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 15:33, Slide wrote: > The big problem with GitHub issues is

Re: RCA of memory conditions on Ubuntu EC2 agents on ci.jenkins.io causing test instability

AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > > High mem could possibly do with a change, the AWS ones are much lower > spec than the Azure ones, thoughts? > > Not sure but I just got an unexplained > > EC2 (aws) - High memory ubuntu 18.04 (i-0e7f3896526c7922e) was > marked off

Re: RCA of memory conditions on Ubuntu EC2 agents on ci.jenkins.io causing test instability

Hi all, I've done the following: * linux docker - was t3.small, now t3a.large (2 core 8gb) * arm64 - was a1.medium, now t3a.large (2 core 8gb) ref: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/ (region is US East) Let's monitor and see how we go (pricing and performance wise) High mem could

Re: Proposal Hosting the Jenkinsfile Runner Docker images in the jenkins DockerHub org

+1 On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 11:00, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently added > a number of new > Docker images to Jenkinsfile Runner, including images for Alpine JRE8 and > Java 11. Currently the images are published to the

Re: How to create a run object outside of a job?

You can pass the Jenkins instance as the context. Jenkins.get() On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 13:51, Michael Carter wrote: > The situation in a nut shell. I've got a validation behind a button that > calls a REST service to do the validation. So the validation is happening > outside any running

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.235

I vote for 2.250, with some backporting needed. Thanks Tim On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:59, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > I would vote for 2.250. 2.250 has no functional difference from 2.249, > there is just one internal fix. 2.250 is a fancy number, so why not? > > 2.249/2.250 still have

Re: Proposal - Expanding the DockerHub admins team

+1 On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 17:14, Matt Sicker wrote: > Sounds great! > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:06 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am planning to be on vacation in the beginning of September, likely > off the grid for some time. I would like to ensure that we have a good

Re: certificate error on lts 2.235.2 (centos/red hat)

The cert issue is fixed, thanks Olivier for doing it Cheers Tim On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 09:13, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Yes it appears to have expired > > curl -kv https://pkg.origin.jenkins.io/ > > * Server certificate: > * subject: CN=pkg.jenkins.io > * start date: Apr

Re: timja would like to join Jenkins Infra's Hosting team

Hi I would like to join the hosting team ( https://www.jenkins.io/project/teams/hosting/#requesting-membership) I believe I meet all the requirements, and have been helping with it already in IRC / PRs Thanks Tim On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 15:36, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > +1 from me, maybe needs a

Re: GSoC 2020 Jenkins Custom Distribution Service Update Center Persistence Discussion

Could you have a background job that updates it every hour? On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 19:35, Sladyn Nunes wrote: > Hi all, > > This discussion thread pertains to the [GSoC 2020] Custom Distribution > Service Project feature implementation decision that the GsoC team would > like feedback on.

Re: LTS next week to change repo signing keys

+1 would be great to do one release while Olivier is around. Would be good to have at least one user facing change in it, but I guess not required. Thanks Tim On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 20:29, Mark Waite wrote: > The core release automation process has been used to deliver weekly > releases since

Re: Discussion: Jenkins Core Maintainer/Developer discussion channels

Hi Any thoughts on Zulip? They have an open source sponsorship for their cloud version: https://zulip.com/for/open-source/ There's a server you can try it out on here: https://chat.zulip.org/ Google, GitHub etc are all supported for auth to. Thanks Tim On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 18:44, Oleg

Re: Any issue with the Release Drafter app

Try the GitHub action: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/release-drafter You’ll at least get logs with that... e.g. https://github.com/jenkinsci/theme-manager-plugin/blob/master/.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml Thanks Tim On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 15:01, Mark Waite wrote: > The git

Re: Any issue with the Release Drafter app

Olegs patches were merged afaik I use the official one in my plugins / at work On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 16:24, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > I updated my configuration to use the GH action too > Is there still an interest to use Oleg's version instead of the official > one ? > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020

Remoting help - CannotResolveClassException

Hi all, I'm currently working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin It works properly in the junit plugin with the h2 database plugin as a mock implementation. When I try to implement it with the postgresql database plugin I'm getting CannotResolveClassException when I run it in pipeline.

Re: component javadoc in https://javadoc.jenkins.io/component/

Should be, If it's not a plugin it also needs updating in the javadoc repo, but it's already there for ATH: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/javadoc/blob/master/scripts/generate-javadoc-components.groovy#L8 On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 12:28, jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking

Re: Core Baseline Java8 -> Java11?

its my understanding that most things should now compile with java 11, >> but not bumping the minimum version yet. >> >> >> >> Gavin >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:43 AM Ullrich Hafner >> wrote: >> >

Re: Core Baseline Java8 -> Java11?

I would be definitely +1 for switching defaults and encouraging people to use jdk11 And not against updating the minimum version, people will move when they have to. At my previous work we moved from 7 to 8 when we had to and it was no issue... We’ve been on 11 for awhile here... Java 8 is 6

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

If it help the docs are recommending either 2.222 or 2.235 https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-development/choosing-jenkins-baseline/#currently-recommended-versions On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 17:30, Matt Sicker wrote: > Whichever LTS version you use should probably be kept up to date with

Re: Config round trip failures in plugin unit tests?

For the record commons-beanutils is provided by core at version 1.9.3 and it’s in the core bom. If it’s a transitive dep I would have thought the bom would have corrected the version, otherwise you can declare the dep without a version and scope provided and the bom should handle it On Sat, 28

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

Agree tracking it in RPU is probably best On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:27, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On 17. Dec 2020, at 07:53, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < > jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > 1) Overrides file > > 2) Issue Managemnet section in pom.xml ( > >

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Sounds good to me I don't have any permissions on the calendar as far as I can see. Could someone add the dates please, and also grant me calendar permissions? Thanks Tim On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:44, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi all, > > (Possibly a question to Tim) > > Can we please

Re: [DISCUSS] Dependabot for Jenkins core (was:Re: Proposal: Automating dependency management for repositories inside the jenkinsci org)

I’m fine with adding more, We could also try a deny list too and see how it goes On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 00:01, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I am +1. We should finally move forward with Dependabot for dependencies > we considers safe and important to be kept up to date. Allow list is a good > way to

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Daniel has granted On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:29, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 for Tim to be granted permission on the Jenkins calendar. > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:43 PM Tim Jacomb wrote: > >> Sounds good to me >> >> I don't have any permissions on the calendar as

Backporting for LTS 2.263.2 started

Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for approximately 2020-12-17. Candidates: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?filter=12146 Fixed: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.263.2-fixed Rejected: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.263.2-rejected

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Added all to the calendar On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:52, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Daniel has granted > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:29, Mark Waite > wrote: > >> +1 for Tim to be granted permission on the Jenkins calendar. >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:43 PM Tim

Re: Adopt database-mysql plugin request

t; >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 17 Aug 2020, at 4:52 pm, Tim Jacomb wrote: >> >>  >> >> Hi >> >> I would like to adopt https://plugins.jenkins.io/database/ >> >> I'm working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin and would li

Re: Request to be made maintainer for the Managed Scripts Plugin

Hi Jonathan This plugin is up for adoption, so we can go ahead with this now Can you create a pull request to https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater/blob/master/permissions/plugin-managed-scripts.yml with your Jenkins infrastructure account please? Thanks Tim On Thu,

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

The way I work around that is by pressing t to go to file find mode and then typing the plugin name :) On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 23:52, Tim Van Holder wrote: > If tweaking and renaming RPU, maybe also tweak the directory structure? > > For example, changing >

Re: Please reassing plugins to Eficode

Hi Ewelina I extracted the components from the Jira API: https://issues.jenkins.io/rest/api/2/project/JENKINS/components ➜ Documents cat jenkins-components.json | jq '.[] | {name, lead: .lead.name}' | grep -B 1 "praqma" "name": "clearcase-plugin", "lead": "praqma" -- "name":

Re: Hosting requests for similar projects

agree would be great if they could be merged and also the jenkins core (and winstone) CLI enhanced with a more modern CLI library On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 18:13, Slide wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Currently we have two hosting requests open ( >

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

I would suspect there’s not many places where issues are enabled and not in use I’m fine with your proposed process Thanks Tim On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 07:38, Richard Bywater wrote: > Using the pom to explicitly point to where issue management is done seems > reasonable to me although I note

Jenkins 2.263.2 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-01-13. Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from

Re: LTS schedule winter break

Is someone going to want to do an RC on 'Dec 30 - 2.263.2 RC' though? could we leave the RC date as the 16th and then release it on the 13th? (creating more RCs as needed if required) On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 13:25, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 6:15 AM Baptiste Mathus

Re: LTS schedule winter break

Well RC builds aren’t automated yet... On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 20:41, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I am pretty sure that our Release Automation infra would not mind to cut a > release on Dec 30, but there is still a lot of manual work involved in > cutting an LTS release. > I am +1 for postponing,

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting, Nov 18, 2020

The time also means I cant attend, so +1 for reviewing another time On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 08:18, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > As discussed a few months ago, we will revise the meeting time once the > 2020 elections are over > Since we have candidates from APAC, the meeting approach may require >

Re: Request using the certificate file of the official Jenkins Update Center

Why don’t the regular files work? Users should be directed to a Chinese mirror already, is it the distance to get the redirect? On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 14:02, Rick wrote: > Yes, we just need to change the URL of plugins. > > You mean generate two or more versions of update-cener.json files? For

Re: Request using the certificate file of the official Jenkins Update Center

i.hpi > Via: 1.1 get.jenkins.io > > HTTP/2 200 > server: nginx/1.14.2 > date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:50:35 GMT > content-type: application/octet-stream > content-length: 613574 > last-modified: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:26:25 GMT > accept-ranges: bytes > > > > &g

Re: Jenkins Jira migration has started

Good it's not just me, Daniel Beck has done some investigation and found that I still receive emails in the INFRA project but not the JENKINS project =/ On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 14:44, Mark Waite wrote: > We didn't intend to disable email notifications but others are reporting > the same

Re: Proposal: Excluding JRebel support from the Jenkins core (JENKINS-64037)

Bin it On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:44, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Same question about > https://github.com/stapler/stapler-adjunct-zeroclipboard . It is a part > of the Jenkins core API and it "provides an easy way to copy text to the > clipboard using an invisible Adobe Flash >

Re: Paying for Dockerhub pro plan

Fixing infra mailing list cc On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:57, Tim Jacomb wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:50, 'Olblak' via Jenkins Developers < > jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Hi Everybody, >> >> The Dockerhub policy change start

Re: Paying for Dockerhub pro plan

+1 On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:50, 'Olblak' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > The Dockerhub policy change start on Sunday unfortunately I couldn't make > significant progress on this. > Either by being sponsored by Docker or having a proper way to

Adopt Post Build Task Plugin

Hi I would like to adopt https://github.com/jenkinsci/postbuild-task-plugin/ Last adopted here https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev/c/0l0443e10hc but seems nothing was done on it. I just plan to deliver a fix for https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-64088 Thanks Tim -- You

Re: Archiving jenkinsci/jenkins-ace-editor repo

+1 On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 11:29, fque...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that the jenkins-ace-editor plugin is taken from the > https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-libs repo. That means the > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-ace-editor is unused. I suggest > archiving it. > >

Re: Log4j2 logger not working for jenkins plugin

Can you post a link to the code? Or at least a new plugin generated off of archetypes where it doesn’t work for you? Thanks Tim On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 17:19, varun...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Matt, > all dependencies are as below: > > > > org.apache.httpcomponents > httpclient > 4.5.2 > > > >

Re: Jenkins 2.249.3 LTS RC testing started

Floating buttons on freestyle and multi branch jobs Clicking them adds more buttons On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 21:12, Amit Dar wrote: > Can you elaborate on what the symptoms are? > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:15 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:22 PM Daniel Beck wrote: >> >

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

although I actually expected 2.264.x be next LTS, not sure why >> 2.263 was preferred). >> >> > Adding a new release to the plugin BOM is part of the new LTS release > checklist that is being developed by Tim Jacomb. See > https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release/pull/122 for the

Re: Archive https://github.com/jenkinsci/stride-notification-plugin ?

Please merge the PR as well, GitHub doesn’t ignore archived repos in searches On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 20:54, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I'm 100% behind getting rid of plugins. > > Do you want to add it to update center's ignore list too? >

Jenkins 2.263.4 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-02-10 Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from

Re: Jenkins 3.x

Hello Few points > Marketing Definitely value in considering this, a 3.x and a big marketing push could bring some good attention to Jenkins, but do we have enough big changes to justify, possibly if we consider not just this LTS but other changes since 2.x. Some other stories worth

Re: 2.263.4 LTS release candidate

Hi Sorry we missed that with the regression fixes and the extra LTS release that was done this week Backporting hasn't started yet but will aim to have the RC out by Monday ish. Any help appreciated Thanks Tim On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 09:31, Beatriz Munoz wrote: > Hi all! > > Next LTS will be

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

Hello Given there have been no objections to 2.277 let's take that one. The new bom line has been prepared and the 2 failures are now sorted, Acceptance tests are not in the best shape, any help here would be greatly appreciated. ~68 tests failed on

Jenkins 2.289.2 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-06-30. Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >