Hello everyone,
Latest RC was made public and it is ready to be tested.
We have 8 days to make sure that all the fixes[1] are in place and no new
regressions ware introduced.
Report your findings in this thread or in the test plan wiki.
Download bits from
On 26/08/14 07:05, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On Monday, 25 August 2014, Slide slide.o@gmail.com
mailto:slide.o@gmail.com wrote:
There have been a couple times recently where someone from Cloudbees
has made changes to email-ext without consulting with me as the
maintainer of
Okay... really sorry about that... I did make those changes on a branch but
I should have done it on a fork. I actually did create a fork after seeing
there was a build tracking branches. Let me know if I should delete the
branch I created - I won't touch anything until you let me know what
Discard or cancel? From what you say, seems like there's a confusion
somewhere I guess.
2014-08-26 14:41 GMT+02:00 Dzmitry Kashlach dzmitrykashl...@gmail.com:
I've met with one more difficulty.
I've extended RunListener in my project to implement onDeleted() method.
I've created an instance
I want my plugin to do the following:
1. Start performance test as a build step;
2. If user cancels build(pressed red button with x near build link on UI)
- stop test and free test resources.
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 9:55:16 AM UTC+3, Dzmitry Kashlach wrote:
Hi all,
I'm developing
Not a big deal, I've wondered why all branches are tracked on
jenkins.ci.cloudbees, I would think only master would be tracked. Don't
worry about deleting the branch. If you have specific things you would like
added, pull requests are great.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Tom Fennelly
I added a v1 of this to the wiki
at https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Browser+Compatibility+Matrix
Of course, feel free to make comments and edits :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Jenkins Developers group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Great, thanks Tom. I just reworked the page a bit into a table to help make
the information more quickly findable by readers.
Hope this suits you and others.
2014-08-26 15:06 GMT+02:00 Tom Fennelly tom.fenne...@gmail.com:
I added a v1 of this to the wiki at
Hey Tom,
That's not a bad idea, I'll give cygwin a shot. I've been pulled onto
other tasks but I will try to get back to this ASAP. Thanks for the
suggestion!
--
Jake Vallejo
On 26 Aug 2014, at 6:28, Tom Fennelly wrote:
Hey Jacob... did you try building through cygwin? A ton of tests
On 26.08.2014, at 15:06, Tom Fennelly tom.fenne...@gmail.com wrote:
I added a v1 of this to the wiki at
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Browser+Compatibility+Matrix
Of course, feel free to make comments and edits :)
Any particular reason you list Firefox ESR as L2?
--
You
That's great, thanks Baptiste.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:26:18 PM UTC+1, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
Great, thanks Tom. I just reworked the page a bit into a table to help
make the information more quickly findable by readers.
Hope this suits you and others.
2014-08-26 15:06 GMT+02:00 Tom
Good question... no reason other than being hasty. I'll update it and make
it L1. In fact... is there a need to mention it specifically?
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 6:14:05 PM UTC+1, Daniel Beck wrote:
On 26.08.2014, at 15:06, Tom Fennelly tom.fe...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I
On 26.08.2014, at 19:39, Tom Fennelly tom.fenne...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question... no reason other than being hasty. I'll update it and make
it L1. In fact... is there a need to mention it specifically?
Well, it's outdated by ~3 months on average compared to the latest, so telling
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Slide slide.o@gmail.com wrote:
I've wondered why all branches are tracked on
jenkins.ci.cloudbees, I would think only master would be tracked.
Not sure but I suspect this is necessary for the pull request builder.
It is annoying though that when you have a
For proper stratification I needed to deprecate
AbstractBuild.getTestResultAction (and .getAggregatedTestResultAction)
in Jenkins core 1.577, allowing the JUnit test result publisher and
associated APIs to be split into junit-plugin. Plugins calling these
methods will generally not work in 1.577+.
Thanks for the heads up Jesse. IIRC the tap-plugin also utilizes these methods.
I'll take a look this weekend and will update it.
Bruno
From: Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com
To: Jenkins Dev jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:24 PM
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:51 PM, 'Bruno P. Kinoshita' via Jenkins
Developers jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com wrote:
IIRC the tap-plugin also utilizes these methods.
I do not think so—it calls TestObject.getTestResultAction, but that is
fine. Only the methods on AbstractBuild are affected.
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
