Are there situations or usages of (accumulate) that would actually prevent a rule from firing?
?c <- (accumulate (bind ?count
0)
;; initializer
(bind ?count
(+ ?count
1))
;; action
?count
(pattern to look for.. sing
Yes, that's how you
can sweep a lot of data of different type together in one rule. The rule still
fires of some types are not present.
Martijn
From:
Roger Studner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 2 december 2005
13:19
To: jess-users@sandia.gov
Subject: JESS: Accumul
All pattern-matching has to be driven by *some* change to working
memory. A few CEs (not, test, accumulate) can pass when they match no
facts at all. Therefore, these CEs need a little help to know when to
fire. If any of them appear first on the LHS of a rule, Jess inserts a
pattern "(initial-fact
JessDE doesn't accept "slot-specific" declarations.
Yuri
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List probl
Interesting.. I definately am finding cases where I have rules that
have all their conditions met on the LHS.. there is NOTHING for the
accumulate part to match on.. and the rule doesn't fire heh.
I'll try to find a concrete example with some facts I can display
etc. Basically if I add 'junk' to
An example, please? I just tried it myself and (as I expected) not
only does it not flag them as an error, it auto-completes them.
I think Yura wrote:
> JessDE doesn't accept "slot-specific" declarations.
>
-
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Advanc
This rule fires:
(defrule count-icd9-codes-in-a-group-for-zip
(declare (salience 5))
(granularity
(gran "ZIP"))
(ICD9_COUNTING_GROUP
(id ?id)
(codes $?codes))
?factV <- (ICD9_CODE (ICD91 ?code))
(test (neq (member$ ?factV $?codes) FALSE))
(analysis_wi
If you call apply with str-cat outside of a function, the
result is what you would expect: a single string that is the argument strings
concatenated.
Jess> (apply str-cat “foo” “ bar”
“ baz”)
“foo bar baz”
If you declare a function that performs the concatenation on
its single mult
Well say I have this rule
(defrule rule (declare ) =>)
When I type "(" inside "(declare)" I receive auto-loop,
no-focus,node-index-hash and salience. After manually inserting
"slot-specific" I receive error. I'm using Jess70b4, my Eclipse is 3.1.1.
At any rate I'd like to ask a more serious ques
Jess's "apply" differs from the classic Lisp "apply" in that the
varargs are in the "apply" funcall, rather than being bundled up in a
list. This is by accident rather than by design, I'm afraid. In
classic Lisp, this form
(apply str-cat "foo" " bar" " baz")
is an error, but in Jess, it's correct
I think Yura wrote:
> (defrule rule (declare ) =>)
>
> When I type "(" inside "(declare)" I receive auto-loop,
> no-focus,node-index-hash and salience. After manually inserting
> "slot-specific" I receive error. I'm using Jess70b4, my Eclipse is 3.1.1.
Ah. OK. That's because slot-specific applies
I'm sorry - it's there in the manual. I should be more attentive.
Yuri
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own addres
I think Yura wrote:
> I'm sorry - it's there in the manual. I should be more attentive.
By my calculation, you've reported 4 bugs, and 3 of them were real --
so you're batting .750 . Seems like an excellent average to me!
-
Ernest Friedman
13 matches
Mail list logo
