Thanks,
dalibor topic
[0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jigsaw-dev
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic
Consulting Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 , Mobile: +491737185961
, Video: dalibor.to...@oracle.com
Oracle Global Services Germany GmbH
Hauptverwaltung: Riess
vious versions, (ii) the frequency of
breaking changes increases over time, (iii) 2.54% of their clients
are impacted, and (iv) systems with higher frequency of breaking
changes are larger, more popular, and more active"
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
On 16.01.2018 14:08, jeffrey kutcher wrote> Is there official
documentation explaining the method resolution process somewhere?
I'd suggest taking a look at the Java Language specification and JVM
specification for details.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dali
topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwal
s,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverw
rpose.
This is perhaps why there were only 36 applications in our
sample."
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &a
Thanks, Martin - I've passed your feedback on to the team publishing the
builds.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 13.01.2017 19:04, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I tried to look at build 151 "Summary of changes" and went to
http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/changes/jdk-9+151.html
but that on
On 27.09.2016 13:01, dalibor topic wrote:
On 27.09.2016 12:03, Andrew Dinn wrote:
Yes we could use braces instead of a
belt, but why do we /need/ braces when we can already wear a belt?
I don't think that it's an either one or another proposition,
Although the developing fashion sense
://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1641=theses
for an example of research on the benefits of using suspenders to reduce
lower back pain in police officers, that often need to carry heavy duty
belts.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product M
swered this specific question by providing two
counter examples:
1. "no security manager at runtime", and
2. "no equivalent at compile time"
when A (i.e. being able to constrain access control using a security
manager) can not be true.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http:
As Mandy said, jdeps can't do that. There are other tools that perform
bytecode engineering, optimization and shrinking that could assist you
in determining a useful subset of all your application's classes to feed
into jdeps for further analysis.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 08.09.2016 00:42
, they
don't turn out to be very likely in practice. [0] [1]
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] "Comet May Kill All Earth Life Says Scientist," The San Francisco
Call (San Francisco, CA), February 8, 1910, Page 1, Image 1, col. 2.
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85066387/1910-02-08/ed-1/se
he scenes to support that approach, please see
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/sotms/#compatibility--migration
.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +49173718
On 01.08.2016 16:04, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 08/01/2016 05:40 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
Is it safe to assume that all such involuntarily headache inducing
Slings and Stones are also kept under lock in non-public classes?
Of course not, no more than it is safe to assume
,
which is also useful as well as intuitive.
How do I make a single class non-public in a third party component?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737
On 29.07.2016 16:55, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 07/29/2016 09:20 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
Is it safe to assume that all potentially headache inducing Guns and
Bullets are always kept under lock in non-public classes?
Of course, that's why we had non-public classes in the first place.
OK
lock in non-public classes?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE
of such builds (like different binary formats, or builds with some
option turned on or off, or whatever else people tend find a temporary
need for).
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +
.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] For example, some kind of "open source way", applying to binaries
not actually being published under an open source license.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobi
/ApocalypseDayPlanner?from=Main.ApocalypseDayPlanner
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFatVn1hP3o=youtu.be
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
e software.
It even touches briefly on the utility of modules in JDK 9.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co.
aults" in
https://buildsecurityin.us-cert.gov/articles/knowledge/principles/failing-securely
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORAC
Done: https://twitter.com/iotsakp/status/757546517519622145
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 25.07.2016 12:05, dalibor topic wrote:
On 25.07.2016 07:36, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I wasn't suggesting that it was a JDK bug - but that LWJGL might be a
good
test subject.
I'll try to reach out
On 25.07.2016 07:36, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I wasn't suggesting that it was a JDK bug - but that LWJGL might be a good
test subject.
I'll try to reach out to someone involved in that project and see if
they are interested in joining the fun [0].
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] https
elopment of the programming language and associated development tools
[2].
In short, let's not argue about absolute statements one way or the other
if we can avoid it.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/boring-crypto/48qa1kWignU/o8GGp2K1DAAJ
[1] https://twitter.com/robila
, such as
jdeps, or -XX:+CheckEndorsedAndExtDirs, ... as is empathy.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &
On 15.07.2016 15:39, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 15.07.2016 14:55, dalibor topic wrote:
[...]
And if adopting the more correct practices requires them to make a huge
breaking change? Maybe even getting rid of base principles?
Commitment bias to accumulated technical debt is completely
as they start testing against JDK 9 and discover
one or more issues with their code.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutsch
migrating to JDK 9.
I maintain a list of things to consider at
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/JDK+9+Outreach and would
welcome suggestions for improving and expanding that list over on the
adoption-discuss mailing list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.
On 14.07.2016 14:31, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:22 AM, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> wrote:
I'd suggest moving on [1] to a maintained version of that dependency, such
as 2.6.x currently seems to be.
I'm not complaining about the issue: I'm simply trying
ersion of that dependency,
such as 2.6.x currently seems to be.
While that doesn't necessarily mean it won't break in the same or a
different fashion in the future, at least you would have a chance to fix
such issues or to have someone else fix them for you. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1]
On 14.07.2016 11:57, Andrew Dinn wrote:
On 14/07/16 10:44, dalibor topic wrote:
I believe that this was discussed before at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-observers/2015-September/000122.html
Thank you for the link, Dalibor. It does indeed appear that the
possibility
aside the
appropriateness of such descriptions in order to challenge the assertion
that it 'needs to go away'.
I believe that this was discussed before at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-observers/2015-September/000122.html
.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145527 .
As far as the burden of running the Oracle JDK installer goes, keep in
mind that it can be installed silently in a user chosen location, as
described in [3].
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads
any cross-posted messages.
- Mark
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschla
On 07.07.2016 18:18, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
Right - I was trying to find documentation on the new url format.
Please see http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 for details on the new jrt
URI scheme for naming stored modules, classes, and resources .
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<h
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Haupt
Vote: Yes.
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE
On 12/2/15 5:26 PM, Stephane Epardaud wrote:
> Of course it does not help that I have to do this all outside of my IDE
> as Eclipse doesn't know about Java 9 yet :(
See https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/java-9-support-beta-neon
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.o
On 30.10.2015 16:29, Vincent Privat wrote:
Hi,
- Is it expected to allow external people to have the possibility to
subscribe to JDK issues?
See http://robilad.livejournal.com/139637.html
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Haupt
implementation are part of
OpenJDK, so you'd have to write your own.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
http://www.oracle.com Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 tel:+494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
tel:+491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
42 matches
Mail list logo
