On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Tom Metro wrote:
becomes active. Once it is, I'd expect the form to guide posters as to
what's appropriate. Though even then, it could probably use some intro
Well, what I meant was guidelines on what constitutes
sufficient/appropriate information. I added this to the
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Vicki Brown wrote:
W2 (US) means they take taxes (federal, state, social security) out of each
paycheck (along with various other things such as life insurance or pension
plan). W2 is the usual term for an employee (even if the person is a
contractor, they are consider
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Vicki Brown wrote:
Corp-to-Corp:
This indicates that the employer would prefer to deal directly with another
corporation. The main reason for this preference is to avoid some of the
potential liability that might exist in dealing with an independent on a 1099
basis.
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Paris Sinclair wrote:
So, applicants, it is asked that if you would like to take on this
venture that you accept a waiting period for payment of your work
of a few months in order to generate the necessary profit to pay
you, or, at your option, instead of a fixed price,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
To the local pm lists yes. I think the only reason I got to know about
this job is since Dave forwarded it. How does the data look in the
database?
About what you'd expect:
- title
- location
- salary
- required skills
etc..
Maybe if the person
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Vicki Brown wrote:
At 13:10 -0800 1/21/02, Vicki Brown wrote:
We appreciate you response to our recently posted ad for programmers, we are
looking for motivated, talented individual who are willing to work for a 30
evaluation period for company stock. We are a privately
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Casey West wrote:
I don't think it matters much now. With a reply like his, there's no
way I'd want to step foot in his office, or log in to his boxes. He's
a fool for losing his temper and I can bet it wouldn't be the last
time.
Good point.
Plus, if I any of my
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
Actually, I just got another warning about these guys off the list.
Dave, we really should make that list ...
added as docs/killfile in CVS.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/
On 23 Jan 2002, Michael R. Wolf wrote:
no money implies unethical
Non-sequitor!!!
My point was that in my experience there is a corrolation between the two.
We're in a community centered around free software. Larry
Wall, himself, does not currently have an income stream.
Yes, he
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Terrence Brannon wrote:
Is it asking too much to request a donation of gratitude for the
jobs.perl.org services? I mean, even if I were starting a startup
company in my garage, I would be willing to pay 20-100 dollars
(perhaps to YAS or something) for them finding me a
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Douglas Wilson wrote:
URL for more information:
http://www.hrpro.ca/job_details.asp?id=2271
Contact information:
To learn more and apply for this position click link
http://www.hrpro.ca/job_details.asp?id=2271
Gee, I was hoping to find out more information
I added a page of site stats at http://perl.jobs.org/about/stats
Looks like March will be our biggest month yet.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:42:20PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I added a page of site stats at http://perl.jobs.org/about/stats
Surely that's http://jobs.perl.org/about/stats :-)
um, yeah ;)
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await
I just added this. Someone asked about this a week or so back, I think.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/
We got 46 postings last month, which beats our old record (34) from March
of this year. Cool!
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/
On 4 Oct 2002, Uri Guttman wrote:
has anyone dealt with [EMAIL PROTECTED]? i think he has posted
before and he just posted a telecomm opening. i am holding off approval
until i hear some feedback.
i am just worried he might be the guy we banned a couple of years ago
who had a nyc agency.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Adam Rinehart wrote:
Following the link to guruperl.com only results in a page advertising their
product. Not employment info.
Did they pull a fast one on us?
I just assumed they wanted people to mail them at the address on the page.
I'll check it out with them.
-dave
On 16 Oct 2002, Perl Jobs wrote:
Required skills: PERL, Php and Linux operating systems
As an FYI to potential applicants, this job was first posted as being 80%
PHP, 10% Perl, and 45% MySQL (yes, I know that's 135%!). They changed it
so I posted it, but I debated on whether or not I should,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Charles Albrecht wrote:
Yeah, and I notice that MySQL doesn't even show up in the new
description.
Yep.
To be honest, we often get very borderline postings on jobs.perl.org. My
general rule (and Ask's as well, I believe) is to give posters the benefit
of the doubt,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
She was showing someone else here how to edit postings for Perl jobs.
In fact, she wasn't expecting it to post. She thought she was merely
editing an expired post and hadn't intended to post it (yet).
(Having never looked at the UI myself, I don't
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Perl == Perl Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perl Required skills: PERL, HTML, HTTP, C++, C, UNIX
Hmm. I don't know about PERL. Just Perl. (And some perl.)
And I don't know any UNIX... just Unix.
Perl URL for more information:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Uri Guttman wrote:
just looked at the job posting stats (http://jobs.perl.org/about/stats)
and the numbers have been steady. in fact it is hard to see any real dip
or climb. so far this month has been a very good one and it could top
40+ posts. there are still plenty of
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Vicki Brown wrote:
One more thing I forgot to mention. Even if _you_ think you are qualified for
a position, the posters often do not. I have pushed back on some postings I
applied for by sending another note a few days later to the effect I am so
qualified, why didn't I
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, David Kaufman wrote:
but i wasn't. i was looking for a salaried job. and just hoping to find
one at around at least 2/3 of my former salary (with the economy swirling so
low in the bowl, of late) which means i would have been happy to bring home
something at least in
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Steve Lane wrote:
i've pretty much decided that if i want a job posted to this list, i
need to find a way to move to CA or the DC/Boston corridor and -then-
apply. i wonder if that's accurate. has anyone else here lived in a
non-top-50 metro area in the US, and found a
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
Wow, 20 openings for one position.
Too bad the payrate is a little low. Even for Seattle
I think.
$35/hour as a W2 isn't _too_ bad, I don't think. That's approx $70k/year
at 40 hours/week.
Since it mentions Mason and is in Seattle, I'm guessing
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Andrew Brosnan wrote:
On 7/5/04 at 6:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl Jobs) wrote:
Online URL for this job: http://jobs.perl.org/job/1625
Posted: July 5, 2004
Job title:
very entry level (VISTA) cgi mod_perl and system scripter
Location: United States, MA,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Uri Guttman wrote:
RLS == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RLS Got Pearl?
RLS :-)
yeah, spelled it that way in the subject and inside but also had PERL
inside too. not someone i would want to work for :)
Which is why I approve thes things unedited.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Marty Landman wrote:
The subject is from a jobs posting I just saw. Am I the only one that doesn't
get what a
Junior Perl/Mod_Perl/Java *Typist* is?
Yeah, it was weird. I usually approve such things on the theory that
people's stupidity in postings reveals something about
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Brad Greenlee wrote:
Heh. Maybe a typist is on a lower pay grade than a programmer.
I also thought this was funny: If you can't write HTML without an editor,
this is not for you.
So I guess that pretty much limits you to using cat ?
You wuss. You're supposed to use Perl
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Paris Sinclair wrote:
crap of course probably meaning much more than the typical inexeperienced
but capable person will actually accept in the current tech job market. This
is because, most of them end up with a non-tech job.
It amazes me, it continues to amaze me, the
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Warren Smith wrote:
As for the argument of looking for a Junior programmer, that's exactly
what it is. I wanted to post a job description bereft of marketing hype
and straight to the point. I failed in some areas, and succeeded in
others. And as far as the bedazzle ...
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Steve Leibel wrote:
PlatinumTel is looking for an inexperienced perl developer. Yes, you heard
me. An *inexperienced* perl developer.
snip
Note -- I am not in HR, but will be hiring you. Please be professional, but
friendly. Bedazzle me with your technical abilities.
Is this a
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Ron Hill wrote:
What happened to this job listing?
http://jobs.perl.org/job/4157
Why was it removed
The person who posted it removed it.
-dave
/*===
VegGuide.Orgwww.BookIRead.com
Your guide to
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Terrence == Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Terrence I am willing to cover my condo lease while I work elsewhere to get
Terrence away from my current employer's repeated attempts to police the
Terrence employees like a bunch of
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
That's what I was trying to get at. Few would fault me if I claimed that my
former employer practiced incessant micromanagement, as long as I had a few
sane examples to back up my claim. However, the phrase repeated attempts to
police the
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Andy Lester wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I think Terrence's phrase could be altered just a little to something like
my employer makes me feel like I'm a kindergartner or I feel like my
employer thinks I'm a kindergartner and it would be more
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, José Alves de Castro wrote:
A quick question: what's the standard size for resumes in your countries?
It depends.
I've heard rules like 1 page for every 5 years of experience, or something
like that. Nowadays, resumes are often online, and never printed, so this
seems
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Usually 1-2 pages. If you are very experienced then 2-3 pages.
Everything in the resume should be interesting and relevant though. As lont
as it is, the length isn't so important.
One way to keep the resume shorter is to start trimming
39 matches
Mail list logo
