On 01/10/2012 11:23 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
whenver a license change layer is active and you have lots of objects
loaded, JOSM becomes noticeably slower.
I could use a little help here. Since many of you have tweaked JOSM's
drawing performance in the past, maybe you only need to
Hi,
whenver a license change layer is active and you have lots of
objects loaded, JOSM becomes noticeably slower.
I could use a little help here. Since many of you have tweaked JOSM's
drawing performance in the past, maybe you only need to take a quick
look at this drawing code
Hi,
On 07/02/11 14:50, Stephan Knauss wrote:
The doCheck() in BasicLicenseCheck is in my opinion not right regarding
nodes that have no tags. As all information these nodes carry is their
existence and coordinates I see no reason why any other status than the
one of the last editor of that node
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 07/02/11 14:50, Stephan Knauss wrote:
The doCheck() in BasicLicenseCheck is in my opinion not right regarding
nodes that have no tags. As all information these nodes carry is their
existence and coordinates I see no reason why any other status
Hello Dirk,
On 07.07.2011 14:49, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
That would be wrong. I'm not sure if he described it that way, but the
condition must be:
* no tags of previous editors are included in the current node (which is
true for untagged nodes)
and
* the position of the node is different.
I think
Hi,
Stephan Knauss wrote:
Am I right to assume that without inspecting the full history of a node
we can not know what caused the new version?
Yes. And looking and the full history is always an expensive operation,
hence the plugin relies on the wtfe.gryph.de service and that, in turn,
has
On 07.07.2011 23:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
* All versions of an element are clean, so the whole element is
considered clean (green).
I think that clean elements should not be marked at all. Clean is the
default; no action is required on a clean element.
Yes, in some areas this is already the
Hi,
Stephan Knauss wrote:
For the undecided there is still hope. About 100 user agree each day.
http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/license_count.html
The declined, too, can still redecide, and at least we have a sign of
life from them whereas for the undecided we don't even know if they
still
I downloaded v4201, but I can't seem to find this licensing plugin in the
list of plugins. I'd like to experiment with it. Do I need to add another
repository or install it manually, somehow?
Jo
2011/7/3 Willi wil...@gmx.de
Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org] wrote at 2. July 2011 23:11
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The plugin still has a bug where newly created objects are flagged as
problematic, but other than that it would be good to be released to the
public (given that Potlatch meanwhile has the same functionality - and we
don't want to fall behind, do we ;)
Hi Frederik,
On 02.07.2011 16:12, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The tool is doing background data requests. It should provide some
feedback to the user regarding this.
It shouldn't be doing background data requests, only send a request when
you explicitly ask for it.
Yes, but then the request is
Hi,
Stephan Knauss wrote:
It shouldn't be doing background data requests, only send a request when
you explicitly ask for it.
Yes, but then the request is running asynchronous in the background.
There is no visible user feedback the request is still running. If your
server has problems and
On 07/02/2011 06:11 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Maybe we should do away with the distinction between non-agreeing and
undecided users; anyone who is still undecided today is probably very
likely to be unreachable and thus this would be a clear data loss.
There are imports, where the license
Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org] wrote at 2. July 2011 23:11
Maybe we should just rename stuff in the interface then: red = first
version created by non-agreeing user, orange = first version created
by undecided user, yellow = later version created by non-agreeing or
undecided
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have just committed a first alpha of a license change plugin
(svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/licensechange).
The plugin still has a bug where newly created objects are flagged as
problematic, but other than that it would be good to be
Devs,
I have just committed a first alpha of a license change plugin
(svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/licensechange).
It is a blatant rip-off of the validator plugin and works much like it,
only that instead of data errors it checks for license change agreement
by
On 6 May 2011 22:55, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I have just committed a first alpha of a license change plugin
(svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/licensechange).
Great! This is a tool I've wanted for quite a while. It seems to be
doing what it's supposed
17 matches
Mail list logo
