Thanks Dirk and Jochen (again). We fixed the incomplete ways bug in our
output so the display bug no longer appears. This thread has given me some
more clarity about the file format definition. I will try and capture that
in the JXML wiki page also. (Oh and yes the extraneous tags like `foo` and
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Martijn van Exel wrote:
If the file is really incomplete, I don't think JOSM should accept it - or
at least not without some kind of warning. The current behavior is
ambiguous: it loads the file without any warning or error, and merges with
another layer just fine, but it
On Mo, Mär 09, 2015 at 09:10:55 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
If the file is really incomplete, I don't think JOSM should accept it - or
at least not without some kind of warning. The current behavior is
ambiguous: it loads the file without any warning or error, and merges with
another layer
Hey Tod, Vincent and Jochen,
Thanks for looking at this also.
If the file is really incomplete, I don't think JOSM should accept it - or
at least not without some kind of warning. The current behavior is
ambiguous: it loads the file without any warning or error, and merges with
another layer
Hi,
I'm also posting this on the JOSM-List in hope to get feedback on the
technical parts here.
Regards,
Michael
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: [OSM-dev] GSoC: OpenGL view for JOSM
Datum: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:58:41 +0100
Von: Michael Zangl
On So, Mär 08, 2015 at 11:11:15 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I just had a weird experience with a JOSM XML file where some ways are
present but not visible on the map. I described the issue in some detail in
my diary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/34521
Before I open a
This is rather a bug of the software that produces the .osm file
(GraphEnhancer 1.0.0), not JOSM. Half the nodes are missing in your file.
Please report the bug to them.
2015-03-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
On So, Mär 08, 2015 at 11:11:15 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I
