[jQuery] Re: Choosing an Autocompletion solution

2008-02-15 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
timothytoe schrieb: I'll try Jörn's. The only thing that gave me pause on that one was the number of dependencies. Thats actually not that bad as it looks. The part of dimensions that is actually used - I'd have to actually check it again, so take this with a grain of salt - is now part of

[jQuery] Re: Choosing an Autocompletion solution

2008-02-13 Thread Diego A.
I use: http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/ I made this decision a few months ago, but I remember going through 4 or 5 options (I even considered writing my own), but in the end I chose the option that I thought was most likely to see future development and support.

[jQuery] Re: Choosing an Autocompletion solution

2008-02-13 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Diego A. schrieb: I use: http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/ I made this decision a few months ago, but I remember going through 4 or 5 options (I even considered writing my own), but in the end I chose the option that I thought was most likely to see future

[jQuery] Re: Choosing an Autocompletion solution

2008-02-13 Thread Jack Killpatrick
I also decided to use that one (Jörn's) after evaluating 4 or 5 others. As you (timothy) noticed, many of the solutions borrowed from each other, but that one seemed to have the best aggregate of features from them all and some of the others looked like they might have been stagnating. It has

[jQuery] Re: Choosing an Autocompletion solution

2008-02-13 Thread timothytoe
I'll try Jörn's. The only thing that gave me pause on that one was the number of dependencies. On Feb 13, 6:15 pm, Jack Killpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also decided to use that one (Jörn's) after evaluating 4 or 5 others. As you (timothy) noticed, many of the solutions borrowed from