RE: [jug-discussion] RE:confluence navigation & mod_jk

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
> Excellent! Much better. In the mean-time we could set a > redirect from 80 to 8080 (I won't have time to look at > setting up mod_jk until maybe the weekend). The proxypass trick might be easier, assuming that module is loaded. http://tucson-jug.org:8080/display/TJUG/MOD_JK+or+Proxy+Setup http

RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
Interesting. Actionscript 3.0... ...new "strong typing" and "E4X" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActionScript http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E4X http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/productinfo/faq/flex2_faq.html#i tem-4-2 What is ActionScript 3? ActionScript 3 is a new version of the st

Re: [jug-discussion] Code Camps .... RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Chad Woolley
Lack of IDE support does suck in Ruby, but there are many other things to (almost?) make up for it :) As for the non-Java focus, this is something we discussed in the last few meetings. Kind of branching out an attempt to give a little more life to the group, and make it easier to come up with in

[jug-discussion] signup on confluence

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
If everyone wouldn't mind please create an account on confluence (Tim just fixed the mailing problem). That way you can contribute content, ideas, and discussion points. http://www.tucson-jug.org:8080/ There should be a link to create an account there. -warner -

Re: [jug-discussion] RE:confluence navigation & mod_jk

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
Excellent! Much better. In the mean-time we could set a redirect from 80 to 8080 (I won't have time to look at setting up mod_jk until maybe the weekend). -warner On Apr 13, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Tim Colson ((tcolson)) wrote: Okay, Confluence can do navigation out of the box. :-) Browse Spac

Re: [jug-discussion] Code Camps .... RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
On Apr 13, 2006, at 11:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I created a framework called Presto that is similar in concept to RoR, but it is all Java. It makes heavy use of Spring AOP/Introductions, Hibernate and Facelets composition components. It is similar in concept to Trails but for JSF. I

[jug-discussion] Code Camps .... RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread rhightower
I created a framework called Presto that is similar in concept to RoR, but it is all Java. It makes heavy use of Spring AOP/Introductions, Hibernate and Facelets composition components. It is similar in concept to Trails but for JSF. IMHO, it is far more practical, more flexible and less obtrusive

[jug-discussion] RE:confluence navigation & mod_jk

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
Okay, Confluence can do navigation out of the box. :-) Browse Space -> Space Admin -> Themes -> select "Left Navigation" theme. Add a page called "Navigation". Bingo. You've got navigation. ;-) For setting up the port 80 thing -- here are some sample configs using mod_jk or apache proxypass: ht

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
Yes, that was actually one of the first things I tried when I tried to email my information to myself. I couldn't find any options that would allow me to try and fix it. I just tried it again and it didn't work. -warner On Apr 13, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Tim Colson ((tcolson)) wrote: Excellent

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
My biggest thing with that is that we want navigation on the site which confluence doesn't do by default and that's my biggest thing. If we can start migrating content over that would be a good start, but before we make it live I want navigation so that people can actually find what we put

RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
> Excellent, thanks for setting that up. As for SMTP it doesn't > require a login it does some funky authentication by checking > to see if that IP has retrieved mail recently, so not really > doable. What we would need to do would be to setup our own > SMTP on the box itself to get it to work

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Andrew Barton
I would be interested. My biggest consideration is making my wife take care of the kids on the weekend while I go off and geek. So, I may not be able to attend every one of these.As far as topics go, I am probably least interested in C# and Objective C. I have some interest in all of the other topi

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Jon Thomas
I would be really interested in many of these areas Jt On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Warner Onstine wrote: i guess what i'm shooting for is, what topics are people interested in doing? i've listed a few of mine, but feel free to chime in or pipe up if what i've mentioned interests you. -war

RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
> I think that would be great. Volunteers to help set up? (I > have absolutely no idea on how to make confluence look less > confluency and more like a regular site). It is more import to have current information than a site that doesn't look "confluency", in my opinion. ;-) -T

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
I think that would be great. Volunteers to help set up? (I have absolutely no idea on how to make confluence look less confluency and more like a regular site). -warner On Apr 13, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Tim Colson ((tcolson)) wrote: If we are going to do more stuff on the wiki now, it would be

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
Excellent, thanks for setting that up. As for SMTP it doesn't require a login it does some funky authentication by checking to see if that IP has retrieved mail recently, so not really doable. What we would need to do would be to setup our own SMTP on the box itself to get it to work (I bel

RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
> If we are going to do more stuff on the wiki now, it would be > good to put a link to it on the main JUG home page. And > maybe link to the meeting list on the wiki too, instead of > the outdated one on the home page? Personally, I'd prefer to see the wiki "be" the homepage, on port 80. Then

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Chad Woolley
If we are going to do more stuff on the wiki now, it would be good to put a link to it on the main JUG home page. And maybe link to the meeting list on the wiki too, instead of the outdated one on the home page? -- Chad On 4/13/06, Tim Colson (tcolson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like a g

RE: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
Seems like a good topic to continue on the wiki. ;-) http://tucson-jug.org:8080/display/TJUG/Home http://tucson-jug.org:8080/display/TJUG/Code+Camp+Discussion Speaking of wiki -- it would help tremendously if a mail server was available. Warner -- you mentioned the SMTP server requires a login.

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Chad Woolley
Python would be fun... On 4/13/06, Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i guess what i'm shooting for is, what topics are people interested > in doing? i've listed a few of mine, but feel free to chime in or > pipe up if what i've mentioned interests you. > > -warner > > On Apr 13, 2006, at

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Warner Onstine
i guess what i'm shooting for is, what topics are people interested in doing? i've listed a few of mine, but feel free to chime in or pipe up if what i've mentioned interests you. -warner On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Chad Woolley wrote: I might, depending on the topic, the time, and my ava

Re: [jug-discussion] our own code camps?

2006-04-13 Thread Chad Woolley
I might, depending on the topic, the time, and my availability... On 4/12/06, Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Awhile ago I tried to get a little code sprint going on for people > interested in learning Tapestry and maybe creating something useful. > I would like to remold these into st