A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc1, is here!
## What's New in RC1
* The Juju client now works on any Linux flavour. When bootstrapping
with local tools, it's now possible to create a controller of any
supported Linux series regardless of the Linux flavour the client
is running on.
On 19/09/16 23:36, James Beedy wrote:
> Thanks, Mark! By interactive bootstrap, do you mean interactive
> add-credentials? If so, I think it already exists for RAX, but isn't quite
> spot on yet. It looks like I should be able to get bootstrapped with the
> information contained in the bug link
On 19/09/16 23:36, James Beedy wrote:
> Thanks, Mark! By interactive bootstrap, do you mean interactive
> add-credentials? If so, I think it already exists for RAX, but isn't quite
> spot on yet. It looks like I should be able to get bootstrapped with the
> information contained in the bug link
Thanks chaps, looks it, if I can get the logs I'll add them to the ticket.
Tom
--
Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder
Tel: +44(0)5603641316
(Thanks to the Saiku community we reached our Kickstart
Personally, I really enjoy having everything in the same place, more than I
expected. It's also one less barrier of entry for newcomers and outsiders.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, 5:54 PM Menno Smits wrote:
> (gah, hit send too early)
>
> ... If we decide to stay with RB,
(gah, hit send too early)
... If we decide to stay with RB, that will need to be fixed.
On 21 September 2016 at 09:53, Menno Smits
wrote:
> Some of us probably got a little excited (me included). There should be
> discussion and a clear announcement before we make a
Hi Tom,
Sorry to hear you're having trouble.. I think there might be something
interesting in the controller logs that could help us fix it.
If you can ssh into the controller machine, could you tar up the logs in
/var/log/juju and attach to a Launchpad bug (
That would help for every platform and give users a way to configure the
output for their own platform/need.
I live with hi-res screen and would love to be able to customize it as Jay
pointed.
Fabrice.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jay Wren wrote:
> With an accepted
I spoke with Alexis today about this and it's on her list to check with her
folks on this. The tech board has been tasked with he decision, so please
feel free to shoot a copy of your opinions their way. As you say, on the
one hand it's a big impact on the team, but it's also a standard developer
Seems like a good thing to do would be to ensure the tech board doesn't have
any objections and then put it to a vote since it's more a property of the team
and not the codebase.
I just want some consistency until a decision is made. E.g. "we will be trying
out GitHub reviews for the next two
Hi folks
I have a controller on CDP thats stuck with 4 running units and 8 pending.
I can't destroy it or kill it, which strikes me as a bug but I don't know
what I can provide to help you guys fathom it out.
Obviously its still running as I can't kill it, so let me know what I can
offer up to
Can we try reviews on github for a couple weeks? Seems like we'll never
know if it's sufficient if we don't try it. And there's no setup cost,
which is nice.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:44 PM Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I see quite a few PRs that are being
I see quite a few PRs that are being reviewed in GitHub and not ReviewBoard. I
really don't care where we do them, but can we please pick a direction and move
forward? And until then, can we stick to our previous decision and use RB? With
people using both it's much more difficult to tell
With an accepted minimum value, it seems like $COLUMNS or `stty size` could
be used for variable width status output based on the current terminal
window.
Does the interest in this thread warrant that complexity?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Rick Harding
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:56 AM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wilkins <
> andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Just a heads up, where will be some changes to authentication in the
>> Azure provider. When
Thanks, Mark! By interactive bootstrap, do you mean interactive
add-credentials? If so, I think it already exists for RAX, but isn't quite spot
on yet. It looks like I should be able to get bootstrapped with the information
contained in the bug link in Rick's response.
~James
> On Sep 19,
Awesome! Thanks!
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Rick Harding wrote:
>
> James, what good timing. The streams with image info is just going through
> getting setup.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1625243
>
> It took a bit for the images for
Awesome! Thanks!
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Rick Harding wrote:
>
> James, what good timing. The streams with image info is just going through
> getting setup.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1625243
>
> It took a bit for the images for
18 matches
Mail list logo