Hi!
I just installed the OpenGL.jl, SDL.jl, and GLUT.jl packages, and tried to
run some of the NeHe tutorials.
But no matter which one I tried, the result is only black.
With SDL.jl, I get a window titled e.g. NeHe Tut 2 with only black
contents. When it has focus, it responds to the q button
Hi Amit,
Well in my case I'm parsing a bunch of files, store results in dictionaries
which are merged back into one big array of dictionaries. Since each file
can be parsed independently pmap seems to be good and clean fit. But
because size of each Dictionary is quite big merging the data back
I have a small test-case which is slow when benchmarked from a loop, but
fast when benchmarked from a function:
using Images
function expensive(img)
img[1, 2] * img[3, 4] + img[5, 6] - img[7, 8]
end
function benchmark(img)
for i in 1:100
expensive(img)
You should definitely open an issue about this – if your timings are right
it's definitely not desirable behaviour.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues?state=open
On 31 May 2014 11:00, mike c coolbutusel...@gmail.com wrote:
I've narrowed down the problem. It's not a profiling problem.
are there any libraries for parsing in julia? either parser combinator or
something more traditional (maybe a wrapper for something like antlr)?
all i can find is an old discussion started by leah h in which jeff b
suggests doing everything in julia. that included a pointer to
Hello,
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 4:40:02 PM UTC+2, Robert Gates wrote:
Dear Julia users:
my colleagues and I are planning on writing cross-platform (Linux
variants, OS X, Windows) commercial software for the research community,
preferably in Julia. Our projected release date will be some
There was a nice looking PEG system previewed a few days ago if you search
the users list (and I think there was another one several months back by
Michael Fox).
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:22 PM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
are there any libraries for parsing in julia? either parser
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/t56VxOX1vvk/nszQYWP_pm4J
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/6jz3Ow5SAAE/TgKHQ48gUG4J
thanks!
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 14:04:28 UTC-4, Isaiah wrote:
There was a nice looking PEG system previewed a few days ago if you search
the users list
Hil,
DASSL.jl supports multiple equtions, I have just added an example to the
readme file [1]. If you need any further help with setting up DASSL.jl I
am ready to help you.
[1] https://github.com/pwl/DASSL.jl/blob/master/README.md
W dniu czwartek, 29 maja 2014 19:31:19 UTC+2 użytkownik
Robert,
These questions are hard to answer without knowing a little bit more about
what you are planning. How many people will be working on the project. What
are the tools used to date? What would be the considered alternative to
Julia? These are quite essential questions.
If the alternative
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 10:40:02 AM UTC-4, Robert Gates wrote:
my colleagues and I are planning on writing cross-platform (Linux
variants, OS X, Windows) commercial software for the research community,
preferably in Julia. Our projected release date will be some time in the
next 3-4
It seems the idea of JIT Hardware Compilation has been around for a while:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-78791-4_12#page-1
http://www.informationweek.com/jit-compilation-to-hardware/d/d-id/1073781?
On Sunday, 1 June 2014 00:21:07 UTC+10, Simon Kornblith wrote:
Yes, this is kind of a toy solution to a toy example. It sounds like what
you describe is implementable as:
f(i, object, objects..) = min(intersect(object, i), f(i, objects...))
f(i) = 0.0
I did try something like that in
There are a number of issues about type inference for `map` and similar
functions. See 6692 and the issues linked therein:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/6692
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Tomas Lycken tomas.lyc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a `DataArray{Float64,1}` named `ps` with a
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:08:29 PM UTC-4, Iain Dunning wrote:
And I don't necessarily think this is wrong - look at the code it generates
f{t,n}(::Type{Array{t,n}},::Array{t,n}) at none:3
f{t,n}(::Type{Array{t,N}},::Array{t,n}) at none:2
There is nothing to distinguish these two from a
I should add that PEGParser's code is fairly new and untested (besides
having an uninspired name). I'm also hoping to have better action
semantics soon.
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 2:17:27 PM UTC-4, andrew cooke wrote:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/t56VxOX1vvk/nszQYWP_pm4J
16 matches
Mail list logo