If you know the categories then one thing you could do is think about it as a
barplot
julia> UnicodePlots.barplot(a[:,1], a[:,2], symb = "▇")
┌┐
7 │▇▇ 4│
4 │▇▇▇ 2 │
has been successfully
> applied in many areas, even though there are many other areas remaining.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Christof Stocker <stocker@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello Kevin,
>>
>> Enthusiasm is a good thing and you should hold on
Hello Kevin,
Enthusiasm is a good thing and you should hold on to that. But to save
yourself some headache or disappointment down the road I advice a level
head. Nothing is really as bluntly obviously solved as it may seems at
first glance after listening to brilliant people explain things. A
I also prefer the ! so I know it modifies an existing plot. If I don't
use a ! then I expect to create a new one
On 2016-04-09 02:52, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
Cheers,
Daniel.
On 9 April 2016 at 02:30, Tom Breloff >
ise, which it is the right way to generate the file
tags? in .julia/ ?
with the command:
`ctags -R .`
2016-03-16 10:38 GMT-03:00 Christof Stocker
<stocker.chris...@gmail.com <mailto:stocker.chris...@gmail.com>>:
Makes sense. I don't use C-], I use the CtrlP plugin to jump
around in
-3, Christof Stocker wrote:
I made myself a custom one based on the one from the julia
repo. Basically I seperated the big one into multiple
categories and also allow functions to be marked inline
I posted a gist of it for those interested
https
14:38:42 UTC+1 schrieb Christof Stocker:
>
> Hi!
>
> Are there any VIM users here who have a nice
> [tagbar](https://github.com/majutsushi/tagbar) going?
>
> For the tagbar to work properly one needs to have a Julia language
> definition for [ctags](http://ctags.sourcef
Hi!
Are there any VIM users here who have a nice
[tagbar](https://github.com/majutsushi/tagbar) going?
For the tagbar to work properly one needs to have a Julia language
definition for [ctags](http://ctags.sourceforge.net/). I have found one
I am happy to see people interested in messing around with Julia for ML.
The best way to wrap your head around the concepts is usually to try it
out and see what happens.
My 2 cents are that I doubt that you will get competitive results with
neural networks for your regression problems (even
To follow up with a question on this "multiple dispatch is resolved at
runtime" statement:
I was under the impression, that if the Julia JIT compiler is able to
infer the concrete types of the variables involved in a method call,
that it will select the appropriate method at compile time. Am
I happen to really like Julia's package manager. It unifies package
development with package usage and is also really convenient to work
with. Because of this I pretty much create a package for every
experiment I make. Personally I'd go around telling colleagues that
Julia's Package Manager is
11:56:11 PM Christof Stocker wrote:
I am trying to find a way to convert a JPEG that I receive from a GET
request into an Image, but without creating a temporary file. Does
anyone know a good solution to this? I tried a couple of things such as
creating an IOStream out of the Array{UInt8,1} that I
I am trying to find a way to convert a JPEG that I receive from a GET
request into an Image, but without creating a temporary file. Does
anyone know a good solution to this? I tried a couple of things such as
creating an IOStream out of the Array{UInt8,1} that I receive from the
GET request,
Funny coincidence. I have been playing around with its REST API
recently. I was thinking of mirroring the R package (and thus have a
more or less identical interface), which is Apache licensed and is
really nice to use. I did, however, have two concerns that discouraged
me. My main concern is
Personally, I think the most progress is made if some person has a huge
interest in doing it. I for one have a big interest in using Julia for
ML, but I myself am not particularly interested in using Spark from
Julia. I just don't feel like it would be useful to me for anything. In
the
What is the current best practice to handle JSON and to use a REST API
from Julia?
From preliminary search I would assume JuliaLang/JSON.jl and
JuliaWeb/Requests.jl, but I am unsure
Doe anyone have any suggestions what to look at?
A pure Julia ML ecosystem is something that is actively being worked
on/towards. Naturally large problem sizes are one big reason that people
are interested in working on this. It just takes time to flesh it out to
something that people are used to from languages like python or R. As I
see it,
enrichment,
ETL, etc. I don't think Julia ML ecosystem by itself will ever expand
to these areas.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Christof Stocker
<stocker.chris...@gmail.com <mailto:stocker.chris...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A pure Julia ML ecosystem is something that is actively bein
e they had consistently used more descriptive names
(eg. regularization_strength instead of alpha).
On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 11:00:56 AM UTC-5, Christof Stocker
wrote:
I understand that. But that would imply that a group of people
that are used to different notation would nee
I agree. I personally think the ML efforts should follow the StatsBase
and Optim conventions where it makes sense.
The notational differences are inconvenient, but they are manageable. I
think readability should be the goal there. For example if you implement
some algorithm one should use the
I'm afraid it is not as easy as simply wrapping "existing"
functionality, unless one is ok with a lot of wrapper packages for C
backends. I do realize that a lot of people might be ok with this, but
to some (me included) that would defeat the purpose of using Julia in
the first place. I really
the paper as a reference. (the
obvious solution is to never use greek letters, of course)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Christof Stocker
<stocker.chris...@gmail.com <mailto:stocker.chris...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I agree. I personally think the ML efforts should follow the
My two favorite languages combined! Then again, I wouldn't want ice
cream on my steak :-)
On 2015-10-19 19:39, ssarkarayushnet...@gmail.com wrote:
I am confident that a new OOP language *ScalaJulia *is possible
integrating syntax of both functional languages Scala and Julia.
Thanks,
SS
I agree with you in that most of the code I start out with usually
contains some dirty hacks that I later refactor. But that is just my
personal approach to programming -> get something running quickly and
iterate on it
That being said, based on my personal experience with Julia (which is
I have been spending the past weeks trying to really understand how to
implement efficient code.
As far as I can tell (from first hand experience), Julia really does
give you a prominent edge over R and Matlab in terms of performance.
However, I also think that there are currently a lot of
2015 à 21:46 +0200, Christof Stocker a écrit :
So the website is (probably on purpose) not very specific on
recommendations for how to document ones functions (stylewise) using
the
new doc system. However, since I am writing an enduser-facing library
with a lot of parameters, I am wondering about w
n Qt (& QtCreator
I believe). I thought that JuliaStudio was a nice start (also based on
QtCreator). I wish a group would fork it and develop it further in the
direction of RStudio.
On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, Christof Stocker
wrote:
I would be a huge fan of an
So the website is (probably on purpose) not very specific on
recommendations for how to document ones functions (stylewise) using the
new doc system. However, since I am writing an enduser-facing library
with a lot of parameters, I am wondering about what useful guidelines
others here came up
So bottomline what does this mean for the upcoming 0.4 release. Is the
deb not going to be updated for stable releases anymore, or are you just
talking about managing different versions at the same time?
On 2015-09-20 20:23, Elliot Saba wrote:
Yep, Tony hit it on the head. As the maintainer
I would be a huge fan of an RStudio like Julia IDE
On 2015-09-18 10:05, Uwe Fechner wrote:
I like QT a lot. There is more then one open source, QT based IDE out
there, e.g. QT Creator.
QT has a GUI builder, that is much better then the GUI builders for
GTK (in my opinion).
And you can use the
Thank god, almost got a heart attack there. I am just looking at the
papers in my efforts
On 2015-09-18 16:32, Mauro wrote:
Just the implementation. But by looking at the code you look at the
implementation. So, it's ok to look at pseudo-code in a paper (even if
that paper is under strict
Wait, so how does this work. Doesn't the license just cover the
implementation? or is the underlying abstract algorithm covered by it?
On 2015-09-18 16:00, Tim Holy wrote:
not implemented, care to try? You can find several implementations online;
watch the license, though---if you read code
for
hijacking this thread
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 16:37:59 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker:
>
> Thank god, almost got a heart attack there. I am just looking at the
> papers in my efforts
>
> On 2015-09-18 16:32, Mauro wrote:
> > Just the implementation. But by looking
ge anymore)
On 2015-09-18 21:49, Daniel Carrera wrote:
I have never used RStudio (or R, or IDEs). What features does it have
that you would like to see in a Julia IDE?
Cheers,
Daniel.
On 18 September 2015 at 10:08, Christof Stocker
<stocker.chris...@gmail.com <mailto:stocker.chris...@g
I am just happy and thankful that people work on the IDE side of Julia.
But I have to admit that the whole web-based IDE movement annoys the
heck out of me.
On 2015-09-17 11:31, Daniel Carrera wrote:
On 17 September 2015 at 11:17, Eric Forgy
applications that are fast and responsive.
On 2015-09-17 13:23, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Why?
On 17 September 2015 at 12:09, Christof Stocker
<stocker.chris...@gmail.com <mailto:stocker.chris...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am just happy and thankful that people work on the IDE side
+100
i don't even know what to say. This is so awesome. It's exactly what I
wished for with gadfly
On 2015-09-14 17:14, Tim Holy wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Immerse package:
https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Immerse.jl
Immerse is designed to add a new layer of
I could use some advice on how to randomly partition large arrays into
train and holdout set
I am working on a machine learning related problem where I want to
provide convenience methods to deal with large in-memory data sets (i.e.
a large dense matrix |X| and a target vector |t|)
In
On 2015-09-02 13:51, Leff Ivanov wrote:
Is it possible or is it even planned to be able to create native standalone
executables from Julia scripts? By standalone I mean that executable file can
be used fully by the end user without the need to install Julia. By native I
mean that Julia code
Hello everyone!
If you are like me and work a lot from the command line, but you would
still like to visualise your data somehow, then maybe UnicodePlots.jl
https://github.com/Evizero/UnicodePlots.jl could be of use to you.
It supports colors and also offers a low-level API to the canvas itself
40 matches
Mail list logo