Re: [julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-23 Thread James Dang
I just updated Jude so you can configure your Julia path. Good to know we can eventually get autocomplete in the console for autocomplete+. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Mike Innes wrote: > This is very cool! RE the path, perhaps it could make sense for Jude to >

Re: [julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-22 Thread Mike Innes
This is very cool! RE the path, perhaps it could make sense for Jude to check for the `julia-client.juliaPath` before defaulting to `julia`? I'm also hoping that julia-client can expose some kind of API eventually so that people can build whatever custom interactions they want. Autocomplete in

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-21 Thread James Dang
Hi Evan, no, the console is controlled by Juno (or "julia-client" in Atom), and Jude can't hook into that. Besides, Jude is complementary and distinct from what Juno provides. Jude does auto-complete within scopes, so you can get autocomplete in the middle of a function body you are editing,

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-21 Thread James Dang
Hi Nitin, yeah I haven't set up a way to configure which Julia binary to run, so it just expects `julia` on your path. That will be fixed up soon. Another user who used homebrew found a workaround: https://github.com/jamesdanged/Jude/issues/1

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-21 Thread Evan Fields
Looks great - I'm excited to try this out. Does the autocomplete work in the console as well? I recently tried Atom flavored Juno and was super impressed but found the lack of console completions a major pain point. Will this play nicely with Juno's packages? On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-21 Thread Evan Fields
Looks great - I'm excited to try this out. Does the autocomplete work in the console as well? I recently tried Atom flavored Juno and was super impressed but found the lack of console completions a major pain point. Will this play nicely with Juno's packages?

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-21 Thread Nitin Arora
Awesome :) . I will try this tomm. On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 11:58:15 AM UTC-7, James Dang wrote: > > Hi All, Julia has been great for me, and I wanted to give back a little. > LightTable and Atom are great editors, but I was really starting to miss > good intellisense-like autocomplete and

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-20 Thread James Dang
Thanks! I think it's the default Atom theme heh.

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-20 Thread Eric Forgy
*drool* That looks awesome. Can't wait to try it out. Thanks!

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-20 Thread Uwe Fechner
Today I thought multiple times: How nice would it be to have a "goto definition" function in Juno/Atom. And now it is already there! Very nice. :) Uwe On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 7:58:15 PM UTC+1, James Dang wrote: > > Hi All, Julia has been great for me, and I wanted to give back a little.

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-20 Thread Kristoffer Carlsson
This looks very nice! Might even push me into using Atom ;)

[julia-users] Re: Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

2016-03-20 Thread feza
Nice I will try this! BTW which theme are you using :) On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 2:58:15 PM UTC-4, James Dang wrote: > > Hi All, Julia has been great for me, and I wanted to give back a little. > LightTable and Atom are great editors, but I was really starting to miss > good