Re: [j-nsp] Junos 21+ Killing Finger Muscle Memory...

You can probably deny that command using the login class ACL. -- Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone). > On 12 Jul 2023, at 11:49, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > So, this is going to be a very priviledged post, and I have been spending > the last several months mu

Re: [j-nsp] SRGB Allocation

I vote for static Adj-SID allocations for the SR-MPLS. It makes operations much more convenient as one might arrange a map of interface name (index) to an Adj-SID. -- Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone). > On 11 Aug 2020, at 16:58, Andrew Alston > wrote: > > Adjacency SI

Re: [j-nsp] SRGB allocation

(as they have different default SRGB ranges). It is also important to consider different MPLS implementation specifics, e.g. how MPLS label manager actually allocates the labels. -- Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone). > On 11 Aug 2020, at 12:27, Antti Ristimäki wrote: > > Hi list, >

Re: [j-nsp] Transit composite next hops

Hi, no, not supported. CNH is there only for a limited number of LER cases. Please contact the account team and PLM for the details. -- Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone). > On 10 Feb 2018, at 21:17, Luis Balbinot <l...@luisbalbinot.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > I was reading ab

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and 128.0.0.0 martian (JFYI)

+1. I guess nobody cares about intersecting address spaces in typical BGP L3VPNs, why to discuss router's internals then? Just my .02$. With best regards, Vladimir Blazhkun. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 23:59, Tima Maryin timamar...@mail.ru wrote: I don't see any problem with it since it's

Re: [j-nsp] Preventing NSSA LSAs from leaking into the backbone when part of a summary

Hi, Tore, Did you try using: set protocols ospf area ${nssa_area_id} nssa area-range ${ipv4_prefix} restrict, where ${nssa_area_id} is the NSSA ID, ${ipv4_prefix} - the prefix, containing the range you want to filter? With best regards, Vladimir Blazhkun. On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 18:07, Tore

Re: [j-nsp] LSP Refresh ISIS

Hi, David, I guess it is 317 because the number is a prime one (decreases a possibility of the self-synchronization). Also 317 looks cool :) P.S. As was told, 300 is a reasonable value, the standard says, not a recommended one, to be precise. With best regards, Vladimir Blazhkun. On Tue, Sep 6

Re: [j-nsp] Rapid ping gives ping: send to: operation not permitted

Hi, Siva, I would guess that you receive an ICMP Destination Unreachable message with the code 10 (Communication Administratively Prohibited) or similar in response to your (rapid) pings. With best regards, Vladimir Blazhkun. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 20:50, MSusiva ssiva1...@gmail.com wrote