Thanks for the quick feedback. Looks like it will be ospf. Thanks for
pointing me in the right direction.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Fahad Ali Khan [mailto:faha...@cyber.net.pk]
Sent: 07 April 2009 16:15
To: Nick Ryce; juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net; juniper-nsp
Hi Guys
I have recently installed a j2320 with source nat using the following guide:-
http://www.juniperforum.com/index.php/topic,7261.0.html
Can dynamic nat also be applied for the remainder of internal ip's that are not
defined in the source nat list? If so is there any guides on how to
Sorry, forgot to mention im using [9.3R2.8] Enhanced Services
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent: 16 June 2009 11:09
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Source (1 to 1
Hi Guys,
I am having difficulties getting an adsl pim module to work in a j2320 running
9.3R2.8 Enhanced services.
SP is using ppoa whith chap authentication and I have confirmed the adsl line
is working by using a netgear adsl modem. We are seeing sync but cannot
establish a PPP connection.
]
Sent: 30 June 2009 15:55
To: Nick Ryce; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] UK adsl config
Hey Nick,
AFAIK, the access-profile configuration should work if the client name
matches the service provider BRAS hostname.
Try to use passive knob under ppp-options chap also add local-name
Of Nick Ryce
Sent: 01 July 2009 11:53
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] UK adsl config
Gave that a try and still nothing.
Forgot to mention that i have set keepalives as the adsl line is a backup and
no traffic is flowing. Would the interface come up without traffic going
established
but packets continue to be lost. Any ideas?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
0845119
P.S. do you love Lumison? Why not take a moment and vote for us?
http://bit.ly/Vote_Lumison
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely
Spec sheets say it should be able to hand a couple of hundred vpn tunnels so
not sure if that would be? Is there a hardware encryption module for the
junipers?
Nick
From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 April 2010 12:13
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
To: Nick Ryce
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper IPSEC VPN
OFF-LIST PRIVATE RESPONSE.
Spec sheet of 1000265-en.pdf indicates a j2320 should be able to do 140mb/s
IPsec VPN... Also 1000206-en.pdf says that crypto module you found is for a
2350 only.
If you are not pushing more than that published limit
a difference.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Kerry Milestone [mailto:k...@sanger.ac.uk]
Sent: 06 May 2010 15:32
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper IPSEC VPN
Hi,
i batteed me head on this one... turns out, to get our VPN stable even though
the Checkoint's
-srx240.txt
but dont think that would encrypt everything going down the tunnelor would
it.
Im using 9.6 at the moment.
Any help appreciated
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
0845119
P.S. do you love Lumison? Why not take a moment and vote for us?
http://bit.ly/Vote_Lumison
[mailto:jonloo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 May 2010 14:21
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Encrypt GRE tunnel with ipsec
Are you using SRX/J-series or AS PIC/MS PIC/ASM/Services DPC? The
configuration will be different for those two classes of platform.
-Jon
On Mon
Hi Ben,
Its 9.6 im using which I believe ES was rolled into this. I will look at the
docs provided :) Sounds like exactly what I require.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Ben Dale [mailto:bd...@comlinx.com.au]
Sent: 25 May 2010 12:03
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: Jonathan Looney; J NSP
Subject: Re
Hi Guys,
This is such a newb question that im slightly embarrassed to ask but I just
cant get any joy from the Juniper KB.
Im remotely upgrading junos software from 9.1 to 9.3 and I have a usb device
where I have issued the command
'request system snapshot media usb'
Now if I upgrade and the
errors enabled
2010-06-24 16:35:02 BST: Rotate backup configs
2010-06-24 16:35:06 BST: commit complete
commit complete
Any ideas?
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
0845119
P.S. do you love Lumison? Why not take a moment and vote for us?
http://bit.ly/Vote_Lumison
Hi Thomas,
Its on a j2320 9.6R3.8
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eichhorn [mailto:t...@te3networks.de]
Sent: 25 June 2010 08:08
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] unabel to archive to ftp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is about
On the back of this I have a j6350 running 10.0R3.10 and am using for some bgp
and ospf.
Is the best guide to following to move from flow to packet-based this
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Enabling_packet_based_forwarding or does
anyone have any other suggestions?
Nick
-Original
I haven't implemented. I was asking if the below link is the best way to do it
as I would prefer to go back to packet-based.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hanke [mailto:jha...@myclearwave.net]
Sent: 21 July 2010 15:10
To: Nick Ryce; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp
Hi Guys,
I have searched through this list and also on juniper and cant find an answer.
Is it possible to use BFD on a j2320/j6350 to make the router become either
backup/master on a vrrp group?
Nick
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are
which return counter32 and OctetString but not an integer.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
t: 0845 1199 900
d: +44 131 514 4049
P.S. Fancy some light reading? Clouds to networks, download a Lumison
whitepaper now at http://www.lumison.net/why
And 30 seconds after I posted I think I have found it
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.50.1.1.1.3.6.80.114.111.98.101.49.3.69.68.73.1
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent: 03 September 2010 16:03
Hi Guys,
Is there a set speed for the st0 interface. The physical line is 100meg that
the st0 is bound to but I only seem to get 10meg out of it.
Any help appreciated.
Nick
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely
Hi Guys,
Quick question. We have 2 x 6350's on 100mb connections to the internet and a
secure tunnel between them. Both run 9.6R3.8.
We were only seeing 40mb/s throughput on this and as a last gasp before
faulting to the carriers we moved it onto packet based forwarding with the
below:-
Hi Guys,
I am starting to play with BGP and have set up some communities to separate
customer, peer and transit routes. I am trying to figure out how to allow
customers to send me a blackhole community number and then blackhole this.
Does anyone have any examples? I have set up most of my
Thanks for all the replies and help :)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) [mailto:j...@probe-networks.de]
Sent: 20 October 2010 16:03
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Blackhole communities
Hi,
its easy:
- you need multihop
Hi Guys,
Just having a look through the ex2200 datasheet and cant see if the switch can
do L3 policing. I understand that it does basic L3 functionality like static
routing but I would have thought that policing would be a basic L3 function.
Can anyone else confirm?
Nick
Did anyone ever get this resolved as we are facing the same issue.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: 11 August 2010 00:52
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Egress
When you pass the assessment it also gives you a prometric discount code :)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
david@orange-ftgroup.com
Sent: 22 December 2010 15:15
To: 'Jared Gull';
Anyone know if Juniper plan to allow IPV6 routing without the extortionate
advanced license?
Nick
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you
Do you have a return route on the other device for the network you are trying
to ping from?
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alexander Shikoff
Sent: 18 January 2011 13:43
To:
specified. I have a
about 150 customer ACLS each with about 40 lines of code which I really don't
want to do manually.
Thanks.
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
t: 0845 1199 900
d: +44 131 514 4049
P.S. Fancy some light reading? Clouds to networks, download a Lumison
whitepaper now
ACL we use on most
customer vlans and then a customer specific vlan?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
t: 0845 1199 900
d: +44 131 514 4049
P.S. Fancy some light reading? Clouds to networks, download a Lumison
whitepaper now at http://www.lumison.net/why-lumison/whitepapers
use tcp-established in cisco land ).
Is there any known work around?
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Network Engineer
Lumison
t: 0845 1199 900
d: +44 131 514 4049
P.S. Fancy some light reading? Clouds to networks, download a Lumison
whitepaper now at http://www.lumison.net/why-lumison/whitepapers
Ryce
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 egress filter
Why not perform this at the routed layer?
Or, are you routing into the VLAN at the EX4200? (i.e. using the EX4200 as a
router, not a switch which then uplinks the VLAN to something bigger like an
MX...)
- Chris.
On 2011-04-28, at 7:35 PM, Nick
Thankfully only using ospf and vlans on our ex4200's :)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net]
Sent: 28 April 2011 14:05
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: Chris Kawchuk; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 egress filter
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011
Especially using apply-path to build dynamic prefix-lists can help greatly and
remove a lot of overhead from adding/removing when things change.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kurt Bales
Sent:
Do you have any figures for throughput required?
What functionality do the SRX's need to support?
Nick
On 14/08/2011 02:41, uk2usa uk2...@gmail.com wrote:
Experts,
Please share the best practices for SRX deployment in service provider and
enterprise networks?
Also, recommend SRX options I
Hi Mark,
Maybe something like
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=KB22052pmv=print
is what you are looking for?
Nick
On 18/02/2013 13:34, Mark Menzies m...@deimark.net wrote:
Hi all
I hope someone here can help.
I have an SRX cluster with 3 reth interfaces, 2 for WAN
/swmpls.html#wp1285989
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 14/04/2013 17:47, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Monday, February 25, 2013 04:56:39 PM Benny Amorsen
wrote:
Dedicating an MX routing engine
You can set optimize timers to something low so it will check for
underlying IGP changes and reroute.
Ideally you will want to look at fast reroute etc so a backup path is
already there in the event of a failure.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http
We can't speak highly enough of Flexoptix. Very well priced SFP's and you
can even buy a box which can program them to look like sfp's from most of
the current hardware vendors.
DOM is also on their optical SFP's too.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w
It doesn't appear to mention anything about sampling.
I assume this is the fix for the BGP convergence issues per RAS's Nanog
presso
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Tuesday/tue.lightning2.
steenbergen.juniper-slowfib.pdf
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n
Can you provide a sanitised config for the routing instance and LSP's?
--
Nick
On 16/07/2013 15:50, Gabriel Blanchard g...@teksavvy.ca wrote:
I'm attempting to turn up an VPLS circuit and it appears that only one
side is showing as Up while the other is showing as VC-Dn
I turned on a
Hi Richard,
Are you able to swap the RJ45¹s for SM 1G and see if the issue is still
present which could indicate a possible port fault?
N
Nick Ryce
On 20/10/2014 18:12, Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Richard Hartmann
richih.mailingl
You may be able to use output-traffic-control-profile to achieve this
N
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications
(Commsworld Ltd T/A)
T: +44 (0) 330 121 1000
www.fluency.net.uk http://www.fluency.net.uk/
n...@fluency.net.uk mailto:char...@fluency.net.uk
On 19/06/2015 16:00, Adam
If you speak to a friendly Juniper SE, they have a release that features
spring. Julian Lucek mentioned this when I saw a presentation from him back in
November.
N
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications
(Commsworld Ltd T/A)
T: +44 (0) 330 121 1000
www.fluency.net.uk <http://www.fluency.net.uk/
Hi Andres,
If you do show virtual-chassis vc-port does it show the new ports?
N
On 03/04/2017, 17:46, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Andres Diaz via juniper-nsp"
wrote:
Hi,
I have two EX switches in Virtual
47 matches
Mail list logo