the REs as they broke. Thankfully nobody
ever died over a had RE HD, and there are no accelerator pedals on the
routers, so a little cover-up was probably to be expected and I doubt
anybody will ever be called to testify in front of congress. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
(and probable given
our change windows) that multiple technicians could be making changes
on it in rapid fire
Have you ever tried committing on an SRX? :) Don't worry, there is no
danger of anything that could even be remotely described as rapid fire
happening there. :P
--
Richard A Steenbergen r
-RPD_SCHED_SLIP_KEVENT: 4 sec
133028 usec kevent block
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
reflector (and yet
they're still taking your money for the BGP RR licenses, go figure :P).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
to be limited to the lowest common denominator, some guy clicking Save
As in their IE6 browser on their Windows desktop. Would a sftp server
you could actually do bulk gets from really be that hard?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
line, but they limit the simultanious
connections to 1 per IP. You can't even go browsing for other software
or download the release notes while you wait for your first download to
finish. And at least Juniper hasn't pulled a Cisco-style move and
required javascript to download files.
--
Richard
my download
speeds. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
seen
there.
Speaking of EX and sucking, has anybody else noticed the hardcoded 512MB
rlimit on rpd on EX8200? :)
Process (55002,rpd) attempted to exceed RLIMIT_DATA: attempted 524412 KB Max
524288 KB
pid 55002 (rpd), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
a pain to
remember to turn it on. Personally I wish there was just an interface
unit level point-to-point flag you could set that told all associated
protocols this was a p2p even if it's over ethernet.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
). The only reason you need a MS-DPC
for v9 is they just never got around to writing it for the RE.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
1879 root1 111 15 120M 120M RUN951:29 0.05% sampled
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
also simpler for the
router to run CCC for local switching.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
the initial upgrade, but
eventually settled down and has been stable since. JTAC wasn't
immediately helpful in determining if it was a known issue or not, and
we have far to many bigger more important bugs to deal with as it is, so
this got stashed on the back burner.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
versions. Does anybody know if this is actually on the
roadmap to get supported, or has flowspec just completely fallen off the
radar since Pedro and Raszuk left Juniper? :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C
total number of paths and adj ribs, but you'd be eliminating
two complete ribs worth of extra routes... ~200MB sounds pretty
realistic, *maybe* more depending on the number of attributes
(communities, etc) and how your multipath config works out.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
people
who would have known better, it's just that the EX guys didn't consult
them. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper
for those two different revisions of hardware. What 3200/4200 does is
not necessarily the same as what 8200 does.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
;
interface xe-1/0/1.101;
}
}
}
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
definitely do
the additionl on my side post-SNMP collection.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:16:36PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
protocols {
connections {
interface-switch test {
interface xe-1/0/0.101;
interface xe-1/0/1.101;
}
}
}
Well for everyone woh asked, I tried the following on an EX8208
: 0. V
Receiver signal average optical power : 0.
etc etc etc all 0's for everything...
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
off accept-remote-nexthop keeps rpd from
crashing (oh and btw when it does crash, it somehow wipes out a bunch of
directly connected interface routes from the krt in the process,
requiring you to manually remove and re-add the interface configs to
restore normal routing on them).
--
Richard
of flash cost, $100? Think about the amount of
grief that will be caused by this in comparison, and tell me it was a
smart move on their part. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:45:07PM -0700, Hoogen wrote:
I think flash isn't going to be considered... It has a finite
erase/write cycles.. yeah but 8200 could have had more storage..
Erm... what do you think it uses currently, a 2GB hard drive? :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
really put in as backup because nobody trusted spinning
media in a router, go figure.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
in the datacenter, but I can't find them shipping yet either.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/buffalos-16gb-5mm-usb-thumbkey-its-really-small/
Then again, I have some promotional Cisco USB drives that might look
good sticking out of the box like a giant wart too. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r
configured vlan it is a Big Problem (tm) which needs to be fixed.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
, but if your EX's are leaking things they shouldn't be
I'd like to see that get addressed too. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
, hit o, and sort by res to see what else is
consuming memory on the box.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
is doing the right thing by swapping them out.
You can probably run just fine with a decent amount of memory used in
swap.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
/T 992C)
Nice solid 6MB/s, barely sticks out of the box at all, couldn't ask for
better on the price either. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
a route is or
isn't active. Look at show route detail on a route you believe is
incorrecting picking a wrong path and see for yourself. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
at any
rate. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
around this by deactivating the interface so the IP
config doesn't go into the parser at all, I'm just wondering why it
would be designed this way in the first place. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C
/neighbors is epic disaster.
Maybe JUNOS-ES is better or different or something, I dunno.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
for a small peering pop/exchange point.
Ah ok, when I see 65 peers I'm used to it being several million paths.
I'm sure 4k or even 20k routes are perfectly fine, just watch out for
the performance issues if you want to start stuffing many full tables
into a J-series.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r
to implement today if your life depended on it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
what they are. Anybody? :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
there are a
ton of them running autobw, and in some cases the ae's being reported
don't have any mpls/rsvp speakers at all.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:17:14PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Yes the boxes are running autobw, but almost none of the interfaces
being reported in these messages are doing any mpls/rsvp/etc. I'd have
to dig into the actual stats file to confirm it, but I suppose these
could
thorough, only about 20%
of it is actually on the exam, and most of the more complicated
scenarios are nowhere to be found or are only a single question out of a
section. If you read and understand the study guide, you are all but
guaranteed to pass. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
in the same chassis, I expect a lot of
people are going to be very unhappy very soon when they're forced to
upgrade. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:41:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Saturday 01 May 2010 04:01:38 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
chassisd[1305]: %DAEMON-3-UI_CONFIGURATION_ERROR:
Process: chassisd, path: [edit groups BASE-FORWARDING
forwarding-options hash-key family], statement: inet6
we did find in it (some very serious) Juniper
refused to fix in the 9.5 branch. It would have been nice if they'd made
9.5 an extended support release, but alas no such luck.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
it saves you a flap if
you ever need to turn it on later.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
a static route.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
, it will
make life much easier in the future. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
. Also note that there are several more issues caused by the
NxSVI approach on Crisco, but that is a rant for a different mailing
list. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
features
Get 10.1R2 (which was due out a couple days ago), we hit a bug in 10.1S1
on EX8200 where FPCs crashed when updating a prefix-list that was
referenced in a firewall filter that is fixed in 10.1R2.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
saw, and it was dated Nov 2009.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
completely broken on EX, if that counts as a reason :P). I'm not sure
what the current release schedule is, but it can't be too much longer,
and there are some pretty serious problems in 10.1S1.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC
a single
IBGP session in 10.1 tests.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
to replicate. Given this and the other issues
w/updating prefix-lists referenced in a firewall filter causing crashes,
you might want to lay off that feature for a bit. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
.
If you want to readd it (to see if its actually broken), drop to shell,
su to root, and do:
sysctl -w machdep.bootdevs=whatever
i.e. take your current bootdevs and add disk (the ad1), or whatever
you want to do.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG
have an SRX at home, and trust me I feel your pain). To be
less fair, this is not an isolated problem, and these days JUNOS is less
reliable than IOS.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1
of having to a no-install
on all of the regular LSPs, then match everything without the transport
communities and install them to lsp-regexp IP.*.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
http://www.e-gerbil.net/juniper.jpg
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
output whenever you get into a penis waiving contest
over who has the device with the longest uptime. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
be to fix this?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
it from resignaling excessively.
I'll gladly accept any clue anyone can offer on this one. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
2071 root1 1270 991M 975M RUN192.8H 89.16% rpd
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:01:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2010 02:33:08 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
Oh and a word of warning before anybody runs out and
tries this, doing this kind of forwarding-table policy
to select specific LSPs seems to SIGNIFICANTLY
broken as-is. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
the counters in IOS.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
the logical
system B on the Juniper due to lack of IPv6 support.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
THINK this one might not have been fixed until
9.3R3, but I try to repress those days so my memory may be a little
foggy.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
as fast as is humanly possible.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
for an interface not
found condition to detect this kind of thing, which may or may not be
easy depending on how stateful your monitoring system is.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
somebody else the grief that it caused me, before you assume
9.6S5 to 9.6R4 is a safe upgrade. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
and 9.6R4 and be fixed by removing the prefix-export-limit,
even though that limit was in no danger of being hit..
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
they did something to break it in chrome (I'm assuming
javascript related).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing
shell pfe) and remote command.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
shell pfe does.
That way the request pfe hierarch becomes the one stop shop for pfe
commands, and people aren't left trying to guess what was that other
command that had no relationship to the first one.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID
it has helped
prevent at this point.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
as disastrous as
the 2GB flash on EX8200 (where there is so little storage you can't
write a core dump from a large rpd process).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:13:41AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Not that poor, it's a 1.2GHz PowerPC, which is roughly the performance
of a p4 3GHz. I haven't looked at it in detail yet, but I'd say odds are
good its the exact same integrated CPU/RE that is used on the EX8200 RE
(which
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:28:01AM +0300, Nahrux M wrote:
Greetings,
Does JUNOS on Intel platform supports SMP (symmetrical multi processing)?
Not the official public builds, yet. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535
;
}
}
}
I've been begging for the ability to reset event priorities to more
sensible values in the event policies for ages, but so far there hasn't
been any interest.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F
is a giant pain in the ass already. I'd really
rather not have to hard-code the new priority mapping into a slax
script, when it makes far more sense to do it in the event policy.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204
behind a buggy SRX. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
.
On a MX960 with RE-S-2000 and a BGP config consisting of nothing more
than an IBGP mesh (28 sessions) and a SINGLE TRANSIT SESSION, it took
just over 12 minutes before a single route from the transit session was
successfully installed to hardware.
So far things aren't looking good.
--
Richard
session flap.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
to deploy the new cards and discover what a disaster modern
JUNOS has become. Seriously, how the hell do you manage to ship
production code that has broken subinterface counters? Does anyone in
systest actually do anything any more?
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e
RE 8.5 may be the last code you can fit
onto the flash anyways. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
a tunnel pic, so it doesn't
help you much. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
in an unusable state before abandoning it.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
and start losing business
because of it, and that kind of thing can be very hard to undo.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp
be viable as a standalone RR, since it would have to be priced
at least somewhat reasonably to serve in the function they're marketing
it for. The hardware specs are certainly not terrible.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/options/xre200/
--
Richard
the price
Juniper will charge me for standard PC hardware :P).
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
, but if you really can't figure it out give a
hard clear a try and see if it helps.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing
probably just need to tweak your
localprefs. :)
All my policy evaluation bugs are REALLY obscure, for example subroutine
policies which will randomly not apply any actions in any term that
doesn't contain a then accept. I've never seen a problem with a
configuration as simple as yours.
--
Richard
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:46:42AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:55:44 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
All my policy evaluation bugs are REALLY obscure, for
example subroutine policies which will randomly not
apply any actions in any term that doesn't contain
has been fixed for a couple
years now.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
showing only
locally terminated control plane traffic and not showing interface
transit traffic, the numbers would be about right, but we weren't able
to confirm that before it went away.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59
to imply that local switching on a MPC could
support 30G.
If anybody has better info, I'd absolutely love to hear it. Until then,
I'm assuming that the 3D in the MPC card names actually stands for how
you'll be using them, 3 ports working, one Disabled. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
help the logical
counter issue. At this point all I can really say is being on the look
out for it, and if you do see it make sure Juniper looks at it quickly
because it goes away on its own and leave no evidence for them to debug
it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http
with no impact to your other capacity.
I think that was everything. And if they aren't planning to add it
already, please join me in asking them to add a way to view fabric
utilization, as it would really make managing the local vs fabric
capacities a lot easier.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e
. Technically 4 ports of 10GE would exceed the
55Mpps, 14.488Mpps * 4 = 57.952Mpps, so you wouldn't quite be able to
get line rate on small packets even with local switching.
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C
201 - 300 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
