Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 and Mixed Modules

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:39:04PM +0200, Leon Kramer via juniper-nsp wrote: > according to Juniper docs if you insert an EX4600-EM-8F module into an > EX4600 chassis the interfaces are being restarted, while with installation > of QFX-EM-4Q they do not. > > However, I have experienced a link

Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 218, Issue 2

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:51:51PM +, David Adams JR wrote: > Is this a place to ask or get help on a Juniper router issue? > > I am trying to learn and then pass Juniper certification(s) and bout a J2320 > router with a serial card. Even though it appears serial connections are no >

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 filter options?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:58:07PM +, Matthew Crocker wrote: > I’d like to do some PM on my MX480s and replace the filter, > FLTR-KIT-MX480-S is $1,000 for a piece of foam and some stamped sheet metal. > Does anyone have any alternatives? We thought that was absurd as well with

Re: [j-nsp] VPN client for srx300

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:32:46PM +0200, Łukasz Trąbiński wrote: > I’m looking VPN client for macOS Catalina to connect with SRX300? I used > Pulse Secure (32 bit client) but it doesn't work anymore with newest macOS. > Any solution, instead of Pulse Secure? VPNTracker365

Re: [j-nsp] Macsec not working with carrier ethernet link

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:35:42PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Ask your Juniper rep for a feature that Cisco calls "WAN MACsec". Juniper calls it MACsec. The OP probably needs to make sure the firmware is correct for his platform.

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen-to-Junos Translation Tool

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:48:52AM +, M Abdeljawad via juniper-nsp wrote: > Was checking portal for the Netscreen-Junos translation tool but was not > there, is it obsoleted? If I remember right, that tool was really Netscreen->JunOSe So, an obsolete target that was nothing like what an SRX

Re: [j-nsp] VPC mc-lag

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:06:14PM +0530, Mehul Gajjar wrote: > Need to know what is the difference between Cisco VPC and juniper Mc-lag. Overall, they do the same general function, allow a pair of switches to port-channel/aggregated-ethernet a connection in a redundant fashion. The main

Re: [j-nsp] More power questions

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:15:13PM -0700, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: > So I want to connect an MX240 and some other gear in a single > cabinet at 208V. The group has convinced me this can work in general. I > am now trying to find a rack mounted or Zero-U type metered 208V PDU but > I

Re: [j-nsp] 208v power and 110...

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:38:50AM -0700, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: > My system has the 'high line' 208v power supplies and this is my first > time dealing with non-110v ac power. I have the two power supplies > installed and I am thinking I may want to add a switch to this >

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 virtual chassis

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:57:07AM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > We are planning to add backup switches in a Virtual Chassis > configuration to our existing EX4200s. ... > If I have a standalone EX4200, should I power it off before plugging > in the Virtual Chassis Cable for the first time, and

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 15 on EX2200's

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:00PM -0400, Matt Freitag wrote: > I'm wondering what your stories are with Junos 15 on EX2200 switches. I ask ... Juniper doesn't recommend running JunOS 15 on the EX2200, they moved their recommended release back down to 12.3. I think the explaination at the time

Re: [j-nsp] [rbak-nsp] SE600 End of life status

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:49:07AM +0200, Robert Hass wrote: > AFAIK you wrong. > > You cannot open JTAC or TAC (Cisco) case if you don't have valid support > contract. > Same regarding software upgrades - you cannot upgrade to next major version > without valid support contract. > You cannot

Re: [j-nsp] cheapest juniper router capable of lsys

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:57:10PM +, Simone Spinelli wrote: > For study/personal lab I would also take a look at firefly image for > vagrant. FWIW: firefly == vSRX, already mentioned in this thread. Somebody else writes (sorry, too much quoting cruft to keep it all straight). > > I

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 : Ping problem

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:32:15AM +1100, Dale Shaw wrote: > On 29 November 2016 at 08:35, Eduardo Schoedler wrote: > > > > Here on EX2200 I put ip address directly in the vlan. > > > > Try this: > > > > set interfaces vlan unit xxx family inet address 10.x.x.x/24 > > set

Re: [j-nsp] Questions about EX4550 switches

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:22:04AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 16/Nov/16 17:12, Doug McIntyre wrote: > > BUT, I know on this platform (EX4550), that certain interface cards require > > newer code in the 13.2 series of code releases. So, make sure you check > > out th

Re: [j-nsp] Questions about EX4550 switches

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:02:04PM +0800, Rod Bio wrote: > 1. Configuring firewall gives me "Warning: statement ignored: > unsupported platform (ex4550-32f)" when including "except". I'm trying > to filter ALL traffic except from some IP but except is not working. Indeed, filters tend to be a

Re: [j-nsp] Junos to IOS translation

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:10:05AM +0300, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > I want to translate from Junos to IOS , I have checked the tool on Juniper > website , it translates from IOS to Junos not vice versa , any ideas guys? I would expect to find such a tool on *cisco's* website, its not like a vendor

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:20:45PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote: > I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does > MX80 base model support 20G throughput? or do i need to buy license to > use more 20G? The MX80 allows 40Gbps throughput (or 80Gbps in Marketing speak). > in

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:51:10AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 22/Oct/15 00:40, Chad Myers wrote: > > > And finally putting commas in the monitor interface traffic output. > > Or just use the correct units of measurement, e.g., Kbps, Mbps, Gbps and > Tbps :-). I so wish there was a '-h'

Re: [j-nsp] 10G Interfaces

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:28:04PM +0300, Mohammad Khalil wrote: How can I know if My device supports 10G interfaces? show chassis hardware ? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Using Cisco SFP's on Juniper 4500's

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:57:14AM -0400, youza fuuccingbitth wrote: We are short juniper copper SFP, but have an excess of Cisco copper SFP's. Is it possible to use Cisco copper SFP's on Juniper ? A colleague said the Cisco will work but always show up/up even if nothing is connected. Has

Re: [j-nsp] Route capacity EX4550

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:12:48PM -0700, Morgan McLean wrote: Anybody know what sort of routes an EX4550 could take? Can't find much on their specs aside from 2gb memory. Would probably be in a VC setup. Considering taking partials or just using two defaults for a customer that wants to

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/L3 routing support on EX2200 EX2200-C

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:19:30PM -0800, Yucong Sun wrote: The datasheet is conveniently vague here, Do any know whether these two support BGP? and how much instances/peers can they support? Also, do they have wire routing capability (suspiciously missing from data sheet too) No, no BGP on

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/L3 routing support on EX2200 EX2200-C

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:52:51AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote: To quote: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e63 Yes, I agree it is vague. I'd like more information about the amount if Layer 3 interfaces (RVI/SVI), Static

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/L3 routing support on EX2200 EX2200-C

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:43:18PM -0800, Yucong Sun wrote: Thanks for the link, what about EX3200 ? EX3200 doesn't need AFL for l3 features? Anything EX can do routed L3, but if you want BGP, you're going to be buying a license (and for some reason, OSPFv3 on some platforms is a license, where

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/L3 routing support on EX2200 EX2200-C

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:29AM +0900, Paul S. wrote: From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,' at least for BGP. I've got quite a few customers doing BGP on the aforementioned products without the AFL, all it appears to affect is that it whines every single time a

Re: [j-nsp] Rationale behind set chassis aggregated-devices ethernet device-count

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:38:34PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: On 23/08/13 17:14, Michael Loftis wrote: Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are added/removed. ae0 is always index blah. A lot of tools are

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Power supplies

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:01:15AM -0400, Paulhamus, Jon wrote: Power Supply in EX3200 Switches The power supply in EX3200 switches is a hot-removable and hot-insertable field-replaceable unit (FRU) that you can install on the rear panel without powering off the switch or disrupting the

Re: [j-nsp] Dynamic VPN from MAC

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:59:18PM +1000, Ali Sumsam wrote: Is it possible to connect Dynamic VPN to Juniper SRX100 from my MAC? Can I dial directly from my Mac's dialer, if I dont want to use Junose Pulse. The Mac dialer is L2TP over IPSec, so the SRX would need to support that set of

Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:09:16PM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote: I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular, anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in particular, a mixed vendor environment. I've used the EX2200's, and aside from the

Re: [j-nsp] what happens if HDD on routing-engine fails during the router operation?

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:35:07AM +, Per Granath wrote: Did you try it with this configuration? chassis { redundancy { failover { on-loss-of-keepalives; on-disk-failure; I assume that was directed at me, and yes, I did have that part of my

Re: [j-nsp] what happens if HDD on routing-engine fails during the router operation?

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:27:29PM +0300, Martin T wrote: M and MX series routing-engines have HDD(or SSD) installed which has a UFS and is mounted to /var. /var directory contains many important sub-directories like log for log files, crash for core-dumps, tmp for some temporary files etc.

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.4R1.6 shipping on new EX-series switches, serious problems

On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:50:37PM +0100, Gavin Henry wrote: Why is that not the version that ships on new kit from the distributors? Bad management. We're getting two EX4200's and two MX5's delivered this week. Hope they have the recommend JTAC versions on them! We recently got in two

Re: [j-nsp] DOM support for OEM optics

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:31:48PM +0300, Amos Rosenboim wrote: Can you share some models that support DOM ? All the compatibles that we have do not support it. Not sure what kind of optics you are looking for, but for 1000-Base-SX the Finisar 8519 (FTRJ8519P1BNL) provides DOM. I see the