Re: [j-nsp] "set protocols evpn encapsulation vxlan" is missing in ACX7100

to configure it slightly differently for it to be happy: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/information-products/pathway-pages/nce/EVPN_VxLAN_MAC-VRF.pdf -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Subscriber management / dual stacked VLAN / DHCP help

Hi, So, firstly, you shouldn’t need to do IP demux (i.e. demux0 etc.) - as your users appear to be on different VLANs. IP demux is for situations where you have a single VLAN with multiple subscribers - but in your case you want “VLAN demux”. The Juniper docs and examples are unfortunately not

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

t/ip-prefix-routes-edit-routing-instances-protocols-evpn.html <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/evpn-vxlan/topics/ref/statement/ip-prefix-routes-edit-routing-instances-protocols-evpn.html> -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] FlowSpec rules being installed, but not matching any traffic

irewall filters seems like a very bad idea on those boxes. I wonder if the flowspec rules aren’t matching because the whole thing is too complex and it’s failing open. -- Nathan Ward --- End Message --- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN IRB / gateway selection

be a helpful thing to have to keep configs simpler, so have been keeping an eye on release notes but not seen anything yet. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] EVPN vrf-export + vrf-import

outes, but, that’s not what I’m doing here - these are pure type 5 routes. Does anyone know how to set communities in EVPN type 5 routes, where we have knowledge of the route’s original protocol? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list junipe

Re: [j-nsp] MX/MPC maximum routes

a good reference: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/juniper-mx-series/9781491932711/ch01.html -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP server recommendation for subscribers management

> On 11/08/2021, at 8:44 AM, Andrey Kostin wrote: > > Nathan Ward via juniper-nsp писал 2021-08-10 08:00: >>> On 10/08/2021, at 10:40 PM, Bjørn Mork via juniper-nsp >>> wrote: > > Thank you Nathan and Bjorn for your explanations, they are very helpful!

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP server recommendation for subscribers management

mory) the address used as the giaddr is also used as the “DHCP server address”. It’s what your CPE will send renew messages to. That does not confuse CPE, in my experience. > I don't think this is any different whether you use the local DHCP > server with RADIUS shared pool or a centralize

Re: [j-nsp] MX VRRP on VXLAN enviroment

if you have other devices on that broadcast domain running VRRP group 1 perhaps). -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] what's the difference between SFPP-10GE-LR-IT and SFPP-10GE-LR optcis

FP specs. They are *much* cheaper list price, huh? Like, 1/8th. Odd. There seems to be -IT variants of a few SFP+s. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] MX subscriber captive portal - redirect and rewrite simultaneously

has anyone else made the “both redirect and rewrite” function that is in the note above actually work? Does anyone have any information about this feature? It doesn’t seem to be very widely used, as there’s so little understanding of it. -- Nathan Ward ___

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP relay monitoring

JDHCP-MIB may be useful - though when the DHCP process is dead you may get polling timeouts. If your polling system can alarm on that you might get usefulness there. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN IRB / gateway selection

I think. For different topologies, i.e. ones with different path lengths, this is regularly going to result in poor selected paths. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Next-table, route leaking, etc.

he ER. :-) > > Ooh, very good news. Nathan, can you please talk to your account team > about this and get formal ER going? I'm happy to 'me too' my account > team, once you have the ER number. And Jeff's work is made whole lot > easier when he can go 'customers are asking

[j-nsp] EVPN IRB / gateway selection

where? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

> seems to work. This is not wildly confidence inspiring, eh? Don’t get me wrong, this is one of those “I’m complaining because I like your gear and it pains me to see you mess up so bad” situations. > On 26/01/2020, at 8:16 PM, Nathan Ward wrote: > > Hi, > > Looks to me and collea

Re: [j-nsp] Next-table, route leaking, etc.

the exporter of the route is local or remote. > On 10/02/2020, at 4:27 PM, Larry Jones wrote: > > Try a tunnel (lt) interface. > > > Original message ---- > From: Nathan Ward > Date: 2/9/20 6:08 PM (GMT-09:00) > To: Juniper NSP > Subject: [j-nsp] Next-table, r

[j-nsp] Next-table, route leaking, etc.

they are from a different router. Anyone got any magic tricks I’ve somehow missed? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

ss Halliday >>> : >>> >>> Seems to be back albeit a bit rocky - I could not get in with my previous >>> password and had to reset. SRM and Downloads appear to be functioning >>> >>> Ross >>> >>> >>> -Original M

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

2D mobile here too. > > > Cheers > > Liam > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 8:16 PM, Nathan Ward <mailto:juniper-...@daork.net>> wrote: > Hi, > > Looks to me and colleagues of mine like Juniper support is offline. > > Last night, I was able to log in but trying to

[j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

sales/SE/etc. folks I usually deal with are likely not anywhere near their phones. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX Physical Interface Damping

cept/physical-interface-damping.html> About half way down, in the coloured box: - Penalty added on every interface flap is 1000. Not sure about your other questions though sorry! Perhaps disable/undisable works? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp m

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3xx VPN Client - NCP alternatives?

ever seen such /1 routes. > I know that «here it works» isn't that helpful, but at least this is how our > mileage varies… You on 4.0? Came out a few days ago. The NCP support are saying they can’t reproduce, so, time to fire up a VM to test it

[j-nsp] SRX3xx VPN Client - NCP alternatives?

party clients available. I haven’t been able to find any. Are there any? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP-TE broken between pre and post 16.1 code?

> On 16/08/2019, at 10:01 PM, > wrote: > > > >> From: Nathan Ward >> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 8:39 AM >> >>> On 1/07/2019, at 9:59 PM, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: >>> >>>> From: Michael Hare >>>&g

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

niper Networks > 978-618-3342 > > > On 5/13/19, 9:25 AM, "Nathan Ward" wrote: > > >> On 14/05/2019, at 1:17 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: >> >> >>> On 9/05/2019, at 11:52 PM, Richard McGovern >> <mailto:rmcgov...@juniper.net&

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Juniper MX204

> On 21/07/2019, at 9:41 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 21/Jul/19 04:09, Nathan Ward wrote: > >> >> >> However, the issues I’m aware of with BFD on LAGs are dealt with by Micro >> BFD on each LAG member. Is there something more that I’m not

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Juniper MX204

, BFD is broken in LAG scenarios. I agree with you generally - that multiple links is better than LAG in the core for a bunch of reasons. However, the issues I’m aware of with BFD on LAGs are dealt with by Micro BFD on each LAG member. Is there something more that I’m not aware of which Micro

Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480

balancing problems. 40G is easier to send over a single pair between DCs, too - 4x10G means muxes or similar. 40G works the same way of course, but does it in the optic. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

> On 14/05/2019, at 1:17 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: > > >> On 9/05/2019, at 11:52 PM, Richard McGovern > <mailto:rmcgov...@juniper.net>> wrote: >> >> Nathan, I am not sure what you want to hear, or what would make you >> satisfied, but YES Juniper [

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

s noted earlier in the thread. I don’t know that it’s *that* far fetched though.. it pretty explicitly says “you can pay us for this!” in the KB. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

T people at now, to indicate how frustrating this is for your customers and that it needs to be fixed. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

vern > Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks > 978-618-3342 > > > On 5/8/19, 3:05 AM, "Rob Foehl" wrote: > >On Tue, 7 May 2019, Nathan Ward wrote: > >> Is it actually coming back? Hard to believe the “technical issue” given how >> long it’s

Re: [j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

> On 8/05/2019, at 7:05 PM, Rob Foehl wrote: > > On Tue, 7 May 2019, Nathan Ward wrote: > >> Is it actually coming back? Hard to believe the “technical issue” given how >> long it’s been, seems like a pretty big systemic issue rather than a >> technical one. “Ac

[j-nsp] prsearch missing in inaction

rather than a technical one. “Actively worked on” seems pretty inactive, to me. Does anyone have, I dunno, some sort of dump of all the public PR data, and subsequent prsubscription data archived anywhere searchable? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Next-table performance

- but - may have been hitting the wrong search terms. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX

_US/junos/topics/concept/forwarding-options-hyper-mode-overview.html <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/forwarding-options-hyper-mode-overview.html> There are a bunch of features you cannot use if you enable hyper mode. -- Nathan Ward _

Re: [j-nsp] Network automation vs. manual config

> On 20/08/2018, at 12:43 AM, Thomas Bellman wrote: > > On 2018-08-19 08:11, Nathan Ward wrote: > >> I would be interested in a way to build a command alias with >> `| display inheritance | display commit-scripts | display omit | exclude #` >> or something - `ex

Re: [j-nsp] Network automation vs. manual config

rst - only local config (IPs etc.) goes outside groups. > I have a couple other semi-related (to automation / configuration > enhancement) ER's going if folks are interested and would like to chat > about those directly. Would love to hear about them, maybe we can collabor

Re: [j-nsp] Network automation vs. manual config

and it’ll be very clear that it’s there and where it’s come from. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] SRX RA client

from neighbors, and create a static default - not ideal…! -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Is it possible to pass apostrophe character(ASCII dec code 39) as an argument value to SLAX script?

I thought I had it by being cunning, but, no! {master} nward@mx> op test chr \x27 ''':(null):(2) Invalid expression error: runtime error error: Evaluating user parameter chr failed {master} nward@mx> op test chr \\x27 '\'':(null):(3) Invalid expression error: runtime error error: Evaluating user

Re: [j-nsp] MX204

Hi, Single RE - but it’s fast, much much faster than the MX80/MX104 You can’t use all ports at once - if you want to use the 10G ports, you need to sacrifice one of the 100G ports - to stop oversubscription. I got the impression there was a knob to allow it but I couldn’t make it work, and,

Re: [j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

15.1 is related to vlan-tagging not > working properly on me0. We would never VLAN tag on me interfaces, so, no problem! Can I ask why you do? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

Hi, > On 12/12/2017, at 10:52 PM, Karl Gerhard wrote: > > Hello > > we've had very bad experience with Junos 15.1 on our switches (EX4550, > EX4300, EX4200). > Now we're getting new MX960s with 2xRE-S-X6-64G and unfortunately the minimum > required Junos version for this

Re: [j-nsp] tl1 transaction language

tl1daemon by simple socket programming and send command and receive response. > > Thanks,Jayshankar I haven’t seen any, you may need to implement your own. I am not sure why this is on the Juniper list - does Juniper have any products with TL1 support? -- Nathan Ward __

Re: [j-nsp] What is your experience with the EX2200

I’d prefer to buy the EX2300, but it doesn’t have PVLAN support presently, which in our management network is a hard requirement. EX2200 does the job brilliantly for now though! > On 10/12/2017, at 9:10 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > Hey Christian, > > It's not just your two cents

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

e that cares about accurate clocking for whatever reason. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

se are not on the EX2300 yet as far as I’m aware (and like the EX2200 early on no indication that they will be), so if you use private VLANs you may want to stick with the EX2200. I don’t see any details on the Juniper site about the EX2200 EOL. Where a

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

n’t Richard Steenbergen run a wiki for this sort of info? -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

> On 21/06/2016, at 19:00, Daniel Verlouw <dan...@shunoshu.net> wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Nathan Ward <juniper-...@daork.net> wrote: >> Does anyone have and tricks to make l2circuit counters work properly, or, is >> this

Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 163, Issue 24

uired - perhaps there is a resource constraint on this platform. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

now. -- Nathan Ward ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp