[j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

With a cisco 1600/2600 router, mlppp config and two T1 WICs I can drop either T1 and the mlppp link still works--if the other side is also a Cisco. With the same cisco 1600/2600 and mlppp config, if the other side is a juniper with P-ML, the mlppp link completely dies if either T1 is

Re: [j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

Well, it turns out that you need ppp multilink fragment delay 500 on the Cisco side to keep mutilink negotiation alive, otherwise the Cisco switches to non-ML PPP when only one T1 is up, while Juniper does not... Michael Wilson brought this to my attention, and the juniper manual also shows it :)

Re: [j-nsp] re333 not booting install media

Hyunseog Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Possibly flash disk file system may not recognized by JUNOS either because it is not formatted/installed correctly or is not compatable. You may check with 128MB or 256MB Flash Disk option. Nope, the RE333 just never boots the pcmcia disk. It boots

Re: [j-nsp] m320

These details are very important to anyone who has a keen interest in how their $250,000 box works. And, how do you get the idea that the ASICs are based upon a robust operating system that is loosely based upon the basic routeD and other open source code ? If you actually took the time to read

[j-nsp] best RE-333 OS

What's the best RE-333 version to run? Latest 9.x or 8.x or what? I deal with some re-333s on 7.5R1.12 now and it's fine. So maybe this is just a stupid question. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] static route priority for iBGP distribution

I use communities attached to static routes at local routers in my network to anchor aggregate eBGP-announced routes specific to that locality. It's just a static route with community XXX:XXX and discard specified. They get redistributed through iBGP to the borders of the network, and, if the

[j-nsp] P-1GE -B

Someone refresh my memory...is the -B variant the only one that is MPLS capable? What is the difference between P-1GE-LX and P-1GE-LX-B ?? -- Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food - Hippocrates ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

[j-nsp] Adaptive Services vs. Adaptive Services II

What is the difference between the AS PIC and the AS2 PIC ? All I can tell is that one has twice the RAM of the other (256MB vs 512MB). I assume the capabilities/speeds are the same? The flow capacity is double on the AS II ? ___ juniper-nsp mailing

[j-nsp] M20 SSB slot 0 failures

Hi, I have four M20 chassis with continuous slot 0 SSB failures. These are from two completely different vendors.. I would think, oh, a bad chassis, but I am getting this same result with a variety of chassis and SSB cards. I do have chassis that don't display this failure, with the same

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper M20 does not clear show chassis alarms/show system alarms although problem not present any more

remove power supply, reinsert? martin [m4rti...@gmail.com] wrote: Hi, sorry about cumbersome subject, at least it's informative :) However, has anyone seen an issue with Juniper M20 where alarms(show chassis alarms, show system alarms) do not clear althought problem itself is not present any

Re: [j-nsp] Qfabric

This sounds more like a configuration problem than a latency problem. Windows Vista/2008 and higher will auto-tune TCP window size to take advantage of available bandwidth, even if the latency creeps up. (So will all other modern operating systems at this point) You can always manually

[j-nsp] P-1GE -B ethernet

P-1GE-xx-B are necessary for ethernet-ccc services... I have a few -B and many non -B. So Are the -B cards important for the connections _between_ MPLS capable routers, or on endpoints facing connections facilitated through ccc, or _both_ ? -- the preceding comment is my own and in no

[j-nsp] re-600 RAM

What kind of RAM does the RE-600 take? I assume DDR PC100 ECC or PC133 ECC? Registered or unregistered? -- the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS (undocumented) hardware diagnostics commands

The cluepon documentation isn't quite right, this tests the SDRAM on the slot 0 FPC, not the slot 0 SSB... Martin T [m4rtn...@gmail.com] wrote: I found an unofficial guide on juniper.cluepon.net which describes following memory testing technique: ? ?* ?start shell user root ? ?* vty

Re: [j-nsp] Fan issues with EX4200 unit

call juniper's quality control department! Dave Peters [d...@terabitsystems.com] wrote: Hey everybody-- I've got an EX4200 that won't recognize that one of its fans is spinning. The same fan works fine in another unit. In addition, a working replacement fan has the exact same issue (shown

[j-nsp] M120/T320/T640 pitfalls with IPv6?

Our Juniper sales rep (3rd party reseller, not Juniper direct) is telling us that IPv6 features are in software on these older platforms, and that if you want full speed on IPv6, you need to move to the MX platform. Is this true? What do I lose by running IPv6 on a M120, an M20, or a T320/T640

Re: [j-nsp] Memmory for M20 SSB-E

http://juniper.cluepon.net/Unofficial_hardware_upgrades - 2x http://www.oempcworld.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PRODProduct_Code=64M-EDO-DIMM-ECC Juan C. Crespo R. [jcre...@ifxnw.com.ve] wrote: Guys Does anyone of you knows where I can find the modules for one Juniper M20 SSB-E ?,

Re: [j-nsp] OpenBGP to Juniper :)

I'd set community on a static routes themselves for each netblock announced via BGP and then use an export filter to filter external BGP announcements to that specific community. set routing-options static route x.x.x.x/y discard set routing-options static route x.x.x.x/y preference 130 set

Re: [j-nsp] traffic load balancing between Juniper and Cisco equipment

These answers aren't all that helpful. MLPPP is out of the question, these are two different providers. Using an E/IGP is not likely on ADSL circuits, providers simply don't support it (although BGP would be the typical answer to this problem, with it you could then announce one IP range over

Re: [j-nsp] Logical interface policer question

tim tiriche [tim.tiri...@gmail.com] wrote: Hi, I am preparing for JNCIP-SP exam and would like to understand what logical interface policer statement does? The documentation says it is an aggregate policer but it is not very clear to me. policer example: [edit firewall] + policer

Re: [j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?

Pavel Lunin [plu...@senetsy.ru] wrote: Oh, yeah! This why the Juniper's bias towards top players can one day become a banana peel. This is of course the top of the technology curve where companies like Cisco and Juniper cater only to the top end of the market, like hard drive manufacturers

[j-nsp] T320 mid mount frame

Hi, Where can you buy chassis mid-mount rails for T320 ? I need some 5 sets or more. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] limitations with RE-600 and RE-1600

are there any limitations with older REs and 10.4 or 11.x ? newer 10.4 images seem to suggest some limitations but I don't have a screenshot anymore, can't recall exactly what I saw ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX

that only took...about 5 years ? sweet, juniperdude. Chris Kawchuk [juniperd...@gmail.com] wrote: Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)

Re: [j-nsp] M20: Adding a second RE

Same software image? Perfect, just plug it in. It will copy its main config from the master when you plug it in. set system commit synchronize and commits will get saved to both REs automatically. Juniper GOWEX [juni...@iber-x.com] wrote: Hello, We purchased a second RE600 (we had only one

Re: [j-nsp] M20: Adding a second RE

Juniper GOWEX [juni...@iber-x.com] wrote: Thank you very much for your help. Both RE?s have the same software image. and now my doubts are about the configuration, Do I need to edit groups RE0 and re1? In this moment I haven?t IP in the fxp0 interface, How I can access the Backup RE from

Re: [j-nsp] Decode $9$ encrypted Junos secrets

For one-way hash: http://www.openwall.com/john/ Matt Hite [li...@beatmixed.com] wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Phil Shafer p...@juniper.net wrote: Matt Hite writes: It's interesting to note just how many things are stored in $9$ encrypted format: RADIUS secrets, IS-IS

Re: [j-nsp] Supported REs for M7i

Phil Mayers [p.may...@imperial.ac.uk] wrote: I really just want an RE which can be put on support. RE-400-256 doesn't cut it, RE-850 can still, but can't be bought new, so is of less use. Which leaves the new (and by the sound of it, prohibitively expensive) RE-1800. What's the big deal

Re: [j-nsp] duplicate acks, EX3300 VC

those TCP statistics have nothing to do with traffic passing through the switch ports, that's for traffic to the control plane (FreeBSD) Mike Williams [mike.willi...@comodo.com] wrote: Hey all, Before I punt this to JTAC, has anyone had any experience with poor/highly-variable TCP

Re: [j-nsp] Extremely high failure rate of SCB-E?

I find quite the opposite with the M20 brother, the SSB-E and SSB-E-16 Although what is usually bad on them, if I get a bad one once in a while, is SRAM. It fails. Also, it takes some time in operation to detect bad ones. The DRAM can also fail and the rest of it is pretty much irreplacable

Re: [j-nsp] Half Duplex VRF

Daniel Hilj [daniel.h...@ipnett.se] wrote: What do you mean by that?? He means that the concept is applicable on any implementation. It's not a special feature that has to be designed in. The cisco configuration should be trivial to translate to junos.

[j-nsp] T320 FPC2 vs FPC2-E

Hi What are the limitations of using FPC2 vs FPC2-E? In a chassis that also has FPC3-E ? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Weird ARP issue

Luca Salvatore [l...@ninefold.com] wrote: I Haven???t touched any ARP config, it???s just the defaults. The plot thickens: I did some port-mirroring, when I send traffic on port 80 to the VM the switch will generate an Arp request. Same if I do a ping, I see an ARP request. However

[j-nsp] FPC-E vs. FPC-E2 (T320)

What is the difference between FPC-E and FPC-E2? The E2 appears to have more RAM. I've even gotten some FPC-E fitted with 512MB RAM. Clues appreciated. -- It was the Nicolatians who first coined the separation between lay and clergy. ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] SSD disks high failure ratio ?

Mounir Mohamed [mounirmoha...@gmail.com] wrote: This is not a hardware issue and does not need RMA for the failed REs. They only need SSD secure erase sequence and a single reboot. However this has to be performed by Juniper engineers. I recommend to contact your SE and he will take care about

Re: [j-nsp] SPUx jmpi mbuf stall on SRX3600 w/ routed multicast

Phil Mayers [p.may...@imperial.ac.uk] wrote: cpp0 swanhill10: SPU10 mbuf stall exceed 80%, p 0% h 0% j 82%, set alarm. alarmd[1152]: Alarm set: FPC color=RED, class=CHASSIS, reason=FPC 10 Major Errors craftd[1153]: Major alarm set, FPC 10 Major Errors The chassis alarm can't be cleared

Re: [j-nsp] Usage of older M10 Juniper

Tyler Christiansen [ty...@adap.tv] wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have old M10 router. I would like to use it for one customer. Router has Enhanced FEB, RE600-2048 and 3 GE PE PICs. My questions : 1) How much full-BGP feeds I can

Re: [j-nsp] M20 fpc issue

Joe Freeman [j...@netbyjoe.com] wrote: I started with a 10.0 train with the same symptoms. Your problem is simple, you have FPC and not the enhanced FPC FPC 0REV 01 710-011153 CN8988E-FPC I'm pretty sure you need JunOS 8.x for the old FPC. 9.x might work too, but

Re: [j-nsp] HDD requirements for RE-333 and RE-600

Martin T [m4rtn...@gmail.com] wrote: > Hi, > > while the original HDDs are in slave mode, I did try with cable-select > and in master mode as well, but the RE did not boot with the Hitachi > HTS541680J9AT00 HDD. I would expect to see at least the BIOS >

Re: [j-nsp] juniper hack news

Hugo Slabbert [h...@slabnet.com] wrote: > >Does this affect any other juniper gear ? > > Not as of this moment, no. It's limited to ScreenOS. > > -- > Hugo > > h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber > PGP fingerprint (B178313E): > CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E > > (also on

Re: [j-nsp] juniper hack news

Hugo Slabbert [h...@slabnet.com] wrote: > >Does this affect any other juniper gear ? > > Not as of this moment, no. It's limited to ScreenOS. > > -- > Hugo > > h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber > PGP fingerprint (B178313E): > CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E > > (also on

Re: [j-nsp] juniper hack news

Hugo Slabbert [h...@slabnet.com] wrote: > >Does this affect any other juniper gear ? > > Not as of this moment, no. It's limited to ScreenOS. > Sorry, this is false. It's clear in the documentation that JunOS was targeted as well. ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] juniper hack news

Hugo Slabbert [h...@slabnet.com] wrote: > > Am I missing something that indicates this is known to affect Junos as well? > I just gave you a link to a formal NSA/GCHQ "TOP SECRET" documentation -- from 2011 -- which says they are DOING IT. It only takes NSA ~90 days to develop a new

Re: [j-nsp] SRX550 Memory upgrade

Travers Stark [trav...@starkie.net] wrote: > HI, > > Just seeing if anyone has upgraded a SRX550 to 4Gb? > > I know they have a 4gb version now and was hoping we could upgrade the older > versions. > This guy appears to have made it work

Re: [j-nsp] SRX100 u-boot

Mohammad Khalil [eng.m...@gmail.com] wrote: > Dears > I have formatted the USB using FAT32 , placed the image > Physical reset took place and now the nand_format is repeating itself ! > see https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB14175 assuming your TFTP server is at 192.168.1.1

Re: [j-nsp] dhcp relay fail between VRFs

Anderson, Charles R [c...@wpi.edu] wrote: > > bootp helper requires you to specify the routing-instance. Have you done > that? > > set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface irb.2287 server 10.0.1.10 > routing-instance FOO > set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface irb.2287 server

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 AC Power Supply fan replacement problem?

Kevin Wormington [kw...@missouri-telecom.com] wrote: > Are the replacement fans the -R00 model of FFB0412SHN? > > I recently replaced the fans in two MX480 supplies and they worked fine and > the alarms cleared. > Oh crap. I have the -F00 versions. I'm having a hard time finding the

[j-nsp] MX480 AC Power Supply fan replacement problem?

So, I had four MX 480 AC power supplies, across two totally different and unrelated routers, all four of them have fan failures reported by JunOS. These fans failed within a span of 6 months. The old fans are definitely bad. On any given power supply, one of the two fans are seized. Maybe both.

[j-nsp] dhcp relay fail between VRFs

I have no trouble with dhcp relay between VRFs across MPLS PE routers, but across VRFs on the same router, the relay daemon fud fails. If I turn on debugging, I am always getting: Dec 18 19:49:06 FUD_RTSOCK_MSG_FAILURE: Unable to get prefix match: No such file or directory Dec 18 19:49:06 reply

Re: [j-nsp] ftp.juniper.net

Tom Beecher [beec...@beecher.cc] wrote: > Lots of people (for better or for worse) may have hard linked / referenced > KB15585 in their documentation, so IMO it's a good idea to leave it up with > a bolded note of depreciation, which is what they did. > Just erase the rest of the KB after this

Re: [j-nsp] dhcp relay fail between VRFs

Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote: > Dang typos... > > Did you apply local prefix leaking feature using auto-export to get multiple > vrfs talking on same PE ? > > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/topics/concept/auto-export-overview.html > I'm using

Re: [j-nsp] dhcp relay fail between VRFs

Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote: > Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was > some stuff there I had to fiddle with. > > Can you post your config? > I'm using the bootp helper instead of the dhcp-relay feature. I don't know if 'fud' handles both. When I

Re: [j-nsp] dhcp relay fail between VRFs

Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote: > I use the per-vrf dhcp-relay in ACX5048 Yeah when I use that I have both 1. a similar problem (replies are not sent to the destination vrf) and 2. the router won't forward replies to destination PE routers anymore. ___

[j-nsp] NFX250 run down ?

I have an NFX250 here to play with and I'm wondering how do I get a JunOS VM to start? There is some kind of start up documentation from Juniper that basically says to point the box to your Network Services Orchestrator or whatever, but I don't have one of those. I am still in the bespoke

[j-nsp] nfx350 reboot loop!

I've tried installing 19.4R3 and 20.4R1 on an NFX350. Here is the boot-up from 20.4R1 after the install. I'm used to seeing weird errors from bad arguments and commands in JunOS boot up, but this is a bit worse. Once the system is installed and it starts the jdm container, the system reboots and

Re: [j-nsp] upgrading an antique 240

Randy Bush via juniper-nsp [juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net] wrote: > > is there any sw upgrade i can usefully do? I was about to try 19.4R3 on basically the same hardware, seems to work well on my MX80s and ACX2200s. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

[j-nsp] juniper fanless devices

are there any fanless devices that do layer 3 vpn, vlan-ccc, rsvp, ldp, and have more than two 10gbps ethernet ports? the acx2100/2200 are a little short on xe ports. are there other hardened devices i should be thinking about even if they have fans?