On Wednesday 30 June 2010 05:28:39 pm Derick Winkworth
wrote:
I understand
things will get much, much better in 10.3 thru 10.5.
Without any confirmation from anyone at Juniper, I suspect
the same. This would be a mirror experiences with JUNOS 9,
where anything pre-9.3 was really terrible.
On Thursday 01 July 2010 05:27:26 am Joe Hughes wrote:
I began an exercise a few months back researching the
options available to replace some of our Cisco gear with
Juniper. At the time - it was looking like a combination
of the M7i and the EX series switches -
We implemented this combo
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
So basically, this stalled route issue has been going on for so long,
that its truthful to say that Juniper probably doesn't think its
important to fix? or they don't care?
6 years by my count. The weird thing is I'm
On Wednesday 30 of June 2010 03:50:49 Derick Winkworth wrote:
I wonder what their official line is. Might be similar to their official
line with respect to the manufacturing issue with the EX series, where so
many ASICs are just bad... I think they have some code in JUNOS now that
detects the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
[dd]
How unfortunate. I wonder of Alca-Lu can do better. Lord knows Cisco could
care less about code quality. surely some networking vendor must give a
sh*t.
Small brief from our ALU equipment evaluation:
BGP:4-byte
#
6 years by my count. The weird thing is I'm constantly running into
plenty of really smart competent people at Juniper who do want to help,
they just have no idea that things are really this broken, or they
aren't empowered to do anything about it. I guess you could call that
hahahaha nice!
From: Andrey Zarechansky zor...@fr.kiev.ua
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 3:26:50 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and MX Trio cards
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
[dd]
How
!
From: Andrey Zarechansky zor...@fr.kiev.ua
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 3:26:50 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and MX Trio cards
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
[dd]
How unfortunate. I wo
When were you evaulating it? I think both of those two features have been
available for some time now, almost 2 years.
Not to say they do not have their own set of issues along with Juniper and
Cisco...
Phil
On Jun 30, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Andrey Zarechansky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:54:16AM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote:
When were you evaulating it? I think both of those two features have been
available for some time now, almost 2 years.
Less than a half year. What we had in the lab:
- few boxes 7750 SR-7, IOM2 based hw, running TiMOS
On 30 June 2010 15:49, Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way that someone could tell me how to reproduce the stalled
route issue? How do I see if is happening etc?
We are about to purchase some mx's to replace our m series and would love to
nail this.
The question of
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 04:05:55 pm Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
So far things aren't looking good.
Very, very nasty, indeed. Hope you have JTAC running around
on this. Would be glad to hear what comes of it. Nasty,
indeed.
On my end, while away on tour, Juniper came back and took
back a
When you say 'transit session' what do you mean exactly? Also disappointed to
hear about the bugs.
Is the stuck-in-pending issue easily reproducible? I have read some of your
past posts, but recently it sounds like this can be reproduced without a lot
of effort?
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:37:20AM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
When you say 'transit session' what do you mean exactly?? Also
disappointed to hear about the bugs.?
Transit (n): An EBGP session where an external ASN sends you a full copy
of the global routing table, usually in exchange for
networking vendor must give a sh*t.
From: Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
To: Derick Winkworth dwinkwo...@att.net
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 2:59:55 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and MX Trio cards
15 matches
Mail list logo
