On Saturday, May 18, 2019 at 10:37:19 AM UTC-5, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
>
> If you include a link in a text-only mail you send normally the receiving
> mail program makes it clickable. No html is needed for that
>
HTML will allow hyperlinks in images however. Images in signatures with
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 5:56:41 PM UTC-5, David W. Jones wrote:
Yes, adding images provides great functionality for tracking and other
> privacy invasions.
>
Yes, but I have a saying: "Ban plastic knifes from the school cafeteria? I
do wish [insert school principle] would realize that I
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 7:07:42 AM UTC-5, S wrote:
> It is not required to work with CSS effects or to create sophisticated
> layouts. It's rather about enabling simple formatting, like bold, italic,
> underline, enumerations, etc.
Yes! This is the point that we trying to convey. Thank
I understand all of your concerns, but a great quantity of K9 users will be
benefited from HTML signatures.
I myself want it, so I can automatically insert pictures as buttons (pictures
with links, like with a small picture of a Facebook logo, that goes to my
profile).
I like the idea of
No, that is not normal. Definitely investigate that.
However, if you are using Gmail (as your email provider) and you disabled "Less
Secure App Access" then you will periodicly receive emails about abnormal
activities which is actually normal (just K9 fetching your emails).
Re-enabling Secure
HTML in signatures is quite the norm of 2018-2019. This is a request to add
HTML compatibility (and the message body) into the signature field.
*(This is a request, I cannot code myself but I am learning JavaScript
right now, I understand this is community-driven. Thanks for all you do
