Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] > I completely agree, though it weakens my argument about consistency ;) Heh. > Now we only need to convince Peter. I just sent you a patch with all [M], so I guess you can consider me sufficiently convinced. I'm not, really, but it's hardly an important issue, so I figured

Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] > Well, it's not that my life depends on it ;) Heh. > But I see the non-verbose mode as an abbreviated view of what > happens, and normally you cannot see the difference between module or > part of module, so it appears inconsistent to have that distinction > in the short vie

Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:21:11PM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > > > The idea was that [M] is printed whenever a new module is born. > > > (M) means a module is in progress. > What people will see is

Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:21:11PM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > The idea was that [M] is printed whenever a new module is born. > > (M) means a module is in progress. What people will see is that sometimes (M) is used sometimes [M]. That will c

Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] > This looks generally looks okay to me, I don't like the subtle > difference between stand-alone and partial module, though, probably > nobody can remember that, anyway ;) And there is really no difference > in the command line, so why print something different. The idea was

Re: [kbuild-devel] [upatch] tweak for !KBUILD_VERBOSE output

2002-11-04 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Peter Samuelson wrote: > With !KBUILD_VERBOSE output, you can't tell whether a CC or LD line is > for a module or for the kernel proper. Sure, most people probably > don't care, but *I* do. Hence this patch. Output: > > CC vmlinux-object.o > CC [M] standalone-modu

[kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 1.3

2002-11-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Oct 30, 2002 at 04:09:31AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/ you can find as usual the latest > version of the new config system. > Changes: > - Update to 2.5.45 It seems that 2.5.45 does not exist. Is this vs a BK snapshot? Attempting to install vs