Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-10 Thread Greg Banks
Roman Zippel wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Greg Banks wrote: > > > > I dislike the requirement to convert all existing config.in files to > > > support the new syntax. You already have the machinery to do the > > > conversion online as needed, so why not detect if config.in is newer >

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:45:45PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: > It seemed easy to add a check to gcml2 for "if" statements beginning > and ending in the same file, so last night I did it. The result is... > zero such cases in 2.5.33. The idea popped up when I noticed the missing "endmenu" in the a

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-06 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Greg Banks wrote: > > I dislike the requirement to convert all existing config.in files to > > support the new syntax. You already have the machinery to do the > > conversion online as needed, so why not detect if config.in is newer > > than config.lkc and if thats the ca

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Banks
Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: Hi Roman, I really haven't had time to look at your release properly yet, sorry. I did notice though that the converter issues warnings for dead code and comparisons of boolean variables to "m", which I though

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-04 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I wrote: > > 5) Tried to delete endmenu on line 610 in arch/i386/config.in: > > ./scripts/lkc/mconf arch/i386/config.new > > :0:parse error > > This error message is not good enough. > > Known problem, but it's currently not very high on my TODO list. BTW the main reason for this is that t

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-04 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Found a slot to give it a spin: > 1) Did not apply cleanly to 2.5.31. Makefile caused a reject. > Other hunks went ok, but with an offset. You probably had other patches applied? > 2) When browsing in menuconfig the menus are repositioned depending of > the length of

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-09-04 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > To install simply run 'make install KERNELSRC=<..>' and to uninstall > 'make uninstall KERNELSRC=<..>', only 'make [oldconfig|config|menuconfig| > xconfig]' is implemented right now, but the rest is easy to do. I tested > it only agai

[kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.3

2002-08-26 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/lkc-0.3.tar.gz you can find the latest version of my config system. Over the weekend I was busy tuning/fixing the converter to keep the new rulebase as close as possible to the old one. Unless I made an error somewhere, the rulebase should be the same now. T