> Personal I would like to see kbuild-2.5 included ASAP. Among other stuff
> I like the compressed output during compilation.
So do I. I like the clean design of kbuild-2.5 and i'm more than fine with
the overall speed.
I vote for inclusion in 2.5. As small as my vote can be co
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
[Not a single word about the battle ongoing at LKLM...]
> kbuild-2.5:
>
> It does the right things! And this should be enought to tell you that
> it should be included in the next kernels.
When Keith brought up the inclusion of kb
Good day, all,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Perhaps that wasn't quite the right words. Statement for Statement and
> > no additional restrictions on questions.
>
> Statement for statement is not going to happen, simply because the structure
>
Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Strictly stated implication for strictly stated implication?
Can't do that, either. One major reason is the single-apex menu tree.
Another is that the old language didn't carry enough information to
do side-effect forcing properly.
> > What invariant or behavior
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:35:31PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Perhaps that wasn't quite the right words. Statement for Statement and
> > no additional restrictions on questions.
>
> Statement for statement is not going to happen, simply because the structur
Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps that wasn't quite the right words. Statement for Statement and
> no additional restrictions on questions.
Statement for statement is not going to happen, simply because the structure
of the old and new languages is different.
What invariant or behavior ar
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:05:45PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It's not so much the look & feel (which seems to have been copied well
> > by now), but policy changes.
>
> I'm glad you think I got the look and feel OK. If I were bug-for-bug
> compatible with
Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's not so much the look & feel (which seems to have been copied well
> by now), but policy changes.
I'm glad you think I got the look and feel OK. If I were bug-for-bug
compatible with the old system, there would hardly be any point, would
there?
I'm not ignori
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:33:01AM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2002 09:04, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> [much sippage]
> > > The big problem in CML2 is python (and python2).
> >
> > This is a red herring. People bit
On Friday 15 February 2002 09:04, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
[much sippage]
> > The big problem in CML2 is python (and python2).
>
> This is a red herring. People bitch and moan about it, but it's not a
> problem.
Agreed, but it is a mino
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:51:18AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Right now symbols without a help entry still won't show up unless
> > CONFIG_ADVANCED is set (right?). And as a case in point (which I told
> > Eric not to do), CONFIG_PPC_RTC is currently a deriv
Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Right now symbols without a help entry still won't show up unless
> CONFIG_ADVANCED is set (right?). And as a case in point (which I told
> Eric not to do), CONFIG_PPC_RTC is currently a derived symbol instead of
> being a question (and if I read the derivation rig
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> >kbuild team members: Dirk Hohndel has volunteered to have a chat with
> >Linus about the CML2/kbuild-2.5 transition (and, implicitly, the status
> >and role of the kbuild team).
> >
> >Please inform
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> kbuild team members: Dirk Hohndel has volunteered to have a chat with
> Linus about the CML2/kbuild-2.5 transition (and, implicitly, the status
> and role of the kbuild team).
>
> Please inform him of:
>
> 1) your technical judgement and opinions about CML2 and kbuild-
14 matches
Mail list logo
