[kbuild-devel] Re: What's up with GT96100 in the MIPS config file?

2001-05-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Near line 55 of drivers/net/Config.in there is code that reads like this: > >if [ "$CONFIG_MIPS_GT96100" = "y" ]; then > bool ' MIPS GT96100 Ethernet support' CONFIG_MIPS_GT96100ETH >fi > > All very well except that CONFIG_MIPS_GT96100

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:39:02PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > It may be that the reason our experiences have been different is because we > > focus on different target languages. But I think my experience is an > > existence proof that there

[kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.9

2002-10-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi Roman, I do always get the following segfault: <-- snip --> $ cd /tmp/ $ tar xzf lkc-0.9.tar.gz $ cd lkc-0.9 $ make ... $ cd ~/linux/kernel-2.5 $ tar xzf linux-2.5.42.tar.gz $ cd linux-2.5.42 $ bzcat /tmp/lkc-0.9-2.5.42.diff.bz2 |patch -p1 ... $ /tmp/lkc-0.9/lkcc i386 ... undefined symbol

[kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.9

2002-10-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, Hi Roman, > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > $ cd /tmp/ > > $ tar xzf lkc-0.9.tar.gz > > $ cd lkc-0.9 > > $ make > > ... > > $ cd ~/linux/kernel-2.5 > > $ tar xzf linux-2.5.42.ta

[kbuild-devel] [2.6 patch] s/integer/int/ in kconfig-language.txt

2004-05-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
The trivial documentation patch below was originally sent by Matthew J. Fanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> some months ago. Please apply Adrian --- linux-2.6.7-rc1-mm1-full/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt.old 2004-05-31 22:19:09.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.7-rc1-mm1-full/Documentation/

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:12:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >... > On Samstag, 7. August 2004 19:25, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Is there eny reason for such options that are never visible nor enabled, > > or could they be removed? > > Yes, the reason is that some other op

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:40:32PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Roman, a related Q. > Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow > symbol in a 'depends on' statement? >... That doesn't sound like a good idea, consider e.g.: config BAGETLANCE tristate "Baget AMD LAN

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, Hi Roman, > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA > > option, or is it simply a bug? > > Yes, undefined symbols hav

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:59:25AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Roman, a related Q. > > > Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow > > > symbol in a 'depends on' state

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:37:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Roman Zippel wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result, > > > > but som

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"

2004-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:01:35AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, Hi Roman, > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > What about normal numbers? I don't think requiring quotes everywhere for > > > this is a good idea. > > > > And numbers (both decimal and hex) can easily be di

[kbuild-devel] Re: [2.6 patch] Kconfig: rename "---help---" to "help" in Kconfig files (first part)

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch is the majority of a patch by Jesper Juhl. > > > > This patch renames all instances of "---help---" to simply "help&qu

[kbuild-devel] Re: [2.6 patch] Kconfig: rename "---help---" to "help" in Kconfig files (first part)

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:09:37PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > The separator used for the help is to indent help texts by two > > additional spaces. > > Yes, that's an additional indicator. > > >

[kbuild-devel] Re: [2.6 patch] Kconfig: rename "---help---" to "help" in Kconfig files (first part)

2005-05-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:47:46PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, Hi Roman, > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > So why exactly has to be removed? Is it ugly? Does it make Kconfig worse? > > > > The ugly thing is that there are currently two diff

[kbuild-devel] Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

2005-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > > Well I built something like this now which I mail to myself, > overlook and then going sent to lkml: Seems to be valuable. > Comparing 2.6.12-rc3-mm2 to 2.6.12-rc3-mm3 (defconfig) > > - arm: broke >... > arch/arm/kernel/built-in

[kbuild-devel] select of non-existing I2C* symbols

2005-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: >... > Link to this page: http://l4x.org/k/?diff[v1]=mm arm26, cris, sparc: select of non-existing I2C* symbols: @ Ian, Mikael, William: This could be fixed by sourcing drivers/i2c/Kconfig in arch/*/Kconfig, but it would be better to sw

[kbuild-devel] Re: select of non-existing I2C* symbols

2005-05-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:30:10AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > >>... > >> Link to this page: http://l4x.org/k/?diff[v1]=mm > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:41:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > &

Re: [kbuild-devel] select of non-existing I2C* symbols

2005-05-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:20:50PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Shouldn't kconfig exit with an error if a not available symbol gets > > selected? > No. There are meny configurations where we select a symbol that is > only visible in some configurations. > > Several possibilities exists: > 1) Sil

[kbuild-devel] Re: [2.6 patch] Kconfig: rename "---help---" to "help" in Kconfig files (first part) (fwd)

2005-05-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:17:50AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, Hi Roman, > On Tue, 31 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > The main reason for this patch (quoting Jesper) is: > > Consistency. out of ~4000 help entries in 134 Kconfig files, 747 of > > those

[kbuild-devel] kconfig re-asks questions if a new dependency is added

2005-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi Roman, my "schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal" patch does the following: ... +config OBSOLETE_OSS_DRIVER + bool "Obsolete OSS drivers" + depends on SOUND_PRIME ... config SOUND_BT878 tristate "BT878 audio dma" - depends on SOUND_PRIME && PCI + depends on

[kbuild-devel] [2.6 patch] fix gconfig with POSIXLY_CORRECT=1

2006-01-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch fixed "make gconfig" with POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 set. This issue was reported by Jens Elkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in kernel Bugzilla #2919. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- scripts/kconfig/Makefile |8 1 file changed, 4 inse

Re: [kbuild-devel] RFC - kconfig date must die

2006-07-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
o dumb to use "diff" himself. > 'make standard-configs' > > This notional target would generate a set of M standard configs, and > name them > appropriately: config-$M foreach $M (@maketarget) Already present for ages, called defconfig. > Just recently on

Re: [kbuild-devel] RFC - kconfig date must die

2006-07-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:53:02PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 04:04:24PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote: > > > >>... > >>Since it has been so long, I'll state some obvious benefits of dropping > >>t

Re: [kbuild-devel] [RFC] Extending kbuild syntax

2007-09-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:11:45PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >... > The second is the more controversial suggestion. > In several Makefile we have simple if expression of the variants: > if ($(CONFIG_FOO),y) > obj-$(CONFIG_BAR) += fubar.o > endif > > The pattern varies over this theme. > The su

Re: [kbuild-devel] [RFC/RFT] kbuild: save ARCH & CROSS_COMPILE

2007-10-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >... > The settings are stored in the build directory in a file > named "Kbuild.config" (should it be a .dot file?). >... A .dot file sounds better. And even if not, generated files should IMHO not share the Kbuild* namespace with non

Re: [kbuild-devel] [RFC/RFT] kbuild: save ARCH & CROSS_COMPILE

2007-10-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:03:33AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the > > drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not &